M'sian students rethink study plans in the US
PETALING JAYA: Malaysian students are reconsidering their plans to pursue higher education in the United States, following policy changes introduced by the Trump administration.
Their uncertainty came amid reports that US state secretary Marco Rubio has told US embassies to stop scheduling interviews for student visas as the country prepares to expand social media vetting of these applicants.
The suspension is reported to be temporary and does not apply to applicants whose visa interviews have been lined up.
This news came following Trump's bid on May 22 to block Harvard University's ability to enrol international students. Although this move has since been temporarily blocked by a US judge, the latest state of affairs has caused concerns among prospective students like Karen Tay Swee Ping.
Maya Devi, 18
Tay, 25, said the current situation had disrupted her postgraduate study plans, leaving her unsure of how to proceed with her application. She said she had initially wanted to pursue a master's degree in chemistry in the United States, but had since decided to look elsewhere.
'An extended pause like this doesn't just affect travel – it affects enrolment timelines, scholarship applications and accommodation plans. Everything gets pushed back.
'I've started exploring other options like Taiwan, Singapore and local universities,' she said.
Maya Devi (pic), 18, who aspired to study international business law at Harvard, said the unpredictability of the situation had made her less confident about pursuing higher education in the United States.
'Malaysia itself offers a wide range of courses in many prestigious universities, so after some contemplation, I would much rather study here,' she said.
Another prospective student, Mandy Lim Yie Zhen, 25, said she had planned to study in the United States to gain global exposure in the field of marine biology.
'But after the recent political shifts, everything feels unstable and unpredictable. It's risky to invest so much when the future is so uncertain. I'm considering Australia and Singapore instead,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Tariffs tarnishing jeweller's shine
PANDORA, the world's largest jewellery company, is based in Denmark and has nearly 500 stores in the United States, more than any of its other key markets. But in some ways, its real home is Thailand, where the company has been making its products for nearly four decades. Like many global corporations, Pandora's continent-crossing supply chain has allowed it to sell its goods worldwide at a low cost. That supply chain became a grave weakness in April when US President Donald Trump said he would impose 36% tariffs on goods entering the United States from Thailand, alongside steep tariffs on dozens of other countries. After Trump unveiled his 'reciprocal tariffs', Pandora's shares were among the worst performing in Europe. Later, Trump postponed those tariffs until early July, offering a reprieve. But the threat looms, and Alexander Lacik (pic), CEO of Pandora, is not expecting the uncertainty that is paralysing businesses to end. Unless tariffs return to previous levels, the next year will be turbulent, he said in an interview. For now, he added, there is little to do but wait to see how investors, customers and competitors react. 'With the information at hand today, I would be crazy to make big strategic decisions,' Lacik said. Alongside business leaders all over the world, Lacik is grappling with how to respond to Trump's unpredictable policies, which have generated almost maddening uncertainty. Lacik says he is not expecting the uncertainty paralysing businesses to end unless tariffs returned to previous levels. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times The Trump administration has started to show a willingness to lower tariffs, but his first agreements, with Britain and China, have posed more questions than answers, and tariffs are still higher than they were a couple of months ago. Although some aspects of the trade war have been suspended, Pandora and other multinationals are in limbo, waiting for more agreements to be finalised. Pandora, best known for its silver charm bracelets, has been making jewellery in Thailand since 1989. Across three factories, thousands of people handcraft the products. The company is building a fourth plant in Vietnam, but Trump has also threatened tariffs on Vietnamese goods. Last year, the company sold 113 million pieces of jewellery, about three items every second, making it the largest jewellery brand by volume, with stores in more than 100 countries. A third of Pandora's sales, US$1.4bil, was generated in the United States and Lacik said he had no intention of moving away from the company's most profitable market. But prices will rise, he said, and who will bear the brunt of that is unclear. 'The big question is, am I going to pass on everything to the US consumer, or am I going to peanut butter it out and raise the whole Pandora pricing globally?' Lacik said. Jewellery by Pandora being worn by a model at a promotional event in Los Angeles. — Jenna Schoenefeld/The New York Times But Pandora keeps several months' worth of stock, giving him time to see how other jewellers change their pricing and then decide. A few things can be done immediately, such as streamlining parts of the supply chain. The day after the reciprocal tariffs were announced, Pandora said that it would change its distribution so that products sold in Canada and Latin America would no longer move through the company's distribution hub in Baltimore, a process that would take six to nine months to complete. Moving production into the United States is not being considered, in part because of higher labour costs. Pandora employs nearly 15,000 craftspeople in Thailand and expects to hire 7,000 more in Vietnam. In an earnings report last month, the company estimated the cost of the trade war. If higher tariffs go back into effect, they would cost Pandora US$74mil this year, and then US$135mil annually after that. But the jeweller is not panicking. In fact, the economic curveballs are starting to feel normal, Lacik said. 'We are battle ready,' he added. When he joined the company as the CEO in 2019, Pandora was struggling. Its share price had dropped more than 70% from its peak three years earlier. Lacik instituted a 'complete overhaul', he said, with new branding and store designs, an emphasis on its 'affordable luxury' label and showcasing its complete jewellery line, not just charms. That prepared the company for the trials that hit the global economy next. First, the Covid-19 pandemic, when 15,000 store employees were sent home, and some factory workers slept on cots to keep production going. Then, a surge in inflation risked customers pulling back. Lacik's strategy appeared to be working. In January, Pandora's share price reached a record high. Since then, however, it has dropped more than 20% as it shields itself from some of the trade turmoil. — ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
America's cold shoulder to foreign students is worrying Asia
The Harvard Students for Freedom rally in support of international students at the Harvard University campus in Boston recently. The US government said it intends to cancel most foreign student visas. — AFP AN Ivy League degree has long been central to the Asian Dream – a ticket to success and status. But President Donald Trump's message to international students is clear: Far fewer of you are welcome. The blunt statement and growing chaos across the university sector has left families wondering if sending their children to America is still worth it. The White House's immediate target is Chinese students allegedly connected to the Communist Party. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said the United States plans to start 'aggressively' revoking their visas. Students affected would include 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' The US will also enhance scrutiny 'of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added. It's unclear how these rules will be executed; the move follows a short period of improved ties between the superpowers after they agreed to a truce in the trade war. China's Foreign Ministry has expressed its dissatisfaction, saying it had lodged a protest with the US. The impact is wider than Washington and Beijing's geopolitical rivalry. The decision to ban Harvard from enrolling international students is focusing minds in Asia, even though a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy. Many families are wondering if other universities will be next. The rhetoric coming out of the White House is hardly reassuring. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump had said. Students of other universities protesting in support of international students at Harvard University. — Bloomberg This attitude, combined with a directive ordering US embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas sends a chilling message to Asian students: The Ivy aspiration is no longer as accessible as it once was. The worries are pouring in on my parent chat groups. Many have already spent thousands of dollars preparing children for a future at a prestigious American university – hiring expensive college counsellors, visiting campuses, and investing countless hours navigating complex application processes. That's not to mention time spent on preparing for standardised tests and extracurricular activities, all in an effort to perfect the profile for a prospective candidate. There are also legitimate concerns about what happens to deposits and scholarships, all of which are up in the air as students and their families figure out what the new rules mean for them. It's no small cost. An average American degree can set an international student's family back approximately US$100,000 (RM42,300) over four years, excluding living costs. An Ivy League degree? It's more than triple that. Parents spend decades making sacrifices and putting aside the massive investment required to help their kids go to their dream university. The money is worth it, the thinking goes, because eventually their child will reap the rewards. The schools get something out of this, too. Foreign applicants are more likely to pay full tuition, essentially subsidising American students who receive aid. Over a million international students studied in American universities in the 2023-2024 school year, according to data from Open Doors, an information resource for foreign students studying or teaching in the US. Asians made up a significant proportion, with Indians and Chinese citizens accounting for over half. America is not going to lose its appeal overnight. It's still a coveted place to study, both because of its world-class tertiary education and the potential to find lucrative employment after graduation. But other countries are becoming more attractive because of the Trump administration's crackdown. Some parents I've spoken to will simply go elsewhere. Canada and the United Kingdom, already popular alternatives, are poised to scoop up disillusioned applicants. Closer to home, Australia and New Zealand are also promoting their schools. Asian universities that offer top-tier programs will appeal to anxious Asian families. Schools such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, and Malaysia's Sunway University are offering credit transfers and other incentives to attract ambitious students and families looking for quality education without the uncertainties tied to American foreign policy. For many Asian students who have dreamt of studying and working in cities like New York or Los Angeles, the political gyrations affecting their futures are no doubt disappointing. But this is about more than visas and policies. It's about the hopes of a generation searching for a place to study, grow, and build their future. Trump has just made the US seem like a far less inviting option. — Bloomberg Opinion/TNS Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Does the US ‘need' Canada?
US President Donald Trump had one big question on his mind as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney headed to Washington last month. 'I very much want to work with him, but cannot understand one simple TRUTH,' Trump said in a social media post, reiterating several ways he believes Canada benefits unfairly from its trade relationship with the United States. The president also repeated his incorrect claim that the United States is 'subsidising' Canada to the tune of US$200bil, alluding to the country's trade deficit with Canada, which is the value of what the United States imports minus its exports. In fact, the trade deficit last year was US$63.3bil, according to US data. And if Canada's energy exports were stripped out, it turns into a trade surplus. For Trump, it all boils down to one point: does the United States need Canada? 'We don't need their cars, we don't need their energy, we don't need their lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship,' he said in the social media post. But industry groups say differently. The auto industries in Canada and the United States have become highly interconnected over the past three decades – especially between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, the busiest commercial crossing along the border – as the countries knocked down trade barriers. In 2023, the US imported about 1.24 million vehicles from Canada, the fourth-highest tally behind Mexico, Japan and South Korea. The US is the world's top oil producer, but its refineries rely on crude oil, a variety that Canada specialises in extracting. Retooling US refineries to eliminate the need for crude oil would cost billions and companies are not willing to make those investments, especially because of the uncertainty over Trump's trade policies. Besides oil, Canada in 2023 supplied nearly 100% of the natural gas and 85% of the electrical energy imported by the US, according to Canada's energy regulator. Canada also provides more than one-fourth of the uranium the United States imports to run nuclear reactors, federal data shows, more than any other nation. Howard Lutnick, the US Commerce Secretary, is investigating whether lumber imports are a threat to national security. In 2021, the United States purchased US$28bil worth of lumber from Canada, nearly half of lumber imports. American industry groups have estimated that the tariffs on lumber that Trump has introduced will increase home costs by an average of about US$9,000. For now, the US lumber industry cannot meet the demand from homebuilders, according to a recent analysis by Fastmarkets, and it would take the country at least 10 years to whittle down its need for imported lumber. Farmers this year were reminded of the US agriculture industry's reliance on Canadian imports of key chemical ingredients used in fertiliser, like potassium-rich minerals called potash. The United States imports 85% of its potash from Canada, which is the world's largest exporter of the minerals. But Trump's tariffs on Canada will make potash more expensive for farmers to import and the increases could be passed down to grocery store shoppers, according to the Fertilizer Institute, a US industry group. Trump says the US needs Canada's friendship. Many Canadians say forget about it. The usually warm relationship between the two countries is in tatters, with Canada invoking a defensive tactic used in hockey – 'elbows up' – as its posture against Trump's economic attacks and threats to make Canada a US state. Toronto residents Douglas Bloomfield (right) and son Phoenix holding a Canadian flag and an ice hockey stick in front of the White House as a protest against US tariffs. — AP Canadians have taken to boycotting American-made products and shirking summer travel to the US, with the number of flights scheduled to the country from Canada down by 21%, a New York Times analysis shows. — ©2025 New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times
