School leaders' unions consider encouraging members to quit as Ofsted inspectors
In a letter to Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and Ofsted chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver, the unions said the proposed action 'underlines the strength of feeling' about the reforms.
This month, Ofsted said it would delay setting out its final plan for school inspections in England until September – just weeks before new report cards are due to be rolled out in November.
Under the plans, set out in February, schools in England could be graded across eight to 10 areas of a provision using a colour-coded five-point scale.
They would receive ratings, from the red 'causing concern' to orange 'attention needed', through the green shades of 'secure', 'strong' and 'exemplary' for each area of practice.
But in a letter on Tuesday, the leaders of the ASCL and the NAHT highlighted heads' concerns over the timetable for reforms and the five-point grading scale.
The unions have both warned that the intention to start inspecting under a new system in the autumn term is 'entirely unacceptable' and it will negatively affect staff's wellbeing and mental health.
It comes after four education unions called on the Government to delay the introduction of school inspection report cards to the beginning of the 2026/27 academic year earlier this week.
The latest letter – signed by the ASCL's Pepe Di'Iasio and the NAHT's Paul Whiteman – said: 'We are writing to you further to our joint letter with NASUWT and NEU to inform you ASCL Council recently determined that unless there are changes to both the timeframe of implementation and to the five-point grading scale, then ASCL will consider encouraging its members to withdraw their service from Ofsted as OIs in the autumn term.
'At its meeting of June 20 the NAHT resolved to do the same.
'This would be an unprecedented step for ASCL and NAHT and underlines the strength of feeling about the proposed reforms.'
Ofsted had planned to publish its formal response to its consultation on proposed inspection reforms in the summer term, ahead of the changes coming into effect in November this year.
But earlier this month, Sir Martyn said the watchdog now plans to publish its full response in September due to the scale of the feedback it received.
The inspectorate has said it will give it more time to analyse responses and carry out further testing of proposals to improve the final approach.
At the time, the Education Secretary called the delay of the publication of inspection materials – and Ofsted's consultation response – 'disappointing'.
Ms Phillipson added that it was 'important' that Ofsted delivers to the expected timescales to avoid additional challenges for school leaders.
Mr Di'Iasio said: 'We have voiced our concerns repeatedly over the past few months in discussions with Ofsted and the DfE (Department for Education), but the timetable for implementation has actually got worse rather than better, and there has been no indication so far of likely movement on the five-point grading scale.
'It feels as though we have exhausted the potential for compromise through discussion, and that we have little option other than to consider this more direct form of action.'
Last year, the Government announced that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped.
Previously, Ofsted awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgments: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate.
The move came after Ofsted faced criticism after the death of headteacher Ruth Perry.
Mrs Perry took her own life in January 2023 after an Ofsted report downgraded her Caversham Primary School in Reading, Berkshire, from the highest to the lowest overall effectiveness rating over safeguarding concerns.
An Ofsted spokeswoman said: 'Ofsted exists to keep children safe and raise standards.
'Our inspectors do vital work to improve children's lives, including by identifying schools, nurseries and colleges where standards are not high enough.
'It is disappointing that unions are taking legal action and using disruption tactics to frustrate our vital work.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
Why are white children doing worst at GCSEs?
That's the trouble of trying to measure everything through the metric of race: sooner or later you will arrive at a situation very different from that which you intended. Namely, that in some cases it is white people who appear to be at some kind of disadvantage. At least Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson is not trying to cover up the glaring disparity in GCSE results between ethnic groups. She has admitted that white working-class children are underperforming and suggests that the state has 'failed them'. But she doesn't really go on to ask herself how or why. What is it about being white, for example, that makes pupils underperform in Maths and English? Last year, 63.7 per cent of white pupils achieved a grade 4 pass or above in both subjects, compared with 65.0 per cent of black pupils, 74.8 per cent of Asian pupils and 88.8 per cent of Chinese pupils. If the state has been failing white pupils, Phillipson is unable, or unwilling, to say what she thinks it has been doing, or not doing, in order to suppress their attainment. We are left to ponder this ourselves. Nor, by the way, does she suggest any remedy other than setting up something called a 'Best Start Family Hub' in every local authority area. How these are supposed to improve the chances of white people in particular she doesn't say – I presume she is not going to plaster them with signs on the doors saying 'whites only'. It isn't hard to wonder whether the underperformance of white pupils – which, as Phillipson says, has been clear for many years – has something to do with years of trying to favour other ethnic groups. Governments started off with the assumption that ethnic minorities were at a disadvantage and so poured resources into those communities. In the process they failed to notice that communities without significant numbers of ethnic children were being ignored. We didn't have detailed ethnic statistics on education or anything else back in the 1980s, but the trend towards underperformance of white children likely began with the concentration of inner cities following the urban riots of that decade. As Mrs Thatcher said after the 1987 general election, 'we've got a big job to do in those inner cities'. Life in many of those places was transformed, beginning with the Conservatives and continuing under Labour. Endless efforts were made to promote the interests of ethnic communities, especially black-dominated ones, where the riots of 1981 and 1985 had started. Black role models were promoted, to the point of absurdity in some cases. In virtually every TV drama nowadays the police, or any other organisation, has to be led by a black woman. Then come the adverts – a world in which you would think the black population of Britain was about 95 per cent, rather than 4 per cent. In the midst of all the activity, no one seemed to stop to ask what effect it might have on children who happen to be white. Are they not allowed role models? Do poor communities which are dominated by white people not deserve extra resources too? The result of all this panicking over race and ethnicity is that the poorest, most disadvantaged communities in Britain have shifted from the inner cities to towns at the geographical margins: secondary towns in the Midlands and North, former industrialised areas and coastal towns. Statistically, the most disadvantaged place in England now is Jaywick, a ramshackle suburb to the west of Clacton. It is no accident that this is the parliamentary seat which first voted Ukip and has since returned Nigel Farage to parliament in his new political guise, Reform UK. When black communities rioted in the 1980s, they were showered with resources; when white communities rioted last year in the wake of the Southport murders, the Prime Minister condemned them as 'far right'. It is little wonder that the white working class is beginning to find its political voice. That perhaps explains why Phillipson has chosen to recognise educational underperformance among white pupils. But it would seem to me a better way to promote educational attainment is to stop trying to pigeonhole children into ethnic categories at all. Once you do this, there is always going to appear to be some kind of ethnic disadvantage, with the implication that there is some kind of underhand racism going on. The same would occur if we collected statistics on other human attributes, such as the length of people's earlobes. The sooner we stop collecting these ethnicity statistics and tailor education to individual children's needs, rather than treating them foremost as members of an ethnic group, the happier a country we will be.
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Governments have 'failed white working-class students' and Britain is falling behind as a result, Bridget Phillipson claims
Governments have ' failed white working-class students,' the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has said. As pupils wait in great anticipation for GCSE results day this Thursday morning, she warned that four-fifths of children from white working-class backgrounds struggled with basic English and maths skills. Ms Phillipson said that as a result, Britain is falling behind as the UK's productivity suffers and so does the economy. In 2024, only 19 per cent of white British, working-class children achieved a strong pass in maths and English GCSE and has been a trend in data since 2017. 'It's appalling, and I won't stand by and watch those numbers continue to grow. It's not just the life chances of those children that are being damaged – it's also the health of our society as a whole. Swathes of human capability and productivity lost. 'Fewer than one in five of all white British children on free school meals are leaving school with the maths and English skills to succeed in work and life. 'This data goes back to 2017. Alarmingly, it looks almost identical today to how it did then,' she said writing for The Telegraph. The Education Secretary added efforts to overcome the problem would focus on increasing school attendance as poor performance among white working-class pupils is thought to be closely linked to high absence levels. Officials fear that failure to provide young people with the skills they need to succeed in life will only further deplete Britain's already low productivity levels and could lead to less people entering work and more on benefits. It comes as a study from the Institute for Government (IfG) suggests ethnicity may be a factor in how badly poverty impacts on educational attainment. The think tank said disadvantaged white pupils have 'particularly poor educational outcomes' in terms of attainment in Year 6 Sats. Official data showed only 3 per cent of British white pupils from low income families attend a top university – one of the least successful groups. Last week, Ms Phillipson said it was a 'national disgrace' that so many white working class children were 'written off' and failed to achieve their potential. The IfG report referenced previous research which found this demographic is overrepresented in rural and coastal areas where there is 'lower funding… higher teacher vacancies, longer travel times and worse digital infrastructure'. The report adds: 'Factors from children's home environments, such as varying aspirations among parents from different ethnic backgrounds, also likely play a role.' The report examined the councils in England and identified the 'bottom fifth' for performance of disadvantaged pupils. It found the vast majority of these had 'above average shares' of white children within their population of disadvantaged pupils. On average nationally, 67 per cent of disadvantaged primary school pupils are white. The think tank has said tackling high absence rates – particularly among disadvantaged pupils – 'will be key' to narrowing educational inequalities. A Department for Education spokesman said: 'Tackling the baked-in inequalities in our education system will take time, but through our Plan for Change this government is taking action against the root causes that we know are holding young people back. 'We are driving high and rising standards for every child through the expert-led Curriculum and Assessment Review, new RISE teams and strengthened school accountability. 'This comes alongside work to tackle disadvantage including expanding free school meals, rolling out free breakfast clubs and revitalising family services in every local authority. 'But we know there is more to do, which is why we will bring about the reforms needed through our Schools White Paper later this year to create an education system where every child can thrive, regardless of their background.'
Telegraph
19 hours ago
- Telegraph
It is not just the state that is failing white kids, it is Labour
In an education system which has improved considerably over the previous 14 years of Conservative Government, Bridget Phillipson – Labour's Education Secretary – has been searching high and low for a figure she can use to make party political hay. Thanks to the reforms to the teaching of reading introduced by Michael Gove and I from 2010, England is now fourth in the world in the reading ability of our nine-and 10-year-olds according to the authoritative PIRLS study. And in maths England has risen from 27 th in 2009 to 11 th in the latest PISA survey of over 80 countries. These figures are challenging for a Labour politician who is keener on making partisan jibes than doing the hard work of raising academic standards in our schools. Labour have lighted upon one figure – the proportion of 'white working-class children' achieving a strong pass (Grade 5) in English and Maths GCSEs which they cite as 19 per cent compared to the overall figure of 46 per cent. I put that phrase in inverted commas, because the figure they quote is actually for white children eligible for free school meals, which is by no means the same as working-class, and Bridget Phillipson knows that, or should do. Nevertheless, I agree that the figure is too low. But let's look at those statistics when Labour were last in office and before our reforms to the education system were in place. The problem is the grading system of GCSEs was changed in 2017 from letters to numbers. The most accurate comparison is between a Grade 4 (known as a Good pass) and a Grade C in the old system. Back in 2010, 30.9 per cent of pupils eligible for Free School Meals achieved a C grade or better in their English and Maths GCSE. In 2024, some 43.6 per cent of pupils eligible for Free School Meals achieved a Grade 4 or higher in their English and Maths GCSEs. I wish I had the figure to compare a Grade 5 with the old grading system in 2010 but because the Grade 5 lies between an old B and a C that direct comparison isn't possible. But these show how much genuine progress was made amongst all children from disadvantaged backgrounds between 2010 and 2014. And Bridget Phillipson knows that or should do. These figures reflect the reality that there was significant improvement in standards in our state schools between 2010 and 2024, due to a real focus on phonics in the teaching of reading, better teaching of maths by the adoption of methods common in the highest performing countries in the world, particularly east Asia. It has been achieved through a stronger knowledge-rich curriculum and more support for schools to improve behaviour. The last Conservative Government gave schools more autonomy, to free them from the 'progressivist' ideology that was driving down standards when Labour were last in power. The UK fell from 7 th in reading in 2000 to 25 th by 2009 and from 8 th to 28 th in Maths, over those years of Labour government, a decline that we reversed through hard work and reform in the years after 2010. The autonomy we gave to schools through the Academies programme (combined with strong accountability), and which helped drive up standards, is now being undermined by the current Government through measures in their Schools Bill currently going through Parliament. The stronger curriculum we carefully introduced between 2013 and 2017, and which schools have adopted and are teaching well, is threatened by the Government's curriculum and assessment review that is still to produce its final report. Everything Bridget Phillipson has sought to do since becoming Education Secretary in 2024 has been to undo the reforms that successfully drove higher academic standards in our schools. Am I content that only 19 per cent of white children eligible for free school meals achieved a strong pass in English and Maths GCSE last year? Of course not. But our reforms were helping these children. Everything Labour is now doing will simply make the education system worse. Mercia School in Sheffield, a free school, the type of which Labour have refused to create more, achieves astonishing results in a disadvantaged part of that South Yorkshire city. At Mercia School 80.6 per cent of their pupils (of all ethnicities) eligible for free school meals achieve a grade 5 or better in their English and Maths GCSE. If the current government were serious about standards they would be learning from Mercia and similar schools and spreading that success across the school system as a whole. Instead, their Schools Bill removes many of the freedoms and much of the autonomy which have underpinned the success of schools like Mercia. The suggestion that the Conservative Party failed to deliver for schoolchildren – of any group – is absurd.
