Warisan's track record doesn't reflect good governance, says GRS leader
PETALING JAYA : Warisan's track record with state-linked companies does not reflect good governance, says a divisional youth chief of Gabungan Rakyat Sabah.
Ceasar Mandela Malakun, head of GRS Penampang Youth, dismissed recent claims on good governance raised by Warisan vice-president Junz Wong.
Malakun said Warisan's portrayal of itself as a reform-oriented government did not reflect the realities of its time in power from 2018 to 2020.
Malakun highlighted the serious concerns that were raised over Sabah International Petroleum (SIP) and Sabah Development Bank (SDBank) at the time.
The concerns were about the concentration of power and oversight when the chief minister, who was also state finance minister, added on the role of SIP chairman.
'From May 2018 to September 2020, SIP's debts to SDBank increased from RM1.05 billion to RM1.24 billion, while its total group liabilities – combining those with commercial banks – rose to RM1.75 billion,' he said in a statement today.
Malakun also pointed to SDBank's external bond obligations which reportedly jumped from RM3.66 billion to RM4.57 billion by the time Warisan left office.
'Despite clear signs of financial distress, the bank continued to declare annual profits,' he said.
'Industry observers at the time said this raised concerns of governance weaknesses, including the possible use of creative accounting practices that may have masked the bank's underlying financial risks,' he said.
Malakun said the GRS-led government is currently undertaking restructuring efforts to restore proper financial discipline, improve risk management, and ensure that SIP and SDBank serve their developmental mandates effectively.
'Sabahans deserve the truth, not Junz's selective memory. Governance isn't about rhetorics, it's about taking responsibility,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
9 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
After Thai-Cambodia truce, Anwar now seen as key to possible Asean-led Myanmar peace push
PHNOM PENH, Aug 2 — Following its successful mediation of the Cambodia–Thailand border truce, Malaysia may now seek to apply a similar conflict resolution model to one of Asean's most intractable challenges — the ongoing armed conflict in Myanmar. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia's assertive diplomacy is redefining Asean's role, transforming the bloc from a passive consensus-based forum into a more active regional player capable of navigating complex crises, according to political observers. In just four months as Asean chair, Anwar has secured two major diplomatic breakthroughs in addressing long-standing regional crises – moves that have drawn praise from the international community. Former Indian Ambassador to Thailand Anil Wadhwa noted that Anwar's proactive approach is challenging Asean's longstanding principle of non-interference - necessary to address the ongoing crises and issues like human trafficking and scams. 'By doing so, Malaysia is restoring Asean relevance in addressing the Myanmar crisis and promoting human security in the region. Malaysia will do well to ride on its success in the Thai-Cambodia conflict and try the Asean mediation between the military regime and the NUG and other disparate groups,' Anil told Bernama from New Delhi. Anil, who served as India's envoy to Thailand from 2011 to 2014, underscored the urgency for Asean to develop a workable political framework to address Myanmar's multi-layered crisis — one that has defied solutions for decades. Anwar, however, broke the bitter diplomatic deadlock in mid-April. He met Myanmar's State Administration Council Chairman Senior General Min Aung Hlaing in Bangkok and also consulted the National Unity Government (NUG) representatives to allow the flow of humanitarian aid into earthquake-hit regions — a rare moment of cooperation between the two rival entities. Most recently, Anwar hosted a high stakes meeting in Putrajaya between Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, successfully defusing tensions along the two countries' shared border. The ceasefire, widely seen as a major Asean achievement, prevented a broader military escalation and ensured the safety of thousands of civilians. The 77-year-old leader's diplomatic masterstrokes brought the much-needed calm to the border communities on both sides and helped save thousands of lives. Otherwise, it could have turned into a costly military confrontation, destabilising the region. Still, Myanmar's situation presents a more complex challenge. The country's civil war involves some 20 ethnic armed groups, many of whom have been fighting for autonomy or independence since 1948. With over 135 recognised ethnic groups and competing visions of governance, the path to peace is steep. 'Asean needs leadership — and Anwar is providing that,' remarked Kavi Chongkittavorn, a senior fellow at Chulalongkorn University's Institute of Security and International Studies in Bangkok. 'He is making Asean more relevant under Malaysia's leadership, Timor-Leste is accepted into Asean, and to solve the Myanmar crisis, Asean needs the leadership too. 'Now Asean can engage superpowers, especially the US and China and others more effectively. Malaysia announced the new Vision 2045 that envisages the bloc as future-ready. Anwar is doing exactly that. It will take time to further rebrand Asean,' he told Bernama. He also highlighted the significance of the Thai-Cambodia ceasefire, calling it a milestone, especially since Thailand had previously rejected Asean mediation during similar border clashes in 2008 and 2011. While the world's focus shifted to the border tussle in recent days, Myanmar continues to grapple with its domestic predicaments from economic hardship, natural calamities, raging civil war in various states and internally displaced people. The military coup on February 1, 2021, has displaced at least three million people, exacerbating an already dire humanitarian situation 'The only way to solve the crisis in Myanmar is for the military government and the NUG constituents to come together to discuss power sharing, revenue sharing formula and open humanitarian corridors. The people of Myanmar need to be freed of their burden,' said Anil. The military government recently lifted its four-year-old state of emergency and has announced plans to hold national elections in December. Whether Asean, under Malaysia's leadership, can facilitate meaningful dialogue in Myanmar remains to be seen. But as Anwar continues to chart a more assertive course, political analysts agree: Asean may be inching closer to becoming a truly effective regional actor. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
13 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Impose Unexplained Wealth Order to curb graft among elite, says ex-MP
Former Klang MP Charles Santiago said Malaysia needs a law to force individuals to explain how they obtained wealth beyond their known income. PETALING JAYA : Former Klang MP Charles Santiago has urged the government to introduce an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) to tackle illicit wealth and systemic corruption among the elite. Citing official estimates, Santiago said Malaysia lost RM277 billion to fraud, procurement abuse, and illicit flows between 2018 and 2023, or RM55 billion annually, that could have funded schools, hospitals, and food aid. He pointed to the UK's UWO model, which recovered £62.9 million (RM390 million) in a single year through the order and related civil actions. 'Malaysia can do the same, recover stolen wealth without dragging cases for decades in court,' he said in a series of posts on X. UWOs allow authorities to compel individuals to explain how they acquired assets that appear disproportionate to their known income, even without a completed criminal case. Malaysia does not currently have a UWO framework. The existing laws, such as the MACC Act and the Anti-Money Laundering Act, allow investigators to request asset declarations and freeze accounts, but only after a case is opened. Santiago's remarks came after Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim told the sons of former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad to return any wealth they cannot justify. But he said unexplained wealth should not be 'about one family or the fallout of the Turun Anwar rally'. He said ordinary Malaysians are made to prove their income for aid or loans, while the wealthy often escape scrutiny. 'Unexplained wealth shouldn't depend on who's in power. Malaysia needs clear legal triggers that require individuals to prove how they obtained assets beyond their known income. 'Without it, justice is just politics,' he said.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Big Oil's big reckoning: Why energy companies must reinvent or fade — Ahmad Ibrahim
AUGUST 2 — The global energy business is at a crossroads. The old certainties that once kept oil and gas companies flush with profits are fast evaporating. Rising climate pressures, aggressive carbon targets, volatile oil prices, and the unstoppable march of renewable energy are rewriting the rules of the game. In Malaysia, this new reality has landed squarely at Petronas' doorstep. The national oil company recently announced substantial job cuts, joining a long list of global oil majors trimming operations to stay afloat. But here's the hard truth: job cuts alone won't save them. The problem isn't just about leaner operations — it's about an outdated business model in a world that's moving on. For decades, the business model was simple: extract, refine, sell. High demand and a few strategic geopolitical disruptions kept prices buoyant, while oil companies banked billions. Those days are over. With more than 140 countries pledging to reach net-zero emissions by mid-century, demand for fossil fuels is approaching a long, irreversible decline. Even the world's largest fund managers now factor sustainability risks into investment decisions, increasingly avoiding companies perceived as climate laggards. Covid-19 delivered a brutal wake-up call. Energy demand plummeted. Oil prices crashed. Petronas, like its global peers, was forced into difficult decisions. The recent job cuts are not isolated belt-tightening, but early symptoms of an industry forced to rethink its very reason for being. Sure, trimming overheads can shore up quarterly numbers. But it won't future-proof the business. Energy companies can no longer afford to think like fossil fuel producers; they must start behaving like integrated energy providers. The future belongs to companies that can offer clean, reliable, and affordable energy solutions — and that means going well beyond oil and gas. Some oil majors have already taken bold steps. BP is repositioning itself as an integrated energy company, investing heavily in renewables and electric vehicle charging networks. Total has rebranded as TotalEnergies, reflecting its diversified energy portfolio. Even ExxonMobil, once a vocal sceptic of climate risks, is now pumping money into carbon capture and low-carbon solutions. Despite the stand taken by President Trump, there is no stopping the transition away from fossil fuels. Petronas has made initial moves into solar energy and green hydrogen, but these efforts need to be scaled rapidly. The longer it waits, the harder the catch-up will be. Experts agree on five moves energy companies must make. To stay profitable — and relevant — energy companies need more than incremental tweaks. They need reinvention. The future is clean energy. Solar, wind, hydrogen, and energy storage are where the growth lies. Energy companies should aggressively diversify their portfolios before being left behind. The skills used in offshore drilling, mega-project management, and complex logistics are transferable. These companies can lead in offshore wind, large-scale hydrogen, and carbon capture projects. Industrial clients and governments increasingly demand integrated, low-carbon energy options. Packaging natural gas, renewables, and carbon offset services is a smart, future-ready play. Workforce transformation is key. The energy workforce must pivot from traditional oilfield roles to clean tech, digital energy systems, and smart grid management. Developing integrated energy parks, waste-to-energy systems, and rural electrification projects not only creates new revenue streams but also builds public trust and national resilience. The energy transition isn't a distant risk — it's here. And it's accelerating. The companies that survive won't be the ones clinging to the past but those bold enough to shape the future. For Petronas and its global peers, this is a defining moment. Reinvent, diversify, and lead the transition — or watch profitability, relevance, and public support steadily erode The choice is clear. The clock is ticking. Since oil and gas is essentially about mining. The closest option that Malaysia should consider is rare earth metals. The country is holding substantial deposits of this new critical metals group. Exploration studies have uncovered their presence in most of the states of the country. But extracting them requires technologies which must consider their environmental impacts. But processing them is not an issue since Malaysia has many years of world class experience at Lynas. Despite all those time-wasting baseless concerns, Lynas survived. A Petronas like model should be just right if Malaysia is to effectively harness the country's rare earths deposits. * Professor Datuk Dr Ahmad Ibrahim is affiliated with the Tan Sri Omar Centre for STI Policy Studies at UCSI University and is an associate fellow at the Ungku Aziz Centre for Development Studies, Universiti Malaya. He can be reached at [email protected] ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
