"Mistake...": Maharashtra Goes To Top Court Against Train Blasts Acquittals
The plea was mentioned on Tuesday before a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai by Solicitor General of India (SGI) Tushar Mehta, who requested that the plea be taken up urgently by the top court.
The Court listed the matter for hearing on Thursday.
Nineteen years after seven train blasts that killed more than 180 persons, the high court on Monday acquitted all the 12 accused, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was "hard to believe the accused committed the crime".
The Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), said the high court, failed to prove the offences beyond a reasonable doubt.
The high court set aside a September 2015 judgment of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) court that had imposed the death penalty on 5 of the 12 accused persons and had sentenced the remaining 7 to life.
In its damning indictment of the prosecution's case, the high court declared all confessional statements of the accused as inadmissible and suggested "copying".
The Maharashtra government argued in its petition that the high court has recorded a "very peculiar observation in disbelieving the confession" of the fifth accused.
The government has called it a mistake to not trust the important evidence on the recovery of RDX and detonator.
"The High Court has disbelieved the recovery of 500 gms of RDX from Accused No 1on a hyper technical ground that the RDX which was seized was not sealed with a lac seal. It is worth noting that it was not sealed with Lac because RDX is a flammable substance...The high court has erred in disbelieving the recovery of RDX," said the government in its petition.
Investigators said the bombs, made of RDX and ammonium nitrate, were placed inside pressure cookers and concealed in bags. The attacks were attributed to Pakistan-backed Islamic militants.
The High Court, argued the state government, has committed a grave error in not accepting the arguments advanced by the trial court for sentencing the accused.
"It has erred in acquitting the accused of all the charges including the UAPA," it said.
The Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) filed charges under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The prosecution relied heavily on confessions, alleged recoveries, and circumstantial evidence - none of which stood up under the high court's scrutiny.
"It is necessary to see that the accused were continuously engaged in activities prohibited by law, which are cognizable offences punishable with imprisonment for 3 years or more and in respect of which more than one charge sheet has to be filed in the competent court within the preceding period of 10 years and which have been tried by the competent court cognizance should have been taken," it said.
Former Mumbai police commissioner A N Roy today expressed shock over the high court's acquittal of all 12 accused in the case, saying the probe into the case was conducted by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in a professional manner where evidence was collected "honestly and truthfully".
On the evening of July 11, 2006, bomb blasts took place at seven different places in the Mumbai local trains within just 11 minutes. In this incident, 189 people died, while more than 827 passengers were injured.
The bombs were placed in first-class compartments of trains from Churchgate. They exploded near the stations of Matunga Road, Mahim Junction, Bandra, Khar, Jogeshwari, Bhayandar, and Borivali. A trial court in 2015 convicted 12 people in the blasts' case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After 12-year wait, hundreds set to become primary teachers in UP
After a legal battle spanning over 8 years and a wait of 12 years, hundreds of unemployed candidates are finally set to be appointed as assistant teachers in government-run upper primary schools across Uttar Pradesh. A teacher teaching students at a government-run upper primary school in Prayagraj. (HT file) The case concerns the long-delayed recruitment of 29,334 assistant teachers for mathematics and science subjects, which began in July 2013. Although over 22,000 candidates were initially selected, the state government abruptly halted the process midway. Since then, hundreds of affected candidates have pursued legal recourse—first through the Allahabad high court and eventually the Supreme Court. Now, more than 1,700 remaining vacancies under this recruitment drive are expected to be filled, according to officials from the state's basic education department. Following a Supreme Court's directive on January 29, 2025, deputy secretary (basic education) Anand Kumar Singh issued instructions on July 19 to the director general (school education), Kanchan Verma, to proceed with the selection of eligible petitioning candidates in accordance with established norms. A copy of the order, obtained by Hindustan Times, directs officials to complete the recruitment process as per the Supreme Court's ruling and within the stipulated timeline. 'In compliance with the Supreme Court's order, action will be taken to appoint candidates against the remaining vacancies under the 29,334 assistant teacher recruitment drive. The process has already begun,' confirmed Surendra Kumar Tiwari, secretary, Basic Education Council, Uttar Pradesh. On January 29, the Supreme Court had directed the basic education department to appoint all candidates who had secured marks above the minimum cutoff and had filed petitions before December 31, 2019. The recruitment process began on July 11, 2013. After seven rounds of counselling were completed by February 2015, an eighth round was held for candidates who had scored up to 82 marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test, with appointment letters issued in January and February 2016. Later, in November 2016, a final opportunity was extended to candidates who had undergone counselling but missed joining earlier. However, the process was halted on March 23, 2017, following a change in government. In response, the affected candidates approached the Allahabad high court, which ordered that the recruitment process be completed within two months. The state government filed a special appeal and a review petition in the Allahabad high court, but both were dismissed. When appointments still did not take place, candidates filed contempt petitions. Subsequently, in May 2019, the government filed a special appeal in the Supreme Court. 'I never lost hope' Alok Chaudhary, 35, from Aligarh's Heerpur village is one of the many candidates who endured a long legal battle. Coming from a farming family, Alok completed his B Ed in 2011. At 23, he cleared the assistant teacher recruitment exam in 2013. 'However, what followed was a long and trying struggle,' he recalled. 'I had to take a loan just to fill in the application form. The prolonged litigation meant frequent travel from my village to Prayagraj and Delhi for court hearings. With no money, I often had to travel in the general compartment, but the hope never died,' he shared. 'I survived by working alongside my father on the farm. Without a job, marriage was out of the question. Now, after all these years, I am finally looking forward to starting the life I had dreamed of—beginning my career as a teacher and settling down,' he said. 'I can now support my family' Manoj Kumar Patel, 37 from Jhunsi area of Prayagraj cleared the recruitment exam at 25. 'However, what followed was a gruelling struggle,' he recalled. 'I staged protests alongside fellow candidates, met officials and petitioned them repeatedly, consulted lawyers, and pursued the matter in court,' he shared. During this time, Manoj worked as an outsourced employee at a bank to make ends meet. 'Now, I am hopeful that I can finally support my family, live with dignity, and build a career doing what I've always dreamed of—teaching children and shaping their futures,' he said with a smile.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 minutes ago
- Business Standard
FM calls OGE delay 'unpardonable', urges action on five key tax priorities
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, on the 166th Income Tax Day on Thursday, sharply criticised delays in the issuance of Orders Giving Effect (OGEs), calling them 'unpardonable,' and urged the income tax department to act decisively on five priority areas identified during a high-level review in June 2025. OGE refers to the implementation of appellate or court decisions by tax officers. It ensures that the outcomes—such as refunds, reassessments, or adjustments—are formally carried out based on the ruling. 'After all the decisions are taken, the delay in OGE issuance is just not explainable. But we have a category—would you believe it? You have a category of OGE issuance delay. Why pray? The decisions are all done. You just have to issue the OGE. Unpardonable,' she said, addressing senior officials. Reinforcing the need for accountability, she said that good policies alone are not enough. What matters, actually, is timely execution. Referring to the progress made in redrafting the Income Tax Act, she added, 'For a group or the CBDT, which is able to reduce five lakh words of the 1961 Act within a matter of three months to give me a draft bill which is half the size of that earlier 1961 Act… you're able to do that, but you can't issue OGEs? What's going on?' Recalling the key action points from the June 2025 review, Sitharaman said: 'I would recall five of them (including the issue of OGE), which I would think are important for all of us to re-look at—not because things have changed from then to now, June 2025 to now, but to refresh ourselves that these were things which all of us spoke about together.' The first, she said, is to 'accelerate disposal of disputed tax demands pending before the faceless appellate authorities and ensure timely resolution of litigation backlog.' Second, departments must 'identify and withdraw departmental appeals falling below the revised monetary threshold announced during the Union Budget 2024–2025 within the next three months.' The Union Budget 2024–25 raised the monetary thresholds for filing departmental appeals in tax-related cases, setting the new limits at ₹60 lakh for tribunals, ₹2 crore for High Courts, and ₹5 crore for the Supreme Court. These enhanced limits apply to disputes under Direct Taxes, as well as legacy cases in Excise and Service Tax. The third priority is to 'ensure timely processing of tax refunds and proactive and timely resolution of taxpayer grievances,' said the Minister. Fourth, departments must 'analyse the grievances and devise strategies not only to resolve the existing pendency but also to address the challenges that are causing the grievances in the first place.' And fifth, Sitharaman said, is to 'undertake region-wise performance reviews to help identify factors hindering performance and streamline operations through indicators such as grievance disposal and orders giving effect issuance.' Calling the Income Tax Day 'the moment when we reaffirm the unsaid social contract between the state and the taxpayer,' Sitharaman said this contract must not be allowed to 'fray at the edges' or 'become loose, become diluted.' She urged officials to raise the benchmark and ensure that the reform process is matched by efficient delivery on the ground. In addition, the Finance Minister lauded the drafting of the new Income Tax Bill as the first-ever comprehensive review of the Income Tax Act since 1961. She said that several members of the select committee of the Lok Sabha had informally appreciated the drafting of the IT Bill 2025. She expressed hope that 'Parliament actually looks at the good work done… we will welcome the suggestions by honourable members and… expect with enough engagement, discussion, and debate in the House… this bill… passes through Parliament's scrutiny.'
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cabinet directs action on two officials for Tirupati stampede
The Andhra Pradesh Cabinet has instructed the authorities to take criminal and departmental action on the officials found responsible for the stampede at Padmavati Park in Tirupati in January 2025, while approving the report submitted by the one-man commission of inquiry headed by retired High Court judge Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy. The Commission found two officials, a DSP and a TTD functionary, negligent in discharging their duties during the tragic incident that claimed six lives. The eCabinet meeting on Thursday, chaired by Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu, also ratified judicial and administrative decisions, including permanent appointments for seven outsourced drivers working in the judiciary. Briefing reporters after the meeting, the Minister for Information and Public Relations, Kolusu Parthasarathy, said the Cabinet gave its approval for the implementation of the Talliki Vandanam scheme from the 2025–26 academic year and the establishment of a new Noor Basha/Dudekula Economic Corporation under the BC Welfare Department. The Revenue Department received clearance for land allotment for a Kendriya Vidyalaya in Anakapalli, a market yard in Banaganapalle, and industrial parks in Madakasira. The Cabinet also approved a one-time waiver of ₹86 crore abnormal water tax interest dues of farmers. Tourism received a boost with approvals for five-star hotels in Visakhapatnam (ITC Hotels, Lansum Leisure and entertainment LLP) and Tirupati. Wildlife, eco, heritage, and temple tourism circuits will be promoted to generate employment and preserve heritage. In the agriculture sector, revised tobacco procurement guidelines were approved, including a 20-quintal limit per farmer and logistical support. Construction of a BC girls' residential school in Banaganapalle was also cleared. A proposal for land acquisition for developing a road network from Amaravati capital city through 24 villages, by amending the earlier Government Orders related to land pooling scheme, got the Cabinet clearance. These lands will be taken from farmers for the Seed Access Road, and trunk roads.
