Deepest-Ever Field Image of Giant Galaxy Cluster Is a Brutal Reminder of Your Cosmic Insignificance
But the latest images of Abell 3667 also offer 'whispering evidence of past galactic interactions,' which astronomers document in detail in a paper published today in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. The team, led by astronomers from Brown University, caught Abell 3677 at a particularly lustrous moment in space-time, during a merger of two of the clusters' brightest galaxies. The stellar union, resembling a starry bridge stretching across the cluster, generated powerful gravitational bursts that yanked away the occasional stray star from other galaxies.
Together, these lone stars emit a faint glow known as intracluster light (ICL)—and it's this phenomenon that researchers are investigating to explore Abell 3677's past. Specifically, it appears likely that Abell 3667 also formed from the rapid merger of two galaxy clusters, which previous X-ray and radio observations had predicted. This latest observation, however, represents the first ever optical evidence to support this idea.
'This is the first time a feature of this scale and size has been found in a local galaxy cluster,' Anthony Englert, study lead author, said in a statement. 'We knew that it was possible for a bridge like this to form between two galaxies, but it hadn't been documented anywhere before now. It was a huge surprise that we were able to image such a faint feature.'
The team had an unusually long observation period for this project, which partly enabled them to construct such a detailed image. In addition to the intracluster light, the researchers captured faint, wispy puffs of cosmic dust called integrated flux nebulae, seen as bluish ribbons of light streaking across the image.
'It was just a happy coincidence that so many people had imaged Abell 3667 over the years, and we were able to stack all of those observations together,' Englert noted.
The researchers have some outstanding questions about Abell 3677 and, more importantly, intracluster light. Fortunately, their timing couldn't have been more impeccable; with the Rubin Telescope officially up and running, astronomers are now better equipped to further probe these questions.
'Rubin is going to be able to image ICL in much the same way as we did here, but it's going to do it for every single local galaxy cluster in the southern sky,' Englert said. 'What we did is just a small sliver of what Rubin is going to be able to do. It's really going to blow the study of the ICL wide open.'
Essentially, if this new image doesn't make you feel small, you might want to wait for the soon-to-come Rubin versions of this image. In fact, if Englert is right, we'll be seeing multiple versions of this image, and in higher resolution, too. So, for better or worse, we humans will only get smaller from here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
‘Battle of the Big Bang' Review: A Question of Origins
In the 1920s, scientists discovered that the universe was not static in size, as had previously been assumed, but was expanding in all directions. Galaxies were rushing away from one another as the very space between them was stretching. It was tempting, therefore, to imagine running the film backward into the past. The expansion, it seemed, must have started somewhere: at an infinitely hot, infinitely small and infinitely dense point from which everything exploded some 13.8 billion years ago. This origin became known as the big bang, and that infinitely small point at which it all began was called a singularity: a place where all the known laws of physics break down. Time was purportedly created only at the moment of banging, so it made no sense to ask what came before the big bang, just as it makes no sense to ask what is north of the North Pole. Why it happened at all remained an awkward question, but the existence of such an inscrutable singularity at the birth of all things became the mainstream view. It might be surprising, then, to learn that few experts in the field hold this view anymore. The traditional picture of the big bang is actually two separate ideas, explain Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Halper in 'Battle of the Big Bang: The New Tales of Our Cosmic Origins.' Researchers continue to endorse the hot big bang, the idea of a primordial explosion of energy, but most do not think it goes back to 'a state of infinite density where time stands still and the answers to all our origin questions meet their demise.' Mr. Afshordi is a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Waterloo in Canada; Mr. Halper is a fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society and the creator of the YouTube series 'Before the Big Bang.' Their excellent book promises to map the 'quiet revolution' of 21st-century cosmology and introduce us to the revolutionaries. In very different ways, these rebels are all addressing questions left unanswered by the old theory. One is the origin-of-structure problem: The big bang ought to have spread energy homogeneously throughout space, but we observe clumps of galaxies with vast spaces between them, and measurements of the cosmic microwave background—the fossil radiation from when the universe was only 380,000 years old—reveal an unpredictable pattern of warm and cold spots. Nor have we ever seen an inflaton, a hypothetical particle that is supposed to have driven a period of enormous growth in the size of the early universe.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
Reforming NASA: A path to Mars and beyond
Despite everything that is broken and unsettling in the world, America and our great space agency is worth fighting for — and fixing. From the moment Jared's nomination to head NASA was announced last year, the reaction from passionate space enthusiasts and professionals was overwhelmingly positive. Everyone had ideas — big, small, crazy, pragmatic and visionary. It became immediately clear that no other federal agency attracts the level of engagement NASA does. Space captivates people — us included. So, we wanted to share a few of our ideas. Please consider these thoughts just a drop in the sea of ideas that come from many knowledgeable voices who long for humankind's next giant leap. The first step to fixing a problem is admitting we have one. If NASA wants to get back to generating world-changing headlines, we must confront some difficult facts. Every president for the past 35 years has called for a return to the Moon and a path to Mars. More than $100 billion has been spent, yet the return path remains distant and uncertain. Major programs are over budget, behind schedule and often canceled. This wastes opportunities for science and discovery and undermines public confidence in NASA. Similarly, we have maintained a continuous presence in low Earth orbit (which is a great accomplishment). But we still haven't cracked the code on creating the commercial orbital economy. If we don't, humankind's future in space will forever be tethered to taxpayer funding and inefficient government spending. The federal government is entering a challenging budgetary environment. The national debt is exploding, and we can't spend our way out of it. NASA can and must do more with less. Already, NASA isn't getting the most out of its budget — whether it's $20 billion or $25 billion. The agency's leadership has often said, 'If we have 10 healthy centers and take care of people, the science will take care of itself.' By this logic, any CEO with a good human resource department should be as successful as Steve Jobs. This is ludicrous. One of leadership's current solutions to budget pressures is to reduce astronaut crew sizes and mission frequency. Meanwhile, bureaucratic positions proliferate. This is unacceptable. Astronauts — not bureaucrats — are the human identity of the agency. There are too many managers, deputies, assistants and review boards — and not enough doers. Bureaucracy is stifling innovation. The culture must return to being mission focused. We need to empower the best and brightest to make decisions and take calculated risks. Some efforts — such as exploring worlds beyond our own — involve risks worth taking. NASA has also lost its ability to inspire and excite people. The agency's storytelling is fragmented. NASA has numerous social media channels and countless small initiatives that dilute the big, bold mission the agency was established to achieve. NASA must reorganize, cut the bureaucracy and align responsibilities logically with agency priorities alongside a cultural rebirth. We should create engineering and finance strike teams that can identify inefficiencies, solve problems and fix failing programs. Of course we will also need to use what we already have. This means using the Space Launch System vehicles that are already funded to return to the Moon. This being said, Artemis II must get to the pad and launch by Christmas. To get to Mars, we must work in parallel alongside the commercial industry that is pioneering the reuseable heavy lift vehicles. NASA should support the development of reusable systems for routine deep space missions and focus agency resources on the challenges commercial industry will not be capable of solving. Ultimately, we should move beyond Space Launch System. The agency should redirect talent and resources to nuclear electric propulsion. This is the logical evolution for power, efficiency and exploration at scale with dual use potential. NASA needs a mini-Manhattan Project to get America underway on nuclear power in space. In addition to returning to the Moon and going to Mars, NASA needs to develop an industry outreach effort to prioritize high-value science and commercial work aboard the International Space Station. This incredible investment can generate economic returns. The taxpayers alone can't fund the future we all want to see in space. As we mentioned before, a strong commercial orbital economy is imperative. If NASA is operating as it should, we should be able to generate a continuous cycle of amazing scientific discovery. We all love the James Webb Space Telescope, Hubble and the Mars rovers. But we need to launch missions like these frequently. A flagship science program shouldn't have to cost a billion dollars. Administrator Dan Goldin was right. NASA should focus on lower-cost, higher-frequency missions, that accept more risk. Today's commercial space sector makes this model much more viable. This could help enable academic institutions to leverage their $1 trillion in endowments to fund their own extraordinary scientific missions. NASA can be a facilitator and partner in a new age of discovery. These are turbulent times, and budget pressures are real. But delay and defeat are not options. NASA was never meant to be a caretaker of history. The agency was built to make history. China is moving fast with bold ambitions in the ultimate high ground of space. If we fail to be the leader, we will be the follower — and we may never catch up. Jared Isaacman is an entrepreneur, pilot, and astronaut with more than 7,000 flight hours, including ratings in experimental and ex-military aircraft. He is executive chairman of Shift4 (NYSE: FOUR) and co-founder of Draken International, the world's largest private air force, supporting U.S. military pilot training. Newt Gingrich was Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995-1999 and a candidate for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. He is chairman of Gingrich 360.
WIRED
10 hours ago
- WIRED
See 6 Planets Align in the Night Sky This August
Aug 6, 2025 8:14 AM This rare planetary alignment will be visible from August 10, but will be best viewed later in the month. Here's everything you need to know to see it at its best. On August 10, six planets—Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune—will line up in an arc in the night sky. Four of these planets—Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, and Saturn—can be seen with the naked eye, while Uranus and Neptune will be visible through a very strong pair of skywatching binoculars or a backyard telescope. While August 10 marks the beginning of this planetary parade, these six planets will be visible until the final days of August, when Mercury sinks lower on the horizon and meanders too close to the sun to be observed safely. The next time that all of these planets will be visible together won't be until February 2026, so you won't want to miss this alignment. While this planetary parade starts on the 10th, the best date to view these planets is on the nights leading up to August 23, when there will be little to no moonlight and when Mercury will be at its furthest point from the sun. Moonlight and artificial light can wash out objects in the night sky, so you'll want to do your skywatching under a clear, moonless sky and away from artificial light. If you must use a flashlight, opt for one with red light to preserve your night vision. What to Expect Rising first are Neptune and Saturn, followed by Uranus, then Venus and Jupiter, and finally Mercury. Once these planets are above the horizon on August 10, if you're in the northern hemisphere, you will see Neptune and Saturn to the southwest (about 40 degrees above the horizon), followed by Uranus to the southeast (about 55 degrees above the horizon). Completing the arc in the east are Venus and Jupiter (both just over 20 degrees above the horizon) and lastly Mercury, which will just barely eke over the eastern horizon. If you're in the southern hemisphere, instead of looking south, you would look north to see these objects: Neptune and Saturn would be in the northwest, followed by Uranus in the north and slightly to the east. Venus, Jupiter, and Mercury would be slightly more to the northeast in the southern hemisphere, and they would be a few degrees lower on the horizon than in the northern hemisphere. Here's what you need to know about each of these planets and how to find them. Neptune and Saturn First, Neptune and Saturn rise together between about 8:30 pm and 10 pm local time in many locations in both hemispheres. The exact times that the planets rise and set will vary depending on your exact location; you can use websites like Time and Date to find exact times. Neptune and Saturn will remain together until they set in midmorning. They will appear slightly to the west of the moon, under the constellation Pisces. Saturn is very bright and easily visible to the naked eye. You can spot Saturn's marvellous rings with a pair of skywatching binoculars or a backyard telescope. Seeing Saturn's rings for the first time is one of the most awe-inspiring moments you can have when stargazing. You can also spot Saturn's largest moon, Titan, through a powerful pair of binoculars or a backyard telescope. Titan's name refers to its mammoth size: It's the second largest moon in our solar system and is actually larger than the planet Mercury. Neptune, however, is more difficult to spot. You'll need a powerful backyard telescope to see it, or perhaps a very powerful pair of skywatching binoculars. Because the moon will initially be so bright and so near to Neptune, conditions won't be ideal to see this planet on the 10th. The most ideal time to view Neptune will be the week centering on the New Moon on August 23, when there will be minimal to no moonlight to wash out the planets. On this night, the planets will rise a few minutes earlier than they will on August 10, and Saturn and Neptune will still appear to be just a couple of degrees apart, with Neptune being slightly above Saturn. Uranus Uranus rises between about 11:45 pm and 12:45 am local time in most locations in the northern hemisphere and upper part of the southern hemisphere. In very southern latitudes, you may not see Uranus until 1:30 to 2:30 am. You will need a powerful pair of binoculars or a powerful backyard telescope to see Uranus. Through a telescope, it looks like a star or a faint pale blue disc. Although Uranus has vertical rings, they are too faint to see through amateur stargazing equipment. Because the moon will be so bright on August 10, plan to observe this planet on August 23 when there will be little to no moonlight. Uranus will be positioned just under the star cluster Pleiades. If you're not able to catch Uranus with your binoculars or telescope, the Pleiades are well worth observing: This stunning star cluster contains seven very bright, well-known stars along with thousands of other dimmer or indistinguishable stars all grouped together. Jupiter and Venus Jupiter and Venus will rise between 2:30 am and 3:30 am local time in the northern hemisphere. In the southern hemisphere, you'll have to wait until about 4:00 to 5:30 am to see these two planets. Again, you can check Time and Date to see the times in your city. They will be slightly less than 1 degree apart, since they are almost at conjunction, sharing the same right ascension (the celestial version of longitude), meaning they're basically in the same position on an east-west axis. They will actually reach conjunction on the following night, August 11–12. Jupiter and Venus will be in the constellation Gemini. These two planets will be very easy to spot since they are the two brightest. You can easily see them with the naked eye; however, you won't want to miss viewing them with a backyard telescope or pair of skywatching binoculars. Jupiter's awe-inspiring cloud bands—including its famed Red Spot, a massive storm—are visible through binoculars or a telescope. However, because Jupiter rotates on its axis every 10 hours, observing its Red Spot can be tricky. The Red Spot is easiest to see when it crosses Jupiter's meridian, the imaginary line that connects the planet's north and south poles when viewing it. You can use this tool from Sky & Telescope to find the times when the Red Spot crosses or 'transits' the meridian from your vantage point. With the aid of skywatching equipment, you'll also be able to see Jupiter's four most prominent moons—Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto—which were discovered by Galileo in 1610. Skywatching equipment also reveals awe-inspiring details on Venus: Like the Moon, Venus has phases—full, gibbous, quarter, crescent, and new. However, unlike the moon's phases, Venus's phases aren't visible to the naked eye. Because Venus appears to be so small, you need a pair of binoculars or a telescope to view them. Look out for a crescent Venus in the night sky. Mercury Mercury rises last, between 4:30 and 5:30 am local time in most locations in the northern hemisphere and parts of the southern hemisphere. However, Mercury will rise around 6:30 am in more southern latitudes. It will be low on the horizon, so you'll want to observe this planet from a very flat area without trees or other obstructions in the east. Although Mercury will join this planetary parade on the 10th, the best window to see it is August 18 through 23, when there will be the most time between Mercury's rise and sunrise. During this window, there will be about an hour and a half between the time that Mercury rises and the sun comes up. This is down to Mercury reaching its greatest western elongation—its furthest point to the west of the sun—on August 19. Because you have such a narrow window of time to observe Mercury, you'll want to check Time and Date or the skywatching app Stellarium to see the most accurate times for sunrise and Mercury's rise in your location. Plan on observing Mercury just as it ekes over the horizon before sunrise when you have the most darkness possible. A word of caution, however: Don't use binoculars or a telescope to view Mercury, as it's too close to the sun—you don't want to risk accidentally pointing your equipment into the sun and damaging your eyes. Never stare at the sun with the naked eye, either. Use your best judgement about when to stop skywatching before the sky gets too bright. While Mercury will leave this planetary parade in the final days of August, when it sinks lower and lower on the horizon toward the sun, the other planets will still remain visible in the night sky, so you will have many nights of enjoyable skywatching ahead.
