logo
Disney didn't copy 'Moana' from man's story about surfer boy, jury rules

Disney didn't copy 'Moana' from man's story about surfer boy, jury rules

Yahoo11-03-2025

The Brief
A jury rejected Buck Woodall's claim that Disney's "Moana" copied his story, "Bucky the Surfer Boy," ruling that Disney creators never had access to his work.
Woodall's lawyer argued that numerous similarities, such as demigods and shape-shifting characters, showed "Moana" was based on his script, but Disney's defense disagreed.
LOS ANGELES - A jury has rejected a man's claim that Disney's "Moana" was stolen from his story of a young surfer in Hawaii.
On Monday, the Los Angeles federal jury deliberated for only about 2 ½ hours before deciding that the creators of "Moana" never had access to writer and animator Buck Woodall's outlines and script for "Bucky the Surfer Boy."
What they're saying
Defense lawyer Moez Kaba said that the evidence showed overwhelmingly that "Moana" was clearly the creation and "crowning achievement" of the 40-year career of John Musker and Ron Clements, the writers and directors behind 1989's "The Little Mermaid," 1992's "Aladdin," 1997's "Hercules" and 2009's "The Princess and the Frog."
"They had no idea about Bucky," Kaba said in his closing early Monday. "They had never seen it, never heard of it."
The other side
In closing arguments, Woodall's attorney said that a long chain of circumstantial evidence and similarities, so numerous they couldn't be coincidences, made it clear that his story "Bucky the Surfer Boy" was the basis for the hit 2016 animated film.
"There was no 'Moana' without 'Bucky,'" Gustavo Lage, lawyer for plaintiff Buck Woodall, said during closing arguments in the courtroom.
The backstory
Woodall said he had shared his work with the stepsister of his brother's wife, who worked for a different company on the Disney lot, but the woman testified during the two-week trial that she never showed it to anyone at Disney.
This is not the first time Woodall has taken legal action against Disney. A similar case was dismissed in November due to the statute of limitations.
According to The Associated Press, both projects include Polynesian demigods as major characters, with the figures of Maui, Te Fiti and a fiery volcano goddess in "Moana" clearly counterparts of the divine characters in "Bucky."
Both also include shape-shifting characters who turn into, among other things, insects and sharks.
In addition, both include the main characters interacting with animals who act as spirit helpers.
"How many coincidences are too many?" the lawyer asked. "When does a coincidence stop being a coincidence?"
The relatively young jury of six women and two men watched "Moana" in its entirety in the courtroom.
Many others, including shape-shifting characters, appear throughout other films, including "The Little Mermaid," "Aladdin," and "Hercules," which made Musker and Clements essential to the Disney renaissance of the 1990s and made Disney a global powerhouse.
Many others, including animal guides, go back to Disney movies as early as 1940's "Pinocchio" and appear in all of Musker and Clements' previous films.
"Moana" earned nearly $700 million in the global box office.
RELATED: Disney sued for allegedly copying the idea for Moana and its sequel
A judge previously ruled that Woodall's 2020 lawsuit came too late for him to claim a piece of those receipts, and that a lawsuit he filed earlier this year over "Moana 2" — which earned more than $1 billion — must be decided separately.
Why you should care
The lawsuit highlights ongoing debates in Hollywood over intellectual property and creative rights.
Going forward, the case could have implications for how studios handle submissions and develop culturally inspired films.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast
Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast

Los Angeles Times

time33 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Disney finally owns all of Hulu, ending long tug-of-war with Comcast

Walt Disney Co. has agreed to pay Comcast Corp. an additional $438.7 million to finalize the Mouse House purchase of streaming service Hulu. Disney in December 2023 initially paid Comcast $8.6 billion for NBCUniversal's one-third stake in the streaming service. The final payment, announced Monday, brings the total to $9 billion, the amount the Burbank entertainment giant will ultimately pay Comcast for its stake. This week's agreement came after an extended appraisal process as the two companies struggled over Hulu's actual value. The platform that is home to 'The Handmaid's Tale' and 'Only Murders in the Building' appears to be worth about $27.5 billion. The resolution also represents a major step in Disney's years-long pivot to streaming. 'We are pleased this is finally resolved,' Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger said in a statement, acknowledging Disney's productive partnership with the Philadelphia-based company. 'Completing the Hulu acquisition paves the way for a deeper and more seamless integration of Hulu's general entertainment content with Disney+ and, soon, with ESPN's direct-to-consumer product, providing an unrivaled value proposition for consumers,' Iger said. The two companies have had tense relations since Comcast launched a failed hostile takeover of Disney in 2004. Tensions flared again seven years ago after Comcast jumped into Disney's bidding process for Rupert Murdoch's entertainment assets, substantially driving up the price for Disney. Disney prevailed. It gained the majority stake in Hulu as part of its $71.3-billion acquisition of much of Murdoch's company in April 2019. That spring, Disney and Comcast negotiated a pact that outlined the governance of the service while it was jointly owned by the two companies and also provided a blueprint to dissolve their partnership. At the time, they agreed that Hulu would be valued at no less than $27.5 billion, making Comcast's stake worth at least $8.6 billion. Comcast's divestiture process began two years ago when Chief Executive Brian Roberts signaled that his company wanted out. The parties then entered into an appraisal process to find a value for Hulu. Disney noted the $438.7 million payment was substantially less than what Comcast had wanted. The deal is expected to close by July 24.

Disney Takes Full Control of Hulu for Billions Less Than Comcast Wanted
Disney Takes Full Control of Hulu for Billions Less Than Comcast Wanted

New York Times

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Disney Takes Full Control of Hulu for Billions Less Than Comcast Wanted

The tug of war over Hulu is over. Disney said in a securities filing on Monday that it had agreed to pay Comcast an additional $439 million for full control of the streaming service, ending a year and a half dispute over the amount. Disney had argued that it owed Comcast nothing beyond the $8.6 billion it already paid for Comcast's 33 percent stake — and Comcast countered that Disney owed another $5 billion. Eventually, a third-party appraiser was brought in. The relatively small new payment will not affect Disney's previous guidance for overall company growth in the current fiscal year, Disney said in the filing. The deal is expected to close by July 24. Robert A. Iger, Disney's chief executive, said in a statement that full ownership of Hulu would allow for 'a deeper and more seamless integration of Hulu's general entertainment content with Disney+' and for bundled sales with a new ESPN streaming service that is planned for introduction later this year. In a separate statement, Comcast called Hulu 'a great start for us in streaming,' adding 'we wish Disney well.' Comcast's primary streaming service is now Peacock, which it has been loading with sports content as it seeks to expand advertising sales and subscriber counts. Peacock, which has been unprofitable, has about 41 million subscribers. Hulu, one of the first streaming services, started as a joint venture between Disney, Comcast and Time Warner. It now offers programming from Disney's traditional television networks, including ABC and FX, in addition to original series, including 'Only Murders in the Building.' Hulu, which is profitable, has about 55 million subscriptions. To increase engagement on Disney+ and slow subscriber churn, Disney last year began allowing people who pay for both Disney+ and Hulu to watch both services through the Disney+ interface. That strategy has been a success for Disney, analysts have said. Some analysts expect Disney to eventually discontinue Hulu as a stand-alone app and make it a tile within Disney+.

‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar
‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

‘How to Train Your Dragon' review: Live-action remake is nice, but doesn't always soar

movie review HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON Running time: 125 minutes. Rated PG (sequences of intense action, and peril). In theaters June 13. Over the course of two hours, the macho Vikings of the village of Berk go from despising and demonizing dragons to loving them like adorable puppies. I can't say I experienced the same abrupt about-face when it comes to the noxious trend of turning fantastic animated films into live-action remakes. But, hey, at least the decent 'How to Train Your Dragon' update is better than 'Snow White.' The transition from the DreamWorks CGI version from 2010, one of the best family flicks in years, to real human actors is thankfully smoother and not as off-putting as most of Disney's recent, pitiful princess efforts. Redoing 'Dragon' in a photorealistic way actually makes sense, even if it's just another studio ploy to plunder our wallets by rehashing their greatest hits. The heart of the story about a misunderstood boy named Hiccup and the scaly scamp called Toothless, who becomes his unlikely best friend, still beats, if a little less magically. Its relative success is because 'Dragon' was already an action-adventure story with aerial chases, fire-breathing beasts and explosions to begin with. That's a lot easier to swallow than the House of Mouse making a zoo hyena sing a song. The new movie works best when our hero is soaring through the air with his pal as John Powell's inspiring score is blared. 3 Hiccup (Mason Thames) makes an unlikely new friend in 'How to Train Your Dragon.' AP And it's tear-jerking as ever watching the very well-cast 17-year-old newcomer Mason Thames as geeky Hiccup teaching Toothless, an injured Night Fury, how to fly again. By the way, just because 'Dragon' is no longer fully animated doesn't mean the flick is 'Jurassic Park.' Toothless still has huge eyes, rather than a cold-blooded creature's beady peepers. And he's not really threatening at all, even before the duo become bros. Instead of making the lizards look like ferocious dinosaurs, director Dean DeBlois' movie keeps them toy-like and unscary. Fine. It's a movie for children — and depressed millennials. 3 The filmmakers opted not to turn Toothless into a scary dinosaur. AP Where 'Train' derails are the supposed-to-be-funny scenes in the dumb little town of Berk, the aesthetic of which is 'Game of Thrones' if Westeros was inhabited by the Teletubbies. The script is almost word-for-word the same as the original. Big mistake. Without the chipperness of animation, the jokes all fall flat. The lines are too simple, and the characters who speak them are obnoxious. I became more annoyed by the adults in this movie than their hormonal kids were. Gerard Butler as Hiccup's strict chieftain dad Stoick, who wants his loner son to become a dragon killer, is just plain dreadful as he stomps around harrumphing and brooding. He really is the haggis of actors. 3 Gerard Buter is terrible as Stoick. AP The other rascally teens training alongside Hiccup to be dragon slayers — including Nico Parker as his warrior crush Astrid — fare better. But their characters are, well, too cartoony to believe. The dialogue could've used some rewrites. Whenever the movie ventures into the forest and homes in on the sweet friendship of Thames and Toothless, even the iciest crank will melt. OK, so 'How to Train Your Dragon' is watchable. That doesn't make the live-action remake trend any less toothless.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store