Auto sector reels from China's rare earth restrictions
New cars of various brands are parked for export on the parking of a car terminal at the harbour of Duisburg, western Germany.
Image: AFP
The global auto industry has been rocked by China's decision to restrict exports of rare earth magnets that are crucial to making vehicles.
With a near monopoly on the output of rare earth elements, Beijing is using them as a key weapon in its trade war with Washington.
These are the implications for the sector:
China's restrictions
China accounts for more than 60% of rare earth mining production and 92% of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency, driven by generous state subsidies and lax environmental protections.
As the trade war with the US has developed, Beijing has required Chinese companies since April to obtain a licence before exporting these materials - including rare earth magnets- to any country.
While these rules were expected to be relaxed after a tariff deal in Geneva last month, industry stakeholders said they have not been eased at a sufficient pace.
"Since early April, hundreds of export licence applications have been submitted to Chinese authorities, yet only approximately one-quarter appear to have been approved," the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) said Wednesday.
"Procedures are opaque and inconsistent across provinces, with some licenses denied on procedural grounds and others requiring disclosure of intellectual property-sensitive information."
And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this month said Beijing was "blocking certain products it had agreed to market as part of our agreement".
China, however, defended its "common international practice".
Few alternatives
Rare earths are 17 metals used in a wide variety of everyday and high-tech products, from light bulbs to guided missiles.
Two of them - neodymium and dysprosium - are crucial to making powerful magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines.
These components play an essential role in "electric motors, sensors, power steering, and regenerative braking systems, among other advanced features in modern vehicles", according to consultancy firm BMI.
China's restrictions highlight the world's heavy dependency, with Europe importing 98% of its rare earth magnets from the country, BMI said.
And, it notes, while the European Union has introduced regulations to boost its production of critical minerals, "rare earth processing operations in Europe not only struggle to compete with Chinese producers on cost, but also lack the necessary scale to supply its automotive sector".
Industry group CLEPA added that efforts undertaken in Europe to diversify supply sources "offer no short-term solutions and cannot address the acute risks currently facing supply chains".
Production halts, supply concerns
The auto industry is already suffering globally.
"With a deeply intertwined global supply chain, China's export restrictions are already shutting down production in Europe's supplier sector," said CLEPA Secretary General Benjamin Krieger.
The group on Tuesday reported "significant disruptions" in Europe, where these restrictions "have led to the shutdown of several production lines and plants". It warned that "further impacts (were) expected in the coming weeks as inventories deplete".
"The slow pace of customs formalities for shipments requiring a valid export licence poses a problem," said Hildegard Muller, president of Germany's automotive industry association VDA.
"If the situation does not evolve quickly, production delays, or even production losses, can no longer be ruled out."
While not citing "direct restrictions" for itself, Germany's Mercedes-Benz said it was maintaining "close contact" with its suppliers, while Japan's Suzuki Motor said Thursday it "had ceased production of certain models due to a component shortage", including rare earths, the Nikkei daily reported.
And US auto giant Ford had to halt production for a week in May at its Chicago plant making the Explorer SUV because of shortages, according to Bloomberg.
The firm told AFP that it does not comment on "supplier issues".
Indian scooter-maker Bajaj Auto recently warned the restrictions could impact its production in July.
"The slow processing of (export) requests appears to be causing significant supply shortages," Cornelius Bahr from IW Economic Institute told AFP.
"Statements (by German companies) indicating that stocks will only suffice through the end of June should certainly be taken seriously."
The electronics industry, another major consumer of rare earths, could also suffer.
"Concern is visibly growing, many companies currently have resources only for a few weeks or months," said Wolfgang Weber, president of Germany's electronics industry association ZVEI.
Hope for a turnaround
While uncertainty remains, talks between US President Donald Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on Thursday seem to have paved the way for a potential easing by Beijing.
"There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of (exporting) Rare Earth products," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after their phone call.
A rapid resolution of the China-US row remains unlikely but reports indicate "an agreement was reached to overcome immediate obstacles, particularly concerning critical minerals", noted Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute.
AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
10 hours ago
- IOL News
Auto sector reels from China's rare earth restrictions
New cars of various brands are parked for export on the parking of a car terminal at the harbour of Duisburg, western Germany. Image: AFP The global auto industry has been rocked by China's decision to restrict exports of rare earth magnets that are crucial to making vehicles. With a near monopoly on the output of rare earth elements, Beijing is using them as a key weapon in its trade war with Washington. These are the implications for the sector: China's restrictions China accounts for more than 60% of rare earth mining production and 92% of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency, driven by generous state subsidies and lax environmental protections. As the trade war with the US has developed, Beijing has required Chinese companies since April to obtain a licence before exporting these materials - including rare earth magnets- to any country. While these rules were expected to be relaxed after a tariff deal in Geneva last month, industry stakeholders said they have not been eased at a sufficient pace. "Since early April, hundreds of export licence applications have been submitted to Chinese authorities, yet only approximately one-quarter appear to have been approved," the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) said Wednesday. "Procedures are opaque and inconsistent across provinces, with some licenses denied on procedural grounds and others requiring disclosure of intellectual property-sensitive information." And US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this month said Beijing was "blocking certain products it had agreed to market as part of our agreement". China, however, defended its "common international practice". Few alternatives Rare earths are 17 metals used in a wide variety of everyday and high-tech products, from light bulbs to guided missiles. Two of them - neodymium and dysprosium - are crucial to making powerful magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines. These components play an essential role in "electric motors, sensors, power steering, and regenerative braking systems, among other advanced features in modern vehicles", according to consultancy firm BMI. China's restrictions highlight the world's heavy dependency, with Europe importing 98% of its rare earth magnets from the country, BMI said. And, it notes, while the European Union has introduced regulations to boost its production of critical minerals, "rare earth processing operations in Europe not only struggle to compete with Chinese producers on cost, but also lack the necessary scale to supply its automotive sector". Industry group CLEPA added that efforts undertaken in Europe to diversify supply sources "offer no short-term solutions and cannot address the acute risks currently facing supply chains". Production halts, supply concerns The auto industry is already suffering globally. "With a deeply intertwined global supply chain, China's export restrictions are already shutting down production in Europe's supplier sector," said CLEPA Secretary General Benjamin Krieger. The group on Tuesday reported "significant disruptions" in Europe, where these restrictions "have led to the shutdown of several production lines and plants". It warned that "further impacts (were) expected in the coming weeks as inventories deplete". "The slow pace of customs formalities for shipments requiring a valid export licence poses a problem," said Hildegard Muller, president of Germany's automotive industry association VDA. "If the situation does not evolve quickly, production delays, or even production losses, can no longer be ruled out." While not citing "direct restrictions" for itself, Germany's Mercedes-Benz said it was maintaining "close contact" with its suppliers, while Japan's Suzuki Motor said Thursday it "had ceased production of certain models due to a component shortage", including rare earths, the Nikkei daily reported. And US auto giant Ford had to halt production for a week in May at its Chicago plant making the Explorer SUV because of shortages, according to Bloomberg. The firm told AFP that it does not comment on "supplier issues". Indian scooter-maker Bajaj Auto recently warned the restrictions could impact its production in July. "The slow processing of (export) requests appears to be causing significant supply shortages," Cornelius Bahr from IW Economic Institute told AFP. "Statements (by German companies) indicating that stocks will only suffice through the end of June should certainly be taken seriously." The electronics industry, another major consumer of rare earths, could also suffer. "Concern is visibly growing, many companies currently have resources only for a few weeks or months," said Wolfgang Weber, president of Germany's electronics industry association ZVEI. Hope for a turnaround While uncertainty remains, talks between US President Donald Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping on Thursday seem to have paved the way for a potential easing by Beijing. "There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of (exporting) Rare Earth products," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after their phone call. A rapid resolution of the China-US row remains unlikely but reports indicate "an agreement was reached to overcome immediate obstacles, particularly concerning critical minerals", noted Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. AFP
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
Europe's Left Must Unite to Oppose NATO's Rearmament and Austerity
U.S. Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth (left) and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in conversation ahead of the meeting of NATO defence ministers at NATO Headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on June 5, 2025. Image: AFP John Ross As Europe approaches NATO's 24–26 June summit in The Hague, its 750 million people face a decisive strategic choice that will affect their lives for years to come – and one with a far wider global impact. The policies implemented in Europe in recent years have been disastrous socially, economically, politically, and militarily. Europe is experiencing worsening social conditions, its largest war since 1945 in Ukraine, and the biggest rise of far-right authoritarian, racist, and xenophobic forces since the Nazis in the 1930s. The proposals to the NATO summit would worsen that situation. The key question is therefore whether Europe will continue down this destructive, disastrous path or adopt policies that offer a way out. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has proposed to the 32 NATO members that 'the NATO summit… aim for 3.5% hard military spending by 2032' – a 75% increase from the previous 2.0% GDP target. Trump calls for even higher military expenditure of 5% of GDP. Rutte opened the door to this by supporting a commitment to '1.5% related spending, such as infrastructure, cybersecurity and things like that. Also achievable by 2032'. The 3.5% plus 1.5% adds up to Trump's 5%. The social and political consequences of such a course are already clear. Europe's economies are nearly stagnant, with the EU's annual per capita GDP growth averaging less than 1% from 2007 to 2024. The IMF, somewhat optimistically, projects an increase to only 1.3% by 2030. With rising inequality and reductions in social spending due to austerity policies, hundreds of millions of people in Europe have already experienced stagnant or declining living standards. Diverting more resources into military spending, already being accompanied by social spending cuts to finance it, will worsen that situation further. The political consequences are also clear. Far-right and neo-fascist forces, exploiting the worsening conditions, which are caused by austerity measures and increased military spending, by demagogically blaming immigrants and ethnic and religious minorities, will gain further strength. The disastrous consequences for traditional left-wing and progressive parties supporting or enacting these rearmament and austerity policies, even before their support for the new NATO rearmament policies, are already known in major European countries. The SPD in Germany in 2025 saw its vote drop to 16%, the lowest since 1887. In the last elections at which they stood independently, the French Socialist Party gained only 6%. In Britain, the Labour Party, which already received one of its lowest votes since the 1930s at the last election, is now in the polls behind the far-right Reform Party. In contrast, left-wing parties that have opposed austerity and NATO policies – La France Insoumise in France, Die Linke in Germany, and the Belgian Workers Party – have maintained or significantly increased their support. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ This disastrous collapse suffered by traditional left-wing parties that have supported war and austerity is extremely dangerous in the context of the rise of far-right parties across Europe. The reason for the collapsing support for such parties is obvious. Such policies attack the population's living standards. If parties claiming to be on the left continue to support austerity and rearmament, this trend of decline will just continue. The only way out of this situation for both Europe's population and the left is a complete policy reversal to one that prioritises social progress and economic development. Following the end of the Cold War, Europe should have focused on fostering economic cooperation and minimising military tensions and expenditures. This would have created a balanced economic area, equivalent to the US, with a strong potential for growth by combining Western Europe's manufacturing and services with Russia's energy and raw materials. What was possible was shown in Asia by ASEAN, which, in a continent that had suffered the worst conflicts of the Cold War, the Korean and Vietnam wars, became the world's most rapidly growing economic region through a concentration on economic development and the absence of military blocs. But, because an economically cooperating Europe could have been a successful competitor to the United States, US administrations pursued a path to prevent it – primarily through NATO's eastward expansion, which was carried out in direct violation of US promises to then-Soviet Premier Gorbachev that NATO would not advance 'an inch' eastward after Germany's reunification. Instead, in 1999, 2004, 2009, 2017, and 2020, new countries were added to NATO, and the door was deliberately left open to admitting Ukraine, known to be a red line for Russia due to Ukraine's proximity to Russia and its position as a historical route for invasion. Numerous US experts on Eastern Europe opposed this, led by George Kennan, the original architect of US Cold War strategy, who warned NATO expansion would be 'the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-Cold War era'. But their warnings were ignored, with results culminating in the Ukraine war. Now NATO demands rearmament and cuts in social protection to finance this war. NATO forces simultaneously expanded outside Europe to participate in wars in the Global South, Afghanistan and Libya, and set up numerous organisations and initiatives to prepare for intervention in the Global South – such as the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative, the Strategic Direction-South HUB, the Liaison Office in Addis Ababa – and has begun to expand into the Pacific – with Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and South Korea attending every NATO summit since 2022. Such NATO expansion would involve Europe in even more conflicts and more calls for military expenditure. What is required is the complete opposite – priority to social progress and investment for economic growth. Both require more spending and are therefore directly contrary to a military build-up. Europe's need for social spending is obvious. But Europe's investment, the key to economic growth, has also collapsed. In the EU, investment, once depreciation (the wearing out of existing means of production) is taken into account, has halved from 7.4% of GDP in 2007 to only 3.5% on the latest data. International comparisons show this is enough only to generate 1% annual economic growth. Additionally, the US is now pressing for further policies harmful to Europe and its people. The US has already enormously damaged Europe by its conscious policy of cutting off Western Europe's source of cheap energy from Russia, achieved via the Ukraine war and the blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline, which anyone who looks seriously at the matter knows was carried out by the US.
IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
Rate cut will drive automotive industry forward
There have been mixed reactions from the automotive industry to the 25 basis points interest rate cut announced by the South African Reserve Bank last week. Image: Supplied There have been mixed reactions from the automotive industry to the 25 basis points interest rate cut announced by the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) last week. Renai Moothilal, CEO of the National Association of Automotive Components and Allied Manufacturers (NAACAM), said that they welcomed the recent interest rate cut announced by Sarb, as this will likely provide impetus to consumer uptake in the automotive market. 'There will be greater motivation for the purchase of new vehicles, and if these are of the type assembled locally, then component producing companies in SA will benefit from greater volumes, from which greater localisation can be unlocked.' Moothilal added that ultimately it is the components manufacturing part of the value chain where the greatest economic benefits come from employment, skills and technology transfer, and new business opportunities. 'Besides the positive impact on new vehicle sales, we know that consumers have been under pressure financially and under such circumstances may delay things like vehicle repair and maintenance. The stimulus that comes from this rate cut should also be beneficial for component production in such aftermarket-type components including segments like autoglass, tyres, filtration, electronics and braking systems, all of which are produced domestically.' Dr Roelof Botha, an economist and advisor to the Optimum Investment Group, said in Drive Motor Index Q1 2025 that the lowering of the official bank rate (the repo rate) by 25 basis points in January resulted in the prime overdraft rate declining to 11% (compared to 11.75% prior to September 2024). 'The relaxation of monetary policy, albeit only marginal, has clearly provided South Africa's motor vehicle sector with a measure of impetus, with the Motor Index (DMI) having increased by 3.9% in the 1st quarter of 2025 (compared to the 1st quarter of 2024).' Brandon Cohen, National Chairperson of the National Automobile Dealers' Association of South Africa (Nada), said that it was most satisfying to see consumer confidence, boosted by a further interest rate cut and positive developments on the geopolitical front, translate into a 22% improvement in retail new vehicle sales in May. 'Sales were relatively slow during the first half of May but increased significantly in the latter half of the month following President Ramaphosa's meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, the finalisation of the national budget, and the interest rate announcement,' Cohen said. Cohen added that the substantial rise in overall sales was primarily driven by a 30% increase in passenger car sales, with 31,741 units retailed. 'In fact, actual market activity may have even been stronger than the reported total of 45,308 vehicles sold in May, as only 12 of the 24 Chinese brands currently available in South Africa submitted sales data. Retail dealer channels performed particularly well, accounting for 88.4% of total vehicle sales in May. In contrast, rental companies made up a much lower-than-usual 6.8%, industry corporate fleets 3%, and government purchases just 1.8%.' Cohen said that the commercial vehicle sector performed exceptionally well in May, potentially signalling a renewed sense of confidence in the broader economy. Thembinkosi Pantsi, Vice-Chairperson of Nada, said that the used vehicle market also delivered some noteworthy trends. 'May was a fascinating month for the pre-owned segment of the retail motor business. Many customers opted for pre-owned models from aspirational brands instead of investing in new vehicles. This trend has been gaining traction in recent months, with some buyers even expressing interest in premium brand cars that are between seven and ten years old.' Rate cut and fuel price decrease for consumers to look forward to On Wednesday, Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe announced that both grades of petrol will decrease by five cents per litre (5.00 c/l) while both grades of petrol decreased by thirty-six point nine cents per litre (36.90 c/l). This follows Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana in Budget 3.0 in May announcing an increase in the Fuel Levy, which will increase by 16.00 c/l on petrol and 15.00 c/l on diesel effective on Wednesday. Abigail Moyo, spokesperson of the trade union UASA, said that although the recent increase in the general fuel levy presents a financial setback for consumers, the decrease in fuel, paraffin, and LPGas prices is welcome news. 'The general fuel levy for petrol has risen to R4.01 per litre, while that for diesel has increased to R3.85 per litre, effective from midnight. Despite the fuel levy hike, any decrease in fuel prices, no matter how small, is positive news for consumers who have been struggling with the rising cost of living due to high inflation rates on goods and services.'
