MTA plans to add 300 new transit jobs
Part of the MTA's 2025-2029 Capital Plan, currently 'under negotiation in Albany,' will bring more construction projects in-house.
More Local News
Some $6 billion of work in the 2025-2029 budget will be completed by in-house workers over private contractors, according to David Soliman, vice president of subway facilities. This will require 300 more jobs to New York City Transit, which oversees subway and bus service, he said.
Some of these jobs will include interior staircase renovations, platform barrier installation, above-ground station roof and enclosure work, and work at shops and yards.
The union representing New York City transit workers said the new jobs were negotiated in Albany.
'We successfully made the case that work done by TWU members is of higher quality, more cost-effective, and is completed more quickly than projects given to private contractors,' TWU Local 100 President John Chiarello said. 'We fully support this capital plan and want to see it funded and implemented.'
More: Latest News from Around the Tri-State
The $68 billion 2025-2029 capital program was first released in September.
'Our capital plan is hanging in the balance,' MTA Chair Janno Lieber said. 'There is a lot at stake and we did adopt it some time ago, even though there's not a program on the table at this minute.'
To find open MTA jobs, click here.
Emily Rahhal is a digital reporter who has covered New York City since 2023 after reporting in Los Angeles for years. She joined PIX11 in 2024. See more of her work here and follow her on Twitter here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
'…Add That to Our Code of Conduct': Bank of America Stock (NYSE:BAC) Notches Up After Rule Change
The notion of 'debanking' someone—be it a person or group—is a downright dangerous one in America. It basically removes the ability to do business with a bank, which all but destroys a person or group's ability to earn money. And now, Bank of America (BAC) is turning away from such principles, and investors are pleased. Bank of America shares ticked up fractionally in Thursday morning's trading. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. A New York Post report noted that Bank of America has turned its back on a rule that allowed businesses and charities to be 'debanked.' There was a rule known as the 'reputational risk clause' built into some key federal banking regulations, which allowed banks to deny services to certain groups that engaged in behaviors that could damage the reputation of the institution providing them with banking services. Indeed, in some cases, a supplementary rule that focused on 'religious viewpoint' was also brought into play, which hit organizations from both sides. But many banks ultimately pulled the plug on reputational risk and the viewpoint rule, believing that the rule itself was illegal. And now, Bank of America is one of those. Bank of America reps noted, 'While we have been very clear that politics is not a factor in our decisions, we received thoughtful input from a range of stakeholders and agreed it is best to explicitly add that to our Code of Conduct. Religious views are not a factor in any account closing decision. Bank of America is proud to provide services to about 120,000 non-profits associated with religious organizations around the country.' Knock One Down, Another Takes its Place The legal hydra that Bank of America is left to face, meanwhile, continues to fight. While Bank of America may have settled the viewpoint rule, a new problem has emerged. Western District of North Carolina federal judge Max Cogburn Jr. dismissed a motion from Bank of America to dismiss a lawsuit against it alleging that it used '…forfeited retirement plan assets to offset its own contributions.' Cogburn noted that, while courts previously have '…come to different conclusions…' about what actually qualifies as a 'fiduciary breach' under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the plaintiffs in the suit had '…adequately alleged the bank breached their fiduciary duties by using Plan assets to lower new employee contributions.' Is Bank of America a Buy, Sell or Hold? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on BAC stock based on 17 Buys and three Holds assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 21.04% rally in its share price over the past year, the average BAC price target of $52.60 per share implies 10.85% upside potential.


Bloomberg
14 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Is Anybody Fighting Back in This Trade War?
William Clayton, a businessman who served successive US presidents and became one of the chief architects of the Marshall Plan, was no fan of tariffs. He rated the barriers erected during the Great Depression as one of the great crimes of the century. It's hard to imagine that Clayton, who believed that free trade was as important to prosperity as American aid and security guarantees, would remotely approve of Donald Trump's efforts to reshape commerce. This White House-engineered upheaval, which pushed tariffs to levels unseen since the Smoot-Hawley law of 1930, will be costly — even if the full price isn't immediately apparent. The global economy hasn't suffered some of the direst consequences that were predicted in April. Demand for US assets has held up, despite the superficial allure of the 'sell America' narrative. The International Monetary Fund doubts growth will suddenly crater, and inflation hasn't taken off. Has a bullet been dodged or is shock delaying the pain?


Associated Press
18 hours ago
- Associated Press
What Comes After the Storm: Compassionate Recovery and Business Resilience Strategies
When disaster strikes, preparedness often takes center stage, but what happens after the crisis passes? Recovering from a disruptive event is more than restoring power or reopening your doors. It's about caring for your people, rebuilding operations, and creating lasting resilience for the future. In our recent webinar, 'Disaster Recovery & Resilience: What to Do After the Crisis,' Antea Group experts Alizabeth Aramowicz Smith, Environment, Health & Safety Practice Leader; Tracy Taszarek, Senior Consultant; and John Ruksenas, Senior Manager; led a powerful discussion exploring recovery strategies through the lens of Human and Organizational Performance (HOP), business continuity planning, and trauma-informed leadership. Below are four essential takeaways to help your organization not only recover but grow stronger after a crisis. Find the full webinar here: Watch On-Demand 1. Rethink Investigations with HOP Principles In the wake of disaster, organizations are under pressure to respond quickly, especially when incidents involve injuries or operational breakdowns. Traditional investigation tools like the Five Whys often miss the bigger picture, leading to oversimplified conclusions and misplaced blame. Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) reframes how we investigate. It encourages us to understand why an employee made a decision based on their environment and pressures, rather than assuming they failed to follow procedure. An example discussed during the webinar shared how HOP-enabled interviews, conducted after a tornado, revealed critical system failures that would have been missed by traditional approaches. By prioritizing psychological safety and empathy, an organization can learn more, respond better, and strengthen its safety systems. Key takeaway: In times of crisis, shift your focus from blaming individuals to learning from the event to improve the system. Train your teams in HOP principles before an event occurs. 2. Activate Your Business Continuity Plan—Early Statistics show that 40% of businesses without a continuity plan never reopen after a disaster. A well-designed Business Continuity Plan (BCP) is your roadmap to recovery, and it must be more than a static document. Using the tornado example scenario mentioned earlier, here are some steps leaders should take immediately following an event: gather updates from the scene, assess employee safety and infrastructure, coordinate emergency communications, and identify critical functions that must be restored first (e.g., payroll, IT, procurement). Common pitfalls include failing to escalate quickly, not testing plans, or struggling with outdated contact lists and contractual agreements. Proactive planning, prepared with regular walkthroughs, desktop simulations, and role-play exercises, helps mitigate these gaps. Key takeaway: Act quickly and don't wait to activate your BCP. Regularly test it through integrated emergency drills and full recovery simulations. The more you train, whether through desktop or role-play, the more confident and capable your response will be. 3. Turn Recovery into Continuous Improvement Recovery is not the final step; it's the beginning of building back better. Every incident, no matter how severe, is a learning opportunity. Post-disaster debriefs should include more than logistics. They must evaluate what worked, what didn't, and what needs to change. This includes reassessing your maximum tolerable outages, reviewing contractor performance, validating contact info, and refining communications strategies. One of the most overlooked reasons recovery plans fail? They're never tested under pressure. Exercises like scenario-based simulations and post-exercise reviews give your teams the chance to build muscle memory—so they know how to respond when it really counts. Key takeaway: Don't file away your recovery plan once the crisis passes. Update it based on rea l-world lessons and stress-test it regularly to build resilience over time. 4. Make Compassionate Recovery Part of Your Safety Culture After a disaster, one of the most powerful things a leader can do is acknowledge the emotional toll on employees. A serious injury, or the loss of a colleague, can leave teams grieving, disoriented, and fearful. A trauma-informed recovery approach prioritizes people. It includes access to grief counseling or Employee Assistance Programs (EAP), compassionate communication from leadership, flexible time-off policies, and thoughtful reintegration of staff into operations. It also means pausing—not pushing—when employees need space to process. A leadership team's empathetic response to a tragic employee fatality, such as bringing in counselors, delaying the restart of operations, and holding a remembrance event, can have a profound and lasting impact on workforce trust and morale. These actions show employees that their well-being is a priority, helping to strengthen safety culture and build long-term resilience. Key takeaway: How you respond in the aftermath of a crisis will define your safety culture. A human-centered approach builds not just recovery but long-term loyalty and resilience. Frequently Asked Questions Q: How can we build HOP principles into recovery exercises? A: Integrate emotional scenarios into your desktop or live simulations, such as an injury or structural damage, so teams can practice asking better, more empathetic questions and avoid falling back into blame-based patterns. Q: What makes a good debrief after a crisis? A: Look beyond whether the 'plan' was followed. Review if vendors met expectations, if communication tools worked, and if decisions were made quickly enough. In today's hybrid work environment, evaluating your communication plan is critical—were messages timely, accurate, and received by the right people to enable decision-making? Also focus on key metrics like restoration time, data loss, and leadership response to truly gauge effectiveness. Q: How can I ensure our business continuity plan will actually work? A: Test it. Start with a simple walkthrough, then evolve into full scenario simulations. Review contracts, contact details, and access to backup locations or systems. Ensure your leaders know how and when to activate the plan. Looking Ahead True disaster recovery goes beyond patching holes. It's about rebuilding with purpose and listening to your employees, testing your systems, and learning with humility. By integrating HOP principles, activating and updating your continuity plans, and leading with compassion, your organization can emerge from crisis not just operational, but stronger, safer, and more united than ever. Need help building a resilient recovery plan or training your leaders in HOP? Reach out today! We're here to support your people and your process. Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from Antea Group