logo
Sally made a complaint about an Australia Post driver for an unbelievable act... then came an unexpected visitor and email that will shock you

Sally made a complaint about an Australia Post driver for an unbelievable act... then came an unexpected visitor and email that will shock you

Daily Mail​4 days ago
An Australia Post customer claimed they were left 'scared' after a delivery driver confronted them for leaving a complaint about him.
Melbourne woman Sally said she was expecting a parcel from a small pet business in Queensland, but had to leave her home to visit her terminally ill grandmother.
The customer claimed the delivery driver falsely signed off on the package before it was stolen by a mystery thief - prompting her to make a complaint.
Sally said the delivery driver then turned up at her front door and demanded to know why she made the complaint, and that he even tried to look inside her house to make sure she hadn't stashed the package inside.
In a stunning twist, she said she ordered a replacement and the same Australia Post worker later delivered her the package and threw it at her.
'It was a bit scary, I wasn't expecting the delivery man to come to our house to confront me over his wrongdoing!' she told Daily Mail.
An Australia Post spokesman said the postal service 'takes customer concerns of this nature very seriously'.
'We are currently investigating this matter with the local delivery team and will update the customer in the coming days,' he said.
Sally shared her experience on Reddit, claiming Australia Post told her that her first package would be taken to a local post office if no one was home.
'All good, except it was "delivered" whilst we were away. I came home and there was no sign of our parcel, so I went to the local post office to see what was going on,' she wrote.
At her local post office, Sally learnt a delivery man had signed for the parcel on her behalf and left it at her door.
Unsurprisingly, the package was stolen.
The clerk at the Australia Post office urged Sally to lodge an online complaint, which she did.
'Literally two days later that delivery man came to my door while I was home and asked me why I'd submitted a complaint,' she said.
'I told him he'd fraudulently signed on my behalf and his actions had led to my parcel being stolen. He tried looking into my house, probably to see if I'd stashed it.
'I was fuming. It seemed so inappropriate, and I'd been afraid something like this would happen if I complained.'
Sally shared a screenshot of an email sent by Australia Post, informing her the company was investigating the incident.
'The facility has confirmed the delivery officer did not follow property delivery procedures,' the email read.
'Management has since taken interest in this incident and have since spoken to the delivery officer in question, in regards to delivery procedures and to ensure proper delivery practices are performed for future deliveries.'
Australia Post urged Sally to contact the small business to help organise a replacement parcel.
However, she claimed the service didn't offer to help cover the cost.
'My replacement order came yesterday and it was the same delivery man!' Sally wrote in an update on Saturday.
'He literally threw my parcel at me as soon as I opened the door!
'I've lodged another complaint with Australia Post, and have lodged two separate complaints to the ombudsman for the fraudulent signature, and for turning up to my house and using my private details in an improper way.'
Sally claimed she has heard nothing from Australia Post regarding the delivery man showing up on her doorstep.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shocking scenes as neo-Nazis flood Melbourne's CBD
Shocking scenes as neo-Nazis flood Melbourne's CBD

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Shocking scenes as neo-Nazis flood Melbourne's CBD

Confronting footage has been captured of more than 100 neo-Nazis marching through the streets of Melbourne before they squared off with police. Members of the National Socialist Network (NSN) congregated in the Melbourne CBD and marched along Bourke Street, dressing in all black clothing, before police were called to intervene on Saturday morning. Victorian police responded to the march, featuring people carrying Australian flags and chanting, at about 12.40am on Saturday night as the group walked to Flagstaff Gardens and dispersed at about 1.25am. 'Around 100 people dressed in black with face coverings marched through the Melbourne CBD,' a Victorian Police spokeswoman said. 'It is alleged an altercation occurred during the protest where a man confronted the group and was assaulted.' The 26-year-old man was taken to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Police vehicles were seen arriving at the scene with lights flashing, but they let the march continue as protesters held a 'White Man Fight Back' sign. It was not the first time neo-Nazi groups have march through Melbourne's streets and Victorian Police said there were no arrests made last night. 'Victoria Police respects the right to protest however there is absolutely no place for antisemitic, racist or hate-based behaviour in our society and police will not tolerate such activity,' a police statement read. National Socialist Network members reportedly gathered again as the sun came up at Bacchus Marsh in Melbourne's outer west. Bacchus Marsh locals were told of the group's planned march prior to Saturday. 'We want to alert you to a concerning event planned in our community: a neo-Nazi gathering has been scheduled to take place in the Bacchus Marsh area on August 8, 9 and 10,' a flyer handed out read. 'This group, the NSN, promoted hate, violence, and dangerous extremist ideologies that threaten the safety and unity of our community. 'Members will be coming from all over Australia. For the first time, they have invited their supporters to join them as well.' There will be a bigger police presence between Melton and Ballarat over the weekend. Victorian Police told Daily Mail that there were no protests happening in Mlebourne as of 11.45am on Saturday morning. Aussies online lashed out at the protest. 'Australia is multicultural so no, they are NOT standing up for 'Australians,' one person wrote. One person described them as a 'pathetic little club of cowards'. 'Not one of those manchild scumbags is doing anything, they just only feel strong in a gang,' they said. 'Separate them and you have a club of snivelling babies.' It comes after a previous white supremacist march outside a shopping centre in Melbourne in June where a group gathered outside Northland Shopping Centre in Preston. They too were filmed dressed in black with their faces covered while chanting slogans such as 'white man, fight back' and 'white pride' while holding an offensive banner. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan described that demonstration as 'hateful' and 'extremist' and said it had 'no place' in Victoria.

Lincoln is out of prison but a ‘lifetime' penalty hangs over him. Does a NSW police anti-firearm scheme go too far?
Lincoln is out of prison but a ‘lifetime' penalty hangs over him. Does a NSW police anti-firearm scheme go too far?

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Lincoln is out of prison but a ‘lifetime' penalty hangs over him. Does a NSW police anti-firearm scheme go too far?

Lincoln* calls his firearm prohibition order (FPO) a 'lifetime punishment'. It was placed on him after he left prison, and Lincoln says it made it difficult to feel as if he had a fresh start. Even when dating a new partner, he had to have a difficult conversation: that anywhere they went – at home or even in a car – he could be searched by police without a warrant due to the FPO. 'I'd been studying and working, doing all that kind of stuff, but still had that fear that at any minute they could come through the door,' Lincoln, who lives in Sydney, says. Weapon and firearm prohibition orders, which never expire, can be made if police deem that someone is not fit, in the public interest, to possess a firearm or weapon. Thousands of people in New South Wales are living under these orders – some as young as 14, others in their 80s and 90s. A Guardian Australia report in May revealed FPOs are disproportionately placed on Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people. The majority of under-18s served with a FPO identified as Aboriginal. New data obtained from NSW police shows similar results for weapon prohibition orders (WPOs), which are often served simultaneously: of the 78 people served with a WPO under age 18, 55% identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. About 51% of the 4,267 people in NSW with WPOs identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander – a 'concerning level of over-representation', according to Jonathan Hall Spence, the principal solicitor with the Justice and Equity Centre. In response to questions from Guardian Australia, NSW police pointed to recent amendments to the procedures that govern FPOs and WPOs, including an independent review of any applications of FPOs for those under 18 by the commander of the firearms registry and an internal review of adult FPOs every five years. Timothy Roberts, the president of the NSW Council for Civil Liberties, said the FPO and WPO regime is an example of how the criminal justice system is increasingly being used punitively rather than for helping people rebuild or change. 'You've got a situation here where someone can walk out the door of a prison sentence that would serve their debt to the community, but then the police at their own discretion create a debt of their own,' he said. Claude Robinson knows more about this than most. At Rainbow Lodge in Sydney, Robinson helps men who have recently left prison get back on their feet. The long-running residential support program assists all sorts of people, but he's recently had to make a new rule: men with weapon and firearm prohibition orders can no longer stay there. Robinson's particular worry is how police deliver these orders. The first time someone was served with a FPO at the lodge, police called ahead, Robinson says. The next time, it was different: police came early in the morning with masks and weapons with no warning and pulled the man out in his underwear. Robinson says they served the order and searched the man's room, finding nothing. His program tries to teach men that if you behave in what Robinson calls 'a pro-social way', that the criminal justice system becomes irrelevant to your life. A show of force like this risks undoing the work of the program for everyone staying there, he says, and that's why men with these orders can no longer stay at the lodge – cutting off an important rehabilitative opportunity. 'The police turn up here in riot gear and … undo what it's taken us three months to get people to believe in 10 minutes,' Robinson says. FPOs and WPOs are applied at police discretion – not by a court. There is no requirement that the person committed a firearm or weapon-related offence. Alongside criminal history or gang associations, police can consider factors such as traffic infringements that demonstrate 'a general disregard for the law' when considering whether to make an FPO, according to NSW police standard operating procedures obtained by Guardian Australia. While both FPOs and WPOs do not expire, the latter cannot be appealed to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) – a situation affirmed in a 2020 decision before the tribunal. In his NCAT findings, Geoffrey Walker, a University of Queensland emeritus professor, remarked on submissions that argued 'most Australians would consider it unfair that a person should remain subject to a WPO, with its concomitant liability to warrantless search and seizure … long after the circumstances that caused the commissioner to form the opinion … had ceased to exist.' The FPO scheme's enhanced search powers mean police can search someone with an FPO or their premises or car at any time, 'as reasonably required', to determine if they have committed an offence by having a firearm, firearm parts or ammunition. While they were introduced in 2013 to combat gun crime, legal advocates have raised questions about the efficacy of FPO search powers, and whether they're being used as a surveillance tool rather than gun control. In 2023-24, police found firearms or firearm accessories in only 1.36% of 8,651 searches. The year before, there were only nine occasions when a firearm-related item was found out of 9,731 searches. According to the police FPO procedures, if police find other illegal items during a search, they must identify another legal authority to seize them. Brendan*, a former resident at Rainbow Lodge, didn't know what an FPO or WPO involved when he first received them from police. When he understood the FPO meant anywhere he went could be searched without notice, he stopped socialising out of concern that he would inadvertently bring police to the doors of friends and family. It's hard to move on when 'that's hanging over our head all the time', Brendan says. '[I'm] on edge all the time, waiting [for them] to bang on the door.' Both Lincoln and Brendan agree that they can see the purpose of something like an FPO if someone has committed a violent offence using a firearm, but are frustrated these orders are not decided in court. Typically, no lawyers are present when they're served. Robinson is also worried about the impact of these orders and what he calls the 'carte blanche' of FPO search powers on men trying to rebuild their lives after prison. 'It continues that negative relationship that the men who come here have with the police and [the belief] police do treat them differently,' Robinson says. 'That window of change where things need to get better is small and this doesn't help them.' Lincoln served the time that Australia's justice system decided was his punishment, but now he feels he has another never-expiring penalty hanging over him. 'You're saying, I want to be a completely different person with a different friend group and different work … but I'm also hiding this secret that ties me to a life I used to have and means that I'm different to everyone else. 'It's painful and I don't think it's fair.' * First names only used for privacy reasons.

Titans back Jayden Campbell with hilarious dig at missed conversion after trainer gaffe
Titans back Jayden Campbell with hilarious dig at missed conversion after trainer gaffe

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Titans back Jayden Campbell with hilarious dig at missed conversion after trainer gaffe

If the Gold Coast Titans are shattered by the trainer incident that marred their golden point loss to Penrith last week, they certainly aren't showing it. During the tense clash between the Titans and Penrith, a Panthers trainer ran directly in front of Titans goalkicker Jayden Campbell as he lined up a sideline conversion with five minutes remaining, disrupting the kick. The distraction appeared to cost the Titans the goal, as Campbell missed and Penrith's Nathan Cleary landed a two-point drop goal to force golden point. The Panthers then snatched victory with a 60-metre try in extra time. Outrage followed, with commentators calling the act disgraceful and critics highlighting past trainer misconduct by Penrith. The NRL fined the club $50,000 and suspended trainer Corey Bocking for the final five regular-season matches, citing multiple previous breaches. The NRL banned Bocking for five matches while the Panthers were issued a $50,000 fine Penrith claimed the incident was an honest mistake during confusion over a substitution, with both the trainer and coach offering immediate apologies. Now, the Titans have released training footage of players laughing and joking about the incident. Campbell is filmed practising kicks from almost the same spot where he missed last weekend, with teammates pretending to run in front of him and distract him. That includes captain Tino Fa'asuamaleaui, who ran alongside Campbell as he was lining up a conversion attempt while teammates laughed. While it didn't ease the pain of the Panthers loss, it did help lift the spirits of battling Gold Coast supporters. 'The only thing that would have made this better is Des showing up and going off his nut 'get out of the showers' style. Good stuff Titans,' one posted. 'This is the fun rugby league stuff that we love,' added another. Meanwhile Campbell has opened up on 'that' conversion attempt and how it cost his side a four-point buffer and a real chance of beating the four-time defending premiers. Campbell admitted the incident got to him at the time, but is working on moving past it He said the trainer incident rattled him, but he had since made his peace with what had happened. 'At the time I was visibly upset, I wasn't too sure what was happening,' he told News Corp. 'I was a bit upset but I've still got to make the kick. 'Everyone's sort of blown up. I feel like it's a bit of a bigger deal than it should be. 'Corey reached out to me and apologised, which I was really appreciative for. 'I threw the kicking tee because I was upset, but it wasn't because he ran in front of me, it was because I knew how big the kick was and I missed it. 'I've learnt from it. It's a high-pressure kick. I did have time to go back and go through my routine again. 'If that happens again, I know what to do next time.' While plenty of footy fans have blamed the incident for the Titans loss, Campbell wasn't buying into that. 'I don't really want to make excuses to make things easier,' he said. 'I know it was a mistake from Corey and he was really sorry and he felt really bad about it. 'But in saying that too I feel like if something like that was to happen again then maybe something could be changed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store