California governor calls Trump National Guard deployment in LA unlawful, World News
LOS ANGELES — California National Guard troops arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday (June 7) to quell demonstrations over President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement, as the state's Democratic governor called their deployment unlawful.
The National Guard began deploying as demonstrations over federal immigration raids continued for a third day in Los Angeles, culminating in confrontations between protesters and police.
Los Angeles police declared one rally near City Hall to be an "unlawful assembly," alleging that some protesters threw concrete, bottles and other objects at police. "Arrests are being initiated," the department wrote in a post on social media.
Demonstrators shouted "shame on you" at police and some appeared to throw objects, according to video. A group of protesters blocked the 101 Freeway, a major thoroughfare in downtown Los Angeles.
California Governor Gavin Newsom said he requested the Trump administration withdraw its order to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops in Los Angeles County, calling it unlawful.
Newsom accused Trump of trying to manufacture a crisis and violating California's state sovereignty. "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President," he wrote in a post on X.
The White House disputed Newsom's characterisation, saying in a statement that "everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness."
Earlier, about a dozen National Guard members, along with Department of Homeland Security personnel, pushed back a group of demonstrators that amassed outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles, video showed.
Trump in a social media post on Sunday, called the demonstrators "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and said he was directing his cabinet officers "to take all such action necessary" to stop what he called "riots."
Speaking to reporters in New Jersey, he threatened violence against demonstrators who spit on police or National Guard troops, saying "they spit, we hit." He did not cite any specific incidents.
"If we see danger to our country and to our citizens, it will be very, very strong in terms of law and order," Trump said.
National Guard troops were also seen in Paramount, in southeast Los Angeles, near the Home Depot, the site of altercations between protesters and police on Saturday.
Law enforcement faced off with a few hundred protesters in Paramount and 100 in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday, with federal officers firing gas canisters in efforts to disperse crowds, according to Reuters witnesses.
Authorities in Los Angeles arrested about 30 people on Saturday, including three on suspicion of assaulting an officer. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office said three deputies sustained minor injuries.
The FBI offered a US$50,000 (S$64,420) reward for information on a suspect accused of throwing rocks at police vehicles in Paramount, injuring a federal officer.
Despite Trump's rhetoric about the demonstrations, he has not invoked the Insurrection Act, an 1807 law that empowers a president to deploy the US military to suppress events like civil disorder. Asked on Sunday whether he was considering invoking the law, he replied "it depends on whether or not there's an insurrection." 'Zero tolerance'
The protests pit Democratic-run Los Angeles, where census data suggests a significant part of the population is Hispanic and foreign-born, against Trump's Republican White House, which has made immigration enforcement measures a hallmark of his second term.
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has warned that the Pentagon was prepared to mobilise active-duty troops "if violence continues" in Los Angeles, saying the Marines at nearby Camp Pendleton were "on high alert."
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said her city's law enforcement would have been able to handle the protesters, and blamed the Trump administration for inciting tensions by sending in the National Guard.
"It's a feeling here of intentional chaos in a situation that had not broken out to violence short of a few people," Bass, a Democrat, said on CNN.
Democratic Congresswoman Nanette Barragan, whose California district includes Paramount, also blamed the Trump administration.
"It's only going to make things worse in a situation where people are already angry over immigration enforcement," Barragan told CNN's "State of the Union."
Vanessa Cárdenas, the head of the immigration advocacy group America's Voice, accused the Trump administration of "trumping up an excuse to abuse power, and deliberately stoke and force confrontations around immigration."
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the National Guard would provide safety around buildings to people engaged in peaceful protest and to law enforcement.
ICE operations in Los Angeles on Friday arrested at least 44 people on alleged immigration violations. The Department of Homeland Security on Sunday shared information about what it said were the criminal records of some of those arrested.
Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the US-Mexico border, setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day.
But the sweeping enforcement measures have also included people legally residing in the country, some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Sunday criticised the US government over the immigration raids and deployment of the National Guard.
"We do not agree with this way of addressing the immigration issue," Sheinbaum, who has sought to cultivate a positive relationship with Trump, said at a public event. "The phenomenon will not be addressed with raids or violence. It will be by sitting down and working on comprehensive reform." Trump's justification
Trump's justification for the National Guard deployment cited a provision of Title 10 of the US Code on the Armed Forces. However, Title 10 also says the "orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States."
It was not immediately clear if the president had the legal authority to deploy the National Guard troops without Newsom's order.
Title 10 allows for National Guard deployment by the federal government if there is "a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." Those troops are only allowed to engage in limited activities and cannot undertake ordinary law enforcement activities.
Trump's memo says the troops will "temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law, and to protect Federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur."
[[nid:718855]]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Trump administration to review AUKUS submarine pact with Australia and Britain
Canberra has downplayed a decision by the US to formally review the AUKUS defence pact with Australia and Britain. The agreement, spanning decades, would ultimately equip Australia with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines. Signed under the previous Biden administration, AUKUS will be judged on whether it aligns with the 'America First' agenda under current President Donald Trump. This comes as American shipyards struggle to meet demand for submarines in the US Navy and as Washington pushes its allies to spend more on defence. Nick Harper reports.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Los Angeles ‘safe and sound' for two nights after protests
The protests had ignited over an escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the US illegally. PHOTO: AFP Trump says Los Angeles 'safe and sound' for two nights after protests WASHINGTON - Los Angeles 'was safe and sound for the last two nights', US President Donald Trump said on the morning of J une 12 , as he hailed troops for helping to restore order in the city after days of anti-deportation protests. 'Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the LA Police in a position to effectively do their job,' Mr Trump said on Truth Social, adding that without the military the city 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years'. The mostly peaceful protests ignited last week over a sudden escalation in efforts to apprehend migrants in the country illegally. But there were also pockets of violence, including the burning of self-driving taxis and hurling stones at police. Mr Trump deployed several thousand National Guard troops and some 700 active-duty Marines over the objections of Democratic California governor Gavin Newsom, the first such action by a US president in decades. In his post, Mr Trump said Mr Newsom 'had totally lost control of the situation'. 'He should be saying THANK YOU for saving his a**, instead of trying to justify his mistakes and incompetence!!!' the president added. Similar protests also ignited in other cities across the United States, as California prepared on June 12 for a legal showdown of Mr Trump's deployment of the military. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders tried to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the 1,300 sq km metropolis. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Here's why Trump's tariffs won't work
[SINGAPORE] US President Donald Trump's tariffs have been widely panned as reckless, short-sighted and self-defeating. Economists called them 'taxes on Americans' rather than the rest of the world – penguin-majority islands included. Many blame those tariffs – imposed under the banner of 'America First' – for worsening the global trade slowdown. But zoom out, and Trump's actions are not so radical. Throughout history, many leaders have believed that security lies in self-sufficiency. From imperial China to Nazi Germany, ancient Rome to modern-day Brexit Britain, the instinct to turn inward runs deep. The logic: Tighten borders, produce everything at home and cut reliance on other nations to shield against risk. Two new books argue that this instinct, while understandable, is exactly what has led great powers to fall. It is not narrow self-interest that builds empires – it is exchange. Civilisations rise not by going it alone, but by embracing openness – even when it is messy or uncertain. The two timely books are Exile Economics: What Happens If Globalisation Fails by Ben Chu, and Peak Human: What We Can Learn From History's Greatest Civilizations by Johan Norberg. Both were published in May 2025 – shortly after Trump waved around a cardboard chart that sent shockwaves through global markets – though their writing predates the latest phase of his trade war. Chu is the British economics editor at BBC Newsnight; Norberg is a Swedish historian and bestselling author. They have observed the same global trends from very different angles – Chu from the world of policy and supply chains, Norberg through the long arc of history. Yet they arrive at a shared conclusion, which serves as a sobering warning about the deepening divide between China and the US, and the risks it poses to global stability and prosperity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up When empires close themselves off If you had to pick just one of the two books, I recommend Norberg's Peak Human. His grasp of history is sweeping, but he also knows how to keep things light and entertaining – which helps when you are sprinting through centuries of civilisation in a single chapter. The book explores 'golden ages' such as ancient Athens, Song Dynasty China and Renaissance Italy – moments when humanity flourished economically, intellectually and artistically. What these societies had in common, Norberg argues, was openness. They welcomed outsiders, embraced trade and encouraged innovation. But when they turned inward, they stagnated. Peak Human by Johan Norberg is an entertaining guide through the golden ages of human history. PHOTO: ATLANTIC BOOKS In Song China, trade and cultural exchange drove technologies that Europe would not see for centuries. But when paranoia and conservatism took hold, progress ground to a halt. Similarly, Abbasid Baghdad was once a hub of Islamic learning and diversity. That golden era ended with religious orthodoxy and invasions. If Norberg looks to the past to explain why empires thrive or collapse, Chu turns his gaze to the present. He coins the term 'exile economics' to describe a world turning its back on global trade in favour of national self-reliance. The appeal is obvious – who does not want independence, security and control? But the reality, he argues, is that autonomy comes with steep costs. Want food independence? Expect higher prices and less variety. Want to make your own microchips? That is a decades-long, cross-border supply chain you will need to build from scratch. And good luck finding anyone else eager to handle rare earth metals like China does. Ben Chu's Exile Economics explores anti-globalisation sentiment across economies. PHOTO: BASIC BOOKS Chu offers real-world examples to show just how entangled the world is. Global trade is not just about cheap goods, it is about shared resilience and rising living standards. Break that in the name of sovereignty, and you often get more fragility, not less. He even points to history: Nazi Germany's push for self-sufficiency helped fuel its aggressive expansion. Resource nationalism, in other words, is not just inefficient. It is dangerous. Lessons for today Both Peak Human and Exile Economics warn that today's anti-globalisation sentiment threatens to undo decades of progress. It is not trade, immigration or openness that causes modern problems – it is poor governance and weak systems. The solution is not retreat, but reform. Both authors highlight how interdependence, while complex, is more resilient than we give it credit for. Chu notes how supply chains adapted swiftly to pandemic shocks. Norberg reminds us that empires rarely fall because of enemies abroad – they collapse when they close in on themselves. And the effects are already visible. In response to Trump's tariffs, China did not panic – it pivoted. Supermarkets swapped out US beef for cheaper Australian imports, thanks to the China-Australia free trade agreement. Meanwhile, US consumers are expected to pay more for beef – a tariff own-goal. In April 2025, research and consulting firm Ipsos released a poll which found that the US' reputation had sharply declined in 26 out of 29 countries over the previous six months. For the first time in the survey's decade-long history, more respondents viewed China as a more positive influence on world affairs than the US. What these books make clear is that prosperity is fragile. The systems that brought billions out of poverty and spurred innovation did not emerge by accident. They were built on trust, trade and cooperation. Undoing them is easy. Rebuilding them is not. Exile Economics: What Happens If Globalisation Fails by Ben Chu and Peak Human: What We Can Learn From History's Greatest Civilizations by Johan Norberg are available at Kinokuniya
