
After years of flying high, tequila braces for impact
It's tough out there to be a tequila maker — not even Kendall Jenner is immune from the industry's challenges.
818 Tequila, the four-year-old brand owned by Jenner, has slowed down hiring and dialed back spending on some of its marketing efforts, a troubling sign for the industry that has experienced seemingly stratospheric growth and garnered celebrity attention for the past several years.
'We've observed a pull-back on discretionary spending and an increase in what we view as more deliberate purchases,' Mike Novy, CEO of 818 Tequila, told CNN, adding that the company is focusing on its core lineup of tequilas to give customers the 'best possible price.'
This year is turning into quite a headache not only for 818 Tequila, but for the whole industry. Tequila sits at a 'critical juncture,' according to a recent report from OhBev, an alcohol marketing agency, with 'signs of market normalization' following a decade of extraordinary gains.
Consumers already aren't spending as much on tequila compared to the height of Covid-19 when people stocked up their at-home bar setups, which has prompted a wave of layoffs.
Plus years of excessive demand have sparked an oversupply of agave — the main ingredient in tequila — causing prices to sharply decline as inventory goes unsold, damaging profits for farmers.
Now there's the threat of tariffs of 25%, as the spirit is produced exclusively in Mexico. Tequila currently falls under the free trade agreement President Donald Trump signed with Mexico and Canada, which is set to expire next year. For now, that trade deal has allowed goods from America's neighbors that comply to come in duty-free, but that could always change.
Consumers are being more discerning of their purchases, with the industry 'seeing a reversion to pre-pandemic levels of business and growth,' according to Andrew Chrisomalis, co-founder and chairman of Pantalones, the two-year-old tequila brand created by Camila and Matthew McConaughey.
He said that tequila drinkers are not spending as much on the super premium category (i.e., the $150 bottle of Clase Azule that's a favorite of celebrities and Real Housewives, alike) with purchases being 'less kind of flash, less sort of showy' as drinkers look for high-quality tequila at an affordable price.
That benefits Pantalones, he said, which costs $45 for a 750 ml bottle of Blanco.
'Given the uncertain economic environment, people are being more cautious… you sort of feel that in everything and in every way of life, including ours,' he said. 'Discernment would be the key word and if you have that differentiated product, you should feel pretty good about yourself.'
But there's some relief on the tariff front – at least for now. 'We have not seen any changes or differences this year at all from a tariff perspective, which has been a blessing, frankly,' he said, but confessed that it's operating in an environment that has a 'little bit of uncertainty, no question.'
That uncertainty has prompted Pantalones, 818 Tequila and other companies to stockpile their supply in the United States, which is tequila's biggest consumer, accounting for 80% of imports. Tequila exports from Mexico jumped 30% in January of this year compared to the same month a year ago, data from Mexico's Tequila Regulatory Council shows.
With sales in the United States possibly nearing its peak amid an uncertain trade environment, Pantalones is eyeing the United Kingdom for further expansion. The brand has recently inked a distribution deal with supermarket chain Tesco, bringing its reach to about 2,500 stores across the country, in addition to being sold in a slew of restaurants and hotels.
Tequila is in its infancy in the country, which means there's an 'education curve' for consumers, Chrisomalis said. The brand is holding tastings to introduce customers to its three varieties plus tapping into McConaughey's star power for promotion.
The McConaughey's 'lend themselves an opportunity with a large audience to help do that. It'd be very difficult for me to do that without them, but with them, it's just a much easier task,' he admits.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Just Revoked California's EV Rules. How Much Is California To Blame?
President Donald Trump just revoked California's permission to enforce its nation-leading clean-car rules — and Mary Nichols understands why. "No one likes being regulated," she told me ahead of Thursday's Oval Office signing ceremony. Nichols knows that better than almost anyone. As head of California's Air Resources Board for 17 years, she brought the world's biggest automakers to heel using the state's unique authority to go further than the federal government in setting vehicle emissions standards. It's those same automakers who lobbied Trump to "rescue the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating California's electric vehicle mandate once and for all," as Trump put it Thursday. It didn't have to get to this point. California officials had been in talks with automakers prior to the November election about how to keep them on board, but the state overplayed its hand, Nichols said. "Many people were acting on the assumption that it was going to be the Democrats continuing in power," she said. "So the state felt like they had all the cards in their hand, and then after the election, it was pretty hard to reset the conversation." To hear Nichols tell it, California may have gone too far this time in nudging the industry to ever-higher sales of zero-emission vehicles. The rules would have required automakers to hit increasing percentages — 35 percent by model year 2026 and 68 percent by model year 2030 — before reaching 100 percent of new-car sales in 2035. Maybe that would have worked if it were just about California. But a dozen other states are signed on to California's targets, and they have been slower and less generous with incentives and EV charging infrastructure. Where California has more than a quarter of its new car sales coming from EVs, New Jersey is at 15 percent, and New York is under 12 percent, according to the industry's latest figures. "They were definitely having issues with the California program because they didn't think they could meet the sales numbers in the mandate, especially [Gov. Gavin] Newsom's target of nothing but ZEVs with a deadline attached to it," Nichols said. "That was scary, and even the interim targets were going to be hard to meet." The pendulum has swung against California before: The George W. Bush administration was the first to attempt to deny California's permission from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require automakers to sell increasing percentages of zero-emission vehicles, and Trump went further in his first term by attempting to revoke the state's already-issued authority. But Republicans had never resorted to doing it through Congress, via an untested maneuver that congressional watchdogs have warned is likely illegal but that still drew 35 Democratic votes in the House and one in the Senate (Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), in the tradition of Detroit's John Dingell). It's a far cry from the bipartisan consensus that reigned when President Richard Nixon famously signed the Clean Air Act, which set federal air pollution levels for the first time but gave California permission to continue going further, owing to its decade-plus of vehicle emissions rules aimed at the smoggy Los Angeles basin. The automakers have been steadily lobbying against the rules since then, with a brief ceasefire from 2009-16, when ten automakers and the United Auto Workers signed a nonaggression pact in President Barack Obama's Rose Garden with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the EPA. That it happened at the same time that the federal government was taking an equity stake in General Motors was no coincidence, said Nichols, who helped broker the pact. "They saved them from bankruptcy," she said. California has less recourse this time around. Where Newsom signed deals in 2019 with Ford, Volkswagen, Honda, BMW and Volvo to abide by the state's rules even in the event of federal cancellation, he now only has Stellantis, which signed a separate agreement last year that goes through model year 2030. And several of the state's allies are peeling off. California had 12 other states signed on to follow its lead as of last year, but it now has 10, after Republican-led Virginia dropped out and Vermont delayed enforcement by 19 months. And Democrats are getting cold feet, too: Maryland Gov. Wes Moore signed an executive order in April delaying enforcement, and Democratic lawmakers in New York introduced a bill this year to delay their participation by two years. (California and the other 10 states immediately sued Thursday to preserve the emissions standards.) "If it was only California, I think [automakers] wouldn't have been as eager to jump in on the federal level and work with the Republicans, but it's the fact it's the other states that had the California standards that were killing them, especially New York," Nichols said. That echoes the automakers' argument. "The problem really isn't California," John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said in a statement after the Senate's vote last month to overturn the rules. "It's the 11 states that adopted California's rules without the same level of readiness for EV sales requirements of this magnitude."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Best $100 Gen Z Can Spend on Retirement Planning
Gen Z may be decades away from retirement, but the steps they take today can significantly impact their future financial freedom. Learn More: Read Next: With time on their side, small, smart investments can now compound into significant returns later. Whether it's spending $100 on a one-time financial consult, a subscription to a savvy budgeting app or even investing in a starter index fund, the key is starting early and wisely. Here's the best $100 Gen Z can spend on retirement planning. Budgeting apps and robo-advisors can turn passive habits into active wealth-building strategies. For Gen Z, investing a small fee in the right tool can lead to consistent savings, long-term growth and financial stability. 'Paid tools can be worthwhile when they nudge you into better habits or automate tasks you'd otherwise skip,' said Lily Vittayarukskul, CEO and co-founder of Waterlily. Vittayarukskul said budgeting apps like YNAB come with a small subscription cost, but can help users become more deliberate with their spending. Meanwhile, robo-advisors like Betterment and Wealthfront offer automated investing services for a low annual fee. This approach appeals to around 40% of Gen Z investors who prefer a hands-off approach. 'The price tag is usually minor compared to the value of disciplined saving and diversified investing they facilitate,' Vittayarukskul said. 'I personally use Copilot, and I like that the finally added savings goals last month, but I think that most of the options out there have become very comprehensive and user friendly.' She added, 'Just make sure any app you pay for truly gets you to invest and track your spending in a way that is compounding your wealth and taking care of any high interest debts.' I'm a Financial Expert: Gen Z can skip the hype and spend $100 opening an account with a reputable brokerage that offers diversified, long-term investment options. 'The biggest mistakes I see younger adults making when trying to get ahead financially are listening to the wrong people and chasing outsized returns,' said Tyler End, a certified financial planner and CEO of Retirable. Starting with a solid, low-cost platform keeps new investors focused on sustainable growth without the distractions of viral trends or high-risk bets. Some examples include: Fidelity: No minimum investment for many accounts, zero-commission trades and strong educational tools. Offers Roth IRAs and index funds with no expense ratio. Vanguard: Known for low-cost index funds and long-term investing. Best suited for those who prefer a simple, set-it-and-forget-it approach. Charles Schwab: $0 account minimums, a wide range of low-fee ETFs and mutual funds, and solid customer support. Gen Z doesn't need thousands to start investing for retirement. With just $100, they can open a Roth IRA, one of the most tax-efficient accounts available, and begin compounding gains over decades. 'A Roth IRA is a great place to build and, given their time horizon, they can afford to take on more strategic risk in the market which can make for higher returns,' said Lukendric Washington, founder of Manifest Wealth Management. Washington said by splitting the money between a high-yield savings account for emergencies and a Roth IRA for the long term, Gen Z can build short-term security and long-term returns, laying the foundation for more confident investing down the line. Spending $100 on digital estate planning services can help Gen Z start organizing their assets, even if retirement is decades away. 'Digital estate planning tools can be a smart investment not just for older generations, but for Gen Z because they simplify you and your loved ones' lives and help you make more informed decisions,' said Howard Enders, the COO at the Estate Registry. 'These easy-to-use tools allow tech-savvy Gen Z to stay organized and prepared in ways that traditional methods often fall short,' Enders explained. 'By having all your important documents and assets all in one secure digital location, designated individuals can easily access anything they may need should anything happen.' In addition, it's a low-cost way to ensure the money and accounts they're building now are protected, and it helps form good habits around long-term financial responsibility. 'The real value lies in bringing long-term clarity and peace of mind, no matter your age or stage of life,' Enders said. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on The Best $100 Gen Z Can Spend on Retirement Planning Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Old Dominion Freight Line (NASDAQ:ODFL) have seen decent returns of 95% over the past five years
The simplest way to invest in stocks is to buy exchange traded funds. But in our experience, buying the right stocks can give your wealth a significant boost. For example, the Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (NASDAQ:ODFL) share price is up 90% in the last five years, slightly above the market return. In stark contrast, the stock price has actually fallen 7.3% in the last year. With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. During five years of share price growth, Old Dominion Freight Line achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 16% per year. So the EPS growth rate is rather close to the annualized share price gain of 14% per year. This indicates that investor sentiment towards the company has not changed a great deal. Indeed, it would appear the share price is reacting to the EPS. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Even so, future earnings will be far more important to whether current shareholders make money. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Old Dominion Freight Line's earnings, revenue and cash flow. When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. As it happens, Old Dominion Freight Line's TSR for the last 5 years was 95%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return. While the broader market gained around 12% in the last year, Old Dominion Freight Line shareholders lost 6.7% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 14% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. Investors who like to make money usually check up on insider purchases, such as the price paid, and total amount bought. You can find out about the insider purchases of Old Dominion Freight Line by clicking this link. There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of undervalued small cap companies that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.