logo
‘This mess-free vacuum cleaner is so lightweight yet powerful – and less than half price'

‘This mess-free vacuum cleaner is so lightweight yet powerful – and less than half price'

Daily Mirror3 days ago
With my old vacuum cleaner in need of replacement, I put this Halo cordless model to the test to see how it fared on carpets, hard floors and pet hair – and it's in a huge sale
Like many, I hate cleaning my house, so I'm always on the lookout for ways to make it as quick and easy as possible. So when my old Shark vacuum cleaner looked like it would be packing up soon, I jumped at the chance to try out the Halo Capsule X, the bagged vacuum with the biggest capacity cordless vacuum on the market.
And if, after reading this, you're tempted to buy one then now's the perfect time, as the Halo Capsule X bundle is currently reduced from £616.92 to £249.99 on the Halo website, where you'll also find thousands of five-star reviews praising its performance.
First up, there are a surprising amount of attachments and accessories inside such a compact box: hard floor roller, nozzle, fabric head, mini power head, extra battery, and more. It's all very intuitive and easy to fit together, so you'll be up and running in no time (Halo does advise fully charging the battery before using it though).
With carpets in the upstairs of my house, wooden floors downstairs, and two cats that shed plenty of hair, I was well placed to test the Halo Capsule X out to its full capacity. Starting on my carpets, I was immediately impressed with how light it was to hold and manoeuvre (I could easily do it with one hand) yet how powerful it was – it almost pulled me along with it! My carpets felt perfectly clean in minutes.
I had less luck with the roller head downstairs. Although definitely gentle on the flooring, I didn't feel that it sucked up all the dirt and crumbs. I feel like it might work better on a linoleum floor rather than my uneven wooden one, and I instead switched to using the regular head on its lowest power setting (there are three settings to choose from).
The other attachments were also very effective. The nozzle got right into nooks and crannies, while the head for sofas and fabrics did a good job at removing hair (although the fabric my sofas are made of makes it tricky to get rid of hair completely). My one criticism is that removing the heads can be quite stiff and requires two hands, something that may be tricky for people with dexterity issues.
The bag inside can hold two litres of dust, with a red light telling you when it needs emptying when using boost mode. The bags are compostable and super-easy to fit and remove, and while there is the obvious cost of having to continuously buy these, it is far less messy than tipping out a bagless vacuum cartridge, and much better for allergy sufferers. Having never used a bagged vacuum cleaner before, I was surprised how easy and efficient it was.
Another feature that I liked compared to my previous machine was that the three power settings applied to every attachment and head – sometimes the nozzle, for example, can only be used at one air strength. In my bundle I also got a spare battery, which is handy if you forget to fully charge the tool before starting.
One downside compared to other models, however, is that you can't switch between floor surfaces using the same head – you have to stop and manually change over the heads. There's also nothing to neatly store all the attachments in; a basic tote bag in the box would have been handy.
Overall, though, this is an excellent lightweight-yet-powerful model for anyone looking for a compact bagged vacuum cleaner.
For something more traditional in style, and with larger capacity, the Hoover Bagged Cylinder Vacuum Cleaner is currently reduced from £139 to £99. And Shark's machines are always popular; this is its most basic model, and now down from £249..9 to £179.99.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung's £35 gadget that helps you find lost items now £11
Samsung's £35 gadget that helps you find lost items now £11

Wales Online

time10 hours ago

  • Wales Online

Samsung's £35 gadget that helps you find lost items now £11

Samsung's £35 gadget that helps you find lost items now £11 "So handy to be able to locate your car keys when you're off to work in the morning" The Samsung Galaxy SmartTag2 Bluetooth Tracker is now £11.90 down from its original price of £34.99 (Image: Amazon ) No one enjoys the panic that ensues when something crucial - like car keys, a passport or a wallet - goes missing. However, with Bluetooth tracking technology, it's now simpler than ever to avoid that sinking feeling and keep track of belongings at all times. Smart tags for possessions are gaining popularity, and many view them as a necessity. They can be expensive, and some are more reliable than others, so it's vital for purchasers to ensure they're making the right choice. Amazon has slashed the price of the Samsung Galaxy SmartTag 2 Bluetooth Tracker to £11.90 from its original £34.99. READ MORE: Shark 'easy to use' vacuum has 40% off for a limited-time only on Amazon LATEST: Amazon's £48 drink trolley hailed as 'most beautiful addition' to home now £30 The Bluetooth tracker is available in black and can be attached to anything from keys to suitcases, bicycles and even cars if necessary. It boasts GPS features, and all customers need to do is register their tag to their smartphone and activate the 'search nearby' feature. If that doesn't yield results, they can use the 'ring your tag' function, which will cause the tracker to emit an audible signal so users can locate it. The tag also boasts an extended battery life - up to 500 days - and is IP67 dust and water resistant, ensuring customers don't have to fret about it failing outdoors in damp conditions, reports the Express. If the Samsung Galaxy SmartTag doesn't tick all the boxes, there are other options available. For instance, the Apple AirTag, priced at £29 from Argos, can be attached to keys, backpacks, luggage or wallets and can guide customers to their lost items. Another alternative is the Motorola Moto Tag Bluetooth Item Finder, available for £29.99 from John Lewis, which can be attached to personal belongings and, when paired with an Android phone, can locate anything with pinpoint accuracy. The Samsung Galaxy SmartTag has received a high rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars on Amazon. One customer commented: "So handy to be able to locate your car keys when you're off to work in the morning. Certainly a useful gadget and has saved me so much time." Another user wrote: "Works great, easy to set up, connects to smart things, it's light, good size and accurate. Works by picking up signal from nearby/passing Samsung phones and pings from that location so you know where it was last, not necessarily where it is. "I'm really impressed with this tracker, it was simple to set up and worked reliably in showing my motorcycle's location on a recent two week trip around Europe. Great value for money and so many potential applications!" another customer praised. However, some users expressed disappointment with the tracker. One said: "Lack of features in some sense, would be useful to have notifications if the tag moved when you're not nearby it. Article continues below "It won't show my home address and insists that my keys are in my neighbour's house. It also said I was in a nearby town when I was on the motorway," another user reported.

Dyson versus Shark: Which brand has the better home fan?
Dyson versus Shark: Which brand has the better home fan?

Telegraph

time19 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Dyson versus Shark: Which brand has the better home fan?

£450 Buy now Price at Argos Shark TurboBlade Score: 8/10 We like: Fast cooling Powerful airflow Adjustable design We don't like: It's huge No app control Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 versus Shark TurboBlade: What's the difference? While Dyson and Shark are longstanding vacuum rivals, Shark only entered the fan market last year. Now, with its trio of FlexBreeze models and the new TurboBlade, it's built a range to rival Dyson's. However, the original innovator has been keeping us cool since 2009. So how does Shark's most advanced fan compare to a Dyson classic? Well, the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 (our Best Buy Dyson fan) and the Shark TurboBlade are both bladeless fans, but that's where the similarities end. The Dyson PC1 focuses on circulating purified air. It claims to filter 99.9 per cent of microscopic particles using a HEPA and activated carbon system, making it suitable for allergy sufferers or anyone living near busy roads. It's app-connected too, has auto-sensing air quality and is impressively quiet, even on higher settings. The build is entirely plastic, which makes it lightweight and easy to move, but it feels less premium than other Dyson fans. The Shark TurboBlade, on the other hand, skips the purification entirely in favour of raw, customisable airflow. With dual vents that pivot, oscillate and shoot cool air up to 80 feet, it's designed to move air fast. It's a bit chunkier and louder on its highest settings, but more affordable and visually striking. In short: Dyson purifies, Shark powers through heat. JUMP TO: How we test Review Technical specifications Final verdict FAQs How we test tower fans I score against five key metrics when reviewing tower fans: Performance Design Quietness Ease of use Value for money Each fan was set up and used in a real-world environment, specifically, a small-to-medium-sized home office that gets warm in the afternoons and opens up onto a busy main road. I ran both fans through multiple speed and oscillation settings, measuring airflow strength at various distances and closely listening to how each performed during work, sleep and general daily use. I also kept a close eye on power consumption and used a sound level meter to assess noise levels. Extra attention was paid to usability; both models were tested with their remotes, but I also used the 'MyDyson' companion app to adjust and control the PC1. Assembly, portability and how well each fan integrated into my daily routine were also assessed. Separately, the Dyson PC1 has been tested for its air purification. Our reviewer, Rosie Taylor, awarded it a score of seven out of 10, since the air purifying, while effective, won't operate independently of the fan. Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles. All opinions are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more. Performance Dyson Purifier Cool PC1: 9/10 Shark TurboBlade: 9/10 In terms of raw cooling power, both the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 and the Shark TurboBlade do a solid job of keeping you comfortable, but they approach the task differently. The Dyson offers a smooth, consistent airflow that feels more like a gentle breeze than a gust of wind. It's refined and practical in smaller to medium-sized rooms, but if you're expecting Arctic blasts on a sweltering day, you might be left wanting. The Shark TurboBlade, meanwhile, feels noticeably punchier. It delivers a more substantial, more directional flow of air that's great for instant cooling, especially in stuffier or larger spaces, thanks to its ability to push air across the room to a distance of 20 metres. You can tilt and adjust the blades to customise the airflow, which gives it an edge in versatility. It doesn't purify the air, but as a pure cooling fan, it arguably performs better when you just want to cool down fast. Design Dyson Purifier Cool PC1: 9/10 Shark Turboblade: 8/10 The Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 is undeniably attractive, with its signature Dyson loop that screams: 'I cost £450 and I know it.' However, while the design is eye-catching, it's entirely made of plastic and somewhat inflexible. What you see is what you get; there's no tilt, no adjustable head and no real interaction beyond a gentle oscillation and a subtle, albeit cooling, breeze. The Shark TurboBlade, on the other hand, is unapologetically bold: it doesn't look like your typical fan, instead looking more like someone crossed a jet engine with a retro speaker. It's made from solid, premium materials and is endlessly adjustable, with blades that pivot and twist. However, its bulky frame means it's not exactly suitable for smaller spaces, and its design won't be to everybody's taste. I found it somewhat over-engineered compared to the Dyson PC1. Quietness Dyson Purifier Cool PC1: 10/10 Shark TurboBlade: 7/10 The Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 genuinely surprised me when testing noise levels. Though not marketed as such, the PC1 is impressively quiet, even when cranked up to mid-to-high settings, thanks to Dyson's bladeless design. On the lower settings, it's practically inaudible, making it great for light sleepers, nurseries or sneaky midday naps. The Shark TurboBlade is also bladeless, but it's not quite as discreet. It's noticeably louder than the Dyson at similar speeds, with a low hum that becomes a persistent presence on higher settings. If you're using it in a living room or office, it's fine. But in a bedroom at night, you may struggle to sleep through the noise (despite the fan's horizontal design making it perfect for putting at the bottom of your bed). The TurboBlade reached 88dB in my tests (similar to a loud hair dryer), whereas the Dyson never reached the 60dB mark. Ease of use Dyson Purifier Cool PC1: 9/10 Shark TurboBlade: 9/10 Both the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 and the Shark TurboBlade score highly when it comes to ease of use. They each come with a simple, magnetic remote that sticks neatly to the body, so it's always within reach (until it inevitably gets pinched by my toddler). Set-up is also straightforward. The Dyson is plug-and-play, while the Shark requires a bit of quick assembly, but nothing that'll have you breaking out the toolbox. Where Dyson may pull ahead is if you want smart features. The PC1 connects to the MyDyson app, giving you full control from your phone, even when you're not at home. Want to reduce the stuffiness of a room before you get back from the school run or commute? Done. The Shark, while easy to use on a day-to-day basis, is a little more old-school in that respect, and doesn't offer control through a companion app. Value for money Dyson Purifier Cool PC1: 8/10 Shark TurboBlade: 8/10 When it comes to value for money, the Shark TurboBlade has a clear advantage, given its price alone. While it's far from the cheapest fan on the market, at £249.99 RRP, it's nearly half the cost of the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 (£449.99 RRP) and still delivers strong cooling, a bladeless design and solid build quality. That said, the Dyson isn't wildly overpriced for what it offers. It's certainly a premium buy, but you're getting more than just a fan. There's also built-in air purification, app support, a super-polished design and a whisper-quiet operation that makes it bedroom- and home office-friendly. It feels like a more refined experience overall, and for some, that will justify the extra spend. So while Shark wins this round for affordability, Dyson makes a strong case if you want a fan that doubles as an air purifier and looks good doing it. Technical specifications Should you buy the Dyson or the Shark fan? Both are solid choices, but overall the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 takes the win for me, due to its quiet operation, intelligent controls and additional air purification functionality. Buy the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 if: You want a fan that cleans air simultaneously You'd like app control You want a quiet fan £450 Buy now Price at Argos Buy the Shark TurboBlade if: You want a powerful fan with no extra features You'd like a more versatile design You're on more of a budget Dyson PC1 and Shark TurboBlade FAQs What are the main differences between the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 and the Shark TurboBlade? The Dyson Purifier Cool PC1 is a fan with integrated air purification, offering HEPA H13 and activated carbon filtration alongside smooth, bladeless airflow. It emphasises air quality, maintains low noise levels and has a minimalist design. In contrast, the Shark TurboBlade is a bladeless multi-directional fan, designed for maximising cooling flexibility. Its dual adjustable arms, ten speed settings and modes (boost, breeze, sleep) prioritise powerful airflow and room coverage. In short, choose Dyson for clean air and subtle cooling but choose Shark for bold, adjustable airflow. Which fan is more powerful for cooling? When it comes to raw cooling power, the Shark TurboBlade has the edge. With dual adjustable blades and directional airflow that can cover a wide area, it's designed to push out a strong, consistent breeze, even in larger rooms. It doesn't purify the air like the Dyson Purifier Cool PC1, but in terms of its performance on test, it was more powerful. While both brands share their air flow rates, they use different metrics: Using some rough conversions, the Shark's air flow equates to 717 litres per second. Why is the Dyson PC1 more expensive than the Shark TurboBlade, and is it worth the extra cost? Dyson's Purifier Cool PC1 costs significantly more than the Shark TurboBlade because it combines premium features, including HEPA H13 filtration, activated carbon filters, real-time air-quality monitoring and app control. If you value clean air, allergen removal, quiet operation, app control and a two-in-one design, Dyson justifies the premium. If raw cooling and adjustability matter more, Shark delivers nearly as much at half the price, so choose based on whether air quality or airflow power takes priority.

Shark 'easy to use' vacuum has 40% off for a limited-time only on Amazon
Shark 'easy to use' vacuum has 40% off for a limited-time only on Amazon

Wales Online

timea day ago

  • Wales Online

Shark 'easy to use' vacuum has 40% off for a limited-time only on Amazon

Shark 'easy to use' vacuum has 40% off for a limited-time only on Amazon The Shark Upright Corded Vacuum cleaner is 40 per cent off on Amazon for a limited time, with the price slashed to £139 Shark maintains that the Shark Classic Upright Pet Vacuum traps 99.9% of dust and allergens within the vacuum (Image: Shark Clean) Shark is renowned for its exceptional vacuums and other appliances, and now a fresh deal on Amazon means customers can snap up a "brilliant" vacuum for just £139. The Shark Upright Corded Vacuum cleaner has 40 per cent knocked off on Amazon for a limited period - and compared to its standard RRP of £229.99, it could be a bargain too tempting to pass up. The Shark vacuum features two floor settings so users can toggle between carpet and hard floor modes using controls on the handle. Shark also maintains that it traps 99.9% of dust and allergens within the vacuum, preventing them from being released back into the atmosphere. READ MORE: Dunelm's 'statement' chair that looks designer now 75% off LATEST: Amazon slashes price of 'stylish and functional' £100 smartwatch to £23 It's also ideal for pet owners as it includes a Pet Tool, Crevice Tool and Upholstery Tool attachments. There's an extensive 8m power cable so Brits can extend into difficult-to-access spots and throughout the house. From superstar gigs to cosy pubs, find out What's On in Wales by signing up to our newsletter here . Shark offers a five-year guarantee on the appliance so if anything malfunctions, they will substitute it at no cost - provided they register it with Shark, reports the Mirror. And for those seeking alternatives, Amazon's Avalsor Cordless Vacuum Cleaner has been slashed from £189.99 to £95.45, though it may not deliver the same suction strength as the Shark Stratos. Meanwhile, the Hoover HF4 Hydro Pet Cordless Vacuum Cleaner With Anti Hair Wrap for £219 offers both hoovering and mopping functions in one gadget, courtesy of its interchangeable brush and mop attachments. The Shark vacuum cleaner boasts a 4.6-star rating out of five on Amazon. One satisfied customer shared: "Very happy with the product. I had never used a fancy vacuum cleaner like this one, having only used classical ones in the past (e.g., Henry or similar). "I had to find a vacuum cleaner that would fit behind the door in my room due to space constraints. Being detachable, I'm storing the base part separately and the upright part behind the door, so the door can open properly. "This way, I have it easily accessible as well. Just grab the two pieces, put them together in one click, and vacuum. In a maximum of 5 minutes, I'm done cleaning the carpet in my room. The Shark Upright Corded Vacuum cleaner has 40 per cent knocked off on Amazon for a limited period (Image: SHARK . GETTY) "It has strong suction, and the rotating brush is brilliant. It's light enough for me to manoeuvre easily. It is also very versatile and can be used in many setups, reaching into my drawers and not easily accessible corners and spots. It is just perfect. I never knew how practical these vacuum cleaners are. "I don't have pets, but the pet attachment is very useful, having a smaller rotating brush to fit tight spaces or stairs. Although the vacuum cleaner itself is not too noisy, the pet attachment is, due to the whistle effect, but it is not a major issue. All the same other attachments are good and practical." Some customers have expressed concerns about the size of the dust bag. One customer shared: "I really like the shark, it has no problem picking up the dog hair, and there's lots as I have three large dogs. It's versatile, and I love how you can take the container off the bottom bit to do the stairs easily. Article continues below "The little pet hair tool makes doing the stairs a doddle as it easily picks up dog hair. Neither rotation tool seems to get clogged up with dog hair either. But I have a couple of gripes, the container which holds the dust/dog hair is not big enough, so I'm emptying it very frequently."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store