Is New Jersey's judicial vacancy crisis under control? Trenton lawmakers hear testimony
Still less than a month on the job, Michael Blee spoke about the importance of an impartial court system, noting the 'judiciary must uphold the law and protect the rights of all individuals so that justice can be served.'
State Sen. Paul Sarlo, the committee's chair and a Bergen County Democrat, called the state's system the 'best in the country.'
'We should be very proud of it," Sarlo said. "The process we go through to select our judges — and then the interaction we have with them afterward, the work we do together.'
When asked by state Sen. Mike Testa, R-Vineland, about vacancies stemming from a lack of nominations from the governor's office, Blee said he didn't 'know what the impetus is' but that 'it is a very stringent vetting process,' which is a good thing.
Blee said that as of May 1 there will be 51 vacancies, which is 'not at the crisis level' from several years ago, when the New Jersey courts had as many as 76 judicial vacancies.
He said that they would like to see that number in the range of 25 to 30 vacancies.
There is a possibility of shutting down matrimonial or civil trials in Vicinage 13, which covers Hunterdon, Somerset and Warren counties if there are five or six vacancies, though. They will stand at three next week.
More: NJ lawmakers question school funding formula, federal aid in Trenton budget hearing
Civil and matrimonial trials in Passaic, Cumberland, Gloucester, Hunterdon, Somerset and Warren counties have been suspended in recent years due to vacancies.
A slew of judges were confirmed at the end of 2023 and in early 2024 to bring the number of vacancies on the bench to 38, the lowest since before the pandemic.
In New Jersey, judges serve for an initial seven-year term and can be renominated for tenure, which allows them to sit on the bench until they reach the mandatory retirement age of 70.
Blee also highlighted the efforts made to lower the backlog of cases to something closer to what it was before the pandemic. Blee said that in the past fiscal year, the backlog of cases is down to 21%, an increase of nearly 12%.
The backlog stood at 41,433 in February, according to the courts website, a substantial decrease from the 75,777 cases waiting to be heard in February 2023.
'This is an improvement, but it falls short of our present goal,' Blee said. 'We look forward to continuing to work with the Legislature to fill judicial vacancies, which will help us reduce that backlog and provide timely justice for all.'
Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@northjersey.com
This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: NJ judicial vacancy crisis is coming under control
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
TX Democrat Leaves Call After Police Threaten Her With A Felony - Laura Coates Live - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
TX Democrat Leaves Call After Police Threaten Her With A Felony Laura Coates Live 44 mins The Texas House of Representatives has passed a redistricting bill, paving the way for Republican-drawn maps that could net the GOP as many as five US House seats to be finalized in the coming days.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
McKee campaign manager is out after less than 3 months
Gov. Dan McKee's newly hired campaign manager is stepping down less than three months after he started the job, as the incumbent Democrat struggles with questions over whether he can win reelection in 2026. Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘When they go low…we go lower?' North Bay official rails against California redistricting maps
Sonoma County Supervisor Lynda Hopkins had been loving Gov. Gavin Newsom's full-throated, all-caps trolling of President Donald Trump on social media. But then she plugged her rural Sebastopol address into California's newly proposed congressional maps. Her fellow Democrats' effort to counter Trump's push to gain more U.S. House seats in Texas for Republicans had proposed cleaving her Russian River community into separate districts. Sebastopol, Forestville and Santa Rosa would be lumped with Chico and Oroville in the Sierra foothills. Guerneville, Monte Rio and Jenner would be placed in a sprawling district running from Marin to the Oregon border. She was angry. 'When they go low… we go lower?' Hopkins began writing on Facebook Saturday afternoon. 'What hurts my heart the most here isn't that we're turning red districts into blue districts,' she continued in a 1,705-word post. 'It's that we're doing it by DILUTING THE RURAL VOTE.' The staunchly progressive Democrat (and former farmer who still grows vegetables and raises goats, ducks and geese) didn't stop there, rallying against inflexible government vaccine policies and government regulations that seem to lack common sense. She declared that crunchy west Sonoma County is home to the original 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, and not Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 'We're real MAHA, not fake MAHA… I'm still waiting for RFK Jr. to grow a pair and actually get those crappy additives out of our kids' food!' she wrote. Her rant hit a nerve – or many — drawing praise and criticism. 'Preach, sister!' wrote Santa Rosa resident Deb McGauley, who criticized 'the tit-for-tat, chest beating behavior between these men in power,' and said it is 'NOT going to help anyone in the long run.' 'F that,' wrote Jeniffer Wertz, a Guerneville resident, who held the opposite view. 'They've been punching us in the face and winning, and it's time to punch back while we still have the right to vote!' 'Wow Linda, you seem to be out of touch with the crisis of the current moment,' wrote Gina Cuclis, a Sonoma County Board of Education trustee (who ran an unsuccessful bid in 2012 for a supervisory seat). The post garnered nearly 200 comments and was shared 65 times. The next day, Hopkins deactivated the account but brought it back Monday. Hopkins told the Chronicle that she temporarily took the account down after multiple suspicious login attempts. California's redistricting plan – which could bring Democrats five more seats in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterms – is not finalized. Democrats are racing to clear procedural hurdles and get a redistricting measure onto a special ballot for a November vote. As it stands, Newsom is proposing to use these new maps through the 2030 elections, after which the congressional maps are slated to be re-evaluated by the state's independent redistricting commission. Hopkins, in an interview on Wednesday, said she would vote for the redistricting plan 'because I think that we do need to fight this bigger battle against authoritarianism,' even though she is frustrated that Sonoma County had been 'carved up for parts.' 'When we have to stoop to the level of gerrymandering in order to save our country, that should give us heartburn,' Hopkins said. To get more Democrats into Congress, Newsom and his allies must dilute the populations that have elected Republican legislators including Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley in northern California, said David McCuan, a professor of political science at Sonoma State University. Those Republicans' districts were redrawn to pick up Democratic strongholds further to the west, like Santa Rosa. Bruce Cain, a political scientist at Stanford University, said that Hopkins 'has a valid point' that rural interests are being sacrificed, although the arguments are also strong for Democrats to take every measure necessary to get more representatives into Congress. Cain said part of the goal of the state's independent commission to draw congressional district lines is to ensure that different community interests aren't drowned out – and that includes rural interests, such as health care wildfires, air quality, drug abuse and farming issues. 'Once you stick large rural areas together with urban areas, you're going to swamp out those interests,' Cain said. Hopkins said Wednesday she often writes paragraphs and paragraphs to solidify and express her thoughts. She doesn't always post them. But this time, she did. 'To the city Dem politicians who consider the rest of the state a nice place to visit or fly over: you're welcome for the clean water, the flood control, the food you eat, the wood that builds your homes, the gravel that makes up the roads you drive on,' Hopkins wrote. 'Because all of that, the very basis of life in cities, COMES FROM RURAL COMMUNITIES. And you know what? It's not just owls in these woods. People live here, too."
