logo
NATO's 1.5%: Is this the detail that can derail the new spending deal?

NATO's 1.5%: Is this the detail that can derail the new spending deal?

Euronews8 hours ago

NATO leaders are preparing to agree on a historic military spending target as they convene in the Dutch city of The Hague for what's been deemed the alliance's most important gathering since its foundation.
Reaching a 5% GDP spending target would be a giant leap for most NATO members, as the vast majority currently invest less than 3% in defence.
The only exceptions are Poland (4.12%), Estonia (3.43%), the US (3.38%), Latvia (3.15%) and Greece (3.08%), according to Atlantic Council estimations.
What's in that 5% and what's the controversial bit?
The biggest chunk is a 3.5% GDP for "core defence spending", such as tanks, jets, drones, soldiers, tons of new artillery ammunition and - of course - troops.
But the remaining 1.5% leaves more questions open.
NATO called it "defence and security-related investments".
In other words, civilian and IT infrastructure designed to boost and support military operations, like bridges, roads and ports, storage, as well as cybersecurity and energy pipeline protection.
However, experts argue that this part of the budget is vague and open to national interpretations.
"With diverse traditions of civil preparedness across member states, this risks creative accounting and opportunistic prioritisation, while hampering cooperation", said Germany's Bertelsmann Stiftung think tank.
"If the 1.5% target fails to deliver measurable improvements in European resilience, it could backfire and strain transatlantic trust."
"NATO should establish a structured capability planning process mirroring its defence capability planning process, with clear alliance-wide objectives."
Is the spending target binding?
The devil is indeed in the details.
A NATO letter sent on Sunday to Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez seems to suggest that the 5% target might not be binding.
Spain, the letter says, "will have the flexibility to determine its own path for reaching the Capability Targets set by NATO", with more countries possibly advancing the exact requests.
Also, some allies could view it as a permission to allocate less than 5%, if they can prove they are nonetheless meeting the capability targets (whose list remains classified).
NATO's reassurance followed Spain's concerns about "unreasonable" spending targets.
"Allocating 5% of GDP to defence would slow down economic growth through an increase in debt", the PM has said.
The country currently spends around 1.28% of its GDP on defence, one of the lowest rates in the alliance.
The new NATO agreement will require countries to raise their spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, with a review of the allies' "spending trajectory" taking place midway in 2029.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Turkey tussles with Australia to host 2026 UN climate talks
Turkey tussles with Australia to host 2026 UN climate talks

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

Turkey tussles with Australia to host 2026 UN climate talks

At a meeting of climate diplomats, Turkey promised a world-class COP31 venue in Antalya, a seaside city that has previously hosted G20 and NATO conferences. "We are ready to make COP31 accessible, functional and inspiring," Aysin Turpanci, an official from Turkey's directorate of climate change, told delegates at mid-year UN negotiations in the German city of Bonn. She said Turkey's strategic position between Europe and Asia and its ability to bridge divides between developed and developing nations made it the ideal host. As anxiety grows over the cost and availability of accommodation for this year's summit in the Brazilian city of Belem, she said Antalya boasted more than 600,000 hotel beds. "The prices are able to serve participants from all levels," she told diplomats and non-governmental representatives at a special side event in Bonn to push Turkey's case. Nearly 200 nations attend the annual COP summits, which rotate through five groups of countries that must nominate, by consensus, a candidate to host the marathon climate negotiations. The "Western European and Other States" bloc is hosting in 2026 and two bids have emerged -- Turkey and Australia, which has proposed co-hosting with neighbouring Pacific Island nations. Persistent An Australian official in Bonn told AFP that Canberra was "working very hard to resolve the COP31 bid". Earlier this month, the country's environment minister, Murray Watt, also used a platform on the world stage to push Australia's case. "It's time for a climate COP in the Pacific region," Watt told government ministers at the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France. "COP31 would be an unprecedented opportunity to bring global attention to the unique challenges and opportunities in the Blue Pacific." The Pacific is severely threatened by rising seas and worsening storms, and many small island leaders have urged Turkey to withdraw from the race. But Ankara shows no sign of budging. "We reiterate our candidacy for COP presidency," the country's deputy environment minister, Fatma Varank, told delegates in Bonn. Veteran climate analyst Alden Meyer said Turkey was "definitely being very persistent in their bid". "Everyone is wondering, what is the game here? What does Turkey really want?" Meyer, from think tank E3G, told AFP in Bonn. "And it may or may not be anything related to climate", he added, pointing to possible trade or political goals. What is clear -- a winning candidate is not now expected to be declared during Bonn as hoped, Meyer said.

'Daddy diplomacy' at NATO: Trump's and Rutte's social media bonding
'Daddy diplomacy' at NATO: Trump's and Rutte's social media bonding

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

'Daddy diplomacy' at NATO: Trump's and Rutte's social media bonding

Mark Rutte found himself in the spotlight as the two-day summit in the Hague drew to a close as a series of exchanges of diplomatic niceties between the NATO secretary general and Donald Trump went viral. During a joint press appearance in Washington on Wednesday, Dutchman Rutte reacted to a bombastic statement on Iran and Israel from the US president, referring to his role as that of a "daddy' to Israel and Iran in the dispute during a press conference. "They fought like hell, and then they said let's stop," Trump said of Israel and Iran. "They're not gonna be fighting each other. They've had it. Like two kids in a schoolyard - you know they fight like hell, and you can't stop them. Let them fight for about two three minutes and then it's easier to stop them," said the US president. "Then daddy has to sometimes use strong language to get them to stop,' Rutte quipped, referencing Trump's use of an expletive on Tuesday, when he told reporters: "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f**k they're doing. Do you understand that?" Rutte's eyebrow-raising remark came just a day after Trump published private text messages from Rutte on his Truth Social platform. In the messages, the NATO chief congratulated Trump for his 'decisive action in Iran', calling it 'truly extraordinary' and thanking him for doing 'what no one else dared to do'. 'Mr President, dear Donald,' the message began before he praised Trump's longstanding pressure campaign on European allies to boost defence spending, saying the continent would now increase its military budgets 'in a BIG way'. Rutte has since defended the texts, saying they were 'appropriate' given the circumstances, and downplayed concerns about their tone. Head of the European Union diplomacy, Kaja Kallas defended Rutte on Euronews' Europe Today NATO summit special on Wednesday, when she said: "Mark Rutte is speaking Trump. He is speaking the language that President Trump understands.' Asked during NATO's closing press conference if his flattery of Trump isn't demeaning, Rutte replied: "No, I don't think so, I think it's a bit of a question of taste. He is a good friend." "Doesn't he deserve some praise?" [for the 5% of spending] - I think he deserves all the praise," he added, referring to the target of GDP spending on defence for NATO members.

Strikes on Iran's Fordow facility rendered it inoperable, Israel says
Strikes on Iran's Fordow facility rendered it inoperable, Israel says

Euronews

timean hour ago

  • Euronews

Strikes on Iran's Fordow facility rendered it inoperable, Israel says

Israel's Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC) has said that US and Israeli strikes on Iran on Sunday have rendered the Fordow underground enrichment site "inoperable." In a handout, the IAEC claimed the "devastating" strikes "destroyed the site's critical infrastructure." "We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, has set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years," the statement said. The statement was initially shared by the White House and then later released on X by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli assessment contradicts a leaked intelligence report from the US, which suggests that Iran's nuclear programme has only been set back by a few months and was not "completely and fully obliterated" as US President Donald Trump claimed. The report issued by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) on Monday is at odds with statements from Trump and Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities. The US report found that while the Sunday strikes at the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did cause significant damage, the facilities were not totally destroyed. Washington has held out hope of restarting negotiations with Tehran to convince it to give up its nuclear programme entirely, but some experts fear that the US strikes could push Iran towards developing a functioning nuclear weapon. The intelligence assessment also suggests that at least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium, necessary for creating a nuclear weapon, was moved from multiple sites before the US strikes. The centrifuges, required to further enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, are largely intact, it added. At Fordow, which is buried deep under a mountain north of the city of Qom, the US stealth bombers dropped several 14,000-kilogram bunker-buster bombs, collapsing the entrance and damaging infrastructure. But the facility itself was not destroyed, the intelligence assessment found. The White House rejected the DIA assessment, calling it "flat-out wrong," and Trump defended his characterisation of the strike's impact. "It was obliteration and you'll see that," Trump told reporters while attending the NATO summit in the Netherlands. He said the intelligence was "very inconclusive" and described media outlets as "scum" for reporting on it. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who is also at the NATO summit, said there would be an investigation into how the intelligence assessment leaked and dismissed it as "preliminary" and "low confidence." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, "these leakers are professional stabbers."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store