logo
Greasing the wheels of the energy transition to address climate change and fossil fuels phase out

Greasing the wheels of the energy transition to address climate change and fossil fuels phase out

Business Mayor04-05-2025

The global energy system may be faced with an inescapable trade-off between urgently addressing climate change versus avoiding an energy shortfall, according to a new energy scenario tool developed by University of South Australia researchers and published in the open access journal Energies .
The Global Renewable Energy and Sectoral Electrification model, dubbed 'GREaSE', has been developed by UniSA Associate Professor James Hopeward with three civil engineering graduates.
'In essence, it's an exploratory tool, designed to be simple and easy for anyone to use, to test what-if scenarios that aren't covered by conventional energy and climate models,' Assoc Prof Hopeward says.
Three Honours students — Shannon O'Connor, Richard Davis and Peter Akiki — started working on the model in 2023, hoping to answer a critical gap in the energy and climate debate.
'When we hear about climate change, we're typically presented with two opposing scenario archetypes,' Assoc Prof Hopeward says.
'On the one hand, there are scenarios of unchecked growth in fossil fuels, leading to climate disaster, while on the other hand there are utopian scenarios of renewable energy abundance.'
The students posed the question: what if the more likely reality is somewhere in between the two extremes? And if it is, what might we be missing in terms of risks to people and the planet?
After graduating, the team continued to work with Assoc Prof Hopeward to develop and refine the model, culminating in the publication of 'GREaSE' in Energies .
Using the model, the researchers have simulated a range of plausible future scenarios including rapid curtailment of fossil fuels, high and low per-capita demand, and different scenarios of electrification.
According to Richard Davis, 'a striking similarity across scenarios is the inevitable transition to renewable energy — whether it's proactive to address carbon emissions, or reactive because fossil fuels start running short.'
But achieving the rapid cuts necessary to meet the 1.5°C targets set out in the Paris Agreement presents a serious challenge.
As Ms O'Connor points out, 'even with today's rapid expansion of renewable energy, the modelling suggests it can't expand fast enough to fill the gap left by the phase-out of fossil fuels, creating a 20 to 30-year gap between demand and supply.
'By 2050 or so, we could potentially expect renewable supply to catch up, meaning future demand could largely be met by renewables, but while we're building that new system, we might need to rebalance our expectations around how much energy we're going to have to power our economies.'
The modelling does not show that emissions targets should be abandoned in favour of scaling up fossil fuels. The researchers say this would 'push the transition a few more years down the road.'
Assoc Prof Hopeward says it is also unlikely that nuclear power could fill the gap, due to its small global potential.
'Even if the world's recoverable uranium resources were much larger, it would scale up even more slowly than renewables like solar and wind,' he says.
'We have to face facts: our long-term energy future is dominated by renewables. We could transition now and take the hit in terms of energy supply, or we could transition later, once we've burned the last of the fossil fuel. We would still have to deal with essentially the same transformation, just in the midst of potentially catastrophic climate change.
'It's a bit like being told by your doctor to eat healthier and start exercising. You've got the choice to avoid making the tough changes now, and just take your chances with surviving the heart attack later, or you get on with what you know you need to do. We would argue that we really need to put our global energy consumption on a diet, ASAP.'
The researchers have designed the model to be simple, free and open source, in the hope that it sparks a wider conversation around energy and climate futures.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doctor mistakenly implants wrong embryo in IVF patient mix-up
Doctor mistakenly implants wrong embryo in IVF patient mix-up

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Doctor mistakenly implants wrong embryo in IVF patient mix-up

One of Australia's top IVF providers mistakenly implanted a patient with her own embryo instead of her partner's. Monash IVF said the incident occurred on June 5 at a clinic in Melbourne but did not provide further details, such as how it learned of the bungle or what the couple planned to do next. The company said it was supporting the couple, who it did not identify. It marks the second fertility clinic mix-up of its kind in the country, heightening concerns about an industry that did not have much active government oversight until recently. The clinic said the patient's embryo was mistakenly implanted under a treatment plan which called for an embryo from the patient's partner to be transferred. The incident builds on a reputational maelstrom for Monash IVF, which was already reeling from an April disclosure that an Australian woman had given birth to a stranger's baby after a fertility doctor accidentally implanted the wrong embryo in Brisbane in 2023. That mix-up sparked concerns about security protocols at IVF clinics and an industry which is only now in the process of being more regulated. Monash claimed the world's first IVF pregnancy five decades ago and is Australia's second-largest IVF provider, carrying out nearly a quarter of the country's 100,000 assisted reproductive cycles a year, according to industry data. "This mix-up, the second reported incident at Monash IVF, risks shaking confidence not just in one provider but across the entire fertility sector," said Hilary Bowman-Smart, a researcher and bioethicist at the University of South Australia. Shares of Monash IVF were down 25 per cent by mid-session on Tuesday, against a rising broader market. The stock is just over half its value before the April announcement. "We had thought the Brisbane clinic embryo transfer error was an isolated incident," Craig Wong-Pan, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, said in a client note. "We believe there is now risk of a greater impact of reputational damage and market share losses to MVF's operations." Monash IVF had already hired a lawyer to run an independent investigation after the Brisbane incident, and said on Tuesday it has extended the scope of that investigation. It added that it was installing interim extra verification safeguards to ensure patient confidence. It said it had reported the Melbourne incident to the Victorian Department of Health and industry licensing body, the Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee (RTAC), part of industry group the Fertility Society of Australia. Victorian health minister Mary-Anne Thomas said the department was investigating the company and the incident. "Families should have confidence that the treatment they are receiving is done to the highest standard," she said. "It is clear Monash IVF has failed to deliver that, which is completely unacceptable." Fertility Society president Petra Wale said the incident would have had an emotional toll on the family, but stressed mistakes in the sector were rare. The society reiterated a call to implement nationally consistent laws around IVF. Currently, the country's IVF industry is regulated by a combination of industry bodies and state and territory health departments, resulting in a governance and compliance system that some groups say is too complex. Reports of transferring the wrong embryo are rare, according to fertility experts, and Monash's Brisbane mix-up was widely reported as the first known case of its kind.

Residents endure brutal conditions as record-breaking temperatures soar to 125 degrees: 'Extremely vulnerable'
Residents endure brutal conditions as record-breaking temperatures soar to 125 degrees: 'Extremely vulnerable'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Residents endure brutal conditions as record-breaking temperatures soar to 125 degrees: 'Extremely vulnerable'

May sizzled in the Middle East as the United Arab Emirates set back-to-back records for heat. The mercury climbed to an incredible 51.6 degrees Celsius (nearly 125 degrees Fahrenheit) on May 24 in Sweihan, a town in the Al Ain Region of the United Arab Emirates, according to an AFP report. It was only about 0.7 degrees Fahrenheit lower than the hottest temperature recorded in the UAE since tracking began in 2003. The temperature of 51.6 degrees Celsius in Sweihan and a measurement of 50.4 degrees Celsius (about 122.7 degrees Fahrenheit) in Abu Dhabi a day earlier both eclipsed the previous UAE record for May of 50.2 degrees Celsius (about 122.4 degrees Fahrenheit), according to the AFP report, which contains meteorology office information. It's been a brutal year for extreme temperatures in the Middle East. The UAE also reported an average daily high of 42.6 degrees Celsius (about 109 degrees Fahrenheit) in April, a new record for the month. A 2022 Greenpeace report titled "Living on the Edge" warned of the dangerous impact extreme heat would have on six countries in the Middle East and North Africa region. That report said the region was "extremely vulnerable" to the effects of an overheating planet, per Individual temperature records do not indicate a trend on their own, but taken in the broader context of average warming over time, they can highlight a larger concern. A recently released World Meteorological Organization report has forecasted continuing record-high global temperatures. "There is an 80% chance that at least one year between 2025 and 2029 will be warmer than the warmest year on record (currently 2024)," the report noted. "And there is an 86% chance that at least one year will be more than 1.5°C above the pre-industrial level." This underscores how close the world is to breaching — at least for a single-year average — the long-term 1.5-degree Celsius target limit for warming established by the Paris Agreement, a global pact of 195 nations. The WMO's warning shouldn't surprise anyone, since Earth has been running a fever for over a decade. Last year added to a streak: Each of the last 11 years ranks among the hottest ever recorded, and since only 2012, the U.S. has seen its eight warmest years, as Climate Central reported. As NASA noted, "Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth's surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth's climate." Therefore, one way to try to avoid the worst effects of extreme heat is to seek alternatives to burning fuels for energy. Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. There have been promising new developments in the solar industry. For example, scientists in Japan have developed an all-organic material that could revolutionize solar panels — they are working on making solar panels not only more efficient, but also more eco-friendly. An international team of scientists is also collaborating to pave the way for more efficient thin-film solar panel technology. Thin film solar has been described as "the future of the solar industry" by the American Solar Energy Society because it's cheaper to make, uses fewer materials, and is easy to manufacture. Installing solar panels with a battery can help protect your home against blackouts and extreme weather while slashing your dependence on dirty energy — and in many cases, reducing your energy bill to nearly zero. With EnergySage, you can compare trusted installers and save up to $10,000 on solar installation. Embracing renewable energy sources like solar can help cool our planet by curbing harmful carbon pollution. Other ways to help the world and your wallet include replacing an old HVAC system with a heat pump and opting for an induction stove instead of a conventional range. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.
Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Climate change is here, but don't give up. We can still avoid the worst of it.

2024 was the hottest in at least 125,000 years and the past 10 years have been the 10 hottest in nearly 200 years of record-keeping, the World Meteorological Organization reports. 2024 also has the dubious distinction of being the first calendar year in modern record-keeping in which global average surface temperatures exceed the Paris Agreement's aspirational 1.5°C guardrail to prevent disastrous global warming effects. Why does this matter? Holding long-term warming to the 1.5-degree target compared to the preindustrial era is crucial for lowering the risk of triggering climate change tipping points, beyond which potentially catastrophic impacts have a higher likelihood of occurring, studies show. Holding warming to that target is viewed as necessary for small island states and other extremely vulnerable nations to avoid being wiped out by sea level rise, drought and other threats. Seven years ago, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted that the world wouldn't warm 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels until 2040. Then two years ago, the group predicted the world would pass that threshold between 2030 and 2035. Now, new data from the WMO released this month indicates that Earth will cross this point in just two years. The accelerated timeline means that irreversible tipping points in the climate system — like the melting of Arctic ice sheets or the wide-scale collapse of coral reefs — are closer at hand than scientists previously believed. Greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are the chief culprit, dangerously heating up the planet, imperiling biodiversity, increasing sea level rise and drought and making extreme weather events more common and more destructive. And the oil industry has known this for decades. The American Petroleum Institute commissioned a study by the Stanford Research Institute in 1968 which found: 'Significant temperature changes are almost certain to occur by the year 2000, and these could bring about climatic changes. ... there seems to be no doubt that the potential damage to our environment could be severe. ... pollutants which we generally ignore because they have little local effect, CO2 and submicron particles, may be the cause of serious world-wide environmental changes.' Opinion: Congress must fund Farm Bill conservation programs to protect local ranches It was the first of dozens of studies the industry paid for or knew about, all predicting climate change dangers, including major reports in 1979, 1982, and 1991. Then the 'climate denial' began. In 2015 and again in 2025, the Union of Concerned Scientists documented decades of internal industry memos and strategy sessions that were organizing, funding and detailing roughly four decades of lies foisted on the American public. The industry and its executives' efforts were all, apparently, in the service of preserving their profits and avoiding any liability for the deaths and destruction they knew would one day come as a result of their product poisoning our atmosphere. The election of Donald Trump is a clear setback to the world's ability to rein in dangerous levels of warming. Mr. Trump, who has called global warming a hoax, pulled out of the Paris accord on his first day in office. He has also, as requested by the oil industry, reversed or plans to rescind a raft of regulations to clean up climate pollution. These include tail pipe and fuel economy standards, a fee on methane emissions from oil and gas facilities, and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) waiver that has allowed California — and 11 other states — to set emissions standards stricter than those at the federal level. In addition to largely isolating the United States on the global climate-diplomacy stage, actions like these would also hand a geopolitical win to the country's main rival, China, which has spent a decade building up a powerful clean-energy industry and is now increasingly exporting it worldwide. Most damaging, however, we would lose more precious time. If we act now — decisively and dramatically — we still have a chance at avoiding climate change's most catastrophic impacts. Think about this as we suffer through another sweltering summer. Mike Altshuler is a retired educator and environmental activist who lives in Edmond. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Weather is hot, dangerous here. We can't let it get worse | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store