King for a reason: Bollywood filmmaker still gushes over Shah Rukh Khan's kindness during Chak De, ‘He got it for me'
To pass the time, the then-budding filmmaker browsed books at a store and found an astronaut book she loved. But, it cost ₹ 6,000, so she put it back.
For the contest, the book cost ₹ 6,000 in 2007. If we account for an average inflation rate of about 6% annually, the same book would cost more than ₹ 17,000 now.
The next day, during the 'man-to-man marking' scene from the movie, King Khan called her.
'He was like, 'Look, what's lying here'. It was the book. He had obviously seen me reading it. He knew that I really liked that book. He knew that it was too expensive for me to afford at that time. He went there and got it for me,' an excited Chibber told Zoom.
'I still have that book. It's on my, like, you know, one of my prized possessions,' she added.
The Bollywood filmmaker also recalled a dinner in Australia. During the shoot, Don was released. The entire team went to watch the film and then had dinner.
With a massive group of cast and crew, the dinner bill was huge. Unsure how to handle it, Ashima nervously asked one of her colleagues.
'Please, not me. I don't even have that much in my account,' the colleague told her.
'Then, Shah Rukh sir said, 'Give it to me.' He took it from me. And, I was like, 'Sir, we'll go Dutch',' Ashima said during an interaction with Zoom.
'He looked at me. I think nobody had ever told him, 'Let's split the bill'. So, he was like, 'No. I am paying the bill.' And, I said, 'Okay, sir.',' Chibber said while laughing at the incident.
Ashima Chibber is basking in the glory of Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway. After all, it earned Rani Mukerji her first National Award. SRK also got his first this year for Jawan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Nikhil Dwivedi defends Shah Rukh Khan's National Award win for Jawan: 'I am sure the jury has taken its decision in full wisdom'
The 71st National Film Awards kicked off August with a bang for Shah Rukh Khan, who bagged the Best Actor honour for his electrifying performance in Atlee's blockbuster Jawan (2023). While fans rejoiced at the recognition, a section of critics questioned whether a mass entertainer like Jawan was deserving of the prestigious award. Producer-actor Nikhil Dwivedi, however, has strongly defended the jury's decision. He shared with Bollywood Hungama, 'The National Awards have a jury which always consists of eminent people. The problem is that a section of people questions everything. Either we should reject each and every award that they have chosen. We can't say that the jury is right about the 5 awards but wrong about the rest of the 5 awards. That makes no sense to me. Either reject the jury's outcome completely.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dwivedi further emphasized that selective acceptance of awards is unfair: 'It's not fair to say 'I like this artist and hence, you have chosen correctly' or 'This artist should not have won'. Then, you become the jury! This commentary is absurd. I am sure the jury has taken its decision in full wisdom. These are the people who have been in the world of cinema for years. They must have thought it well and we must respect it.' In Jawan, SRK delivered a powerhouse performance in a double role, as Vikram Rathore, a memory-lost soldier, and his son Azad, a prison-born police officer turned vigilante. The film's high-octane drama, action, and emotional core struck a chord with audiences, and the father-son dynamic added depth to Khan's portrayal. With the National Award win sparking debate, Dwivedi's words serve as a reminder that the jury's collective decision deserves respect, regardless of individual preferences.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Tehran: John Abraham's geopolitical thriller isn't smarter than a fifth grader, no matter how many newspapers it reads
There is a scam in Punjab that Rajkumar Hirani would've heard about while researching Dunki. Shady travel agents are charging crores from desperate (and mostly uneducated) Indians with the promise of arranging safe passage to the American state of Georgia. The scam? These poor men are being sent to the country of Georgia instead. In most cases, they've sold off family land, quit their jobs, and exhausted their entire life savings; some of them even have wives and children with them. All to be sent to the land of khachapuri. To put it simply, there are a bunch of people from Bathinda knocking about in the Caucasus right now. Anyway, the folks who made the new John Abraham film Tehran are no smarter. The movie opens with a voiceover in which we are told about an operation carried out by Iran in 2012, where Israeli diplomats were targeted in Thailand, India, and Georgia. They meant the country. But the map that the movie shows instead is that of the US state. You'd agree that it isn't the strongest of first impressions that a movie like this could've made, especially since it wants to be perceived as more intelligent than the average Bollywood thriller. These days, John seems to have mostly strayed from his past life as a superhuman tank. His last attempt at quasi-realism, The Diplomat, came across as a muddled mess — an oil-and-water combination of edgy intentions and 'massy' execution. The result was something so determined to follow the rulebook that it inadvertently echoed the problematic belief systems of those who write the rulebooks these days. Thankfully, Tehran hews closer to the tone that its subject demands. It's no Syriana, but it isn't Ek Tha Tiger either. Also read – Ground Zero: Hatemongering comes so naturally to Bollywood that it can't make an antiwar movie even when it tries; Emraan Hashmi's film is proof The most interesting thing about the movie, however, is how it positions its star; you cannot help but read it as Abraham's most self-expressive film in years. He plays a special cell police officer called Rajeev Kumar, a burly hotshot who's drawn into a geopolitical mess when some Iranian terrorists target Israeli officials on Indian soil, leaving an innocent young girl dead. Outraged at how two warring nations could use India as a battleground and turn its people into collateral damage, he takes it upon himself to first identify the perpetrator of the attack, and then — this is where the movie jumps the shark — bring them to justice by sneaking into Iran. Rajeev somehow finds a way to annoy three separate governments, including his own. But he pushes through, driven by a sense of justice and patriotism. There is no shortage of actors in Bollywood who would pretend to motivated by these same ideas, both personally and professionally. But with John, the 'josh' feels genuine. Whereas most of his colleagues would prefer to maintain an arm's distance from making political statements, John flexes his biceps, cracks that crooked grin of his, and hurls a motorbike at the idea of hesitation. But if there's an art to remaining apolitical on screen, John has perfected it. In both Vedaa and The Diplomat, he was motivated by personal choices; his politics were incidental to the plot of those films. The movie Batla House was similarly dangerous in what it was proposing. John has said that he'd never make a movie like The Kashmir Files, but he doesn't seem to realise that he already has. In Tehran, which is the cinematic equivalent of a shrug, Rajeev Kumar literally declares that he won't take sides in the Israel-Iran conflict; all that he cares about is avenging the death of a young child. This makes no sense; it's antithetical to the very DNA of the film. It's almost like watching a Batman movie in which the Dark Knight concerns himself not with catching criminals, but with trying out the best new restaurants in town. In one scene, it is shown that the primary antagonist — a maniacal murderer who lives by a skewed code — is a supporter of the Free Palestine movement. This, more than any nuclear war nonsense, is his primary grouse against the Israeli regime. Perhaps it's the film's way of underlining how, even a righteous movement can be hijacked by fundamentalists. But, if it wanted to say this, maybe it should've just come out with it. This isn't Superman, where director James Gunn took (the correct) political stance via fake placeholder nations. Tehran is set in the real world. It alludes to a real-life conflict; it needed to have the courage of its convictions. A more cynical reading of the film would lead you to assume that it is conflating a terrorist organisation's crimes with the plight of the Palestinian people, which, by the way, Rajeev mocks in one scene. Read more – Ulajh: Movies that talk down to the audience are an epidemic in Bollywood, but this one is almost unwatchable While Gunn kept pretending that Superman wasn't about real life and quietly communicated everything he wanted to via his film, Tehran keeps insisting that it's about grave real-world injustices, but it ends up being a movie about nothing. Rajeev Kumar isn't rescuing a person in peril; he's safeguarding the very idea of sovereignty. How could a foreign nation encroach upon our land and carry out an operation that causes harm to our citizens? Rajeev is scandalised by the mere thought. Nobody tell him about the Chinese. But somebody please tell him that a movie about invaders and occupiers simply cannot sit on the fence, especially when its own protagonist is shown to be bothered by such behaviours. But does this mind-your-own-business attitude stem from John's own personality? He has long been a lone wolf of sorts, having worked with everybody from the Bhatts to the Chopras, from the Jayantilal Gadas and Bhushan Kumars to the Sajid Nadiadwalas and the Tauranis. He has also starred in films directed by Deepa Mehta, Anurag Kashyap, Vivek Agnihotri and Vishal Bhardwaj. It's quite the bold spectrum. Only someone who stays in their lane and doesn't talk out of school can get away with something like this, especially in a clique-dominated industry like Bollywood. In other words: being apolitical pays. The recent film Dhadak 2 proved that it is possible to balance Bollywood melodrama with an abrasive personality, whereas Tehran opens by revealing that it probably flunked geography in school. You be the judge.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Taj Mahal breached? Viral video shows man filming Shah Jahan, Mumtaz's tombs, playing 'jo wada kiya' song
A video purportedly showing the inner chamber of the Taj Mahal, including the actual tombs of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan and his wife Mumtaz Mahal, has gone viral, triggering debate over security and public access at the world-famous monument. The clip, shared on Instagram by a popular account, appears to reveal a passageway leading to the real graves—an area long closed to tourists to preserve the sanctity and structure of the 17th-century mausoleum—as the Bollywood song 'Jo Wada Kiya' plays in the background. The footage quickly gained traction online, drawing thousands of views and comments, with many questioning how the individual managed to enter the restricted section. One user, Dipika PS (@lifewithdipika06), recalled: 'I visited Taj Mahal around 1994-95 and this area was open to the public at that time.' Another user, Twinkle Sawant (@twinkle savant), added: 'I have seen this too back in the day.' At present, visitors are only allowed to view the cenotaphs—symbolic replicas of the royal couple's graves—while the original tombs remain sealed off. The video has unsettled conservationists, who warn that such breaches could endanger the monument's preservation. The identity of the person who filmed it remains unknown, and the authenticity of the footage could not be independently verified by Mint. The Taj Mahal remains India's top tourist attraction and one of the Archaeological Survey of India's biggest revenue earners, generating ₹ 297 crore in ticket sales over five years, according to official data. In 2023-24 alone, its income far exceeded that of Delhi's Qutub Minar and Red Fort. In light of security concerns, authorities have recently deployed an anti-drone system at the site. Assistant Commissioner of Police (Taj Security) Syed Arib Ahmad confirmed that the system blocks drone signals within 200 metres of the main dome, supplementing security provided by CISF and Uttar Pradesh Police personnel.
