Labour's AI plans are ‘an act of cultural suicide'
Government plans to weaken copyright laws for the benefit of AI companies are 'a cultural act of suicide', according to Britain's leading literary agent.
Jonny Geller, chief executive of the Curtis Brown agency, said that the publication of an AI-generated bestseller was inevitable and would spell catastrophe for the creative industries.
Under new proposals, big tech companies would be allowed to use copyrighted material to train AI software unless the rights holder explicitly opted out.
Mr Geller, whose authors include Marian Keyes, Anthony Horowitz and William Boyd, and who manages the estate of John le Carré, said the publishing industry must fight the plans.
Writing in The Bookseller, he said: 'The publishing and agency world may be sleepwalking into its own dangerous and dark period. Not so much a democratic threat as a cultural act of suicide.
'Under the banner of, 'how can you stop progress?', we are being invited to reward the companies who stole our authors' work by doing deals with those very same companies.'
AI-labelled content
Mr Geller said that 'no organisation should have the right to take image, creative talent or copyright without permission and that permission should not be obscured by an 'opt-out' only option'.
He also argued that AI-generated fiction and non-fiction should be labelled as such, and AI content must provide attribution and pay for its sources.
'Of course, there will be a number-one, bestselling novel that is purely AI-generated and we will talk about it and bewail (again) the death of the novel,' he said.
'But it will herald a period of disruption so catastrophic for the creative industry that we will forget this simple, inalienable truth: that all creativity comes from humans who have either lived or imagined extraordinary worlds, not a programme that has recycled older ideas and juggled words around,' Geller said.
His intervention on behalf of the publishing industry follows last month's release of a silent album by more than 1,000 musicians, including Kate Bush, Damon Albarn and Hans Zimmer, in protest at the Government's planned changes.
Sir Paul McCartney has also sent a message to the Government, saying: 'You're supposed to protect us. That's your job. So if you're putting through a Bill, make sure you protect the creative thinkers, the creative artist, or you're not going to have them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Can you spot the fake? The AI ‘bootlegs' that have infuriated Disney
Disney and Universal have filed a lawsuit against a tech firm that creates AI-generated images of characters including Shrek and the Minions. The two media giants have mounted a claim against Midjourney accusing the company of making and distributing 'innumerable' copies of characters from their libraries without permission. In the lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles, the film studios said: 'By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters – without investing a penny in their creation – Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism.' They added that the alleged copyright infringement was 'calculated and wilful'. Midjourney has been contacted for comment. Midjourney is a popular generative AI software that allows users to create images from text prompts. For example, if a subscriber asks Midjourney to generate an image of Yoda in a particular setting or carrying out a certain action, the software will oblige with a high-quality and downloadable image. The quality of the images is such that they are often impossible to distinguish from the authentic, copyrighted versions. Can you spot the difference? Test your ability to spot the AI fake with our quiz. Midjourney made revenues of $300m last year through what Disney and Universal branded a 'bootlegging business model'. The Hollywood studios accuse the San Francisco-based tech company of ignoring their requests to stop infringing their copyright, or to at least adopt new technological measures to prevent the practice. They allege that Midjourney instead 'doubled down' on its actions by releasing newer versions of its AI image generation software and teasing a new video service. The lawsuit references a range of copyrighted characters including Darth Vader from Star Wars, Elsa from Frozen, Lightning McQueen from Cars, Toy Story's Buzz Lightyear, Sully from Monster's Inc, Marvel's Iron Man and Homer Simpson from The Simpsons. Disney and Universal have asked for a preliminary injunction to prevent future copyright infringement and are seeking unspecified damages from Midjourney. 'Thievery on a high scale' It comes amid a broader battle between AI companies and the creative industries over concerns the new technology is riding roughshod over copyright protections. Sir Elton John has described the actions of tech companies as 'thievery on a high scale'. While major record labels and publishers are already locked in legal battles with AI companies over copyright disputes, the lawsuit marks the first time large Hollywood studios have entered the fray. Horacio Gutierrez, Disney's chief legal and compliance officer, said: 'Our world-class IP is built on decades of financial investment, creativity and innovation – investments only made possible by the incentives embodied in copyright law that give creators the exclusive right to profit from their works. 'We are bullish on the promise of AI technology and optimistic about how it can be used responsibly as a tool to further human creativity. But piracy is piracy, and the fact that it's done by an AI company does not make it any less infringing.' Kim Harris, NBCUniversal's general counsel, said: 'We are bringing this action today to protect the hard work of all the artists whose work entertains and inspires us and the significant investment we make in our content. 'Theft is theft regardless of the technology used, and this action involves blatant infringement of our copyrights.' It is not the first time Midjourney, which was founded in 2021, has been accused of misusing copyrighted material to train its AI model. Alongside rivals including Stability AI, Midjourney is currently facing a lawsuit filed by 10 artists who accused the tech companies of copying and storing their work without permission. In a 2022 interview, Midjourney chief executive Holz said he built the company's database by performing 'a big scrape of the internet.'. Asked whether he sought consent of the artists, he responded: 'There isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from.'
Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Video game actor strike ends in US - but AI described as 'direct threat' to UK industry
Video game actors in the US have ended their strike after nearly a year of industrial action, over the use of artificial intelligence by game studios. More than 2,500 US performers were barred from working on games impacted by the strike while the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) negotiated a deal with studios. Now, after more than 11 months of discussions, a "tentative" agreement has been reached. "Patience and persistence has resulted in a deal that puts in place the necessary AI guardrails that defend performers' livelihoods in the AI age, alongside other important gains," said SAG-AFTRA's national executive director Duncan Crabtree-Ireland. Actors were banned from working with major game makers like Activision, Blindlight, Disney Character Voices, Electronic Arts, Epic Games, Formosa, Insomniac Games, Take 2 and WB Games. Other studios were also impacted by the strike, as actors took industrial action in solidarity. "We are pleased to have reached a tentative contract agreement that reflects the important contributions of SAG-AFTRA-represented performers in video games," said Audrey Cooling, spokesperson for the video game producers, to Sky News. "It delivers historic wage increases of over 24% for performers, enhanced health and safety protections, and industry-leading AI provisions requiring transparency, consent and compensation for the use of digital replicas in games." In the UK, actors protested in solidarity with their American counterparts, while Equity, the UK actors' union, called for a similar wide-reaching agreement between UK studios and actors. Earlier this week, the British Film Institute (BFI) released a report detailing the risks posed by AI to the UK screen sector, including video games, and described it as a "direct threat". The scripts of more than 130,000 films and TV shows, YouTube videos, and databases of pirated books have been used to train AI models, according to the report. AI poses a particular threat to some video game voice actors, according to one expert, because of the nature of their work creating animal or monster sound effects. "The generic stuff is the easiest thing for generative AI to replace," Video Games Industry Memo author George Osborn told Sky News previously. "Just saying to the model, 'make 200 monster noises' is much easier than convincingly [making AI] sound like it is having a conversation with someone," he said. Unlike the SAG-AFTRA actors' strike in 2023, which saw blockbusters like Deadpool 3 and Gladiator 2 delayed and entire TV series cancelled, huge delays to games were unlikely. Games take years to make and any game already in development before September 2023 was exempt from the strike. Tensions have risen in the game actor community since the industrial action began, as studios appeared to hire international actors to replace the striking US workers.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Data bill opposed by Sir Elton John and Dua Lipa finally passes
A bill which sparked an extraordinary stand-off between some of the UK's most high-profile artists - and their backers in the House of Lords - has finally been wanted an amendment to the drably-titled Data (Use and Access) Bill which would have forced tech companies to declare their use of copyright material when training AI it, they argued, tech firms would be given free rein to help themselves to UK content without paying for it, and then train their AI products to mimic it, putting human artists out of would be "committing theft, thievery on a high scale", Sir Elton John told the BBC. He was one of a number of household names from the UK creative industries, including Sir Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa to oppose the government refused the amendment. It says it is already carrying out a separate consultation around copyright and it wants to wait for the outcome of that. In addition there are plans for a separate AI bill. Critics of the peers' proposal say it would stifle the AI industry and result in the UK getting left behind in this lucrative and booming this left the bill in limbo, pingponging between the Houses of Commons and Lords for a month. But it has now finally been passed, without the amendment, and will become law once royal assent is given."We can only do so much here. I believe we've done it. It's up to the Government and the other place (the Commons) now to listen," said composer and broadcaster Lord government has welcomed the wide-ranging bill passing"This Bill is about using data to grow the economy and improve people's lives, from health to infrastructure and we can now get on with the job of doing that", a Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) spokesperson said. More than AI Caught in the crossfire of this row were other useful proposals contained within the bill, including:New rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they dieChanges to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easilyA 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks by minimising the possibility of them being accidentally dug up. "So this is good news for NHS workers and the police who will be freed from over a million hours of time spent doing admin, bereaved parents who will be supported to get the answers they deserve, and people who will be kept safer online thanks to new offences for deepfake abuse," DSIT even though the Lords have decided they had made their point on AI, the argument has not gone who fought the battle have not changed their minds. Baroness Kidron, a film maker who led the charge for the amendment, told me the passing of the bill was "a pyrrhic victory at best" for the government, meaning it would lose more than it cost, she argues, is the giving away of UK assets, in the form of creative content, to largely US-based AI are many who remain defiant and they believe strongly that the UK's £124bn creative industry is under threat if the government doesn't actively engage with their demandsOwen Meredith, chief executive of the News Media Association which supported the Lords said the bill sent a "clear message" to the government "that Parliament, and the UK's 2.4 million creative workers, will fight tirelessly to ensure our world-renowned copyright law is enforced"."We keep being told that AI will change everything, which, I'm afraid, means that we will discuss this during debates on every bill," said Baroness Dido Harding in the House of Lords, recorded in Hansard. "We will prevail in the end." Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
