Posts falsely claim low-cost carriers to introduce standing seats in 2026
"Standing seats in planes: A new reality of budget airlines beginning 2026," reads a Malay-language Facebook post on May 18, 2025.
It describes the seats as "a cross between bicycle seats and a standing position" and claims they are being introduced to reduce cost and increase capacity.
The post features three images of the vertical, saddle-like seats designed to allow passengers to sit in a semi-upright position.
The false claims spread after British tabloid Daily Mail published an article titled "Is this the future of travel? Low cost airlines could launch standing only seats as early as next year" on May 21, 2025 (archived link).
The report claims that the SkyRider standing chairs, made by aircraft seat manufacturer Aviointeriors, can increase passenger capacity by 20 percent.
Similar posts were shared elsewhere on Facebook.
But Aviointeriors clarified in an Instagram post on May 23 that the "standing seats" were merely prototypes dating back to 2012 (archived link).
"Designed as a bold response to one of the aviation industry's most pressing challenges, while maximizing space and ergonomics it was never meant to be taken at face value," the company said.
A check on Aviointeriors' website also shows the SkyRider standing seats are not part of the company's catalogue (archived link).
When contacted by AFP, the EASA confirmed that it had not received applications to certify standing seats in commercial aircraft.
"Such seats would pose significant technical challenges, particularly in terms of emergency evacuation," it told AFP, adding that the design of a plane's fuselage does not allow for passengers to stand near windows.
"Any airline wishing to introduce this type of seat will face significant challenges, both in terms of aircraft reconfiguration and in demonstrating compliance with strict safety and evacuation requirements."
Irish low-cost carrier Ryanair also told AFP that the airline was not considering introducing the seats.
However, its head Michael O'Leary said in 2009 that he would not have any problem introducing standing seats on planes, but pointed out that such a move will likely be rejected by the European Union for safety reasons.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
UK Trade Secretary Reynolds Hopeful of US Deal on Cars Soon
UK Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said he was hopeful that a deal can be struck soon with the US to lower tariffs on British automobiles but indicated that negotiations over steel have further to go. Reynolds, who met this week with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, expressed optimism during a meeting with reporters Thursday about the prospects of reaching an agreement over the UK's car industry.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
National Advertising Division Recommends Coterie Baby Discontinue Comparative Absorbency and Drier Skin Claims and Disclose Endorsements for The Diaper
Following a challenge by the Procter & Gamble Company (P&G), BBB National Programs' National Advertising Division recommended that Coterie Baby Inc. discontinue certain comparative absorbency claims and improve endorsement disclosures for its product, The Diaper New York, NY, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Following a challenge by the Procter & Gamble Company (P&G), BBB National Programs' National Advertising Division recommended that Coterie Baby Inc. discontinue certain comparative absorbency claims and improve endorsement disclosures for its product, The Diaper. P&G, maker of Pampers, challenged express and implied claims made by Coterie on its website and in influencer marketing for its premium diaper, The Diaper. The challenged claims include "Up To 4x Absorbency Compared to Leading Brands," "Up To 3x Drier Skin Compared to Leading Brands," and superiority claims such as being the 'most absorbent' and 'most high performing' diaper on the market. Superiority Claims At issue for the National Advertising Division (NAD) were Coterie's claims that The Diaper was '4x faster' at absorbing and '3x drier' than leading brands. These claims were based on two studies using synthetic urine to test absorption speed and rewet levels. After review of the studies' testing methods, as well as those provided by P&G, NAD found that the results are sufficient for Coterie to meet its initial burden of providing a reasonable basis that The Diaper product is 4x more absorbent and 3x drier when compared to certain diapers, but not to Pampers diapers. NAD found that P&G's studies, which had similar methodology but very different results, to be more reliable, and determined that Coterie's studies could not support a claim that The Diaper was up to 4x as absorbent and 3x drier when compared to the 'leading brands' since it did not demonstrate superiority over Pampers diapers. In addition, NAD determined consumers would reasonably expect the challenged 'up to' claim to mean that Coterie's The Diaper is 4x faster at absorbing than any Pampers or Huggies diaper, when in fact the 4x faster absorption is substantiated only when compared to Huggies diapers. Accordingly, NAD recommended that Coterie discontinue the claims 'Up To 4x Absorbency Compared to Leading Brands' and 'Up to 3x Drier Skin Compared to Leading Brands.' Endorsement Claims P&G alleged that Coterie did not include material connection disclosures in social media and blog posts by its endorsers, including a Facebook post asking, 'Which diaper is best?' and displays multiple brands, including Coterie, but does not name them. Coterie argued there is no endorsement until the consumer clicks through to the blog, where a disclosure appears. Here, NAD found that the Facebook post appears as an objective review, and it is only when a consumer clicks through to the blog post that they are informed that the post is a paid endorsement. The FTC Endorsement Guides state that native ads must be identifiable as advertising before consumers arrive at the main advertising page. NAD therefore recommended that Coterie clearly and conspicuously disclose its material connection to the endorser in its advertising, including originating social media posts that link to an endorsement. During the proceeding, Coterie voluntarily agreed to permanently discontinue certain challenged claims. As a result, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat them, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued. In its advertiser statement, Coterie stated they 'will comply with NAD's recommendation.' All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. Per NAD/NARB Procedures, this release may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes. About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs, a non-profit organization, is the home of U.S. independent industry self-regulation, currently operating more than 20 globally recognized programs that have been helping enhance consumer trust in business for more than 50 years. These programs provide third-party accountability and dispute resolution services that address existing and emerging industry issues, promote fair competition for businesses, and a better experience for consumers. BBB National Programs continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-and-teen-directed marketing, data privacy, dispute resolution, automobile warranty, technology, and emerging areas. To learn more, visit About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. The National Advertising Division reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and promoting fair competition for business. CONTACT: Name: Jennie Rosenberg Email: jrosenberg@ Job Title: Media Relations
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK ‘ready to go' on implementing US trade deal, says Business Secretary
The UK is 'ready to go' on implementing its trade deal with the US, the Business Secretary has said. The deal, announced last month by Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump, will see British tariffs on steel and automotive exports to the US slashed in exchange for greater access to the UK for some American goods. But the deal has still not been implemented, with both Washington and London yet to take the necessary steps to reduce tariffs. Speaking at a lunch for Westminster journalists on Thursday, Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the UK was ready to implement the deal, suggesting the White House was responsible for the hold-up. He said: 'We are ready to go on our side. 'In terms of the steps I need to take, I will inform the House with a written ministerial statement and lay the statutory instruments for the reciprocal part of that deal, which is obviously about beef and ethanol for us on this side. 'So we're ready to go, and as soon as the president and the White House on their side are able to, we will implement that part of the deal.' The Business Secretary added he was 'very hopeful' that the agreement would come into effect 'very soon', but acknowledged negotiations had not 'always been easy'. Mr Reynolds's comments follow his meeting with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday to discuss implementing the deal. The meeting, which the Prime Minister also dropped in on, was the latest in a series of engagements aimed at securing a reduction in the tariffs Mr Trump imposed on the UK and the rest of the world on April 2. Along with 10% tariffs on all British goods, the president imposed 25% levies on cars and steel. He later increased the tariff on steel to 50%, but gave the UK a reprieve, keeping Britain's rate at 25% until at least July 9. Under the broad terms of last month's agreement, the US will implement quotas that will effectively eliminate the tariff on British steel and reduce the tariff on UK vehicles to 10%.
