
Does the US ‘need' Canada?
US President Donald Trump had one big question on his mind as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney headed to Washington last month.
'I very much want to work with him, but cannot understand one simple TRUTH,' Trump said in a social media post, reiterating several ways he believes Canada benefits unfairly from its trade relationship with the United States.
The president also repeated his incorrect claim that the United States is 'subsidising' Canada to the tune of US$200bil, alluding to the country's trade deficit with Canada, which is the value of what the United States imports minus its exports.
In fact, the trade deficit last year was US$63.3bil, according to US data. And if Canada's energy exports were stripped out, it turns into a trade surplus.
For Trump, it all boils down to one point: does the United States need Canada?
'We don't need their cars, we don't need their energy, we don't need their lumber, we don't need ANYTHING they have, other than their friendship,' he said in the social media post.
But industry groups say differently.
The auto industries in Canada and the United States have become highly interconnected over the past three decades – especially between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, the busiest commercial crossing along the border – as the countries knocked down trade barriers.
In 2023, the US imported about 1.24 million vehicles from Canada, the fourth-highest tally behind Mexico, Japan and South Korea.
The US is the world's top oil producer, but its refineries rely on crude oil, a variety that Canada specialises in extracting.
Retooling US refineries to eliminate the need for crude oil would cost billions and companies are not willing to make those investments, especially because of the uncertainty over Trump's trade policies.
Besides oil, Canada in 2023 supplied nearly 100% of the natural gas and 85% of the electrical energy imported by the US, according to Canada's energy regulator.
Canada also provides more than one-fourth of the uranium the United States imports to run nuclear reactors, federal data shows, more than any other nation.
Howard Lutnick, the US Commerce Secretary, is investigating whether lumber imports are a threat to national security.
In 2021, the United States purchased US$28bil worth of lumber from Canada, nearly half of lumber imports.
American industry groups have estimated that the tariffs on lumber that Trump has introduced will increase home costs by an average of about US$9,000.
For now, the US lumber industry cannot meet the demand from homebuilders, according to a recent analysis by Fastmarkets, and it would take the country at least 10 years to whittle down its need for imported lumber.
Farmers this year were reminded of the US agriculture industry's reliance on Canadian imports of key chemical ingredients used in fertiliser, like potassium-rich minerals called potash.
The United States imports 85% of its potash from Canada, which is the world's largest exporter of the minerals.
But Trump's tariffs on Canada will make potash more expensive for farmers to import and the increases could be passed down to grocery store shoppers, according to the Fertilizer Institute, a US industry group.
Trump says the US needs Canada's friendship.
Many Canadians say forget about it.
The usually warm relationship between the two countries is in tatters, with Canada invoking a defensive tactic used in hockey – 'elbows up' – as its posture against Trump's economic attacks and threats to make Canada a US state.
Toronto residents Douglas Bloomfield (right) and son Phoenix holding a Canadian flag and an ice hockey stick in front of the White House as a protest against US tariffs. — AP
Canadians have taken to boycotting American-made products and shirking summer travel to the US, with the number of flights scheduled to the country from Canada down by 21%, a New York Times analysis shows. — ©2025 New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
U.S. tariff hikes to slow Lithuania's economic growth by 0.36 to 0.82 pp: economist
VILNIUS, June 10 (Xinhua) -- The combination of falling external demand and heightened uncertainty caused by the U.S. tariff hikes could shave 0.36 to 0.82 percentage points off Lithuania's economic growth this year, according to an economist from the Bank of Lithuania. Kasparas Vasiliauskas, an economist at the central bank, said on Tuesday that the impact on Lithuania comes through both direct and indirect channels, with the latter playing a more substantial role due to the country's deep integration into global supply chains. "The United States is Lithuania's most important non-European Union (EU) export market, and its significance has been steadily increasing," Vasiliauskas said. "Higher U.S. tariffs raise the cost of Lithuanian goods in the American market, reducing their competitiveness and potentially leading to lower demand and turnover." He explained that while bilateral trade is affected directly, the broader concern stems from Lithuania's role in producing intermediate goods and services for EU manufacturers. These are often incorporated into final products destined for the U.S. market. "Even if the final goods are not exported directly from Lithuania, the added value generated here is exposed to risk through indirect trade links," Vasiliauskas noted. Lithuania's key trading partners, such as Germany, Sweden, Denmark, and the United Kingdom, are major exporters to the U.S. and are likely to see reduced demand due to the new tariff hikes. This, in turn, could lead to lower demand for Lithuanian inputs, hitting exports, business revenues, and overall gross domestic product (GDP), he explained. "The extent of the economic impact varies based on different tariff scenarios modeled," Vasiliauskas added.


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
With Marines, Guard deployment up, protests against U.S. ICE spread to other cities
NEW YORK, June 10 (Xinhua) -- The standoff between the White House and California Governor Gavin Newsom seemed to escalate on Tuesday, even as protests in downtown Los Angeles appeared to quiet overnight. Newsom responded to the Trump administration's order to deploy 700 active-duty Marines and 2,000 additional National Guard troops by pledging to file a second lawsuit and "surging" 800 additional state and local law enforcement officers to the region. President Donald Trump ordered the mobilization of 2,000 more California National Guard troops on Monday night, in addition to the 2,100 already activated over the weekend. Hours earlier, the Pentagon mobilized 700 active-duty Marines for deployment to the Los Angeles area. Newsom said Monday he would challenge the legality of the Marines' deployment, criticizing it on social media as a "blatant abuse of power." Trump on Tuesday continued to defend his decision to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles, reviving attacks on Democratic leaders in California and invoking the wildfires that devastated the city earlier this year. "If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now," Trump wrote on his Truth Social network. As the federal response to the protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles escalates, demonstrators in San Francisco, New York, Philadelphia, Austin and other cities across the United States are also rallying against immigration raids. In San Francisco, police said they detained "multiple" people around midnight after two small groups of demonstrators splintered off from "overwhelmingly peaceful" protests and committed acts of vandalism, said The Washington Post. Thousands of people marched for miles Monday night before police declared an unlawful assembly around 10 p.m. A contingent that refused to disperse appeared to resist arrest, and were met with force by San Francisco police. Meanwhile, people gathered near the Independence Hall in Philadelphia on Monday to protest the deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles and the detainment of union leader David Huerta. In New York City, an anti-ICE protest was staged outside the Ted Weiss Federal Building with police officers maintaining their presence at the scene on Monday. A protest took place at the Texas State Capitol in downtown Austin on Monday, with organizers saying this was in solidarity with the protests taking place in Los Angeles. "Activists are calling for an end to the Trump administration's crackdowns on illegal immigration," reported FOX7 about the developments. "The protests against the Trump administration's immigration policies that started in Los Angeles have spread to at least two dozen cities, including San Francisco, Dallas, Austin and New York City," said The New York Times. These solidarity demonstrations on Monday were largely contained and peaceful, although some skirmishes broke out between protesters and law enforcement officers as night fell, it noted. In Dallas, about 400 protesters gathered on the edge of downtown. The demonstration began peacefully but brief skirmishes later occurred between protesters and the police, it added.


The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
US Justice Department 'weaponization' reviews spark calls to drop prosecutions
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -As the federal public corruption prosecution of former Tennessee House Speaker Glen Casada neared trial this spring, his lawyers made one last effort to kill the case, by petitioning senior Justice Department officials that it was "weaponization," according to three people familiar with the matter. Under President Donald Trump, the department in February created a "Weaponization Working Group" meant to identify improper politically motivated cases, a response to what the Republican says without evidence was the misuse of prosecutorial resources against him under his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden. In court filings, prosecutors said that Casada's lawyers met with a senior Justice Department official on March 24, where they alleged the "Deep State" had initiated a "weaponized" prosecution and they sought dismissal of the charges. The plan almost worked, according to three people familiar with the matter. With the Deputy Attorney General's office poised to kill the case, prosecutors in the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section pushed back, reviewing their evidence with the higher-ups, the sources said, adding that the Nashville U.S. Attorney's office and the Criminal Division also supported the case. The request was rejected the next week, according to court filings. Both Casada and the DOJ declined to comment. The case is among at least seven Reuters identified where defense attorneys or Justice Department officials have sought to have prosecutions reviewed for possible dismissal, citing Trump's "weaponization" argument or making other arguments about weaknesses in the cases. In a Tuesday speech, Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew Galeotti urged defense attorneys to be "conscientious about what, when and how" they appeal prosecutors' decisions. "Seeking premature relief, mischaracterizing prosecutorial conduct, or otherwise failing to be an honest broker actively undermines our system," Galeotti said. The increase in lobbying started not long after the Weaponization Working Group was created, and after the department's February decision to dismiss criminal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, six sources familiar with the dynamic told Reuters. To date, the Adams case is the only one to be dismissed over 'weaponization,' three of those sources told Reuters. The lobbying wave comes as the Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, reduced the size of its foreign bribery unit and advised department attorneys that tax enforcement is "not a priority," two of the people familiar with the matter said. A department spokesman said the DOJ will "continue to enforce our nation's tax laws." Trump has said the changes are necessary to root out Justice Department lawyers he derides as 'hacks and radicals' for prosecuting him and some supporters while he was out of power. NEW GROUP HAS BROAD REMIT The working group is empowered to review any 'civil or criminal enforcement authority of the United States' exercised under Biden. A lawyer for Robert Burke, a former Navy admiral who was convicted in May on bribery charges, wrote to the department ahead of trial raising concerns about witness credibility, which failed to convince prosecutors to drop the case. Now the lawyer, Tim Parlatore -- a former Trump defense lawyer -- plans to seek a pardon. "I would be crazy not to at least inquire about a pardon," Parlatore said. Another example is a case involving billionaire Britannia Financial Group founder Julio Martín Herrera-Velutini, who is facing an August trial alongside Puerto Rico's former governor on bribery charges. Herrera-Velutini is represented by former Trump defense attorney Chris Kise, who has sought to convince the Justice Department to dismiss or reduce the charges, though the outcome of such efforts is unclear, three people familiar with the case told Reuters. Kise did not return requests for comment, and Reuters could not determine what arguments he has made to the department about the case. WEAPONIZATION REVIEW While many of the reviews of cases are spurred by aggressive lobbying, some requests are coming from within the DOJ. In early February, prosecutors in the department's Tax Division were ordered by senior Justice Department officials to write a memo explaining why the prosecution of Paul Walczak was not an example of "weaponization," two of the people familiar with the matter told Reuters. Walczak, of Florida, pleaded guilty in November to not paying employment taxes and not filing his individual income tax returns, and the trial team was preparing for his sentencing. Prosecutors were baffled, the people said, and only discovered after a few Google searches that Walczak's mother Elizabeth Fago was a Trump donor who, according to a New York Times report, hosted a political fundraiser where portions of a diary written by Biden's daughter Ashley were circulated. The department let the case proceed, and Walczak was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Trump in April spared him any prison with a pardon, which according to the New York Times, was handed down shortly after Fago attended a $1 million fundraising dinner for Trump. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the pardon. An attorney for Walczak said he was unaware of any interactions by the defense team with the Weaponization Working Group. In a statement, the Fago and Walczak families said media reports have painted an "incomplete and inaccurate" picture of the pardon application, and that Trump had "ample grounds to grant the pardon on the merits." Although no criminal prosecutions have been dismissed, prosecutors are bracing for impact since Trump in May named Ed Martin, a supporter of Trump's false claims that his 2020 election defeat was the result of fraud, to lead the working group and serve as pardon attorney. Martin has already successfully encouraged Trump to approve pardons for some of the president's supporters, according to his social media posts. Casada, who was convicted at trial in May on multiple counts of fraud, money laundering and bribery, is now expected to seek a pardon, a person familiar with the matter said. "We've also been getting more folks coming forward within the government as well as outside, saying, 'Can you look at this? Can you look at that?'" Martin recently told reporters. "It's a problem that seems to be growing faster than we can capture it." (Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Peter Eisler in Washington and Ned Parker in New York, additional reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by Scott Malone and Deepa Babington)