logo
Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine

Trump offers assurances that US troops won't be sent to help defend Ukraine

The Mainichi15 hours ago
WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Donald Trump on Tuesday offered his assurances that U.S. troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before.
Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining NATO and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are "impossible."
The Republican president, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. While answering questions from journalists, Trump did not rule out sending U.S. troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Zelenskyy.
Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Putin was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine.
But asked Tuesday on Fox News Channel's "Fox & Friends" what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Trump said, "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president."
Trump would have no control over the U.S. military after his term ends in January 2029.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later on Tuesday emphasized that "U.S. boots will not be on the ground" as part of any potential peacekeeping mission.
The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the NATO military alliance.
"Both of those things are impossible," Trump said.
Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.
Trump on Monday said that he was arranging for direct talks between Putin and Zelenskyy.
But the Kremlin has not yet said whether Putin, who has resisted previous calls by Trump and others for direct negotiations on ending the war, is committed to a face-to-face meeting with the Ukrainian leader.
Asked whether Putin has promised Trump that he'll meet directly with the Ukrainian leader, Leavitt responded affirmatively. "He has," Leavitt said of Putin.
Trump, early on Monday during talks with Zelenskyy and European leaders, said that he was pressing for three-way talks among Zelenskyy, Putin and himself.
But after speaking to Putin later in the day, Trump said that he was arranging first for a face-to-face between Zelenskyy and Putin and that three-way talks would follow if necessary.
"It was an idea that evolved in the course of the president's conversations with both President Putin, President Zelensky and the European leaders yesterday," Leavitt explained.
But when discussing a phone call held after the meeting between Trump and the Russian leader, Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov gave no indication that either a bilateral or a trilateral meeting with Ukraine had been agreed.
Trump said he believed Putin's course of action would become clear in the coming weeks.
"I think Putin is tired of it," Trump said. "I think they're all tired of it. But you never know. We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks. That I can tell you."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Upper House Election: ‘Conspiracy Theory' Mentions Rose During Japan's Upper House Election Campaign, a Study of Social Media Finds
Upper House Election: ‘Conspiracy Theory' Mentions Rose During Japan's Upper House Election Campaign, a Study of Social Media Finds

Yomiuri Shimbun

time6 hours ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Upper House Election: ‘Conspiracy Theory' Mentions Rose During Japan's Upper House Election Campaign, a Study of Social Media Finds

The number of posts containing the Japanese word for 'conspiracy theory' averaged 45,000 per day on X during the latest House of Councillors election campaign period, doubling the number posted before the campaign, The Yomiuri Shimbun has found. The Japanese word 'inbo-ron' was frequently used in connection with political party Sanseito's assertions and allegations of foreign interference in the election. Noting that the spread of unverifiable claims has fueled this trend, an expert warned that an accelerated tit-for-tat conspiracy theory exchange could exacerbate social divisions. Conspiracy theories are claims that shadowy forces or secret organizations manipulate governments and media to control politics and the economy. On social media, they are often used to dismiss opinions that do not align with one's own beliefs. The Yomiuri Shimbun used an analysis tool from U.S.-based firm Meltwater to extract and analyze all posts — including reposts — containing the 'conspiracy theory' term from June last year to July this year. Last year saw the Tokyo gubernatorial election, the House of Representatives election and the Hyogo gubernatorial election, with 15,000 comments containing the term posted on an average day. The number increased to over 20,000 this year and surged to 45,000 during the July upper house election campaign of July the first half of the July campaign, a series of posts criticized assertions by Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya as conspiracy theories. These assertions included 'Jewish international financial capital controls the world' and '[Multinational corporations] are said to have caused the pandemic.' Sanseito members fought back against these criticisms with such a post as, 'They're still talking about conspiracy theories,' which went viral. Meanwhile, there were also posts labeling liberal arguments against nuclear power as conspiracy theories. The period toward the end of the campaign saw an increase in posts against a personal blog that raised suspicions of foreign interference in the election. The blog claimed that Russia was spreading Japanese-language posts criticizing Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's administration that would result in increasing support for Sanseito and other parties. When both ruling and opposition parties called for an investigation of the allegation, Kamiya posted, 'The claim that 'behind the rise of the Sanseito lies Russian interference' is precisely the kind of conspiracy theory we've been talking about.' This post was shared 14,000 times. Posts related to U.S. President Donald Trump's administration have also been prominent this year. A survey found an increase in English-language posts mentioning conspiracy theories overseas. 'Many posts sound the alarm about conspiracy theories, and that itself is a sign that unverified claims are spreading,' Osaka University of Economics Associate Prof. Masaki Hata, who has written books on conspiracy theories, said. 'Politicians also tended to exploit unverified claims for their own advantage during elections.' He said he has the impression that there has been an increase in posts alleging voting fraud, such as those claiming that 'votes are being rewritten,' and that could pose a dangerous threat to democracy.

Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank
Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank

The Mainichi

time7 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) -- Israel gave final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Wednesday, the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on Aug. 6. If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday. Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognize a Palestinian state in recent weeks. "This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize," Smotrich told reporters. "Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground." The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. The two cities are 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart by air, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. Peace Now, an organization that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution" which is "guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed." Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognized. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.

Editorial: Is Trump pushing Russian strategy in quest to settle war in Ukraine?
Editorial: Is Trump pushing Russian strategy in quest to settle war in Ukraine?

The Mainichi

time8 hours ago

  • The Mainichi

Editorial: Is Trump pushing Russian strategy in quest to settle war in Ukraine?

U.S. President Donald Trump recently met his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy and proposed a solution for the war with Russia. The proposal, however, is disadvantageous to Ukraine, the victim of aggression, raising questions about whether it could lead to fair and just peace. What comes into focus is how to achieve a ceasefire and peace, as well as what concrete steps to take for "security guarantees" to prevent Russia's reinvasion of Ukraine. Amid its inferior standing, Ukraine, alongside its European allies, has called for an immediate ceasefire. Trump once agreed to this, but made a turnaround following last week's bilateral summit talks with Russia, prioritizing efforts to achieve peace. This means the Russian offensive against Ukraine could continue until negotiations are settled. Furthermore, Trump appeared to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin's proposal demanding Ukraine withdraw its troops from two eastern regions and cede them to the aggressor. Given the fact the Ukrainian military controls 30% of Donetsk, one of the two regions, the proposal is obviously in favor of Moscow. It is only natural that Zelenskyy has rejected the proposal, claiming that constitutional provisions prohibit territorial transfers or deals. It is worth noting that Trump announced his country's commitment to security guarantees for Ukraine. A framework akin to the right to collective self-defense as defined by NATO is envisaged. While Trump had initially expressed reservations about the initiative, he shifted his stance after Putin did not oppose it during their recent meeting. Trump, however, has not specified how far the U.S. will get involved. To begin with, he has been ambiguous about the obligation to exercise the right to collective defense in the event a NATO member state comes under attack. He must ensure that the security guarantees are viable. What must not be overlooked is that Trump's proposals align with Russia's assertions. With U.S. cooperation essential in continuing the war, Ukraine cannot openly object to Trump. Alarmed, European leaders accompanied Zelenskyy to attend some of the meetings in Washington, yet the best they could do was to ask for keeping pressure on Russia. The war must be quickly brought to an end. But if the U.S. is to fall for a Russian ploy just as Trump is eager to achieve success, it will lead to future problems. It is unacceptable for the president to impose superpower logic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store