Ex-council boss denies he fuelled protests sparked by job loss rumours
Union members chanted 'Put some pork on your fork' and held up a toy pig at the protest directed at Mannoun, who is Muslim, before police were called to a chaotic council meeting on April 24 last year, when Ajaka was stood down pending an independent investigation into his behaviour at a meeting.
Ajaka on Wednesday faced cross-examination in a public inquiry into alleged dysfunction and maladministration at the council in south-west Sydney. The inquiry has previously heard Ajaka was hired in late 2022, and his working relationship with Mannoun had deteriorated by the time Ajaka told the mayor to 'shut the f--- up' in a meeting about staff employment on April 16 last year.
Ajaka, a former Liberal MP, this week told the inquiry he became aware an email about the false rumour was circulating, and had met a senior union delegate, the day before United Services Union advocate Steve Donley told 2GB Radio host Ray Hadley that 150 jobs at the council were 'on the line', and workers and union members were to protest outside a council meeting the next day.
The inquiry heard Donley had told Hadley on air: 'The CEO, John Ajaka, has been told that there will be a council meeting tomorrow at [2pm]. They'll go into a closed session and the so-called mayor, Ned Mannoun, will sack him.'
Loading
Hadley said that 'according to Steve Donley, the mayor is doing his best to remove John Ajaka', before he declared a conflict of interest and said he had known Ajaka and his family for a long time.
Ajaka said multiple people had called him about what was said in the interview, which he did not hear, and that although he knew Hadley, he would not describe him as a friend.
Ajaka said he knew there would be a demonstration, but he did not expect it would be volatile.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
‘Cautious': Visa crackdown sparks worry
Senior Liberal MP Tim Wilson says he is 'cautious' after Anthony Albanese's immigration chief revealed he had blocked dozens of visas to protect 'social cohesion'. Tony Burke holds a suite of powerful portfolios in the Albanese government, including home affairs and immigration. This gives him direct oversight of intelligence and policing concerns as well as the means to curb foreign threats, such as by rejecting visa applications. Immigration Minister Tony Burke says he has blocked dozens of visas to protect 'social cohesion'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia With deteriorating social cohesion keeping the terror threat level high, Mr Burke has not hesitated to refuse entry to high-profile figures, including rapper Kanye West and conservative conspiracy theorist Candace Owens – both highly publicised ordeals. But in a recent interview, Mr Burke revealed he had refused many more that had not reached headlines. Mr Wilson said on Tuesday he was worried not everyone was being held to the same standard. Senior Liberal MP Tim Wilson says visa approval standards 'should be consistent'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'I'm cautious because what it does is empower the minister,' the opposition industry and workplace relations spokesman told Nine's Today. He went on to say Mr Burke 'in 2018 advocated for a visa for somebody who believed in the enslavement and the punishment of homosexuals and the subjugation of women'. 'You need to make sure that there are clear guidelines that are broadly, equally applicable,' Mr Wilson said. 'If people are going to advocate for harm against Australians, the standard should be consistent, not based on what the minister simply decides based on the whim of the day or his political considerations.' More to come.
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Near 60 per cent jump in price of offshore wind in the UK a cautionary tale for Chris Bowen and his unprecedented new renewables remit
UN climate chief Simon Stiell has warned that megaâ€'droughts could one day make fresh fruit and vegetables a 'onceâ€'aâ€'year treat' in Australia, alongside a forecasted $6.8 trillion GDP loss by 2050 unless emissions targets are dramatically ramped up. It would be funny if it weren't being parroted so earnestly. An unelected Grenadian bureaucrat, clocking up air miles on long-haul jets, presuming to tell Australian taxpayers what their priorities should be, as though it's his divine right. Another climate hypocrite in the conga line of green evangelists, shrieking about catastrophe while living comfortably above the sacrifices they demand of everyone else. Next month, the Albanese government is expected to lock in its 2035 emissions target once the Climate Change Authority, chaired by former NSW Liberal premier Matt Kean, hands down its advice. The figure will likely fall between 65 and 75 per cent cuts compared to 2005 levels, dwarfing the already ambitious 43 per cent reduction due by 2030. This is less a public mandate than a frantic bid to impress international delegates ahead of Australia's COP31 hosting bid. Yet no one seems to have asked Australians whether bankrupting their country for climate kudos is a good idea. Or if they're prepared to see food and energy become luxuries in the name of 'ambition'. Meanwhile, households and businesses are already paying for this grand experiment. Between 2023 and midâ€'2025, energy bills have soared around 40 per cent nationwide. From July, default market offers climbed up to 10 per cent across NSW, Queensland, Victoria and South Australia; slugging families with an extra $280 a year. That's hardly pocket change for people who already turn the heating off to keep costs down. Small businesses are on life support. A family-run grocer in Wagga Wagga expects a $24,000 annual hike despite rooftop solar. Across the country, policy shifts have added roughly $4 billion to energy costs, squeezing margins, fuelling inflation and driving up food prices. Electricity costs rose 8.1 per cent in the past year alone, feeding directly into the 4.3 per cent spike in grocery bills and 4.5 per cent rent increases. The same policymakers who promise to save the planet are making it harder for ordinary people to afford dinner. And here's the kicker: Australia is one of the most resource-rich nations on earth. It has the largest coal deposits in the world, vast gas reserves, uranium for nuclear energy and critical minerals that the green transition itself depends on. Yet these assets are increasingly politically off-limits. Billions are poured into renewables while the grid can't cope with intermittent supply, new transmission lines face fierce local opposition, and large-scale storage remains a fantasy. The government wants 82 per cent renewables by 2030, yet warns of looming blackouts. The numbers don't add up, but the ideology marches on. Simon Stiell's sermon about fruit scarcity and GDP losses comes with theatrical hand-waving but little mention of the obvious: China, which builds coal-fired plants with impunity, emits more in a fortnight than Australia does all year and faces no comparable scolding. If Australia disappeared tomorrow, global emissions would barely flinch. Yet our leaders are desperate for pats on the back from unelected bureaucrats, ready to sacrifice competitiveness and affordability for a headline moment on the world stage. We've reached a point where even questioning the policy orthodoxy (what the UN frames as ambition) is treated as blasphemy. If you ask why the West should commit economic self-harm while other nations refuse to play ball, you're a denier. Nigel Farage found his bank account closed in part for being climate-sceptical. A climate priesthood is emerging, intolerant of dissent, allergic to scrutiny, and intoxicated by its own rhetoric. Britain's experience should be a cautionary tale. Successive governments have thrown billions at offshore wind, locking consumers into spiralling costs. The latest strike prices in Contracts for Difference auctions are around £60 per megawatt hour, nearly 60 per cent higher than two years ago. With wholesale electricity averaging £70–75/MWh, taxpayers are effectively underwriting inflated returns for developers while grid bottlenecks and storage delays mean intermittency remains unsolved. The supposed 'cheap wind revolution' has never materialised on consumer bills. Instead, households face higher costs and dwindling energy security- all for climate milestones that look impressive on a spreadsheet but feel punishing in reality. This hyperbolic messaging is deliberate. Andrew Neil exposed it live on the BBC when an Extinction Rebellion spokesperson admitted that exaggerated claims about climate-related deaths were used because 'alarmism works'. UN Secretary-General António Guterres took it further in 2023, declaring that 'the era of global boiling has arrived', that 'the air is unbreathable, the is heat unbearable'. Apocalyptic wordplay wins headlines, but it breeds despair, not action. A 2021 University of Bath survey found 56 per cent of young people worldwide believe humanity is doomed. If you think the end is guaranteed, why invest, innovate or adapt? Why train as an engineer or put capital into clean tech when the message from leaders is that it's already too late? In Canberra, politics has devolved into theatre. Labor governs with a majority but faces a Senate pulled between Greens and Teal independents demanding even harsher cuts, and a Coalition that only half-heartedly argues for gas and a slower transition. The tug-of-war has left no space for serious debate about cost, reliability or trade-offs. Real people pay real bills, industries consider offshoring, and taxpayers fund green gambles that threaten jobs and prosperity. Yet politicians fall over themselves to show 'ambition' to the UN, treating pain at home as proof of virtue abroad. There is a saner path. We can slash emissions without strangling growth or making families choose between heating and eating. With Australia's vast natural resources, it should be using cleaner coal, advanced gas technology, nuclear power where viable, and investing properly in energy storage and transmission to make renewables work. Innovation, not ideology, will get us to lower emissions faster than bureaucratic diktats and theatrical targets. But for now, the West seems intent on policy masochism, applauded by the same unelected officials who never pay the price. If climate leadership now means empty wallets, unreliable grids and strawberries rationed like wartime luxuries, we've gone badly wrong. We're not decarbonising the planet. We're decarbonising prosperity. It's time to bring common sense back to the table before the only thing we power reliably is fear. Esther Krakue is a British commentator who has regularly appeared on Sky News Australia programs, as well as on TalkTV and GB News in the UK. She launched her career with Turning Point UK, with whom she hosted a show featuring guests including Douglas Murray and Peter Hitchens
The Age
4 hours ago
- The Age
Gareth Ward to oppose motion that would force him out of parliament
The NSW lower house will move to expel convicted rapist MP Gareth Ward from parliament on Tuesday, but a vote on the motion will be delayed until Wednesday after lawyers for the former Liberal minister raised concerns about procedural fairness. Ward, the MP for Kiama since 2011, was found guilty last month of one count of sexual intercourse without consent and three counts of indecent assault against two young men he had met through his role as a parliamentarian. The 44-year-old's bail was revoked on Wednesday, but he has not resigned his seat in parliament, prompting the leader of the house, Ron Hoenig, to write to Ward asking him to provide any statement or material he wanted the Legislative Assembly to consider before any move to expel him. Ward's lawyers have responded to Hoenig but the details of the correspondence have not been revealed. His lawyers were contacted for comment but they did not respond. The motion has the backing of Labor, as well as in-principle support from the Coalition. Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said he would want to see legal advice before making a final decision on the expulsion motion. Under the NSW Constitution Act, an MP's seat is declared vacant if they are convicted of crime that is punishable by five years or more in prison, although under changes to the law in 2000, conviction is considered to mean 'once you have reached the end of the appeals process, if you choose to appeal, and not had the conviction overturned'. Ward issued a statement late last week confirming he intended to appeal against his conviction. However, parliament also has the power to expel an MP for 'unworthy conduct'.
