'Israel' army warns of larger Gaza assault as strikes kill 55
Gaza rescue teams and medics said 'Israeli' air strikes killed at least 55 people on Thursday, as the military threatened an even larger offensive if the captives were not freed soon.
'Israel' resumed its military assault in the Gaza Strip on March 18, after the collapse of a two-month ceasefire that had brought a temporary halt to fighting in the blockaded Strip.
The Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) chief, visiting troops in Gaza on Thursday, threatened to expand the offensive in Gaza if captives seized during October 7, 2023 were not released.
"If we do not see progress in the return of the hostages in the near future, we will expand our activities to a larger and more significant operation," Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said.
The warning came as the army issued fresh evacuation orders for northern areas of Gaza ahead of a planned attack.
Earlier in the day, six members of one family -- a couple and their four children -- were killed when an air strike leveled their home in northern Gaza City, the civil defence agency said in a statement.
Nidal al-Sarafiti, a relative, said the strike happened as the family was sleeping.
"What can I say? The destruction has spared no one," he told AFP.
Nine people were killed and several wounded in another strike on a former police station in the Jabalia area of northern Gaza, according to a statement from the Indonesian hospital, where the casualties were taken.
"Everyone started running and screaming, not knowing what to do from the horror and severity of the bombing," said Abdel Qader Sabah, 23, from Jabalia.
'Israel's' military claimed it struck a Hamas "command and control centre" in the area but did not say whether it was the police station.
In another deadly attack, the bodies of 12 people were recovered after the Hajj Ali family home, also in Jabalia, was struck, the civil defence said.
Another 28 people were killed in strikes across the territory, medics and the civil defence agency reported.
They came as the 'Israeli' military ordered Palestinians living in the northern areas of Beit Hanoun and Sheikh Zayed to evacuate ahead of an attack.
"Due to ongoing terrorist activities and sniper fire against IDF troops in the area, the IDF is intensely operating in the area," the military's Arabic-language spokesperson Avichay Adraee said on X.
The United Nations has warned that 'Israel's' expanding evacuation orders across Gaza are resulting in the "forcible transfer" of people into ever-shrinking areas.
Aid agencies estimate that the vast majority of Gaza's 2.4 million residents have been displaced at least once since the war began.
Killed 'one by one'
In the aftermath of a strike in Khan Yunis, footage showed bodies on the ground, including those of a young woman and a boy in body bags, surrounded by grieving relatives kissing and stroking their faces.
"One by one we are getting martyred, dying in pieces," said Rania al-Jumla who lost her sister in another strike in Khan Yunis.
Since 'Israel' resumed its aggression, at least 1,978 people have been killed in Gaza, raising the overall death toll to at least 51,355 since the war began, according to the health ministry.
The military acknowledged on Thursday that 'Israeli' tank fire had killed a UN worker in the central Gaza city of Deir el-Balah last month, according to an investigation's initial findings.
It had initially denied operating in the area where a Bulgarian employee of United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) was killed on March 19.
Bulgaria said it had received an "official apology" from 'Israel' over the killing.
The findings came after the military on Sunday reported on a separate probe into the killing of 15 Palestinian emergency workers in Gaza.
It admitted that operational failures led to their deaths, and said a field commander would be dismissed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
an hour ago
- Al Bawaba
Iran's Strategic Options After the Israeli Strike: A Response Amidst Isolation and Weakened Alliances
Dr. Gil Feiler The Israeli strike on Iranian territory last night represents a sharp escalation in the regional confrontation between Tehran and Jerusalem. Conducted with precision and likely aided by deep intelligence penetration, the operation targeted sensitive Iranian military infrastructure, including possible nuclear and missile development sites. Israel's ability to strike so effectively—despite Iranian defenses—highlights not only its superior military and technological prowess, but also Iran's increasingly exposed strategic position. Tehran now faces a crucial question: how to respond forcefully without plunging into a war it cannot afford? This question is particularly complex given the current geopolitical reality. Hezbollah, Iran's most powerful proxy, is in deep decline. More significantly, Syria has ceased to function as a coherent state, and Bashar al-Assad is no longer in power. The loss of Damascus as a transit hub and staging ground strips Iran of a vital component of its regional strategy. Iran's options—military, economic, and diplomatic—are all still in play, but they are narrower and more fragmented. Last night's operation is the latest testament to Israel's unmatched capabilities in the region. The IDF's air force, bolstered by stealth aircraft such as the F-35I Adir, executed a deep-penetration strike with surgical accuracy. Reports suggest the strike included electronic warfare to disable radar systems, and perhaps cyber tools to blind or delay Iran's ability to respond. What makes Israel especially formidable is not only its firepower, but its integration of real-time intelligence, air dominance, and cyber warfare. Israeli intelligence agencies—Mossad, Aman, and Shin Bet—have repeatedly proven their reach inside Iran's most secure facilities. In addition, Israel's multi-layered missile defense systems—Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow 2 and 3—give it a strong buffer against both short-range rockets and long-range ballistic threats. Iran's ability to inflict real damage in return is limited by this technological shield. The success of the strike sends a clear message: Israel can project power beyond its borders and degrade adversaries' capabilities without becoming bogged down in prolonged operations. Iran's Military Response: Asymmetric, Not Strategic In the past, Iran has relied heavily on asymmetric warfare to counter Israel's advantages. But that playbook has weakened considerably. Iran possesses a large and increasingly accurate missile arsenal, including medium-range ballistic missiles such as the Shahab-3 and Emad. However, launching a direct strike on Israeli territory risks triggering massive retaliation, possibly even targeting core regime infrastructure. Given the balance of power, such a move would be politically suicidal. Iran might fire a symbolic volley of missiles to save face domestically, but it would likely avoid hitting populated areas or strategic sites. Hezbollah: Too Weak to Act Tehran's traditional deterrent—Hezbollah—is not in a position to help. The group has been weakened militarily by years of regional entanglement, stretched thin by Lebanon's devastating economic collapse, and politically cornered by growing internal opposition. Hezbollah's leadership knows that a war with Israel now would be catastrophic. Israel's northern defenses are stronger than ever, and any major offensive by Hezbollah would invite overwhelming retaliation. Limited rocket fire or border provocations are possible, but Hezbollah is unlikely to engage meaningfully. Syria Is No Longer a Theater With Assad deposed and Syria fractured into zones controlled by various militias, jihadist groups, and foreign powers, Iran has effectively lost its logistical backbone for regional operations. The once-vital land bridge—from Iran through Iraq and Syria to Lebanon—is now broken. Without control in Damascus, Iran cannot reliably move weapons, personnel, or supplies to Hezbollah or other militias. Air corridors are routinely targeted by Israeli strikes, and no central Syrian authority exists to shield Iranian movements. This means Iran's conventional and proxy strategies in the Levant are severely hamstrung. Iraqi and Yemen-Based Militias: Secondary Options Iran may look to smaller proxies in Iraq and Yemen, such as Kata'ib Hezbollah or the Houthis, to stage limited attacks on U.S. or Israeli-linked interests. These could include drone attacks on Gulf targets, rocket fire on U.S. bases, or maritime harassment in the Red Sea. However, these actions are geographically and strategically distant from the Israeli-Iranian core conflict. They may irritate or distract, but they do not meaningfully restore deterrence. Cyber Warfare: The Most Likely Tool The most viable military response may come in cyberspace. Iran's IRGC-linked cyber units have shown the ability to disrupt foreign infrastructure, including oil facilities and banks. Iran could target Israeli civilian systems—transport, water, finance—in the coming days. Such attacks are deniable, difficult to attribute, and politically useful. Though not equal in sophistication to Israel's cyber capabilities, Iran's cyber forces are persistent and unpredictable. Economic and Diplomatic Responses: Subtle But Calculated With military options constrained, Iran is likely to engage in economic maneuvering and diplomatic escalation to recast the narrative and apply pressure While Iran's ability to influence global oil prices is limited under sanctions, it can still affect sentiment. By threatening shipping in the Strait of Hormuz or hinting at Gulf instability, Iran can rattle markets, prompting price spikes. Even a few 'mysterious incidents' involving tankers could send a global signal. Tehran may not want to close the Strait, but a few drone attacks or sabotage operations could create sufficient uncertainties The Iranian regime will exploit the Israeli strike to shore up domestic legitimacy. The Revolutionary Guard will frame the attack as Zionist aggression backed by the West, using it to call for unity and 'resistance.' Iran will launch a diplomatic campaign to portray Israel as an aggressor and shift global attention to civilian risks and regional destabilization. It will push for emergency sessions at the UN and work through forums like the Non-Aligned Movement and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). China and Russia, though not military allies, may offer diplomatic cover—criticizing Israel's actions and urging restraint—while maintaining their own strategic distance. Strategic Forecast: A Slow-Burning Retaliation With its alliance structure degraded, Iran will likely pursue a low-intensity, long-duration strategy rather than an immediate kinetic response. The Islamic Republic's modus operandi is patience: leveraging time, narrative, and asymmetric tools to recover strategic ground. We can expect the following: Cyberattacks against Israeli civilian infrastructure in the next week or two. Symbolic missile launches or minor proxy operations designed for Iranian domestic consumption. Maritime disruptions in the Gulf and Red Sea to send signals to international stakeholders. Diplomatic escalation, particularly in the UN and Global South, to isolate Israel politically. Rather than a dramatic act of vengeance, Iran's response is likely to be fragmented, slow, and psychologically aimed at projecting endurance and legitimacy in the face of military inferiority. Israel's successful strike has underscored not just its military superiority, but Iran's deep strategic isolation. With Assad gone from Syria, the Levant is no longer a theater for Iranian influence. With Hezbollah paralyzed, Iran's regional deterrent is hollow. And with international sympathy limited, Tehran stands exposed. Still, Iran is unlikely to concede defeat. Its response will be measured, indirect, and drawn out—designed to signal resilience, maintain internal stability, and extract long-term costs from its adversaries through asymmetric and diplomatic means. But make no mistake: this was a strategic setback for Tehran. Its enemies are operating freely within its borders, while its allies can no longer hold the line.
Roya News
4 hours ago
- Roya News
Iran thanks Jordan for its stance after 'Israeli' attack
Jordan's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Ayman Safadi held a phone call with Iranian Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi on Thursday, during which he strongly condemned the 'Israeli' aggression against Iran, calling it a dangerous escalation and a violation of international law. According to an official readout, Safadi reiterated Jordan's firm rejection of the attack, describing it as a 'serious breach of Iran's sovereignty' and warning that such provocations risk dragging the region into a broader conflict. He also stressed the need for collective efforts to de-escalate tensions and prevent the region from sliding into 'a new regional war that threatens both regional and global peace.' The Iranian foreign minister, for his part, thanked Jordan for its 'clear and principled stance' in condemning the 'Israeli' strikes and for rejecting any further escalation that could destabilize the region. Safadi emphasized that while Jordan continues to condemn 'Israeli' aggression and advocate for calm, it will not tolerate any violation of its own sovereignty or threats to the safety of its citizens. He made it clear that Jordan 'will not be a battlefield for any party' and will respond decisively to any breach of its airspace, whether by 'Israel' or Iran. 'This is a firm and longstanding Jordanian position,' Safadi added, 'and both Israel and Iran are fully aware of it.' The Jordanian foreign minister also stressed that de-escalation can only be achieved by addressing the root causes of conflict in accordance with international law. He reiterated Jordan's position that lasting security in the region depends on upholding the sovereignty of all states and ensuring the legitimate rights of peoples, especially the Palestinian people's right to freedom, security, and an independent state on their own land.
Roya News
4 hours ago
- Roya News
King: Jordan will not be a battleground for any conflict
His Majesty King Abdullah II, in a call he received from France President Emmanuel Macron on Friday, stressed the need to take immediate and urgent action to end the dangerous escalation in the region. His Majesty warned of the repercussions of such an escalation, which threatens to plunge the region into further tensions and expand the conflict. The King urged stepping up action to ensure stability in the region and protect its peoples, warning of the ramifications of the 'Israeli' attack on Iran on regional security. His Majesty stressed that Jordan will not be a battleground for any conflict, and will not allow any threats to its security, stability, and the safety of its citizens.
