I've spent my life hunting Lockerbie bombers… the conspiracy that sickens me & cowards I fear will NEVER face justice
But this week, with the release of a new BBC drama about the downing of the airliner over Lockerbie in Scotland, he describes his bitter regret that not all the perpetrators have been brought to justice.
14
14
14
14
Alleged co-conspirator Lamin Fhimah was found not guilty of carrying out the 1988 atrocity – the deadliest terror attack in UK history - at the same trial.
And Dick, 77, is convinced there were at least four more Libyan nationals involved in the plot who they were never able to charge.
In an exclusive interview, he revealed: 'There are certainly regrets.
'We do this job so we can look the families in the eyes and say, 'We got justice for your relatives.'
'But when I spoke at a memorial service in Arlington, Virginia, I apologised.
'I told the victims' families: 'My one big regret is that we didn't get everybody.'
'I always hoped Megrahi would confess and he would tell us what happened.
'But his family was well taken care of, he became a martyr and he was pretty well catered to in jail in Scotland.'
Sitting in a restaurant in central London during an emotional return to the UK, Dick reels off the names of those he believes evaded justice, most or all of whom are now dead.
They include 'engineer' Ezzedine Hinshiri, spy chief Abdullah Senussi, intelligence officer Said Rashid and Libyan Arab Airlines executive Badri Hassan.
Alleged bomb maker Abu Agela Masud is another on his list and he is due to stand trial in the States, having been arrested in 2022.
I lost my daughter in Lockerbie bombing - now Colin Firth is playing me in new TV series
New documents uncovered by French investigative journalists Karl Laske and Vincent Nouzille, and Libyan activist Samir Shegwara, are said to confirm that Libya's Jamahiriya Security Organisation (JSO) conspired to plant a bomb in a suitcase loaded aboard Pan Am Flight 103.
The Detroit-bound plane was less than 40 minutes into its ascent from London Heathrow when, at just after 7pm on 21 December 1988, the device went off at 30,000ft - causing debris to rain down over an area of 845 square miles, creating the largest crime scene ever formed.
All 259 passengers and crew on board the Boeing 747 "Clipper Maid of the Seas" – including 190 US citizens - were killed and 11 more died when parts of the plane impacted with the ground.
More than 5,000 responders combed the countryside for clues afterwards and 319 tonnes of wreckage was found and taken as evidence.
During the investigation, 10,000 individuals were interviewed in 16 countries.
But it was only when a tiny fragment determined that the bomb had been placed inside a radio – and a second fragment identified the explosive timer – that the trail led to Libya.
Megrahi and Fhimah were charged in 1991 and their trial was held in a specially built Scottish court on former US military base Camp Zeist in the Netherlands.
In 2003, dictator Muammar Gaddafi accepted Libya was responsible and agreed to pay $1billion in compensation to victims' families.
There were rumours he struck in revenge for the killing of his adopted daughter in a US airstrike.
However, Gaddafi always maintained that he did not personally order the attack.
Conspiracy theories
And the case has been beset with conspiracy theories pointing the finger at other terror outfits including the Palestinian group, PFLP-GC.
Dr Jim Swire, 89 - whose daughter Flora was amongst the victims, and who was recently played by actor Colin Firth in the Sky Atlantic drama Lockerbie: A Search for Truth - is convinced Megrahi was framed for political reasons.
Dick hits back: 'I respect Dr Swire, I respect his opinion. I don't agree with it and I've told him as much.
'When I watched the Colin Firth drama and they snuck in the conspiracy theory about the planting of the fragment, well, it smacks all of us in the face, the suggestion we were corrupt.
'I know how the evidence was collected and how it was preserved. I know how it was protected. Those things just didn't happen.
'I'm 99.9 per cent certain that Masud armed the bomb and Megrahi and Fhimah arranged for it to be put on the plane.
'The plane took off and Megrahi and Musad flew back to Libya 30 minutes later and Fhimah went back 10 days later.
'Gaddafi had a lot of control over his intelligence agencies, but I can't say for certain that he gave the order.'
14
14
Traumatic toll
Father-of-three Dick today reveals the huge toll the investigation took on his health.
He said: 'When we started, we had a ton of information coming in from all over the world and I was in the office about 18 hours a day.
'You want to do the right thing, you want justice for the families.
'I only had one person tell me, 'If this gets f***ed up, it's your career.'
I didn't have a day off for at least a month. I had a lot of stress and it was all internal.
Dick Marquise
'I had lots of trips to the hospital emergency room with chest pains.
'I had an ulcer in my chest and it took three years to diagnose it.
'There were at least three trips to the ER and this was right before the indictment time (in late 1991).
'It was exacerbated by the travelling. I did 17 trips in about two years.
'I had two teenagers and a younger one and boys are a handful. My wife Pat was a real trooper and she held down the fort and managed those kids.'
Killer's last laugh
Megrahi was given a life sentence in 2001, but he was released on compassionate grounds eight years later having been diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer.
He received a hero's welcome on his return to Libya and spent his final days living in a villa in the capital Tripoli before he died in 2012.
Dick acted as a consultant on the new BBC series The Bombing of Pan Am 103, which started this week.
He believes the drama shows how the probe set new standards for international co-operation, thanks in part to the strong bond he formed with his UK counterpart Stuart Henderson, who died aged 79 in 2019.
14
14
Dick said: 'Stuart and I were like brothers. We were close for 30 years and he was a wonderful guy.
'I was a pallbearer at his funeral and his death deeply affected me. Going back and walking around Lockerbie, it brings back a lot of memories.
'He and I built rapport and that was something that was missing in the early days of the investigation when we were all fighting each other.
'When the verdict came in, Stuart sat behind me and I was next to FBI agent Phil Reid - and we were literally holding hands.
'They announced Megrahi first and said 'guilty' and I remember squeezing Phil's hand and we went, 'Yes!'
'But when Fhimah was acquitted, we said: 'That just doesn't make sense.'
'We were dejected afterwards, thinking how can they let him go?
'And when we got the sentence, someone calculated it was 27 days for every murder.
"Megrahi was released in 2009, so he didn't even get that long. It was hugely frustrating.'
The Bombing of Pan Am 103 continues on BBC iPlayer and BBC One on Sunday at 9pm.
14
14
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
4 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Police make six arrests at asylum hotel protest in London
Police made six arrests at a protest outside a hotel in London that has been used to house asylum seekers. Protesters gathered outside the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf on Sunday afternoon, with some setting off pink flares and waving England flags. Advertisement Some demonstrators carried a banner that said: 'We're not far right but we're not far wrong. Don't gamble with our lives. Stop the boats.' The Metropolitan Police said six arrests were made for breaching Section 14 Public Order conditions, possession of Class B drugs, and assaulting an emergency worker. In a post on X, the Metropolitan Police said: 'We have imposed conditions using Section 14 of the Public Order Act to prevent serious disruption at the protests in Canary Wharf. 'The group protesting against the use of the hotel by asylum seekers have been instructed to remain on the pavement opposite the Britannia Hotel.' Advertisement The hotel has been the site of numerous anti-migrant protests in recent weeks.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
I had revenge sex after boyfriend bedded my pal – but he thinks what I did was WORSE and constantly brings it up
DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER my boyfriend slept with my friend, I had revenge sex with someone from work. I forgave my boyfriend but apparently what I did is still an issue. We're eight months on and he constantly brings up my cheating. Yet, somehow, his infidelity isn't as important. I'm 25 and he is 26. We've been together for almost two years. A while back we went through a bad patch, because I felt neglected and needed more affection from him, but he refused to change. Miserable, I decided to take a break to see if he would change his mind. It backfired because within a week he had sex with a friend of mine. I was heartbroken but he convinced me to give him another chance. It played on my mind and I couldn't forget what he'd done. We decided we needed some space from one another to work out what we wanted. I was so angry and admit I behaved recklessly. One night I went out after work and got drunk. Looking back I can see I was on a mission: I flirted outrageously and went home with one of my colleagues, my mind was full of revenge. I knew this guy liked me, he had made it obvious before. He's 30 and single but he was a let-down in bed. Afterwards I felt so guilty, I confessed to my boyfriend. Spotting the signs your partner is cheating Still, I was taken aback when he admitted he'd been getting to know another girl and she had given him oral sex. We agreed to forgive one another but my boyfriend is finding it difficult to forget. He always brings up what I did, even though I don't say anything about his behaviour. My sex drive is almost non-existent now. I wonder if it's because he won't accept we are as bad as each other. DEIDRE SAYS: As you now know, two wrongs do not make a right. I understand your anger with your boyfriend but, as you discovered, revenge didn't give you the satisfaction you were seeking. Every time something goes wrong in your relationship, you both run away from the issues. But unless you can dig in, talk about how you feel and start to open up, it won't be possible to create trust. You both will continue to question the other, think the worst of them and – in time – no doubt stray again. You need to be positive about the future and the pleasures you can share but if nothing changes you should think about calling it a day. My support pack Cheating – Can You Get Over It? will help. I'VE LOST WIFE TO THE GYM DEAR DEIDRE: MY wife wants to move out, leaving me and the kids. I put it down to her gym obsession – or one of her workout buddies has turned her head. She joined a gym three years ago, now she's addicted. She's constantly posting on social media about how far she's run or how many bench presses she's done. Is anyone interested? Even our two teenage kids are fed-up. It's as if we don't exist – she'll meet friends from the gym on Tuesdays and Friday nights and now it's spilling into our weekends. We had a row about me feeling second-best but she said she can't give up the gym and we'd be better off with her living elsewhere. I'm a 45-year-old man, she's 40. There's a guy who always goes out with her. He's 43 and equally obsessed with fitness. She says they're friends. But why this sudden urgency for her to get her own place? DEIDRE SAYS: She's checked out – but you can fight to keep her invested, for the sake of all of you. Keep calm and hold a mirror up to her obsession. Explain the children are missing her presence and so are you. She may be feeling a crisis at reaching 40 but she's paying a high price. Be honest – if you've neglected your relationship too, tell her that you're going to wipe the slate clean and look at it through fresh eyes. Counselling will help. See or call 020 7380 1975. SEXY PHONE PICS ENRAGED LOVER DEAR DEIDRE: SOME revealing pictures and messages sent to me by an old friend have flipped out my girlfriend, after she went into my phone and saw them. I am 27 and my girlfriend is 24. We have been together for two years and I absolutely adore her. We met online but I am the first proper boyfriend she has had and the only guy she has fallen in love with. I have no intention of ever cheating on her but do have a bit of a reputation for being flirty. I bumped into my old friend in a coffee shop in town. I have known her since we were both 16. She looked amazing and it was good to see her. My friend and I had never got together but I'd always fancied her so when I discovered she had always liked me it was a huge ego boost. That day we sat and chatted and she admitted she had always had a crush on me. I didn't really know what to say so just laughed it off. But a few days later she messaged me and we began chatting. At first it was just day-to-day stuff but then the messages became flirtier. I now realise a little bit of flirting can run away with you and soon become out of control. My girlfriend has accused me of cheating, which I guess it was. I am now wondering whether I will ever be able to have a relationship without harming it. I can't eat or sleep worrying about the damage I have caused to my relationship. DEIDRE SAYS: Flirting may seem harmless but some see it as micro-cheating. Your girlfriend clearly feels you have betrayed her. She needs to know that you are there for her, because your attention has certainly been elsewhere. Ask yourself how you would feel if she was exchanging revealing pictures and messages with another guy. Talk to her about her boundaries, and what constitutes cheating in her eyes, and see if you can agree limits. Talking this through will bring you closer. Flirting can be driven by low self-worth. My support pack Raising Self-esteem explains more about the underlying causes. BOYFRIEND DUMPED ME FOR ARMY DEAR DEIDRE: I AM heartbroken because my boyfriend is joining the Army and no longer wants to be in a relationship with me. I have begged him to reconsider but he is adamant that he has made up his mind. I have even said I will move to wherever he is going to be based, so we can be closer, but he is not listening. He doesn't want to know. I am 19 and my boyfriend is 20. We have been together for almost a year. We discussed marriage and kids, even though he never made as much effort as I did during our time together. I have been saving for our wedding for over a year and he told me he was putting money aside to buy me an engagement ring. I know he has always wanted a career in the Army and there is nothing wrong with him being ambitious. What I can't understand is why he is being so cruel by completely cutting me out of his life. I am devastated. DEIDRE SAYS: I am sorry he has dealt with this in such a hurtful way. He is young, and clearly wants to see more of life and broaden his horizons before he settles down. Even though it is devastating for you, it is better that you find out now rather than later down the line. My support pack Mend Your Broken Heart will help you to learn from this and move on.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Rank unfairness of UK today means Starmer's Two Tier Kier nickname has stuck – but here's how he can shed it
FOR those enraged at growing evidence of 'two-tier' Britain, the acquittal of Ricky Jones last week was just the latest depressing example. Here was a Labour councillor being cleared of encouraging violent disorder despite calling for far-right protesters to have their throats slit. 3 3 Reform and the Tories seized on the case as yet another blinding display of courtroom double standards. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp wasted no time laying the travesty squarely at the feet of Sir Keir Starmer. In a tweet viewed more than two million times, he said 'as far as I can see, this Labour Government seems to be quite happy with two-tier justice'. Cue howls of anger from online liberals, who breathlessly crowed that not only was he disrespecting the decision of a jury, he was unfairly meting out blame to ministers. 'You ought to know this has nothing to do with them', retorted the arch-Conservative wet Dominic Grieve. 'That is the hallmark of a rabble rouser.' Rank unfairness But people are roused. In fact, they are bloody furious about what they perceive to be rampant 'two-tierism'. The refrain thundered into the political lexicon like a bullet train in the tinderbox aftermath of last year's Southport riots. In that sticky, angry summer, there was a feeling the clunking fist of the British state was being disproportionately brought down upon a certain kind of protester. For a public that routinely watches paedophiles walk free, the case of Lucy Connolly — slung in the slammer for a disgraceful but quite clearly stupid tweet — became a lightning rod. Even now, her 31-month jail sentence is the yardstick held up against some of the more mind-boggling outcomes from our judiciary. 'Two-tier' justice savaged by Kemi Badenoch who blasts 'extraordinary' decision to spare Huw Edwards You can argue the toss over how much blame ministers should shoulder for policing and court decisions. We have an independent judiciary but it is of course Parliament that makes our laws and ministers who make the political weather. Rightly or wrongly, Starmer is the man at the sharp end of the criticism. And much more dangerously for him, allegations of two-tier standards have now stretched well beyond the orbit of crime and seeped into every cranny of public life. It has become a byword for the rank unfairness voters see in modern day Britain. Charges of two-tierism are so common I'd eat my notebook if it is not the 2025 Oxford word of the year. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look Of all the unfortunate nicknames bestowed upon our Prime Minister, none has stuck quite so solidly as Two Tier Keir. For voters who feel they are being taken for a ride, they now see two-tierism everywhere they look. Ordinary British families struggling to pay the rent watch in fury as undocumented illegal migrants waltz into hotels for free bed and board. Law-abiding citizens paying full whack for council services and leisure activities read revelations in The Sun about small-boat migrants getting discounts. Millions of workers setting their alarm clocks for crack of dawn see an ever-growing number of their countrymen and women signing on for welfare with zero requirements to look for work. Taxpayers squeezed more than ever wonder where the improvement in public services is to show for it. Passengers paying hefty Tube fares rattle with rage as guards turn a blind eye to entitled oiks bumping the barriers. And just last week, we saw Birmingham council tear down St George flags from lamp-posts while turning a blind eye to Palestinian ones. Two-tierism is more than just a buzzword — it captures the mood of a nation fed up with a system they increasingly feel is not on their side. The PM's political enemies are alive to just how damaging the Two Tier Keir narrative has become. Consider how just last year those who brandished allegations of two-tierism were dismissed as cranks and nutjobs, whereas now these are mainstream complaints. Even when Starmer was shoving Netflix show Adolescence down our throats, but neglected to watch a documentary about grooming gangs, he was accused of 'two-tier telly'. How does Sir Keir neutralise these attacks and restore the faith of a nation that loves rules and loathes unfairness? Winning the trust of voters always starts by showing them you get it. Starmer will never himself use the T-word — a refrain adopted mainly by the political Right. And it is unlikely this former lawyer will start openly criticising his old profession, although it is a good first step that he has pledged new legislation to stop dinghy-chasing lawyers weaponising European human-rights laws. Kick up backside Expect him to start wrapping himself up in the language of 'fairness' over the next few months, though, as he tries to show he does in fact get it. He tweeted yesterday: 'I will do what it takes to uphold the law and ensure fairness for the British people. 'If someone doesn't have the right to be in this country, we won't allow them to stay.' Which is all well and good, but the rhetoric has to be matched by results. Whitehall departments have been given a kick up the backside to deliver positive stories about this Government to sell. At a recent summer bash, No10 chiefs told Cabinet aides that the Health, Treasury and Environment departments had churned out the most 'top of the grid' stories — a pointed reminder to slackers to up their game. Stopping the boats, closing hotels, driving living standards, going after genuine criminals and getting more people into work — voters don't ask the world of their politicians, they just want the basics done right so they can get on in life. Sir Keir needs to restore that uniquely British sense of fairness — or it could all end in tiers. NEVER wrestle with a pig – you both get dirty but the pig likes it. I fear Sir Keir Starmer's latest mud-slinging campaign against Nigel Farage could see him end up on the wrong end of that old political slogan. 3 New Labour attack ads claim the Reform leader 'wants to make it easier to share revenge porn online' and would 'put women and girls at risk'. Another one attempts to portray him as best mates with social media misogynist Andrew Tate. It all comes shortly after ministers lampooned Farage, right, as 'on the side' of modern day Jimmy Saviles. Politics can be a dirty business and sometimes it pays dividends to go below the belt. But if the gloves are off, the PM should not be surprised if he now gets hit back twice as hard. And Reform are hardly the sort who will pull their punches. I suspect the real reason Labour has ratcheted up the criticism is that nothing else is sticking to Teflon Nige, or knocking him off his perch atop the polls. A No10 insider recently told me their attempts to undermine the costs of Farage's policies were futile. They said: 'We are so far out from a general election that nobody cares about whether the sums add up. It's all vibes.'
