
Hong Kong court orders law on use of opposite-sex toilets to be struck down
In the landmark ruling, the High Court upheld an anonymous litigant's claim that the government violated its constitutional duty to safeguard residents' equality and privacy rights by criminalising the misuse of public restrooms managed by the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department at the expense of the transgender community.
Mr Justice Russell Coleman suspended his judgment for a year to allow the government time to come up with an approach, noting that officials might feel content to 'let the criminal offence go'.
'I suppose the view could be taken that, as with other conveniences accessible by the public (but privately managed), there are other offences which can be used to deter and punish improper conduct,' he said in a 51-page judgment.
'This is a matter of line-drawing, which seems to me to be a question for the government or legislature to address.'
He also stressed that the court would not judge where the line separating men and women should be drawn in the legal context, as it was a matter for legislation, 'probably in the context of wider or interlinked questions'.
The government can also file an appeal against the decision within 28 days.
The applicant, a transgender man only identified in court as 'K', sought a judicial review in 2022 by highlighting a potential breach of local laws if he was found to have entered a public restroom that did not align with the female sex marker on his identity card.
The court heard that K held a gender identity letter showing he was undergoing a period of 'real-life experience', during which he sought to live consistently in the adopted gender.
The step is generally required in Hong Kong for anyone wishing to proceed to hormonal treatment or sex reassignment surgery.
The Public Conveniences (Conduct and Behaviour) Regulation, which governs the use of public lavatories managed by the department, bars anyone aged five or above from such facilities allocated to their opposite sex. Offenders can face a fine of up to HK$2,000 (US$254).
The applicant's counsel argued the regulation should be revised to accommodate holders of such medical certificates so that they could access toilets of the sex they identified as before they were deemed fit to receive treatment.
Tim Parker SC, for K, highlighted the mental health challenges faced by the transgender community and said his client would minimise water intake while outdoors to avoid having to go to public toilets and arousing suspicion.
Authorities resisted the legal bid by highlighting safety and privacy concerns and society's expectation that toilet access be limited in accordance with the users' biological sex.
The present case has founded a new battleground for greater legal recognition by the LGBTQ community that has forced the city government to implement piecemeal reforms over the years through legal action.
The Court of Final Appeal delivered a landmark judgment in 2023 affirming transgender people's right to use their preferred sex on their identity cards without having to undergo the full reassignment process.
But the top court also highlighted that the new legal position did not signify recognition of the holder's sexual status as a matter of law.
One of the applicants behind the successful legal bid has since initiated a fresh challenge over what he considers to be unlawful requirements to continue using his preferred sex on his identity card.
Quarks HK, a concern group focusing on issues with transgender youth, said the ruling marked a significant milestone in human rights development in Hong Kong.
It urged authorities to set up more gender-friendly public facilities and double down on efforts to remove the social stigma attached to transgender people. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ex-soldier loses appeal over dismissal for refusing Covid-19 jab
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today dismissed a former soldier's appeal against his termination from the Malaysian Armed Forces for refusing the Covid-19 vaccination. The three-member bench led by Justice Datuk Azimah Omar ruled that there was no illegality or procedural impropriety on the part of the respondents in dismissing Wan Ramli Wan Seman from service. "The court is of the view that the appeal is without merit and therefore, dismissed," she said. No order as to costs was made. Sitting with her were Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. Wan Ramli, 43, was appealing against the High Court's 2023 dismissal of his judicial review challenging the decision of the respondents. In his judicial review, Wan Ramli had named Lt-Col Sharull Hesham Md Yasin, Lt Mohamad Azammunir Mohd Ashri, Army Chief General Tan Sri Zamrose Mohd Zain, the Malaysian Armed Forces, and the Malaysian Government as respondents. He sought a certiorari order to quash the termination letter dated Aug 4, 2021, which discharged him from service, and a declaration that the discharge letter was null and void. He claimed that the dishonourable discharge had caused him to lose his right to a pension under Article 147 of the Federal Constitution. Wan Ramli also argued that his dismissal was invalid as it was disproportionate in the circumstances, oppressive, irrational, unreasonable, amounted to unlawful discrimination, and took into account irrelevant considerations. Then High Court judge Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid (now a Court of Appeal judge) had ruled that the decision to discharge Wan Ramli was lawful and not tainted with illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. At today's hearing, Wan Ramli was represented by lawyer Hafiz Norkhan, while senior federal counsel Nurhafizza Azizan and federal counsel Solehheen Mohammad Zaki appeared for the respondents.


The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia and Indonesia strengthen ties with key agreements in annual talks
JAKARTA: Malaysia and Indonesia solidified their bilateral ties with several key agreements during the 13th Annual Consultation held in Jakarta. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim highlighted the signing of four memorandums of understanding (MoUs) covering border issues, health, information and communication, and internet governance. 'We touched on various important issues including a US$30 billion bilateral trade target, investment cooperation in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN), as well as smoother cross-border access facilities in Entikong,' Anwar said at a press conference. He emphasised Malaysia's commitment to being a trustworthy partner in renewable energy, infrastructure, and technology, with Sarawak positioned as an export hub. On maritime boundaries in the Sulawesi Sea, discussions were guided by international law, particularly the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). 'Our spirit is to safeguard each other's interests while respecting the boundaries established in accordance with international law,' Anwar explained. Security cooperation was also a focal point, with both nations agreeing to enhance efforts under the Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement (TCA) to maintain peace in the Sulu and Sulawesi Seas. Anwar reiterated Malaysia's strategic focus on the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea, stressing that regional stability should be determined by regional players. Regarding the case of Indonesian businessman Mohd Riza Chalid, Anwar stated that Malaysia is prepared to cooperate within legal frameworks. 'We have only been informed in general terms and have not received any clear information regarding the matter,' he said. Reports indicate that Chalid, a suspect in a corruption case linked to PT Pertamina, is allegedly in Malaysia.

The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Malaysia, Indonesia forge key agreements in 13th Annual Consultation
JAKARTA: Malaysia and Indonesia reached several important agreements in the 13th Annual Consultation held in Jakarta, including border issues, expanding economic cooperation and efforts to accelerate the implementation of new energy projects, says Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. He said that among the main achievements of the talks were the signing of four memoranda of understanding (MOUs) covering border issues, including Pulau Sebatik, as well as health, information and communication, and internet governance. "We touched on various important issues, including a US$30bil bilateral trade target, investment cooperation in Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN), as well as smoother cross-border access facilities in Entikong," he said at a press conference after the talks on Tuesday (July 29). Anwar also stressed that Malaysia's investments in strategic sectors in Indonesia were based on a genuine spirit to strengthen regional prosperity. He said Malaysia's aim was to be an honest and trustworthy development partner in various fields, including renewable energy, with Sarawak as an export hub for infrastructure, housing, education and technology. Regarding the issue of maritime boundaries in the Sulawesi Sea, Anwar stated that the discussions were conducted in accordance with international law, specifically the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), as well as the interests of both countries. "Our spirit is to safeguard each other's interests while respecting the boundaries established in accordance with international law. We will continue with that spirit so that there is no tension," he explained. On the issue of security, Anwar said Malaysia and Indonesia agreed to boost cooperation through the Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement (TCA) framework to maintain peace in the Sulu Sea and Sulawesi Sea. He stressed that Malaysia's priority remains on strategic security in the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea, while reminding that the fate of this region must be determined by the region itself and not by external forces. Regarding the call by a few parties in Indonesia for Malaysia to assist in the issue involving Indonesian businessman Mohd Riza Chalid, the Prime Minister said the matter should be considered within the legal framework. "So far, we have only been informed in general terms and have not received any clear information regarding the matter. However, we are ready to provide full cooperation because Malaysia and Indonesia are friendly countries," he said. Previously, the media reported that Mohd Riza Chalid, who was named by Indonesian authorities as a suspect in a corruption case related to the management of PT Pertamina crude oil for the period 2018 to 2023, is now allegedly in Malaysia. – Bernama