
Trump tariffs created unprecedented uncertainty — trade expert
The trade expert said the Trump tariffs destroyed all levels of trust and confidence in the US and effectively shot the US in the foot.
US President Donald Trump's tariffs have created unprecedented uncertainty and are reshaping the global economy as his administration wields them aggressively as a political and economic tool, with South Africa among the many countries caught in the crosshairs.
Trade economist Matthew Stern, founder of DNA Economics, who previously worked for the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, National Treasury and the World Bank, says the shocks Trump's tariffs are having on the world's trading system are significant, substantive and far from fair.
He was speaking at the latest PSG Think Big webinar, where he unpacked the erratic and far-reaching implications of Trump's protectionist policies.
'Looking at America's growth and development over the last 90 years, America has undoubtedly been one of the greatest beneficiaries of a world trading system that is open and enables and facilitates trade.'
Stern says while Trump's justification for tariffs lies in correcting trade imbalances and reviving American manufacturing, he believes the policy is as much political as it is economic. 'Trump will eliminate the trade deficit, but this will not be a good thing as it will stifle the US economy and innovation.
'Trump sees tariffs as something that he can impose on countries, whether they are friend or foe, and he sees this as a way to get leaders and countries to come to Washington, bend the knee and engage with him on a much wider variety of issues that for whatever reason aggrieve him.'
ALSO READ: Global trade war's potential blow to Southern African Customs Union revenue
SA not the only country suffering under Trump tariffs
Stern pointed out that South Africa's experience reflects the broader volatility created by this approach. Before the 90-day pause, the US included South African imports in a sweeping 30% import tax.
While the potential impact on overall exports is far from insignificant, the broader uncertainty it creates for investors and exporters is the real concern, he said. The US' trade with South Africa is only about 0.4% of its trade with the world, and therefore, South Africa does not have enough economic muscle to retaliate.
'The much bigger issue is how this plays out through the rest of the world economy. The longer, larger global impacts are important. They are far more worrying than the short-term impacts that this might have on South Africa's exports to the US.'
He said the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) recent downward revision of South Africa's growth forecast is evidence of this. 'This week, we have already seen the IMF halve their forecast growth rate for South Africa for the next year, from a paltry 2% to around 1%. That is a 1% cut that we cannot afford.'
ALSO READ: IMF warns all countries will be caught in crossfire of trade war
Retaliating in kind to Trump tariffs will not work for SA
However, Stern said, despite these risks, he believes retaliating in kind would be a strategic error for South Africa. 'A wide scale US-style tariff increase is not going to work for us as it will hurt South African consumers. It will provoke the beast in Trump, and it is unlikely to have any long-term positive gains.'
Instead, he advises that South Africa use a multipronged strategy that includes deepening trade ties with historical partners, such as the European Union (EU), maximising opportunities in African regional trade, and exploring new relationships with high-growth markets like China and India. South Africa does not currently have trading agreements with the Brics countries, he pointed out.
'We already have a very deep historical and strong relationship with the EU. Working with the EU to establish or deepen our existing trade relationships is a good place to start.'
Regional trade can also fill the gap, he said. 'We have a nascent free trade agreement in place across all of Africa. Investing more time and effort in dealing with outstanding obstacles to trade in Africa is equally important.'
ALSO READ: Reserve Bank warns global trade tensions can cut GDP by 0.7%
SA must find other opportunities with EU and Brics
There are also opportunities to be found in the disruption itself, even in the US, Stern said. 'We need to look out for spaces or products where perhaps the tariff that they impose on China is two or three times the tariff that they impose on South Africa, and it is on something that we actually produce.'
He said that despite all the challenges, this period may serve as a much-needed catalyst for introspection and self-sufficiency. 'Rather than focusing on the local market, this creates a massive opportunity to look at the region where we are in, Southern Africa and consider the real obstacles to developing regional value chains.'
Looking ahead, Stern cautioned that the US may remain unpredictable for years to come. 'We will be dealing with a much more nationalist agenda coming out of America. We already see the damage that Trump is doing not just to the world trading system, but the multilateral system in general, whether we are talking health, development, sport or trade.'
ALSO READ: Trump tariffs' seesaw impact on Southern Africa
World can control how it responds to Trump tariffs
However, he pointed out, while businesses and investors cannot control global trade policy, they can control how they analyse and respond to it.
'As businesses and investors, we must try to get a sense [of ] which sectors are going to be affected most. We must watch that carefully and in real time because they change daily.'
As uncertainty continues, Stern encourages investors to move beyond crisis response and take a forward-looking approach.
'Our analysis must also move on from the destruction and start to think about where some of these new openings and new opportunities might emerge as a result of some of these global shifts.'
While the US will now sit with a huge amount of soya beans that used to be exported to China, Stern warns that countries like South Africa must also watch out that this extra stock is not dumped here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
31 minutes ago
- The South African
Mixed news for petrol price change this week
South African finance minister Enoch Godongwana recently announced inflation-based tax hikes, which will see petrol and diesel increase to R4.01c/l and R3.85c/l, respectively, effective from 4 June 2025. As a result, fuel taxes will be going up 15 cents per litre for diesel and 16 cents per litre for petrol, but there will still be a slight decline at the petrol pumps this week. According to month-end data from the Central Energy Fund (CEF), the fuel price balance remains positive thanks to a stronger rand and lower international oil prices. Without adding in the tax increase, these are the following projections: Petrol 93: decrease of 20 cents per litre decrease of 20 cents per litre Petrol 95: decrease of 20 cents per litre decrease of 20 cents per litre Diesel 0.05% (wholesale): decrease of 52 cents per litre decrease of 52 cents per litre Diesel 0.005% (wholesale): decrease of 52 cents per litre However, when factoring in the coming fuel levy increases, this is effectively the current projected outcome: 93: decrease of 4 cents per litre decrease of 4 cents per litre 95: decrease of 4 cents per litre decrease of 4 cents per litre Diesel 0.05% (wholesale): decrease of 37 cents per litre decrease of 37 cents per litre Diesel 0.005% (wholesale): decrease of 37 cents per litre The final overall price changes for both petrol and diesel will be confirmed early this month with the new prices taking effect at midnight on Tuesday, 3 June 2025. INLAND May Petrol 93 R21.29 Petrol 95 R21.40 Diesel 0.05% R18.90 Diesel 0.005% R18.94 Illuminating Paraffin R13.05 COASTAL May 93 R20.50 95 R20.61 Diesel 0.05% R18.11 Diesel 0.005% R18.18 Illuminating Paraffin R12.05 Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
MK party wants full disclosure over R9.5bn battery storage projects
Electricity Minister Kgosientso Ramokgopa praised Mulilo Energy as a "great South African success story". The MK party says it wants full disclosure of bid adjudication records after a multi-billion energy tender was awarded to a company headed by former Eskom CEO Andre de Ruyter's right-hand man, Jan Oberholzer. On Friday, Electricity Minister Kgosientso Ramokgopa announced the appointment of five preferred bidders under the Battery Energy Storage Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (BESIPPPP). De Ruyter's right-hand man Mulilo Energy, chaired by Oberholzer, the Chief Operating Officer of Eskom and Scatec, was awarded five large battery storage projects in the Free State to develop 616 MW / 2,464 MWh of new battery storage capacity for R9.5 billion. Oberholzer was appointed chairperson of Mulilo in September 2023, just two months after leaving Eskom as COO. Out of the five available projects, four were awarded to Mulilo Energy Mulio Energy was founded in 2008 by property developer Johnny Cullum and racing driver Chris Aberdein after a conversation about load shedding. Both remain on Mulilo's board. ALSO READ: Eskom denies reports of 14-hour load shedding next month MK party not happy Ramokgopa praised Mulilo at Friday's announcement as a 'great South African success story' that shows the country can stand tall globally. However, the MK party wants transparency in the bidding process MK party national spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said they have written to Ramokgopa demanding full disclosure of the bid adjudication records within seven days. 'The uMkhonto weSizwe party is blowing the lid off what appears to be one of the most blatant acts of javelin throwing in post-apartheid public procurement, this time under the green veil of 'renewable' energy. 'Should the Minister fail to comply, the MK party will immediately approach the courts to interdict and suspend these contracts,' Ndhlela said. 'Billions' Ndhlela said 'this is no longer about megawatts. 'This is about the billions being funnelled out of our country under the false flag of progress, and the MK Party will not stand by and watch our state-owned entities being handed over to corrupt white monopoly capital interests'. The Battery Energy Storage Programme is a critical initiative aimed at enhancing South Africa's power system by providing essential ancillary services and increasing grid capacity through energy storage. Projects Other awarded projects located in the Free State will include: Erfdeel BESS (123MW/ 492MWh) Retreat BESS (123MW/ 492MWh) Bloemhoek BESS (124MW/ 496MWh) Vanilla BESS (123MW/ 492MWh) The BESIPPPP Bid Window 3 was launched on 28 March 2024, with bids submitted on 28 November 2024. Ramokgopa said the evaluation process was conducted by an Independent Bid Evaluation Committee 'under strict security measures, took place at the IPP Office.' ALSO READ: Eskom winter outlook: Here's how many days of load shedding to expect in SA

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Most South African farmers are black: why Trump got it so wrong
There are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers,says the authors Image: Karen Sandison/ Independent Newspapers When world leaders engage, the assumption is always that they engage on issues based on verified facts, which their administrative staff are supposed to prepare. Under this assumption, we thought the meeting at the White House on 21 May between South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa, and US president Donald Trump would follow this pattern. Disappointingly, the televised meeting was horrifying to watch as it was based on misrepresenting the reality of life in South Africa. Issues of agriculture, farming and land (and rural crime) were central to the discussions. What is clear to us as agricultural economists is that the skewed views expressed by Trump about these issues originate in South Africa. This includes Trump's statement: 'But Blacks are not farmers.' In our work as agricultural economists, we have, in many pieces and books (our latest titled The Uncomfortable Truth about South Africa's Agriculture), tried to present South Africans with the real facts about the political economy policy reforms and structural dimensions of South African agriculture. Writing on these matters was necessary given that official data – agricultural census 2017, as well as the official land audit of 2017 – all provide an incomplete picture of the real state and structure of South African agriculture. The reason is that the agricultural census, which is supposed to provide a comprehensive and inclusive assessment of the size and structure of the primary agricultural sector, and the land audit, which was supposed to record the ownership of all land in South Africa, are incomplete in their coverage. The incomplete and inaccurate official data provides fertile ground for radical statements by the left and the right – and novices on social media. This is why South Africa has to deal with falsehoods coming from the US. These include Trump's statement that black people are not farmers in South Africa. South Africa is to blame for providing inaccurate data to feed these false narratives. The facts presented here should allow a more nuanced interpretation of South Africa's farm structure. Firstly, there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. And not all white commercial farm operations are 'large-scale', and not all black farmers are 'small-scale', 'subsistence' or 'emerging'. Most farm operations can be classified as micro, or small in scale. This is important so that one doesn't view South Africa's agriculture as mainly white farmers. Indeed, we are a country of two agricultures with black farmers mainly at small scale and accounting for roughly 10% of the commercial agricultural output. Still, this doesn't mean they are not active in the sector. They mainly still require support to expand and increase output, but they are active. The facts In the wake of the circus in the Oval Office, we were amazed by the total silence of the many farmers' organisations in South Africa. We have not seen one coming out to reject all of Trump's claims. The only thing we can deduce from this is that these falsehoods suit the political position of some farmer organisations. But at what cost? Will many of their members be harmed by trade sanctions or tariffs against South Africa? The US is an important market for South Africa's agriculture, accounting for 4% of the $13.7 billion (R247bn) exports in 2024. When Ramaphosa highlighted the fact that crime, and rural crime in particular, has an impact on all South Africans and that more black people than white people are being killed, Trump's response was disturbing, to say the least: 'But Blacks are not farmers'. This requires an immediate fact check. We returned to the text from our chapter in the Handbook on the South African Economy we jointly prepared in 2021. In the extract below, we discuss the real numbers of farmers in South Africa and try to provide a sensible racial classification of farmers to denounce Trump's silly statement. As highlighted earlier, the two latest agricultural censuses (2007 and 2017) are incomplete as they restricted the sample frame to farm businesses registered to pay value added tax. Only firms with a turnover of R1 million qualify for VAT registration. We were able to expand the findings from the censuses with numbers from the 2011 population census and the 2016 community survey to better understand the total number of commercial farming units in South Africa. The Community Survey 2016 is a large-scale survey that happened between Censuses 2011 and 2021. The main objective was to provide population and household statistics at municipal level to government and the private sector, to support planning and decision-making. Data from the 2011 population census (extracted from three agricultural questions included in the census) shows that 2 879 638 households out of South Africa's total population, or 19.9% of all households, were active in agriculture for subsistence or commercial purposes. Only 2% of these active households reported an annual income derived from agriculture above R307 000. This translates into 57 592 households that can be considered commercial farmers, with agriculture as the main or only source of household income. This corresponds in some way with the 40 122 farming businesses that are registered for VAT as noted in the 2017 agricultural census report. If we use the numbers from the agricultural census it is evident almost 90% of all VAT-registered commercial farming businesses could be classified as micro or small-scale enterprises. If the farm businesses excluded from the census are accounted for under the assumption that they are too small for VAT registration, then the fact still stands that the vast majority of all farm enterprises in South Africa are small family farms. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA There are, however, 2 610 large farms (with turnover exceeding R22.5 million, which are responsible for 67% of farm income and employed more than half the agricultural labour force of 757 000 farm workers in 2017. Graphic Image: Source: StatsSA (2020b) – based on additional analysis of the 2016 Community Survey Another way to get to farm numbers is to use the 2016 Community Survey. Using the shares as shown in Table 2, we estimate there are 242 221 commercial farming households in South Africa, of which only 43 891 (18%) are white commercial farmers. (This is very much in line with the VAT registered farmers but also acknowledging the fact that many white farm businesses are not necessarily registered for VAT.) Let's consider only the agricultural households with agriculture as their main source of income, surveyed in the 2016 community survey. We end up with a total of 132 700 households, of whom 93 000 (70%) are black farmers. This reality is something that policy makers and farm organisations find very difficult to deal with and it seems that Trump also found this too good to be true. We have tried here in a long winded way to deal with farm numbers and how to get to a race classification of farmers in South Africa. In the end we trust that we have managed to show that there are more black farmers in South Africa than white farmers. Their share in total output is smaller than that of their white counterparts. The National Agricultural Marketing Council puts black farmers' share of agricultural production as roughly 10%. But these numbers are also incomplete and largely an undercount. It will always be challenging to get to the real number of black farmers' share of agricultural output as nobody would ever know whether the potato or the cabbage on the shelf came from a farm owned by a black farmer or a white person but operated by a black farmer, for example. As South Africans know, the labour on farms, in pack houses, distribution systems and retail are all black. So, the sweat and hard work of black South African workers are integral to the food supply chain in South Africa. Let's get these facts straight and promote them honestly. The Conversation Image: Supplied