logo
'Israel's Rebuke = Hamas' Gift': Netanyahu, U.S. Fire Back After 28 Nations Tell IDF To End Gaza War

'Israel's Rebuke = Hamas' Gift': Netanyahu, U.S. Fire Back After 28 Nations Tell IDF To End Gaza War

Time of India23-07-2025
In a rare and sweeping rebuke, 28 nations — including key U.S. allies like the UK, France, Canada, and Australia — have united in a joint statement demanding an immediate end to Israel's military offensive in Gaza. The signatories condemned the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza, slammed Israel's proposed "humanitarian city" as a veiled forced displacement plan, and demanded a permanent ceasefire. Israel and U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee rejected the statement, calling it a gift to Hamas. As Trump's envoy heads to Europe for truce talks, the EU has also warned Israel of an escalating starvation crisis. The global pressure on Netanyahu's government is growing — but will it shift the tide?#GazaCeasefire #Netanyahu #IsraelPalestine #28Nations #EUWarning #GazaWar #HumanitarianCrisis #MiddleEastConflict #CeasefireNow #DiplomaticPressure
Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netanyahu in 'profound shock' after Hamas video of Israeli hostage digging own grave
Netanyahu in 'profound shock' after Hamas video of Israeli hostage digging own grave

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Netanyahu in 'profound shock' after Hamas video of Israeli hostage digging own grave

As the war in Gaza rages on, Palestinian militant group Hamas has released a video of the remaining hostages in its captivity. The new hostage video has reportedly left Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 'profound shock.' In one of the videos, Israeli hostage Evyatar David tells the camera that he is 'digging his own grave.'(AFP/Reuters) In a statement from Netanyahu's office, the Israeli PM stated he had spoken to the families of the two hostages - Rom Braslavski and Evyatar Davi - shown in the video. The Israeli PM "told the families that the efforts to return all our hostages are ongoing", the statement from his office added. Over the past few days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages, who were captured during the October 7, 2023. attack on Israel. In the videos, hostages Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David are seen as Hamas leaders continue to hold them in captivity in underground tunnels. The videos have also fuelled renewed calls to reach a truce and hostage release deal without delay. Earlier in the day, tens of thousands of people had rallied in the coastal hub of Tel Aviv to urge Netanyahu's government to secure the release of the remaining captives. 'Time if running out' In the clips shared by the Palestinian Islamist groups, 21-year-old Braslavski, a German-Israeli dual national, and 24-year-old David both appear weak and malnourished. In one of the videos, Israeli hostage Evyatar David tells the camera that he is 'digging his own grave.' "What I'm doing now is digging my own grave. Every day my body becomes weaker and weaker. I'm walking directly to my grave. There is the grave where I am going to be buried in. Time is running out to be released and be able to sleep in my bed with my family." David is heard saying in the video released by Hamas as the 24-year-old breaks down at the end of the statement. "The deliberate starvation of our son as part of a propaganda campaign is one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen. He is being starved purely to serve Hamas's propaganda," read a statement issued by David's family as protests took over Israel over the Netanyahu government's delayed response to a hostage deal. The images and videos of the hostages made the frontpages of Israeli newspapers. Maariv showcased the "hell in Gaza" and Yedioth Ahronoth showing a "malnourished, emaciated and desperate" David. Left-leaning Haaretz declared that "Netanyahu is in no rush" to rescue the captives, echoing claims by critics and protestors across the state that the war has been prolonged for Bibi's political agenda. France, EU condemn videos The videos released by Hamas have drawn global criticism towards the treatment of the hostages as well as the ongoing famine situation in the Gaza Strip. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the images "are appalling and expose the barbarity of Hamas", calling for the release of "all hostages... immediately and unconditionally". In the same post on X, Kallas said that "Hamas must disarm and end its rule in Gaza." France, which earned backlash for its move to recognise Palestine, has also condemned the videos. "Despicable, unbearable images of the Israeli hostages held for 666 days in Gaza by Hamas. They must be freed, without conditions," wrote French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot on Sunday, adding that 'Hamas must be disarmed and excluded from ruling Gaza.' 60,000 killed in Gaza The Hamas attack of 2023 in southern Israel resulted in the deaths of around 1,200 people. Following the attack, Hamas attackers took around 250 hostages. Of these, 49 hostages are still being held in Gaza. However, as per the Israeli military, 27 are feared dead. Around 100 to 150 hostages were released during the truce pauses in November 2024 and earlier this year. Meanwhile, Israel's onslaught across the Gaza Strip has killed around 60,000 Palestinians. Of this, a majority of the death toll has been attributed to women and children.

Armed groups attack Syrian forces in Sweida, 1 killed in clash
Armed groups attack Syrian forces in Sweida, 1 killed in clash

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Armed groups attack Syrian forces in Sweida, 1 killed in clash

Armed groups attacked personnel from Syria's internal security forces in Sweida, killing one member and wounding others, and fired shells at several villages in the violence-hit southern province, state-run Ekhbariya TV reported on Sunday. Violence in Sweida erupted on July 13 between tribal fighters and Druze factions.(REUTERS) The report cited a security source as saying the armed groups had violated the ceasefire agreed in the predominantly Druze region, where factional bloodshed killed hundreds of people last month. Violence in Sweida erupted on July 13 between tribal fighters and Druze factions. Government forces were sent to quell the fighting, but the bloodshed worsened, and Israel carried out strikes on Syrian troops in the name of the Druze. The Druze are a minority offshoot of Islam with followers in Syria, Lebanon and Israel. Sweida province is predominantly Druze but is also home to Sunni tribes, and the communities have had long-standing tensions over land and other resources. Also Read: Donald Trump caught 'off guard' by Israel's actions in Gaza, Syria; called on Netanyahu to 'rectify' US-brokered truce ends Sweida clashes; Syria to investigate A US-brokered truce ended the fighting, which had raged in Sweida city and surrounding towns for nearly a week. Syria said it would investigate the clashes, setting up a committee to investigate the attacks. The Sweida bloodshed last month was a major test for interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, after a wave of sectarian violence in March that killed hundreds of Alawite citizens in the coastal region.

Elite colleges under pressure: Trump wields federal funding to redefine academic autonomy
Elite colleges under pressure: Trump wields federal funding to redefine academic autonomy

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elite colleges under pressure: Trump wields federal funding to redefine academic autonomy

US President Donald Trump In an unprecedented reconfiguration of the relationship between higher education and the federal government, several of the United States' most prestigious universities have capitulated, some quietly, others under public scrutiny—to the hardball tactics of President Donald Trump's administration. Under threat of losing billions in federal research funding, elite institutions have agreed to sweeping concessions, financial penalties, and ideological alignment with a White House intent on recasting academia in its own image. At the heart of the confrontation is the administration's aggressive use of funding as leverage. Research dollars—historically doled out based on academic merit—are now weaponized to coerce ideological compliance. In a departure from past presidential norms, Trump has fused his political agenda with federal purse strings, tying grants to reforms in campus speech, gender definitions, diversity policy, and even interpretations of antisemitism. The Columbia precedent Columbia University was the first to yield. On July 23, the Ivy League institution agreed to pay a staggering $200 million fine to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for reinstatement of suspended research grants. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Susan Boyle Is Now so Thin and Looks Beautiful! Undo Over $400 million in federal funding had been pulled earlier in the year, largely due to the administration's claim that Columbia failed to adequately address antisemitic incidents during the Israel-Hamas war. In its agreement, Columbia consented to overhauls of its student disciplinary protocols and formally adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, a controversial benchmark critics say conflates political criticism of Israel with hate speech. Additionally, the university committed $21 million to a compensation fund for faculty and staff who alleged discrimination. Yet, even in compromise, Columbia drew a line in the sand: the deal includes language asserting that the federal government cannot dictate its hiring, admissions, or academic speech. For Trump officials, however, the Columbia deal serves as a 'road map' for future enforcement, a blueprint of how universities might 'come to heel.' Brown and Penn : Ideological bargains Brown University followed with a $50 million payment directed not to federal coffers but to Rhode Island's workforce development programs—an unusual stipulation reflecting the administration's local economic messaging. In exchange, the government lifted funding freezes and ended probes into alleged antisemitism and racial bias in admissions. As part of the settlement, Brown agreed to remove race as a consideration in admissions and adopt the administration's binary definitions of gender. The University of Pennsylvania reached its own compromise, agreeing to retroactively disqualify swimming records set by transgender athlete Lia Thomas and issue a formal apology to female swimmers the administration argued had been disadvantaged. The Education Department had linked this civil rights case to a broader effort to ban transgender athletes from women's sports, resulting in a $175 million freeze in Penn's research funding prior to the agreement. Like Columbia's and Brown's, Penn's agreement included a clause preserving curricular independence, but the impact of the federal intrusion had already left its mark. The Holdouts: Harvard , Cornell , and beyond Not all institutions have acquiesced. Harvard University, long a symbolic adversary of Trump's populist conservatism, faces the largest penalty yet: a freeze on more than $2.6 billion in federal research support. The administration has accused Harvard of fostering antisemitism and enabling ideological extremism—charges the university disputes through multiple lawsuits. Negotiations continue, but administration officials have reportedly demanded a penalty surpassing Columbia's. For Harvard, the stakes are not only financial but existential: ceding to such terms may compromise the academic autonomy it has zealously guarded for nearly four centuries. Cornell University, Northwestern, and Duke have likewise seen vast sums—ranging from $108 million at Duke to over $1 billion at Cornell—frozen amid allegations of civil rights violations, racial preferences in hiring, and insufficient protection for Jewish students. In Princeton's case, dozens of federal research grants were suspended without any explicit reasoning—underscoring the unpredictability and opacity of the administration's tactics. A presidency reshaping academia Trump's strategic targeting of elite universities reflects a broader ideological crusade. He has painted Ivy League institutions as bastions of liberal dogma, harboring what his administration sees as anti-American, antisemitic, and discriminatory practices. Unlike any of his predecessors, Trump is using federal funding as both cudgel and carrot—punishing noncompliance while rewarding universities that align with his ideological framework. Critics argue this is a dangerous politicization of education, undermining the intellectual independence and open inquiry that universities are meant to protect. Supporters counter that it's long overdue corrective action against institutions they view as detached from public values. What is undeniable is the chilling effect: colleges across the country now operate under the specter of federal scrutiny, where the cost of defiance is measured not only in dollars but in compromised autonomy. Autonomy at a price These developments mark a watershed moment in American higher education. The Trump administration's wielding of federal research dollars as a means of ideological enforcement has redrawn the contours of university-government relations. Institutions once thought untouchable now find themselves making fraught calculations, balancing their principles against existential financial risk. For elite colleges, the question is no longer just about academic excellence—it is about whether independence can survive in an era where funding is contingent upon political fealty. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store