
Unsealed court docs detail claims in Montgomery County Clerk of Courts case
State-appointed Judge Jonathan Hein this month issued an order saying some documents filed by state investigators and Foley's attorneys were improperly sealed in the court records maintained by Foley's office.
The order unsealing those records came after Hein accepted Foley's plea withdrawal and reversal of his felony conviction last week.
Court records show that Jon Paul Rion, representing Foley, in May subpoenaed former Montgomery County Clerk of Courts employee Tyler Starline for access to texts on his cellphone.
Starline — a former Huber Heights city councilman — was interviewed by state investigators days after he was fired from the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts in 2022.
Rion wants access to all conversations between Starline and Foley, as well as Starline's conversations with Montgomery County Treasurer John McManus and Second Appellate District Judge Mary Katherine Huffman. Rion also requested "any text messages about Michael Foley or the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts in (Starline's) capacity as the attorney for the Clerk of Courts," according to unsealed court records.
Starline's attorney in June challenged this, arguing the subpoena was "unreasonable and oppressive" and would create "significant risk of undue disclosure of privileged attorney-client communications without a protective order."
Starline did not immediately return a request for comment regarding his involvement in the case.
County equipment, campaign finance
Foley's attorneys last year asked the court to suppress information gathered during the state's raid of the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts office in 2022, arguing that misleading information led to search warrants being executed at the courthouse.
The state's Nov. 11, 2024 response to that request became available for public view for the first time last week.
Starline worked in management at the clerk's office and formerly worked as a defense attorney, according to court records.
He told state investigators that while working at the clerk's office, he "observed (Foley's) administrative assistant, who is also his campaign treasurer ... doing campaign finance documents on the County computers where she was filling out his campaign finance report, asking him questions, he was answering from his corner office," according to court records.
"Her cubicle's right outside. They're doing all of this on county equipment," Starline told state investigators, according to court records.
Some of the 12 counts Foley faces are linked to the time theft of former employee Elle Sollenberger for the time she allegedly spent working on his campaign, soliciting political contributions and working on his private business, Dayton Daily News has previously reported.
Sollenberger volunteered for Foley's campaign in 2018 and accepted an executive assistant job at his office when he won the election. She worked as his campaign treasurer through 2022, according to Montgomery County campaign finance forms.
Starline told state investigators that he believes he was fired from the clerk's office for "what he knew was going on in the clerk's office," according to court documents.
Bonuses for donations discussed?
The newly unsealed records allege Foley in 2022 discussed with some managers giving employees higher bonuses if they contributed to his campaign. But the deputy chief clerk advised against this and it didn't happen, state investigators say.
"It's important to remember that the State found no further evidence of the bonus-for-donation scheme contemplated by Mr. Foley," said Ohio Auditor of State investigator Thomas Anger in court documents.
"There were several discussions in 2022 between Foley and some management employees where he indicated if the employee donates to his campaign, then they would get a higher bonus," court documents filed by Anger state.
A filing by Foley's attorney includes an excerpt from an affidavit in support of the search warrant in the case. In it, state investigators allege Foley's chief deputy and the office manager for the municipal courts "went directly to employees on Foley's behalf soliciting donations to the Foley campaign," and employees "felt pressured" by this.
The Montgomery County Clerk of Courts office declined to comment on the allegations against Foley, citing ongoing litigation.
But a spokesperson for that office told this news outlet that bonuses depend on the availability of funds and are awarded on an annual basis. They are based on the recommendations of division managers in the office and are approved by the chief administrator there.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Rep. Jason Crow on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Aug. 17, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Democratic Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on Aug. 17, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we're joined now by Colorado Democratic Congressman Jason Crow. Good to see you in person. Before we start talking about Ukraine, I want to pick up on something, since you sit on the Intelligence Committee. The Secretary of State just said that lawmakers had come to the Trump administration with information that they've been granting visas to individuals with ties to Hamas, or with organizations with ties to Hamas. That's a pretty stunning accusation. Israel controls who enters and exits Gaza. The United States screens all visas. So, is there really a blind spot that you are aware of? REP. JASON CROW: I'm not aware of that. But if that's true, actually, that is concerning. That would be a problem. I mean, Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization. They should not be traveling anywhere. So, if that's happening, it should be stopped immediately. And, you know, the Intelligence Committee has a role to play in that. MARGARET BRENNAN: But the Intelligence Committee wasn't behind the information presented to the Secretary of State. SPEAKER: I have not been briefed on that. I have no information about it. MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay, on Ukraine: You know that the U.S. intelligence assessment is that the battlefield is turning in Russia's favor, despite the fact that Putin has to rely on Iran and North Korea to keep this thing going. If neither President Biden nor President Trump were ever willing to commit troops, doesn't the secretary have a point that it has to be hammered out at the negotiating table? REP. CROW: You know, this absolutely will end at a negotiating table, like most conflicts will. But what happened on Friday was a historic embarrassment for the United States. There's no other way to put it. Right? You listen to what Marco Rubio and the president have said. They keep on saying they're dedicating time. They're making it a priority. They're focusing their attention on it. In any negotiation, when you're trying to end an armed conflict, there's nothing more important than understanding what motivates your adversary. What is making Vladimir Putin tick, in this instance. Vladimir Putin does not care about the amount of time that we're nego- we're allocating to this, does not care about a B-2 bomber flyover, does not care about a lineup of F-22 fighters rolled out. He doesn't care about any of that. What Vladimir Putin cares about is basically three things. He cares about economic pressure in the form of sanctions. He cares about political, diplomatic isolation, being a pariah state. And he cares about military defeat. Those are the three things that will end this conflict if he feels pressure on all of those three fronts. And this administration continues to be unwilling to do anything to assert pressure in any of those three areas. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, they have put in place some secondary sanctions, at least on India here, and they haven't pulled back. They need Congress to help them repeal a lot of these sanctions. But bigger picture, in hindsight, do you think the United States to date has been too hesitant to actually help Ukraine win this war? President Obama did not send offensive weapons to Ukraine. President Biden was criticized for being perhaps too slow in delivery of certain weapons. REP. CROW: There's no doubt. As you know, I was one of the members of Congress that, on a bipartisan basis, pushed really hard in the first two years of this war, under the Biden administration, to do more, to do more quicker. And I was concerned that we were doing just enough to prevent Ukraine from losing and not doing enough to help them win. And I do believe that had we done more, and we had done it faster, and that we were willing to be more aggressive in providing aid and support for Ukraine, then they would be in a different position on the battlefield today. But compare that to what this administration has done, which has relieved almost all pressure. Like look at what happened on Friday. U.S. military personnel in uniform, literally, were on their hands and knees, rolling out a red carpet for the most murderous dictator of the 21st century. Somebody who has kidnapped and is holding prisoner tens of thousands of Ukrainian children. Somebody who started this whole war, right? This both-sides-ism that the administration is engaging in, that both sides need to come to the table and negotiate. Ukraine is the victim. They are the victim. They didn't start this war. Russia did. And somehow we keep on acting like Vladimir Putin deserves to be brought out into the open like any other head of state. This is a historic embarrassment and defeat for U.S. foreign policy. MARGARET BRENNAN: You have served this country in uniform. I wonder, since you sit on the Armed Services Committee, how comfortable you would be with the United States giving this, whatever the Article Five-like security guarantee would look like. Is that something you should see boots on the ground to do? REP. CROW: I don't think boots on the ground would be the way to go. But, certainly, the United States has assets and capability that I think are essential to any type of security guarantee. I think Europe has to come forward with the forward presence of military. But we can provide intelligence. We can provide economic support, diplomatic support. One of the most important things that we can do right now is actually seize Russian assets. This would be huge. This would be a game-changing thing that put pressure on Vladimir Putin. And actually create security guarantees and reconstruction for Ukraine. There's over $150 billion of seized Russian assets, and the United States could lead a coalition to seize that money. Allocate it towards reconstruction, allocate it towards security, allocate it towards the building of a Ukrainian military that could actually resist Russia going forward. But this administration is unwilling to do it. MARGARET BRENNAN: Last administration was too, they-- REP. CROW: --That's right. MARGARET BRENNAN: They did agree to the legislation. But on the immigration front, you and your fellow Democratic lawmakers are now trying to challenge the Trump administration's policy that requires notice to be given before you visit an immigration facility. You just did visit some. What did you see, and how does that compare to the last visit? REP. CROW: Well, there's an ICE detention center in my district, in Aurora, Colorado. I have visited that center 10 times now over the last five years, six years. And oversight of federal facilities is one of the most important things that any member of Congress does. Air Force bases, military bases, VA hospitals and ICE detention centers. This administration just tripled the budget of ICE. Made it the largest federal law enforcement agency in the history of the United States. Bigger than the FBI, ATF, DEA, all others combined. And they are putting in roadblocks to prevent oversight, to prevent transparency because they were trying to hide what they are doing. That is unacceptable. So we filed a lawsuit to force them to abide by federal law that guarantees us access. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we'll see where that heads next. Jason Crow, thank you. We'll be right back.


CBS News
4 minutes ago
- CBS News
Rural Colorado county faces deadly trend in traffic crashes, implements zero tolerance policy
One Colorado county has seen a tragic uptick in fatal traffic accidents in recent weeks, including a head-on crash on Highway 40 that killed one person and injured three others last Thursday. Just days earlier, a family of five, including three children, was killed in a crash on Highway 9 near Kremmling after a truck crossed into their lane. In response to these fatalities, the Grand County Sheriff's Office has introduced a zero-tolerance enforcement for reckless driving, focusing on speeding and aggressive driving behaviors. Grand County Sheriff Brett Schroetlin said the policy is aimed at addressing the surge in dangerous driving behaviors, including excessive speeding, illegal passing, and aggressive maneuvers. "We've noticed progressively worse issues with driving behaviors here in the county," Schroetlin said. "This initiative is a direct response to the recent fatalities, including the one that claimed the lives of an entire family." As of mid-2025, Grand County has already experienced five fatal crashes, a stark contrast to zero fatalities in 2023. The Sheriff warned that drivers caught engaging in aggressive behaviors or extreme speeding could face jail time. "We've seen speeds approaching 130 mph -- that's nearly double the posted speed limit," he said. "This isn't just about tickets; it's about saving lives." The sheriff also emphasized the need for legislative action to hold reckless drivers accountable. The Colorado Department of Transportation is ramping up efforts to address impaired driving as well, particularly ahead of the Labor Day weekend, a traditionally busy travel time. July was the deadliest month for impaired driving-related crashes in Colorado, with 26 lives lost. So far this year, 124 people have died in crashes involving impaired drivers. From Aug. 15 to Sept. 3, CDOT will support law enforcement agencies statewide during "The Heat Is On" DUI crackdown. The campaign aims to reduce impaired driving fatalities, which often spike during the "100 Deadliest Days of Summer" between Memorial Day and Labor Day. "Impaired driving-related crashes are tragic and completely avoidable," Col. Matthew C. Packard, chief of the Colorado State Patrol, said in a press release. "Don't make excuses. If you've been drinking, put down the keys and find a safe ride home." A DUI in Colorado can cost drivers an average of $13,530, factoring in fines, legal fees, increased insurance costs, and lost wages. Furthermore, a DUI conviction can result in job loss, particularly for those in driving-dependent careers such as law enforcement and trucking. CDOT has also launched a campaign to educate the public about the consequences of refusing a DUI test under Colorado's Expressed Consent Law, which mandates that drivers consent to a toxicology test after a DUI arrest. The next DUI enforcement period will run from Sept. 11 to Oct. 22, focusing on Fall Festivals. A graph detailing impaired driving-related fatalities in July from 2019 to 2024 shows a persistent pattern of deaths, with July 2024 seeing 28 fatalities, up from 24 in 2023.


Fox News
4 minutes ago
- Fox News
Putin has 'no interest' in ceasefire deal, Democratic strategist says
National Review editor-in-chief Rich Lowry and Democratic strategist Meghan Hays join 'MediaBuzz' to discuss media reaction to President Donald Trump's summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin.