'Russian spy', 65, planned to tell Moscow about former defence secretary Sir Grant Shapps' private plane, home address, and phone number, court hears
Howard Phillips, 65, from Harlow in Essex, is on trial over allegedly intending to assist the spy network by helping people he believed were agents working for Moscow.
Prosecutors allege Phillips was 'very keen' to develop a relationship with undercover officers he believed were Russian agents, known as 'Dima' and 'Sasha', Winchester Crown Court heard.
It is alleged Phillips, who was unemployed at the time, told the 'agents' he held personal information about Sir Grant, including his phone number and details of his private plane.
He was said to have carried out various tasks for 'Dima' and 'Sasha' in exchange for payment because he was 'struggling financially'.
'That appears to have been a very significant factor in his eagerness and desire to provide assistance to the RIS,' prosecutor Jocelyn Ledward KC told jurors as she opened the case on Wednesday.
'The evidence shows he was very keen to offer assistance, not necessarily for any ideological reason, or because he sympathised with the Russian state but particularly to be financially rewarded for so doing...easy work for easy money.'
Phillips did not know the 'agents' were role players, Ms Ledward KC told jurors.
'He thought and understood them to be Russian agents,' Ms Ledward said.
'They were Russian agents with whom the defendant was very keen to develop a relationship - he was also very keen to provide assistance to them in various imaginative ways of his own devising.'
She added: 'Had the defendant succeeded in any or all of what he had intended to do, any or all of these acts could have had very serious consequences indeed.'
Jurors were told Phillips first disguised himself to the 'agents', purporting to be a 'David Marshall', but later told them his identity.
The court heard he told the 'agents' on WhatsApp that he was 'semi-retired but with connections in high places. Living in Hertfordshire'.
Jurors heard Phillips told 'Dima' and 'Sasha' that he had personal details about Sir Grant, including his phone number and details of his private plane.
Ms Ledward told jurors Phillips met with one or both of the 'agents' in person, including once at a Costa at Lakeside Retail Park, in West Thurrock, Essex, last May 9.
'During this meeting, the defendant revealed... he held personal details about the then-UK secretary of state for defence, including his home address,' she said.
'The defendant explained that he had met Grant Shapps and had visited his house.'
The court heard that at that meeting, Phillips was given £500 in cash to get a phone for the agents and book them a hotel.
It is alleged Phillips intended to assist Russian agents from the end of 2023 until last May.
Jurors heard that Phillips applied for a job at the UK Border Force as a part time Border Force officer in October 2023.
Prosecutors say that by March last year, he was in communication with 'Dima' and 'Sasha' by email, later WhatsApp.
Then on April 4 that year he allegedly left the 'agents' a USB on the exposed seat shaft of a bike in London, near St Pancras and Euston stations, the court heard.
Ms Ledward told jurors Phillips told 'Dima' and 'Sasha' about 'the services he was willing to provide' on the USB, in a document saying: 'If a foreign power had someone on the outside, totally hidden, completely secret, who moves easily in society, anywhere on any level and can completely blend in as an upstanding citizen locally or tourist in any worldwide location, that would prove invaluable to a foreign entity in ensuring discretion of movement.'
The document continued: 'The question is, if such a person can act for you at any time, with 100 per cent loyalty and dedication, no questions asked by anyone on any level, do you consider that such a person could prove invaluable to you?'
Ms Ledward told jurors Phillips made a reference to the fact that he was in the process of getting government security clearance by applying for the border force role.
She told the court that last April 26, Phillips met 'Sasha' and 'Dima' at a hired meeting apartment in London Bridge hotel to 'articulate specifically what he could offer to the RIS'.
In an audio recording played to the court, which prosecutors said was from the meeting at the hotel, Phillips is alleged to have said: 'I've worked 9-5 in offices all my life, I want to be doing something different.'
It is alleged Phillips was asked why he picked Russia, and in the audio said: 'I have only been once, I feel that over many, many years there has been a lot of discredit accorded towards Russia and I think a lot of it is absolute rubbish.'
The court heard Phillips told the 'agents' at the meeting that he was 'motivated by financial gain' and 'wanted to be financially independent from the UK'.
Jurors heard he told agents he would be able to provide logistical support in the UK, such as transport and booking hotel rooms.
After that meeting, Phillips and the 'agents' began communicating on messaging platform Signal, jurors were told.
Prosecutors claim the 65-year-old did not withdraw his border force application 'as he came more deeply involved with what he believed were actual RIS agents'.
'The defendant no doubt believed, or certainly came to realise, the prosecution say, that working at a government agency such as the Border Force and the security clearance that came with it, would give him access to information that he could later provide to a foreign intelligence service,' Ms Ledward told jurors.
Jurors heard Phillips created a document containing Sir Grant's personal details on May 16 last year, and met with 'Sasha' in London that day to take instructions and collect cash for a task he was given.
He was arrested by plain clothed officers that afternoon in a coffee shop near King's Cross station, the court heard.
Phillips denies the charge of engaging in conduct to assist a foreign intelligence service, in breach of the National Security Act, and the trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
As the true scale of the involvement of South Yorkshire Police officers in the Rotherham grooming gangs scandal is revealed, one victim - just 14 at the time - tells her horrific story
With its dirty net curtains, black plastic door and stench of stale air, Elizabeth Harper will never forget the flat in which she was held in Rotherham for ten long weeks in 2004. Nor will she forget the steady stream of male strangers who were allowed into the fetid bedroom to systematically rape and abuse her.
Sky News
39 minutes ago
- Sky News
One year ago, a furious mob rioted in Rotherham. Locals fear another outbreak of violence
A year has passed, but Paris and Josh still cannot quite believe what they witnessed last August. They live 200m from a hotel on the edge of a quiet residential street. "It looked like a modern-day lynching," Paris says. It's the only way she can describe the sickening scene that unfolded as a furious mob tried to attack asylum seekers being housed in the Holiday Inn Express north of Rotherham. 1:40 After seeing masked men setting fires and storming into the hotel, Paris says she was afraid they were going to see "either someone getting thrown out a window, or someone getting dragged outside". Josh remembers looking out of his bedroom window and thinking: "What is England coming to? What is going on?" "It was like they were going to a festival," Paris says. "They had ski masks on and bags full of alcohol, people were taking the kids, like they had the kids on their shoulders." To protect their car, Josh drove it off his driveway to another street nearby. They then retreated inside and watched six or seven hours of chaos unfold. It was one of the most serious outbursts of rioting during a week last August when disorder spread through towns and cities. Days after the knife attack which left three school girls dead in Southport, years of deep-rooted frustration about immigration boiled over. Twelve months on, the Holiday Inn Express next to Josh and Paris' home has reopened as a regular hotel, but the tension that has been seen around other migrant hotels recently hasn't disappeared. "I still see in groups (online) all this hate being spilled," Josh says. "I think it probably could happen again," Paris adds. "That's the faith I have in the country, really." The courts have handed out lengthy prison sentences to those involved in the disorder, leading to rows about whether they match the crimes people committed. The mayor of South Yorkshire says tensions over immigration remain unresolved and told Sky News he believes migrants, hotel workers or police officers could have been killed last August. "Had they [rioters] been more effective at doing some of the things they were trying to do, we would have seen people dying on the day," Oliver Coppard says. "What it speaks to, in my mind, is the poverty that we see in some of our communities, which feeds a sense of grievance." Mr Coppard - who has responsibility for policing in South Yorkshire - added: "Ultimately what we need in this country is a better approach to cohesion, to community integration so people are supported to live full lives within our communities and a proper and legal approach to asylum. "Those things are incredibly toxic and politics is not doing a good job I think of dealing with those issues." Protests around other migrant hotels in recent weeks show that the grievances of last summer still hang in the air. In Rotherham market we meet 23-year-old scaffolder Josh. "I don't think it has been solved," he says. When I asked him how that makes people feel, he replies: "Angry because it makes people want to riot again." He says he has no issue with people who move to the UK legally to work, but adds it is "unfair" when people arrive on small boats and receive hotel accommodation while their asylum cases are processed. Gabriel, 38, who was born in Rotherham, says he feels people look at him differently since last summer's disorder. "I couldn't see anybody smiling at me like they used to before the riot, they are putting every minority in the same box which is wrong," he says. "There is still a bit of aftermath, anger, rage, upset - in everybody's eyes. "That tension alone is worse than the actual incident because before, I think, it was hidden but now it is out there." A woman who didn't want to be named says: "The backlash is going to happen with the government against the people - the people against the government, it is not right. "The way I see it, we all have to live together ... we bleed the same blood, we breathe the same air." That spirit of conciliation and tolerance is less common than it once was - it is a hallmark of a failed immigration system that has left deep-rooted frustration in communities across the UK.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Mother of Baby P would pose a 'high risk' if she was ever around children once freed, parole board warns
Baby P's monster mother could pose a high risk if she were freed and allowed near children, experts fear. Tracey Connelly's toddler son died at home in Tottenham, north London, on August 3, 2007, and she pleaded guilty to causing or allowing the death of a child in 2008. The 43-year-old launched a fresh bid for freedom earlier this year after she was sent back to jail for breaching licence conditions. But in a judgement ordering that a two-day parole hearing is heard in public, the Parole Board said it will assess whether her risk of violence remains low, The Mirror reports. 'But risk would be high and potentially imminent if she were to have access to children while other risk factors are present', the judgement said. 'Miss Connelly, in interview, has stated that she will not be seeking unconditional release due to the support she would lose'. Documents also claim she suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and was subjected to 'bullying and aggression' after her recall to prison. Her solicitor had fought for the upcoming parole hearing to be held in private. The report states: 'He submits that a public hearing will only exacerbate these issues and will have a significant and detrimental effect upon Ms Connelly's ability to five effective and accurate evidence at the hearing'. The disgraced mother was hauled back to jail in September for breaching her jail conditions and was promised an oral parole hearing. She was handed an indefinite sentence with a minimum term of five years in 2009, after covering up her 17-month-old son Peter's injuries caused by her twister lover. Connelly has struggled to stay out of trouble since her initial release in 2013, having repeatedly breached licence conditions. The vile mum was first recalled to prison in 20155 after selling naked photos of herself online to depraved male admirers - and was released again in July 2022. It was revealed back in April that she may be free again by the end of the year. A date has not yet been set for her parole hearing, but it is believed it will take place around late summer - in August or September. The parole board could decide to release her there and then, depending on the circumstances surrounding how she was recalled and her behaviour since. They may also direct a hearing to take place, where a panel will decide after assessing various pieces of material, evidence and information. Connelly previously claimed that cops over-reacted when they recalled her to prison for a second time, saying the breaches of her licence conditions were minimal. Her lawyers have also insisted she is no longer a danger to the public. Connelly's lover Steven Barker was jailed in 2009 for a minimum of 12 years while his brother, Jason Owen, received a six-year jail sentence for allowing the toddler to die. When Connolly was first released, she was made subject to 20 licence conditions, including having to wear an electronic tag and disclose all her relationships, having her internet use monitored or obeying curfew. She was also banned from going to certain places to 'avoid contact with victims and to protect children'. The Parole Board said that she had been cleared due to a low risk of reoffending and that probation officers and prison officials supported the plan. It will now be a matter for the Board to decide if the latest breach of her conditions was so serious that she should not be released. A Parole Board spokesperson said back in April: 'It's been directed to an oral hearing now but no hearing date has been set yet.'
