ICC did not sanction Nigeria over detention of separatist leader
'BREAKING NEWS: International Criminal Court ICC imposes sanctions on all Nigerian goods over failure to release Nnamdi Kanu and reward him with $100 million for his illegal arrest, which they deemed a terrorist act,' reads the heading of a post shared on Facebook.
It further claims that the ICC announced that the sanctions against Nigeria would increase every month until Kanu is released and, as a result, the prices of goods could increase as much as 100 percent.
The post has been shared more than 170 times since it was first published on March 28, 2025, while the claim has also appeared elsewhere on Facebook (see here and here).
Kanu is leading a secessionist campaign for the creation of the Biafra Republic. He was arrested in Kenya and extradited to Nigeria on June 27, 2021. He faces charges related to treason (archived here).
His trial began afresh on March 21, 2025, after the former judge recused herself (archived here).
However, the claim that the ICC has imposed sanctions on Nigeria and ruled for compensation in favour of Kanu is false.
Countries or foreign organisations impose sanctions to punish parties that threaten their national interests or violate international laws.
The types of sanctions include travel bans, arms embargoes, import and export restrictions, asset freezes and sports sanctions (archived here).
Bodies like the United Nations and the European Union have imposed sanctions on countries in the past (archived here).
However, the ICC cannot impose sanctions on countries since it only prosecutes individuals (archived here).
The ICC operates under the Rome Statute, which allows it to prosecute four main crimes (archived here).
These include genocide, war crimes, crime of aggression (when a state attacks the sovereignty of another) and crimes against humanity, including murder, rape, imprisonment, enforced disappearances, enslavement – particularly of women and children – sexual slavery, torture, apartheid and deportation.
Moreover, Nnamdi Kanu's case is not listed among those currently being investigated by the ICC (archived here).
'These claims are false,' ICC spokesman Fadi El Abdallah told AFP Fact Check in an email.
The ICC investigated alleged crimes committed by Boko Haram since 2009 and those allegedly committed by the Nigerian security forces after they started to repel attacks from the militant group (archived here).
Boko Haram was designated as a terrorist organisation by the US government in 2014 and has spawned splinter groups – including Ansaru, which is linked to Al-Qaeda (archived here).
The preliminary investigation by the ICC was concluded in December 2020 (archived here).
Since then, the ICC has been holding talks with the Nigerian government on the situation (archived here).
However, the court has not published a warrant of arrest for any Nigerian, whether for being a member of Boko Haram or the security forces (archived here).
AFP Fact Check previously debunked a claim that the ICC issued a warrant of arrest for Nigeria's senate president.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Leadership changes, potential new charges: What's next for the ICC and Israel?
For the time being, the ICC Prosecution and Israel have their hands full with fighting another round over whether the ICC has jurisdiction over Israelis. After years of moving at a snail's pace, news events between Israel and the International Criminal Court have been moving at a dizzying pace lately. On April 24, the ICC Appeals Court gave Israel a happy surprise when it stalled the progress of the ICC Prosecution against Israelis by saying that the ICC lower court needed to more carefully review Jerusalem's objections to the ICC's jurisdiction. But that was far from the end of the story. Israel then tried to use that win before the ICC Appeals Court to get that same court to freeze the arrest warrants which the ICC lower court had approved against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant in November 2024. In the middle of all of this, over May 17-18, ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan took indefinite leave from his position due to unrelated allegations of sexual assault by him against an ICC employee. In his absence, instead of the ICC's Assembly of State Parties appointing a single acting chief prosecutor, it confusingly appointed his two deputies to both run the office. Those deputies, Mame Mandiaye Niang (Senegal) and Nazhat Shameen Khan (Fiji) have always split the roles between criminal investigations and later stages of prosecution. When the ICC Prosecution filed its brief to fight back against Israel on May 21 Shameen Khan signed the papers over Karim Khan's printed signature, potentially signaling that she will run the case until his return. One perplexing aspect of Shameen Khan's role in all of this is that she comes from Fiji, which has an awful human rights record. In fact, Shameen Khan, according to local coverage of Fiji developments, was fired from the country's High Court in a dispute over political coups. She was then out of public service for some years until she was plucked up again to serve on the UN Human Rights Council and from there to the ICC office. Without getting deeply into which side Shameen Khan was on, the point is that she is no stranger to politics mixing in with law, and comes from a country with a problematic version of democracy, all of which raises questions about how she will understand Israel's complex context versus the Palestinians. In any event, her signing on to continuing the Netanyahu and Gallant arrest warrants seems to suggest that even Khan's extended leave from his position (which could turn into him being fired) will not free Israel from the ICC's ongoing scrutiny. One still open question is whether new charges against Israelis will be filed by Khan's deputies, or whether, given their lesser authority, they will stick to only maintaining the existing probe against Netanyahu and Gallant. For example, the Wall Street Journal has reported that right around when Khan decided to step aside, he was seriously considering going after Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir for their support of the settlement enterprise as well as allegedly their support for Jewish extremists' violence against innocent West Bank Palestinians, such as in Huwara and Jit. In fact, there are even reports that some ICC officials wanted Khan to go after them and the settlement enterprise first back in May 2024, before he decided to go after Netanyahu and Gallant relating to the current war. The strategy for going after Smotrich and Ben Gvir first was that there was more global consensus at that point against those officials and the settlement enterprise, whereas many important countries came to Netanyahu and Gallant's defense. But both because the deputies do not have the same standing as Khan and because the Trump administration's sanctions are deeply harming the ICC's operations - including around half a dozen staff members leaving to avoid sanctions – Shameen Khan may avoid adding new charges against Israelis at this moment. For the time being, the ICC Prosecution and Israel have their hands full with fighting another round over whether the ICC has jurisdiction over Israelis. The Prosecution and the "State of Palestine" must file their next updates by June 27, while Israel can file its response by July 11. Unlike prior rounds of debate on these issues, it appears that the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber will try to reach a decision within several months at most, and will not let the issue drag out over a year or more.
Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Muslims look forward to the annual Eid feast. Many Africans are now struggling to afford it
KARA, Nigeria (AP) — Muslim families across west Africa are grappling with the steep cost of rams for the traditional sacrifice that is central to the celebration of Eid al-Adha, a struggle that mirrors the region's deepening economic and humanitarian crises. At the Kara livestock market in southern Nigeria's Ogun state, ram sellers and buyers are in a bind. Prices have at least doubled compared with last year, slowing sales for what is usually a busy market packed in the lead-up to Eid. 'The ram that I bought for 200,000 naira ($127) last year, this year we started negotiating from 600,000 naira ($380),' said Abiodun Akinyoye, who came to buy meat for the festival. The U.N. World Food Programme said last month that over 36 million people are struggling to meet basic food and nutrition needs in West Africa and Central Africa, a number expected to rise to 52 million during this year's lean season from June to August. More than 10 million of the most vulnerable people across the region have been uprooted by conflict , the WFP said, added to other major drivers like food inflation and climate conditions like extreme weather. 'We are at a tipping point and millions of lives are at stake,' said Margot van der Velden , WFP's regional director. With a majority of Muslim populations in most of the worst-hit countries, families who previously bought rams to take part in the annual joyful festival are finding it difficult to sustain that lifestyle with some spending significantly more of their disposable income on trying to fulfill the religious rites. 'Everyone is suffering,' Nigerian ram seller Jaji Kaligini said as he lamented the cost-of-living crisis fueled by President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, such as a sudden removal of subsidies . 'We don't know what to do.' In countries like Niger , where growing insecurity have worsened the living conditions, the military government banned ram exports this year to stabilize local supply. While that has helped availability, it has affected tightened supplies in neighboring Nigeria and Benin. 'There's enough livestock (in Niger),' said Hasoumi Daouda, who was at a local market to buy ram. 'But it's the financial crisis that makes them too expensive to buy.' The challenge of hardship is also raising the question of how obligatory the ram sacrifice is for Muslims. The tradition is not mandatory for those who 'genuinely cannot afford it,' Bukola Hameed, a Nigerian Islamic scholar, said. However, those who can afford it also have 'a duty to share their meat with poorer neighbors,' another Islamic scholar, Mikail Adekunle, added. —— Adebayo reported from Abuja, Nigeria Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Muslims look forward to the annual Eid feast. Many Africans are now struggling to afford it
KARA, Nigeria (AP) — Muslim families across west Africa are grappling with the steep cost of rams for the traditional sacrifice that is central to the celebration of Eid al-Adha, a struggle that mirrors the region's deepening economic and humanitarian crises. At the Kara livestock market in southern Nigeria's Ogun state, ram sellers and buyers are in a bind. Prices have at least doubled compared with last year, slowing sales for what is usually a busy market packed in the lead-up to Eid. 'The ram that I bought for 200,000 naira ($127) last year, this year we started negotiating from 600,000 naira ($380),' said Abiodun Akinyoye, who came to buy meat for the festival. The U.N. World Food Programme said last month that over 36 million people are struggling to meet basic food and nutrition needs in West Africa and Central Africa, a number expected to rise to 52 million during this year's lean season from June to August. More than 10 million of the most vulnerable people across the region have been uprooted by conflict, the WFP said, added to other major drivers like food inflation and climate conditions like extreme weather. 'We are at a tipping point and millions of lives are at stake,' said Margot van der Velden, WFP's regional director. With a majority of Muslim populations in most of the worst-hit countries, families who previously bought rams to take part in the annual joyful festival are finding it difficult to sustain that lifestyle with some spending significantly more of their disposable income on trying to fulfill the religious rites. 'Everyone is suffering,' Nigerian ram seller Jaji Kaligini said as he lamented the cost-of-living crisis fueled by President Bola Tinubu's economic policies, such as a sudden removal of subsidies. "We don't know what to do.' In countries like Niger, where growing insecurity have worsened the living conditions, the military government banned ram exports this year to stabilize local supply. While that has helped availability, it has affected tightened supplies in neighboring Nigeria and Benin. 'There's enough livestock (in Niger),' said Hasoumi Daouda, who was at a local market to buy ram. 'But it's the financial crisis that makes them too expensive to buy.' The challenge of hardship is also raising the question of how obligatory the ram sacrifice is for Muslims. The tradition is not mandatory for those who 'genuinely cannot afford it,' Bukola Hameed, a Nigerian Islamic scholar, said. However, those who can afford it also have 'a duty to share their meat with poorer neighbors,' another Islamic scholar, Mikail Adekunle, added. —-- Adebayo reported from Abuja, Nigeria
