Consultants question Department of Health productivity stats
Consultants have questioned the validity of new Department of Health metrics which calculated that the doctors are not as productive as they were 10 years ago.
It comes as the Minister for Health said she wants to hold hospitals and individual specialties to account over turning increased investment into productivity.
Advertisement
New analysis of HSE data shows that consultants could have held 1.5 million more appointments last year if they were operating on the same productivity as 2016.
A senior official at the Department said it wants to understand the 'productivity conundrum' where a 'great increase' in the total number of whole-time equivalent (WTE) consultants had occurred against a fall in outpatient appointments per practitioner.
The data shows that a 70 per cent increase in WTE consultants between then and 2024 was met with just a 20 per cent increase in outpatient appointments – meaning a lower average per individual practitioner.
If the consultants had been operating at 2016 levels of productivity, the Department contends they could have held 40 per cent more appointments than they actually did.
Advertisement
The Irish Hospital Consultants Association (IHCA) cautioned that data 'must be presented in the proper context'.
It said it welcomed a focus on transparency and performance but said the number of doctor consultations is not regarded as a valid measure of productivity.
The IHCA said this is because consultations differ in complexity, duration and impact, and the metric 'fails to reflect the significant volume of care provided to hospital inpatients' as well as time spent on diagnostics, research, clinical governance and administration.
It said: 'Any productivity analysis must seek to reflect the value and outcomes associated with care, not merely the volume.'
Advertisement
It said there had been a marked increase in complex, time-intensive direct care delivery by consultants.
It said the issue was fundamentally a capacity crisis and framing it as a productivity issue around one group of staff runs the risk of setting false expectations and undermining collaborative efforts.
The IHCA said: 'We are absolutely committed to doing more — but we cannot do it alone.'
A new data dashboard from the Department of Health's also allows for comparisons on waiting lists and other performance indicators.
Advertisement
While the tool allows specialties and hospitals to benchmark their performance against their peers, the department said the dashboard is a 'learning tool' and 'not a stick to beat anyone with'.
A senior official stressed that the initial focus of the dashboard was about transparency and 'putting a spotlight' on the ability to convert resources into services for patients.
However, there are performance management expectations in health service reforms – with the department figure saying that anyone making major public investment in healthcare would want to be assured that the site has demonstrated an ability to convert investment into improved services.
There were 1,812 WTE consultants in 2016, rising to 3,061 in 2024.
Advertisement
However, the number of appointments per consultant has fallen from 1,686 in 2016 to 1,209 in 2020 – where it appears to have roughly plateaued into the present day.
Using the correlating 3.1 million outpatient appointments in 2016, the department said this meant the same efficiency could have resulted in 5.2 million outpatient appointments last year.
However, this is 1.5 million above the actual figure of appointments which stood at just 3.7 million in 2024.
Department officials said the dynamics behind that discrepancy have yet to be explained, adding that Ireland would have a 'vastly more effective service' and 'massive reductions in waiting times' if 2016 productivity levels had been maintained.
Acknowledging that consultants may find the blunt comparison unfair given the impact of Covid-19 on the intervening years, officials still said the health service seems to be 'a bit stuck' on the roughly 1,200-appointments-per-consultant figure.
A department official said it 'definitely warrants a major effort' to push back towards previous productivity levels – even if 2016 rates are no longer realistic.
'The productivity and savings taskforce is really determined that we get to grips with productivity in these kind of very benign and positive times in terms of investment and expansion, because it will be vital if we ever have to deal with more, more challenging fiscal circumstances.'
One of the other key metrics measured by the dashboard is 'composite activity output', which attempts to distil years-long increases in productivity across different types of care into a single figure to allow for comparisons against workforce and expenditure increases.
Officials said it showed that some hospitals are 'notably better' at converting their input into activity, adding that they wish to determine the reasons for that.
The department said the dashboard provided an entirely new view on data which had not been previously used sufficiently well to inform service planning and development.
Minister Carroll MacNeill said the dashboard was an effort to present 'the best transparency we possibly can' on hospital activity.
She said there had not been enough focus on how hospitals are locally managing increased investment in the most efficient way for better patient outcomes.
Ms Carroll McNeill said: 'For too long hospitals have had the opportunity to regard themselves as independent republics.
'They are very much part of a State system that is funded by the State, and it's a reasonable and appropriate process to shine this light in relation to their activity.'
She said it could not be the case that increased investment in health did not result in increased efficiency.
Ms Carroll McNeill added: 'That means more outpatient appointments, that means better use of surgical capacity, that means better use of diagnostic capacity.
'And I think the productivity dashboard here is a way of making sure that we are holding hospitals and individual specialisms to account to manage themselves better.'
Other potential uses for the dashboard include assisting GPs in deciding where to refer patients, having consulted the waiting lists trends in their region.
Officials also believe that moves to a fuller seven-day working week will improve productivity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
We wanted a baby so they could act as a transplant donor for our seriously ill daughter, reveals MINA HOLLAND. It was a minefield... but what happened next will make you believe in miracles
When the moment comes for the anaesthetist to place the mask over my little boy's face, I falter. While I've witnessed my daughter, Vida, go through the same thing on multiple occasions, her medical condition means invasive hospital procedures are necessary to keep her alive, making it easier to fight my protective instinct.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
How is your NHS hospital doing on waiting times?
Doctors and patient groups warn that the NHS in England is facing an uphill struggle on the government's number one NHS priority – improving hospital waiting are concerned about the lack of progress towards hitting the 18-week waiting time target, one of Labour's key election pledges. It has not been met since the election, the proportion of patients waiting less than 18 weeks has improved, but by less than a percentage an analysis of hospital trusts by BBC Verify found over a third are seeing a smaller share of patients within 18 weeks since the NHS improvement plan was announced in the government said it was premature to suggest progress was too slow as the NHS had only started to push forward with the government's improvement plan in April. Before that, it had focussed on other priorities, including tackling the very longest waits. It said the fact waiting times had continued to improve even during winter - the first time this had happened for 10 years - was in an interview with the BBC, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said progress would go "further and faster" in the coming years, helped by the extra money being invested and the 10-year NHS plan, due to be published next said lots had been achieved so far, including millions more appointments being carried out and the total number of patients on the waiting list dropping to below 7.4 million, its lowest level for two the 18-week target, he acknowledged there was "much more to do", before adding: "There's a big challenge here. Are we going to meet it? Absolutely. We are not going to let people down."The government has promised to hit the target by March 2029, which requires 92% of patients to be seen within 18 January, every hospital trust was given their own individual performance targets to meet by March 2026 as the first step in achieving that Verify is launching an interactive tool, which we will update when there is new data, so you can find out how well your local NHS services are doing. We have included NHS trusts in England that had at least 5,000 cases waiting in November. 'I've forgotten what it is like to not be in pain' John Winnik does not know when he will get treatment for a problem with his grandfather from West Yorkshire, who has arthritis, has been on an NHS waiting list for nine months so far - much longer than the 18 weeks the health service says should be the 73-year-old paid privately to go to Lithuania for a right hip replacement last year, having spent more than a year on the NHS waiting also having injections in his left hip, which will eventually need replacing."I'm living in constant pain," said Mr Winnik, a self-employed consultant in the glass lamination industry. "I've forgotten what it is like to not be in pain, to be honest. I haven't played golf for two years and if I do five minutes of gardening, I'm shattered." Royal College of Surgeons of England president Tim Mitchell said: "The NHS is changing course, but the sails still lack wind."Progress is being made in some parts of the country, but it's too slow to meet the government's ambition of hitting the 18-week target by the end of this parliament."Delayed operations mean patients left waiting in pain, with their condition potentially deteriorating."He said the extra money being put into the NHS in the coming years would help, but "serious underinvestment" in infrastructure like operating theatres over the years is hampering Alsina, chief executive of the patient group Versus Arthritis, also has doubts, saying there was scepticism about whether the rapid progress needed could be she added: "It is impossible to overstate the personal, physical and mental toll of being stuck on a waiting list in daily pain, sometimes for years."There's also a wider impact on society, with many people on waiting lists having to drop out of work, despite wanting to stay in employment, and becoming increasingly reliant on others."The interim targets for March 2026 mean trusts either have to be seeing 60% of patients within 18 weeks of referral or improve on their November 2024 position by five percentage points - whichever is the NHS overall in England is expected to ensure 65% of patients do not wait longer than 18 weeks - currently less than 60% majority of trusts have already started making progress, however a BBC Verify analysis shows 50 - more than one third - are now further away from the target since November the trusts that have improved are taken into account the overall trend though is positive. A handful of trusts have already got to where they need to be by next March - as long as they can keep their waiting lists and West Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust had more than 48,000 patients waiting less than 18 weeks so far for treatment, 64.2% of the total, in April. That is up from 58.7% in Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust also reached 60.1% in April, up from 54.9% in biggest target for improvement was set for The Princess Alexandra Hospital Trust in Harlow, according to our analysis. In November, 41.8% of its patients were waiting less than 18 weeks. By April, that had risen to about 48.8% - one of the biggest improvements in England so far. But it needs to rise further by more than 11 percentage points by next chief executive Thom Lafferty said they were "delighted" with their progress."We recognise the impact for patients who are waiting for care and we are enhancing integration and collaboration with our partners to ensure that patients can access the right care, in the right place, at the right time."Some trusts have a higher mountain to climb because their figures have dipped since and South Essex NHS Trust started out with 52.8% of patients waiting less than 18 weeks in November. But when the clock started in April, it had fallen to 47%.Two of its theatres at Basildon Hospital have been closed for work along with some of the trust's procedure rooms and it has had an increase in executive Matthew Hopkins said it was putting on extra clinics and had a new orthopaedic procedure room opening soon, adding: "We are confident we will improve our waiting times and improve patient experience."Others that have fallen despite requiring large improvements include the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (RJAH) in Shropshire (down from 48.3% to 44.9%) and Countess of Chester, down from 49.6% to 47.1%.Cathy Chadwick, chief operating officer for Countess of Chester, said more clinics and investment in new technology would bring down waiting lists and the trust was confident of meeting the target by next March.A spokesman for RJAH said: "We have a clear ambition to hit the target of 60% by March 2026, and are confident that the plans we have put in place will enable us to do so." Targets in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are different and the interim targets for next March set by the UK government do not the NHS is not meeting the waiting time targets in any Scotland aims for 90% of patients to be treated within 18 weeks of referral, in Wales the target is for 95% of patients to wait less than 26 Northern Ireland, 55% of patients should wait no longer than 13 weeks for day case or inpatient treatment. Interactive tool produced by Alli Shultes, Rebecca French, Ollie Lux Rigby, Chris Kay, Adam Allen, Avi Holden and Rebecca Wedge-Roberts What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
People dying early of cancer costs UK economy £10.3bn a year, study finds
People dying early of cancer costs the UK economy £10.3bn a year, more than any other health condition, a study has revealed. That is the total cost of the 350,000 years of lost productivity recorded across Britain every year because adults have died prematurely of the disease, according to Cancer Research UK (CRUK). Each early death costs the economy an average of £61,000, according to the charity's first research into how much the country loses as a result of the growing toll of cancer diagnoses and deaths. In 2021, cancer caused the loss of more productive years of life than any other condition – 350,000 years. Heart problems led to 257,000 years of lost productivity that year, while diseases of the digestive system caused 123,000 lost years and breathing conditions 85,000 years. Michelle Mitchell, CRUK's chief executive, said: 'Cancer has an immeasurable impact on patients and their loved ones. But this report reveals there is also a significant economic cost. Behind the figures in this report are real people – friends, family and co-workers – whose lives are being cut short by cancer. Through improving cancer survival, we can also have a positive impact on our economy.' The findings come as ministers wrestle with how a record 2.8 million people across the UK are too sick to work amid a sluggish economy. The charity reached its conclusions by subtracting the person's age at death from their expected age of death. They then calculated the economic value of the years of life lost to cancer by estimating that person's total expected earnings and measuring how much of those were lost. Deaths from lung cancer cost the UK more than any other form of the disease – £1.7bn. Those from bowel cancer cost £1.2bn while breast cancer fatalities cost £800m. Those are the three cancers that cause the largest number of deaths from the disease at the youngest ages, which leads to the most productive life years lost. They also cause more deaths in men than women which, because men on average earn more than women, results in a larger financial loss. Cancer deaths among people under the age of 50 lead to the annual loss of 119,000 lost years of productive life and a £3.2bn loss for the economy, the survey found. Those 119,000 lost years were from 5,900 people aged 15 to 49 dying in 2021. Among 50- to 64-year-olds the toll is even higher – 167,000 lost years per year, costing £5.1bn. David Finch, the assistant director of the healthy lives team at the Health Foundation thinktank, said: 'CRUK's findings are a sobering reminder of the increasing rising cost of ill health and disability in the working-age population, which is becoming ever more apparent. 'This issue is not going away with a projected 25% increase in the share of working-age people with diagnosed major illnesses by 2040.' More people are being diagnosed with cancer and dying from it than ever before, mainly because of the ageing population and the impact of obesity. There were 140,000 deaths a year from cancer between 1975 and 1977. The figure rose to 176,000 a year during 2023-25. CRUK says that on current trends it will increase to 208,000 deaths a year by 2038-40. Finch said planned benefit cuts would hamper the government's ambition to get more people well enough to start working again. 'The government's approach to tackling this is too short-term, with planned cuts to disability benefits likely to worsen people's health and reduce their employment chances.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said its 10-year health plan, being published next week, 'will set out how we will utilise the latest technology and techniques to improve cancer outcomes and transform care to give more families hope in the face of this devastating disease'. 'This includes rolling out DIY screening kits for cervical cancer, more radiotherapy machines in every region and opening more community diagnostic centres closer to where people live,' they said. 'We are also making progress in tackling some of the biggest causes of cancer, including our landmark tobacco and vapes bill to create the first smoke-free generation, and restricting junk food advertising to tackle obesity.'
