University in Hong Kong welcomes banned international students from Harvard
Advertisement
HKUST announced on Friday that it was 'opening its doors to Harvard students amid global academic shifts', expediting admissions, credit transfers and prioritising support for transitioning students, such as visa help and housing.
A special team and email hotline have been set up for prospective students affected by the shock ban.
'Diversity fuels creativity and progress,' said HKUST's provost, Professor Guo Yike.
'We are prepared to welcome Harvard students into our community, offering them the resources and vibrant environment needed to thrive in their fields.'
Advertisement
Earlier on Friday, the US Department of Homeland Security announced it was barring Harvard University from enrolling international students. Existing international students must either transfer to other institutions or leave the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
42 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
China confirms Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit at end of month
His comments, made during talks on the two countries' border dispute with Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval on Tuesday, came in the wake of a series of reports in Indian media that the visit would go ahead. It will be Modi's first trip to China in seven years and raises expectations he will meet Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the event. The SCO, a largely Eurasian security bloc that China chairs this year, will meet in the northern city of Tianjin between August 31 and September 1. Russian President Vladimir Putin had already confirmed he would attend. Wang's trip to India marked another milestone in ties between the two countries, which sharply deteriorated after a deadly border clash in 2020. The two countries are now seeing their relationship improve amid ongoing trade tensions with the United States. Wang said relations were on a steady course, with the border situation continuing to 'stabilise and improve'.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Is India's easing of rupee trade rules a response to US tariff threats?
India 's central bank has eased rules for settling international trade in rupees, a move analysts say could bolster the currency's global profile and reduce the country's dependence on the US dollar as trade tensions with Washington escalate. Advertisement Though New Delhi has distanced itself from global de-dollarisation drives, observer say the shift reflects a pragmatic push to insulate India from dollar volatility and future geopolitical risks. Earlier this month, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) said the country's banks would no longer need prior approval from the central bank before allowing the opening of special Rupee Vostro Accounts, easing the process for cross-border payments in the local currency. The move came amid the backdrop of Washington imposing import tariffs of 50 per cent on India, even as nations like Brazil called for a Brics trade currency as a dollar alternative. US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose higher tariffs on Brics – an association of 10 major emerging economies including India – if the bloc tries to weaken the dollar's global reserve currency status. 02:12 Trump to impose 25% tariff on India from August 1, plus 'penalty' for Russia ties Trump to impose 25% tariff on India from August 1, plus 'penalty' for Russia ties India has previously said it neither supports moves for a single Brics currency, nor any efforts aimed at undermining the use of the US dollar.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
How Beijing and other South China Sea claimants can see eye to eye
Few disputes in Asia are as enduring – and as polarising – as those over the South China Sea . For more than a decade, two sharply opposed narratives have dominated. In one, Beijing is seen as using force, or the threat of force, to change the status quo, undermining peace and stability. In the other, China is portrayed as exercising restraint, acting within its rights and working to safeguard regional stability. These perspectives are not merely different; they are mutually exclusive. One side's defensive action is interpreted as aggressive by the other, reinforcing mistrust and escalation. Measures to enhance one party's security inevitably diminish the sense of security for others. This makes de-escalation difficult and drives the dispute beyond legal or territorial boundaries into the realm of identity, national pride and historical grievance. Without narrowing this gulf, a peaceful resolution remains remote. At its core, the divergence stems from conflicting national interests. Yet the roots run deeper, in the incomplete territorial arrangements left after the second world war. The rapid onset of the Cold War froze parts of the post-war settlement in ambiguity. Treaties such as the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty and 1952 Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty required Japan to renounce the Spratly and Paracel Islands but did not specify their new sovereign owner. Beijing maintains these territories are historically Chinese, before Japan's wartime seizure. Other claimants read the record differently. Some argue Japan's renunciation did not automatically transfer sovereignty to China, rendering the islands terra nullius – open to lawful occupation.
