IFS Puts Hard Hats On ‘Industrial AI' Workforce
Engineer holding helmet on site Road construction For the development of modern transportation ... More systems, Technician worker hold hard hat safety first
Product differentiation proliferates across all sectors. We segment our goods and services into different classes, the business world likes to differentiate across different industry verticals, then there is a basic clarification (in most markets) as to whether a commercial offering of any kind should be demarcated as either a business or a consumer product.
In the world of artificial intelligence, we separate out product differentiation in a more applied way by virtue of what any individual piece of AI is supposed to do for us. There's reactive AI that responds to stimuli in as close to real-time as it can, predictive AI which (as it sounds) aims to create predictions based on pattern recognition from past events… and of course there is generative AI, which is quietly taking over a new role as a generator/creator in various roles.
Forging Industrial AI
While the cloud services provision sector is keen to differentiate between general-purpose clouds and industry-specific services (such as a marketing cloud for instance), the next iteration of AI reflects this trend could see it named after the environment that it works in, rather than the precise job or tasks it performs. That's if enterprise cloud services platform company IFS has its way; the company has set about attempting to coin the term 'industrial AI' as a homage to its enterprise resource management and field service management heritage, along with its essentially hands-on approach to working with mission-critical assets and processes.
With ambitions to further its stance in this space, IFS has now acquired Silicon Valley-headquartered agentic AI specialist theLoops. IFS insists that its acquisition of theLoops marks a shift from enterprise software that tracks work, to building and deploying functional software that actually performs workplace jobs, tasks and wider workflows within the context of real-world operational enterprises.
According to Mark Moffat, Chief Executive Officer, IFS, this is not a digital buddy, virtual assistant or some form of quirky workplace chatbot with a smart robotic process automation underbelly. This, he says, is an enterprise-grade agentic AI platform with security and governance, designed to deliver what he pledges to be 'radical productivity improvements and measurable return on investment' in applied industrial settings.
With a promise to deliver what he calls 'real value capture' in working industrial environments, Moffat says that the addition of this newly acquired agentic AI firm will help create digital teammates who can perform real work functions across industries spanning manufacturing, energy, utilities, construction and engineering, as well as aerospace and defense. 'These industrial agentic AI 'workers' understand their business responsibilities from day one; they are agents that speak the industrial language appropriate to the industry they are located in. They can follow rules and operate securely in their workflows,' said Moffat.
Semantic Environmental Awareness
TheLoops acquisition will enable IFS to create and deliver multi-agent environments where autonomous AI agents are both composable and governed. They will be 'semantically aware of their operating environment' and so eminently suited to being applied in regulated, asset-intensive sectors. The industrial AI agents IFS now envisages (IFS would say enabling) will be able to participate in real enterprise workflows side-by-side with humans; adhere to customer-defined security, data access, and compliance standards; and outwardly collaborate with specialized agents across integrated domains.
'AI is disrupting our world, but nowhere is the potential impact more pronounced than in the Industrial setting. IFS's acquisition of theLoops is addressing a huge opportunity for asset-intensive and service-obsessed industries, where agentic decision making will enable organizations to rethink their digital workforce, so they can improve the way they serve their own customers. IFS is well-positioned to lead this shift in each of the industries it serves - bringing intelligent automation that's not just smart, but situationally aware and operationally impactful,' suggested Aly Pinder, research vice president for aftermarket services strategies, IDC
Somya Kapoor, CEO of theLoops (who now retains her position inside of IFS) has spoken of what she thinks could be a new era of automation, where intelligent agents never rest - continuously scanning for improvements, making and executing critical decisions.to streamline operations, increase capacity and free up skilled workers for higher-value tasks. According to Kapoor, this goes beyond traditional AI's pattern recognition and prediction to enable truly autonomous decision-making and execution.
'We're creating autonomous AI agents that understand industrial complexity. They identify required work, determine execution pathways and implement software services with rigorous standards for security, ethics and scale.. This isn't experimental; it's transformational,' said Kapoor.
Industrial AI, Competitive Analysis
IFS has championed the industrial AI tagline or slogan for a while now, but can the firm lay claim to any substantial degree of genuine leadership in this domain? Certainly, the company is structured not just as an ERP provider, but also as specialist in field service management, enterprise asset management and human capital management with manufacturing project management functions manifesting themselves across its platform toolset. That rather leads the firm not just to be a systems of record and systems of transaction company (how the industry normally categorizes a core ERP player), but also a systems of operations specialist for real world factory floors.
But despite that bedrock focus, IFS isn't the only IT vendor known for industrial software technologies. You don't have to look far to find German-born industrial automation company Siemens. My first job was with Siemens in its radar division, but the company is mentioned here for its MindSphere internet of things AI platform and its pedigree in digital twins, smart factories.
Staying in Germany, Schneider Electric probably wouldn't be offended to be referred to as a smart buildings and industrial automation company. Its AI services are aligned towards tasks including energy management and smart manufacturing. The firm is also known for its EcoStruxure platform, an open and interoperable technology architecture built to bring digitized services energy management and operation control systems.
It was a decade ago that stories focused on General Electric (GE Digital) and its Predix platform as detailed here. To reiterate the capabilities found pat GE, Predix.io works to help connect industrial assets across the internet of things and the wider world of machinery and equipment to to the cloud and to each other. It does this for asset performance management and operations optimization, not dissimilar to the focus currently seen at IFS.
Other contenders in this market include ABB, known for its process optimization technologies and AI-powered robotics. Bosch doesn't just make handdrills and drillbits, it also makes industrial automation and mobility products. More centalized on industrial AI for tasks like redictive maintenance and asset performance are Uptake, C3.ai and SparkCognition.
As an additional note, remember that IBM has a specific iteration of Watson AI for industrial applications; Microsoft has Azure AI for industrial analytics (working in partnership with companies including Honeywell); Google Cloud has services dedicated to AI-enhanced vision-based inspection in industrial settings and AWS has its Lookout for Equipment and Lookout for Vision brands for automated quality inspection.
A New Industrial Agent?
Has IFS actually come forward with a new class of agentic AI here? The naysayer might say it is potentially possible to custom-align any form of agentic service into any job or task, that's why agentic services are always described as essentially non-deterministic, capable of drawing data resources from any source (both small and large language models) and remain adaptable on an ongoing basis.
Conversely, a more positive view might suggest yes, this is industrial AI because there are ERP and field service management companies aplenty, but few have defined their target verticals to be as narrowly dedicated as IFS has (key sectors for the company are named above, but think aerospace and engineering from first principles), which is a focus that IFS has 'positively restricted' its focus to for many years.
To apply a standardized agentic AI service that works in a call center and stick it on an oil rig operations center is not always sensible; it takes more than a crowbar (virtual or real) to make that happen. This is not chatbots and copilots, this is a case of AI agents with yellow hard hats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
"eBay for government" helps agencies and schools auction off property, Municibid founder says
A little slice of land in Ambridge Borough could be yours at a steep discount, and all the proceeds will benefit the local community. "We're like an eBay for government," said Greg Berry, CEO and founder of online government auction site Municibid. Berry says his company helps local governments auction off anything, from parcels of land and old desks to school buses and riding mowers. So far, about 7,000 local governments and schools use the online site to sell unneeded items to the public. The latest listing in Ambridge consists of a nearly 4,000-square-foot parcel of land along Glenwood Drive. Twenty-two bids have already been placed at just over $5,000. "A lot of times, smaller towns, and larger ones, have excess land or land that they've come into own in some form, and they don't have a need for it and they're looking to sell it," said Berry. He said maybe in this case, a neighbor wants to expand or a new park could pop up in the space. Berry says governments sell just about everything on his site. "While it's typically vehicles and heavy equipment and tools and land and things that you might expect the government to have and no longer need, it could be anything, such as sailboats and airplanes and jewelry and electric guitars," Berry said. Municibid allows consumers to sort and shop by state, borough or category. And when a winner scores a deal, here's how the costs break down. "When the auction closes and there's a winning bidder, the winning bidder pays us 9% of the winning bid amount, and then they pay 100% of the bid amount to the selling agency," Berry said. Gone are the days of going to the town hall to fill out a sealed bid. Berry told KDKA he used to work as a borough councilor and found that process far from transparent. "No one knew what the governments were selling, and if they did, the process was super inconvenient and intimidating and just wasn't very easy," said Berry. Besides the Ambridge property, KDKA found a lot of items up for grabs in the Pittsburgh area, including an ATV in Mt. Lebanon, a 2020 Ford Explorer in Castle Shannon, a Ford Crown Victoria police car in New Castle, and golf carts in Greensburg. Berry told KDKA some parents snag their teenagers' first car on the site, or business owners land some needed equipment at a fraction of the price.
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
Crisis Averted—But What Was The Section 899 Revenge Tax Proposal?
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 23: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivers remarks during the ... More International Finance Institute Global Outlook Forum at the Willard InterContinental Washington on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. The forum is being held alongside the 2025 spring meetings of the World Bank Group (WBG) and International Monetary Fund (IMF). (Photo by) There are myriad ways to express displeasure with international tax policy: you can file a complaint at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), leverage a charm offensive, or, if you're looking for a quick fix, you can slap a retaliatory tax on foreign investors, spook the market, and call it a day. The Trump administration opted for the latter—albeit briefly—with the seemingly now-defunct Section 899 provision, branded by some as the 'revenge tax.' This provision, tucked into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, levied a targeted tax meant to punish countries that impose 'discriminatory' taxes on American firms – particularly tech giants. Now however, after some handshakes and a flurry of posts on social media, it seems the revenge tax has been scrapped. Quietly scuttled, its political usefulness exhausted—for now. What Was the Section 899 'Revenge Tax?' At its core, Section 899 was a legislative jab aimed squarely at America's trading partners. Buried in the GOP's sweeping policy bill, the provision would have authorized the U.S. to impose punitive taxes on companies headquartered in countries that were, in the view of the Trump administration, treating American firms unfairly. The sweeping new section of the tax code would have been titled 'Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes'—not exactly a subtle start. Section 899 didn't go after governments that it felt had treated U.S. firms unfairly, but instead targeted people and businesses with ties to 'discriminatory foreign countries.' That included foreign individuals, corporations not majority-owned by U.S. persons, private foundations and trusts, and just about any other foreign partnership or structure that Treasury didn't like the looks of. The goal was clear: foreign investors from offending jurisdictions were going to be made to feel real economic pain. The core mechanism was an annual ratcheting-up of tax rates by 5% on the U.S. income of 'applicable persons' – everything from dividends and royalties to capital gains and even real estate sales. Exceptions were few – the legislation even explicitly overrode Section 892, which exempts sovereign wealth funds from taxation. The triggering mechanism for the tax was any broadly-defined 'unfair foreign tax,' which included the Undertaxed Profits Rule from OECD's Pillar 2, Digital Services Taxes (DSTs), and any other tax Treasury later deemed discriminatory or deliberately burdensome to U.S. persons. In sum, it would have been sweeping. If passed, Section 899 would have been a weaponization of the tax code into a tool of transparent foreign policy enforcement. It would have marked a sea change in international tax policy, shifting tax rates away from economics and towards the punishment of deemed foreign policy sins. What Prompted this 'Revenge?' Likely the most salient policy shift that triggered this revenge tax was the OECD's Pillar 2. Championed by the Biden administration, Pillar 2 aims to impose a 15% global minimum tax on the profits of multinationals—regardless of where they are headquartered or what markets they serve. On paper, it was intended to end the race to the bottom of low-tax jurisdictions; in practice, it creates a complex web of policies and enforcement rules that can allow foreign governments to tax U.S. companies in situations where the U.S. does not. The Undertaxed Profits Rule allows other countries to claim the ability to tax if a company's home jurisdiction does not sufficiently tax its own domestic entities. Think of it as a foreign state saying, well, if you aren't going to tax your companies at 15%, we'll gladly make up the difference for you. To the Trump administration, this was unacceptable—a path to the European Union skimming revenue from American companies. The final straw was likely the imposition of DSTs—levies aimed at the revenue of tech giants like Meta and Google, often imposed by European countries that have grown tired of waiting for the U.S. to sign on to Pillar 2. Of course, countries considering and ultimately passing DSTs were merely exercising their right to tax American companies selling into their markets—but that is neither here nor there. Why Section 899 Was a Problem—And Why It Died For all its bluster, Section 899 had one main flaw: it was bad policy masquerading as tough politics. From the moment the bill hit the docket, or more accurately folks found it swimming around in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, alarms went off across the market. As it turns out, foreign investment doesn't like uncertainty. Section 899 would have injected a lot of uncertainty into the foreign investment market. The tax hikes weren't automatic, and there was no schedule that could be consulted by any one individual state; they turned on vague determinations like what was and wasn't an 'unfair tax.' Treasury could label a state a discriminatory foreign country based on opaque criteria and ramp up rates immediately—all without Congress lifting a finger. As is to be expected, trade groups warned of chilling effects on capital markets. Foreign governments viewed it as a backdoor sanctions regime. So it died – not with a bang, but with a post. Scott Bessent publicly called for the provision's removal, citing diplomatic progress. The death of the Revenge Tax doesn't mean this particular international tax skirmish is over, however, only that the battle was paused temporarily in favor of diplomacy. If global talks stall, or DSTs raise their heads again, no one should be surprised if a future Congress pulls out this playbook again.
Fast Company
26 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Nvidia stock price hits fresh record high as analyst sees ‘golden wave' of Gen AI adoption
Shares of Nvidia Corp (Nasdaq: NVDA) reached a new record high on Thursday in premarket trading. As of the time of writing, the stock had peaked at $156.99 before slightly sliding to $156.68. The uptick follows Wednesday's all-time high closing price of $154.31, which rose to $154.59 in after-hours trading. DeepSeek and tariffs worried investors earlier this year Nvidia has been a de facto representative of AI investment in the market. It reached a high of $153.13 in early January, but its shares soon tumbled alongside China's success with AI company DeepSeek and uncertainty around tariffs. DeepSeek used Nvidia chips to build its AI systems despite the United States banning their sale to China. The stock hit a low of $86.62 on April 7, just five days after President Trump's 'Liberation Day,' on which he announced a series of tariffs worldwide. But now, at nearly double that price, it has recovered its losses—and signaled a renewed investment in AI. However, it comes as the dollar hits a three-year low after reports that Trump will move up his selection of a new Federal Reserve chair, the Wall Street Journal reports. What's fueling Nvidia's recent rally? The chipmaker's current ascension was fueled in part by Loop Capital's decision yesterday to raise its price target from $175 to $250. 'Our work suggests we are entering the next 'Golden Wave' of Gen AI adoption, and NVDA is at the front-end of another material leg of stronger than anticipated demand,' Loop Capital analyst Ananda Baruah stated in a client note, according to Reuters. Helped along by Nvidia's 4% rise on Wednesday, the Nasdaq composite also neared its record high with a 0.3% increase.
