Supreme Court turned its back on trans youth. Our community never will.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
US upholds ban on hormone blockers for transgender minors
The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, marking a significant blow to transgender rights in the United States.
unbranded - Newsworthy
The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
Organizations are providing resources and travel grants to families seeking care in other states.
The decision intensifies worries for families about access to care and financial burdens.
Support groups and community fundraising efforts are helping families navigate these challenges.
With its decision in Skrmetti v. United States, the Supreme Court has delivered a heart-breaking blow to transgender youth and the families fighting to protect them. The court upheld Tennessee's law banning gender-affirming care for youth, allowing it to remain in effect.
To be clear, this decision does not require states to ban gender-affirming care. It does not change the fact that interstate travel remains a constitutional right. Above all, it does not mean that families of transgender youth are alone during this crisis.
I understand that moments like this can feel devastating. But right now, it's critical that we maintain hope – and that we do everything possible to support families who are facing hardships.
I work as the Family Resources Manager for the Trans Youth Emergency Project, a core program of the Campaign for Southern Equality. Since 2023, we've been connecting families with vital resources and support in the face of sweeping anti-trans legislation.
Opinion: Corporations won't save LGBTQ+ people. Take their money for Pride anyway.
SCOTUS upholding Tennessee's ban hurts. But we can't lose hope.
Every day, I speak directly with parents of transgender young people who are faced with the reality that their child's life-saving health care is not available in their home state. We offer these families up-to-date information, access to affirming providers who are not impacted by anti-transgender restrictions, and travel grants of $500, renewable every three months, to help them continue to access the care they need and deserve.
And we're not alone in this work: There is a robust network of organizations supporting transgender and queer youth in every single state – from deep red and rural communities in Mississippi to major cities across the South and Midwest. There are many amazing support groups for parents and young people, including chapters of PFLAG and TransParent in every state. We're honored to partner with many of these groups, and they're a powerful place to start for families who are feeling overwhelmed or don't know where to turn.
When it comes to direct logistical and financial support, we're here to help. Since launching two years ago, we have provided over $600,000 in direct travel grants for the families of transgender youth.
Opinion: A trans athlete won in California. Her peers cheered – and exposed the truth.
The families we connect with live with fear and exhaustion. Many families I talk to are worried about delaying or needing to stop care. They worry about the financial burden. They worry about potential prosecution from a rogue state actor or the federal government. There are worries upon worries upon worries.
This Supreme Court decision will only intensify these worries. Now, families living in states with bans are facing the reality of having to travel multiple times every year, or move out of state to get their child health care.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
To families feeling despair, know you are not alone
No family should have to shoulder so much, but I am so inspired and heartened by these parents and families who are moving mountains to care for their children. The parents and caregivers I speak to have deep love for their youth.
Every few months, they are traveling hundreds of miles and spending thousands of dollars to secure care that should be available in their hometowns. Families have taken out second mortgages on their homes. Young people have adapted to switching providers multiple times as new bans and restrictions have come up. Parents have taken new jobs and uprooted their entire lives to protect their kids from anti-trans laws.
I recently spoke with a grandmother in Missouri who is raising her nonbinary grandchild after the child's parents rejected them. When Missouri implemented its care ban, this grandmother was already driving hours to get treatment in Kansas, only to have that option disappear, too. She told me, 'I can't afford another trip, but I'll do it anyway. I have to.'
In the face of this decision, it's important that we look for ways to tangibly and meaningfully support families. The legal system may have failed them, but I know that our community won't.
And we are honored to do our part. We will continue to reach out, to provide life-saving resources, and to affirm that transgender youth have a right to grow up safe, supported, and healthy. Transgender youth deserve to live long, full, authentic lives and to realize their full potential.
We're grateful to see the ways that our community has stepped up to support our program and these families. From craft sales to live performances to lemonade stands, people nationwide have hosted every fundraiser imaginable to support the families we serve. And as these health care bans remain in place, we know that help will be more critical than ever.
To the parents reading this who feel fear or despair, please know this: the Trans Youth Emergency Project and so many others are here, and there is a huge community behind you ready to help you through this turbulence.
We see your love. We understand the weight of your choices. And we will do everything in our power to make sure your child gets the care they need, no matter what politicians or courts say.
Dr. Van Bailey is the Family Resources Manager for the Trans Youth Emergency Project, a program of the Campaign for Southern Equality. Families can get support at transyouthemergencyproject.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hillary Clinton warns SCOTUS 'will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion'
Hillary Clinton believes the U.S. Supreme Court will overturn marriage equality, and she's urging LGBTQ+ couples to get married while they still can. The former Secretary of State and presidential candidate predicted that the court would reverse Obergefell v. Hodges in an interview with Jessica Tarlov of Fox News' The Five, warning that "there are going to be real world consequences." "American voters, and to some extent the American media, don't understand how many years the Republicans have been working in order to get us to this point," Clinton said. "It took 50 years to overturn Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court will hear a case about gay marriage. My prediction is they will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion. They will send it back to the states." WATCH: @HillaryClinton predicts to @JessicaTarlov that SCOTUS will overturn marriage equality and 'send it back to the states' (like abortion) — leading to a ban in much of 🇺🇸 On Trump & Republicans stealing seats: 'they don't want a fair fight' Full: If the Supreme Court reverses Obergefell , marriages between same-sex couples will still be recognized federally under the Respect for Marriage Act. Signed into law by President Joe Biden in 2022, the act mandates that the federal government recognizes same-sex and interracial marriages, and that all states recognize those performed in other states. The act does not require states to allow marriages between same-sex couples. As state bans on these unions were struck down in Obergefell, such bans could be enacted again if Obergefell is overturned. If that were to happen, the fallout would likely be similar to that after Roe v. Wade's reversal, in which red states immediately enacted bans. Related: While the Supreme Court has made no official move to reconsider marriage equality, nine states have recently introduced resolutions asking the court to hear the case again. None have yet passed, and even if they were to, the resolutions are nonbinding — meaning they carry no legal weight, and the court is not obligated to hear them. However, some justices have voiced opposition to Obergefell even after the ruling. When the conservative majority created by Donald Trump overturned Roe v. Wade, Clarence Thomas wrote in his concurring opinion at the time that the court should also revisit and overrule decisions that prevent state restrictions on contraception, marriage equality, sodomy, and other private consensual sex acts, calling the rulings "demonstrably erroneous." "Anybody in a committed relationship out there in the LGBTQ community, you ought to consider getting married," Clinton continued. "'Cause I don't think they'll undo existing marriages, but I fear that they will undo the national right." This article originally appeared on Advocate: Hillary Clinton warns SCOTUS 'will do to gay marriage what they did to abortion' RELATED Gay weddings have boosted state and local economies by $6 billion since marriage equality Idaho Republicans' resolution to repeal marriage equality is 'foreshadowing' for the U.S. New poll finds record-low support of marriage equality from Republicans since Obergefell v. Hodges
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Florida orders Key West to remove rainbow crosswalks after city pushback
The Florida Department of Transportation is demanding the removal of Key West's rainbow-colored Pride crosswalks after city leaders pushed back against a new mandate banning street art. Why it matters: The state's response comes two weeks after Key West appeared to become the first Florida city to resist new state and federal guidelines targeting pavement art that transportation officials say could distract drivers. The latest: In a memo to Key West on Friday, an FDOT official demanded that the city's rainbow-colored pavement markings be removed by Sept. 3 If that doesn't happen, the state "will remove them by any appropriate method necessary without further notice," wrote FDOT District Six secretary Daniel Iglesias. Iglesias added that the state would charge the city for any removal costs unless the city removed the crosswalk itself and threatened to withhold state funds if the city commits "any additional violations." What they're saying: "We are going to fight this," Mayor Danise "Dee Dee" Henriquez told The Keys Citizen. Threat level: The state's response could have ripple effects across Florida, potentially influencing how cities like Miami Beach and Fort Lauderdale — neither of which have removed its LGBTQ street markings — respond to the new policy. Catch up quick: Key West commissioners voted Aug. 6 to explore any legal recourses to maintain the Pride crosswalks on Duval and Petronia streets, which the city have declared cultural landmarks. The Delray Beach City Commission followed suit last week, deciding to keep its Pride intersection until it receives direct orders from the state relating to its June 30 mandate. What's next: The state memo to Key West says the city may request an administrative proceeding and that FDOT has reserved time on Sept. 3 at the Florida Turnpike Enterprise's offices in Orlando for a hearing.
The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
The plot to destroy Black political power
Get ready for the rage: The conservative majority on the Supreme Court looks likely to gut the last remaining parts of the Voting Rights Act. Prompted by a Black conservative, Justice Clarence Thomas, the high court will consider in October a question that answers itself — whether it is wrong to stop openly racist tactics in drawing congressional districts. Even if the right-wing justices manage to close their eyes to the racial politics involved, they will feel the heat and hear the explosive impact of the backlash to a one-sided ruling. The fuse will be lit in several Republican-controlled states, largely in the South, as white politicians begin diluting votes in Black-majority districts to silence Black voices in Congress. Deep-red state legislatures — think of South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi — will be free to demolish their Black-majority congressional districts. Those white-majority, Trump-backing state legislatures aim to bring an end to the careers of several Black Democrats in Congress, such as Reps. Cleo Fields (D-La.), Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) and Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). As a purely political exercise, Trump and his Republican allies have wanted to eliminate these districts for years, because Black voters are key to the Democratic Party's congressional strength. The Voting Rights Act allows for federal courts to look for racial damage done by gerrymandering districts. In the case now before the high court, involving redistricting in Louisiana, the state was forced to add a second Black-majority district. A federal court ruled that, with 33 percent of the state being Black, it was wrong for only one of its six congressional districts to be majority Black. But that led to a lawsuit over the new map. Along the lines of Thomas's recent call for a total end to the Voting Rights Act, the challengers contend that the law — which was created to protect equal voting rights for Black Americans — now prohibits the court from stopping white Republicans from playing politics and crushing Black power as a proportional representation of a state's racial makeup. Thomas makes the case that attention to 'race-based' construction of congressional districts is out of touch with recent history. He argues that 'specific identified instances' of racial bias, including violent voter suppression, are now distant and amount to relics of the nation's past. Last week, a federal appeals court disagreed. The Fifth Circuit ruled that Louisiana's congressional district map 'packed' and 'cracked' Black populations to limit their political power. The ruling stated there are 'decades of binding precedent' under the 15th Amendment allowing Congress to contest racial bias in redistricting. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was written in response to the nation's long history of keeping political power in white hands. Even after Black men gained the right to vote, it was common for that vote to be suppressed through violence. For perspective, South Carolina is 26 percent Black and 67 percent white. But white-majority Republican congressional districts are 86 percent of South Carolina's seven congressional districts. Only one of seven districts has a majority of Democrats and Black voters — Clyburn's district. The Supreme Court plans to hear arguments on racial redistricting on Oct. 15 — early enough for a decision that could affect the 2026 midterms. If the Black vote is diluted, the Democratic Party's ability to win seats in Congress shrinks, increasing Republican chances of retaining majorities in the House and Senate in 2026. That would keep Trump from becoming a lame duck facing a divided Congress. The Republicans' goal is to maintain majorities in Congress for Trump's last two years in the White House. Then Republicans can appoint more judges to issue more rulings that further weaken Democrats. The downward spiral for Black political power will go on and on. Trump is not hiding his interest in the outcome of gerrymandering efforts in Texas. 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats,' Trump told CNBC earlier this month. 'We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas … and we are entitled to five more seats.' Excuse me, Mr. President? Neither you nor the Republican Party is entitled to any seats. Those seats belong to Americans of all colors and parties. Texas Republicans' threats to send law enforcement to forcibly return Texas Democratic legislators to the state capitol to provide a quorum for passing gerrymandered maps are a sideshow. They distract from the real effect that racially-designed gerrymandering can have on race relations and politics for decades to come. Comedian Dave Chappelle famously called Trump 'an honest liar.' In the fight over Texas redistricting, the 'honest liar' is saying that the people looking at redistricting's racial impact are themselves racist. Don't let Trump or his partisans on the high court fool you. Racial justice in Congress is at stake. Democrats will have to fight fire with fire to prevent Trump from diminishing Black voting power. Democrats owe that much to Black voters, who have carried them to electoral victories over the last 60 years. They owe it to the memory of the brave people who marched, were beaten and even died to demand voting rights only 60 years ago.
