
Texas Sees Surge in Babies Getting Vaccinated: 'Really Scared'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Measles vaccination rates among babies in Texas have increased more than 30-fold in some instances as parents are "really scared" about an outbreak in the western portion of the state.
Lara Anton, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of State Health Services, told Newsweek that because of the West Texas outbreak, the agency recommended that infants living in or visiting outbreak-designated counties get an early (zero) dose of the measles vaccine at 6 to 11 months.
Why It Matters
In February, Texas experienced its biggest measles outbreak in about three decades. West Texas saw an influx of almost 50 cases, and health officials attributed the drastic uptick to a close-knit, undervaccinated Mennonite community. Cases have continued to rise in the months since, leading to hospitalizations and the deaths of two children.
A sign outside the Lubbock Public Health facility in Texas on April 9.
A sign outside the Lubbock Public Health facility in Texas on April 9.What To Know
The ongoing situation has resulted in Texas parents being more proactive to vaccinate their babies than in years past.
Truveta, a health care and analytics company, shared internal data showing that about 10 percent of 10-month-old children in Texas had received at least one measles vaccine in April alone—about 10.4-fold higher than the January 2024 to January 2025 average.
Also in April, about 8.7 percent of 6-month-olds in Texas received a measles vaccine. That's a 31.7-fold increase compared to the 0.3 percent averaged between January 2024 and January 2025.
In March and April, about 20.1 percent of all first measles vaccines were administered to children between 6 and 11 months—an 11.5-fold increase compared to 2019, when international and domestic outbreaks were ongoing.
"It does show that parents really are scared, and that parents don't want to wait," Nina Masters, a senior applied research scientist at Truveta, told the Texas Tribune. "They don't want to wait 12 months to get their child vaccinated. They want to wait six months and one day, and they want to do it as soon as they can."
Newsweek has contacted Truveta for comment.
The Centers for Disease Control recommends the first measles vaccine (administered in the U.S. as the combined measles, mumps, rubella vaccine, or MMR or MMRV) to be issued between 12 and 15 months, with a later dose around kindergarten age—i.e., ages 4 to 6.
However, Truveta data from 2020 to 2024 found a "stark decline" in the number of kids overall receiving the vaccine on time.
Anton said children who received an early dose of the measles vaccine should still get the two regularly scheduled doses, meaning they would ultimately get three doses of MMR—with the second dose coming at least 28 days after the early dose.
DSHS data showed that between January 1 and April 30, 51,275 doses were administered—including 44,168 to children 12 to 15 months. In 2019, the annual total was 54,184.
However, the Texas immunization registry requires people to opt in. As most Texans have not done so, the overall count of early MMR vaccines administered during this time period could be different, the DSHS spokesperson added.
DSHS, which provides two weekly updates on cases, said on May 20 that 722 cases had been confirmed statewide since late January. Less than 1 percent, or fewer than 10 of the confirmed cases, are estimated to be actively infectious since their rash onset date was less than a week ago. Individuals are described as infectious four days prior to and four days after rash onset.
Of those 722 cases, 92 of them have led to hospitalizations. Two children have died, including an 8-year-old girl in Lubbock. She died of "measles pulmonary failure" in April at UMC Health System.
DSHS said the following counties had ongoing measles transmission: Cochran, Dawson, Gaines, Lamar, Lubbock, Terry and Yoakum. On Tuesday, Dallam was removed from the list of designated outbreak counties because it had been 42 days, or two incubation periods, since the last infectious case.
There have been 15 documented measles cases outside the West Texas region this year.
DSHS reported that of the 722 confirmed cases, 688 were found in unvaccinated individuals or those with an unknown vaccination status, while 19 individuals who received two-plus doses of the MMR vaccine were infected.
What People Are Saying
Lara Anton, a spokesperson for the Texas Department of State Health Services, told Newsweek: "DSHS has been encouraging people to get vaccinated if they are not immune to measles because it is the best way to prevent illness and stop the virus from spreading."
Miranda Yaver, an assistant professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh, told Newsweek: "We now have over 1,000 confirmed measles cases in the United States, and this is avoidable with vaccination, which we know to be safe and effective. We are seeing the proliferation of vaccine hesitancy, with a pronounced partisan split, extending well beyond the COVID vaccine. As secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has immense power and responsibility to promote vaccine safety and efficacy, especially amid these outbreaks that have resulted in some tragic deaths."
Kala Hunter, a Texas mother of a 2-year-old son, told NBC News: "Being in the hotbed of the measles outbreak, it was a no-brainer. If it was safe to get him vaccinated early, we were going to protect him."
What Happens Next
DSHS said in its May 20 assessment, "Due to the highly contagious nature of this disease, additional cases are likely to occur in the outbreak area and the surrounding communities."
The national conversation around vaccines is also set to continue. Earlier this month, when asked whether he would vaccinate his own children against diseases such as measles, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told the House Appropriations Committee: "My opinions about vaccines are irrelevant. I don't think people should be taking advice, medical advice from me. I don't want to give advice."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Research Shows This Action Can Increase Colon Cancer Survival Rate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new study published by The New England Journal of Medicine on Sunday shows that adding an exercise program to recovery plans following treatment for colon cancer increased survival rates. Newsweek has reached out to the leaders of the study via email for information during non-working hours Sunday. Why It Matters Across the globe, colorectal cancer rates have skyrocketed, especially among millennials, with a 2024 study published by The Lancet showing those born in 1990 being two to three times more likely to have issues than those born in 1955. Colorectal cancer is the second most deadly and the third most prevalent in the world. In the United States, colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer for men and women, according to the Colorectal Cancer Alliance (CCA). Symptoms of colorectal cancers can include a change in bathroom habits, cramps, weight loss as well as blood in the stool, which can still look normal, according to These cancers can cause bleeding in the digestive tract and lead to anemia. Those who experience these symptoms should get tested by a medical professional. "Sometimes the first sign of colorectal cancer is a blood test showing a low red blood cell count," the American Cancer Society's website says. A stock photo shows people exercising at a gym. A stock photo shows people exercising at a gym. Getty What To Know The study followed patients in 55 medical centers for a three-year period following their initial treatment of surgery and chemotherapy. Over a 15-year period from 2009 to 2024, more than 800 patients were designated into either a health education group or exercise group. Researchers found that patients who began a three-year exercise program following chemotherapy had "significantly longer disease-free survival and findings consistent with longer overall survival." The study broke people up into two groups, a health-education program or a health education program in addition to a monitored exercise regime as part of the Colon Health and Lifelong Exercise Change. Both were done through the Canadian Cancer Trials Group. Of those who were a part of the exercise program, 80.3 percent saw a five-year disease-free survival, while 73.9 percent of the health-education group saw the same results. "Preclinical and observational studies suggest that exercise may improve cancer outcomes," the study said, adding that "definitive evidence" was lacking, hence the launch of this study. The exercise program participants received behavioral-support sessions as well as 12 in-person exercise sessions over two weeks for the first six months of the study. In the following six months, as part of phase two, patients continued to go to the support sessions either in person or virtually, along with their supervised exercise sessions. The last two years of the study required patients to go to in-person or remote support sessions, along with supervised exercise sessions, for those attending the support sessions in person. "Results support longer overall survival in the exercise group than in the health-education group," the study says. The study said that people who suffer from these diseases often have less quality of life and physical function issues, which the exercise program aims to help. "Interventions that improve both survival and quality of life in this patient population are needed," according to the study. However, even after treatment, recurrence happens 20 to 40 percent of patients, but the exercise program can cut that risk down, the new study shows. What People Are Saying Dr. Christopher Booth, a co-chair of the international study and a medical oncologist at Kingston Health Sciences Centre in Kingston, Ontario, told The Candian Press: "It's the first clinical trial in the world asking whether exercise can improve cancer survival. And in fact, the results were we had a cancer drug with this amount of benefit, it would cost between $100,000 and $200,000 per year (and) it would be celebrated in all the major guidelines across oncology societies worldwide." What Happens Next? Even after treatment, recurrence happens 20 to 40 percent of patients, but an exercise program can cut the risk down, according to the new study. Those who have received treatment for colorectal cancer should talk to their doctor before starting any exercise programs.


New York Post
13 hours ago
- New York Post
Why one mom is trying to delay her daughter's first period — as experts warn of the risks of early puberty
According to studies, girls who get their menstrual cycles at a young age are more susceptible to long-term health problems. As a result, one mom is trying to prevent her young daughter's body from maturing too soon. According to Stat News, over the past 55 years, young girls in the US have been getting their periods earlier and earlier. Nowadays, the average age is 11 years and nine months. As if that age was startling enough, 16% of girls are getting their cycle before they even celebrate their 11th birthday. Advertisement Nowadays, the average age for a young girl to get her first period is 11 years and nine months. zakalinka – The concerning part is that, according to the National Library of Medicine, females who start their period at this young age have a 23% higher risk of developing different cancers — like breast, endometrial and ovarian — later on in life. Aside from the increased risk of being diagnosed with serious illnesses down the road — another concern about early puberty is that young girls are forced to endure the emotional and physical toll periods can have before their brains and bodies are fully developed. Advertisement '…modern teens have to deal with painful periods, the risk of getting pregnant and sometimes actually getting pregnant well before their brains and bodies are actually mature enough,' Elena Bridgers, a mom of two and a wellness and mental health writer, said in a recent Instagram reel. Because of this alarming news, moms like Rebecca Kinderman are trying to delay their daughter's first period by following a holistic lifestyle. 'I believe that if we can delay this part of 'growing up,' especially when their brains are not developed enough to be able to handle everything that they could be exposed to online, we are allowing our girls to stay young for longer,' Kinderman told Newsweek. Advertisement The 36-year-old posted a viral Instagram reel where she explained her thought process in helping her daughter live a long, healthy life. Believing household toxins and poor diets are contributing factors to early periods, Kinderman stressed in her post that feeding your family whole foods without seed oils and artificial ingredients is major. And in the era of parents raising 'iPad kids,' the mom also stressed the importance of removing kids from their tech devices and encouraging them to get outside and play. Advertisement And it seems that Kinderman might have a point — especially regarding diets and lifestyle choices. 'I think that that is very reflective of the obesity epidemic that we are seeing,' Aviva Sopher, a professor of pediatrics at Columbia University, Irving Medical Center, told Stat News. 'To me, this is concerning as well, this kind of confluence of obesity and earlier puberty and more irregular cycles,' she said.


Newsweek
21 hours ago
- Newsweek
Moms Are Trying To Delay Daughters' First Period—Experts Say They're Right
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Puberty in American girls is starting earlier than ever—and some moms aren't waiting around to see what that means for their daughters. Rebecca Kinderman is just one who's doing everything in her power to try and delay her daughters'—aged 10 and 12—first periods. Her Instagram reel (@bec_kinderman) on the subject had received 1.6 million views and and over 57,000 likes across the platform at the time of writing. For the Gold Coast mom, this has meant overhauling everything from her family's diet to screen time. "I believe that if we can delay this part of 'growing up,' especially when their brains are not developed enough to be able to handle everything that they could be exposed to online, we are allowing our girls to stay young for longer," the 36-year-old told Newsweek. Indeed, data shows the average age for a girl's first period is now just 11.9 years, with 16 percent starting before age 11 in the United States. What is even more alarming about starting your period early is the increased risk of hormone-related cancers later in life. For instance, girls who start their period before age 12 have a 23 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to those who start at 15. Additionally, early menarche has been linked to increased risks of endometrial and ovarian cancers. But it wasn't always like this. Elena Bridgers (@ a science writer who specializes in maternal wellness and mental health, explained in a recent reel on Instagram that girls in hunter-gatherer societies often started their periods as late as 17 and began proper ovulation around 19. "For millions of years, women's brains and bodies went through the emotional turmoil of adolescence before we actually hit reproductive puberty, but modern teens have to deal with painful periods, the risk of getting pregnant, and sometimes actually getting pregnant well before their brains and bodies are actually mature enough," Bridgers said in her now viral clip. This trend suggests an "evolutionary mismatch" adds Bridgers, with modern teens facing reproductive challenges before they are emotionally and physically mature. "Early onset of menarche is associated with higher risk of miscarriage, more menstrual cramping, more painful and irregular periods, higher risk of preterm delivery, reproductive cancers, anxiety and depression," Bridgers told Newsweek. "We are not sure whether early onset of menarche causes these things, or whether there is a third explanatory variable, like obesity, that causes both early onset of menarche and puts girls at higher risk for depression. But, on the whole, I think we can safely say that starting your period too early is not a good thing." Evidence suggests that some of the leading contributing factors to early menarche—the age at which a girl starts her period—are in fact environmental, including stress, psychological factors and diet-related. With this in mind, Kinderman is raising her daughters as holistically as possible. "We are very focused on raising our kids with as much of a holistic approach as we can," she said. "This includes no personal devices for any of them, and certainly no access to social media and the internet." The family eats mostly organic and removes pesticide residue from fruit and vegetables. Kinderman explained that there are no toxic chemicals in the house either. "We make our own perfumes using essential oils," she told Newsweek. "This age is really big for girls wanting to smell pretty and unfortunately perfumes are a cocktail of hormone-disrupting chemicals." Meanwhile mom of two daughters—7 and 4—Nicky Skinner has taken similar steps to delay her own daughters' first periods. On her Instagram page (@nourished_and_vibrant), Skinner, from New Zealand, raises awareness that girls are starting their periods earlier than ever. Her recent reel on the topic, which had clocked up 8 million views at the time of writing, provides a list of reasons why other moms may want to join her on her mission. But while delaying first menses is her goal, it's not about artificially manipulating natural development, she told Newsweek. "It's about creating an environment that doesn't bring the period on prematurely," she said. "It's about an awareness that girls are starting to ovulate earlier, knowing that comes with risk, so doing what I can to ensure the environmental factors I can control as a mother—knowing there's a lot I can't control—are not impacting my girls' health in a negative way." Indeed, the two moms are part of a growing group of parents rethinking early puberty and how modern life may influence when a girl has her first period. And the subject is gaining traction with with experts too. Lara Briden, a doctor of naturopathic medicine with almost 30 years of experience in women's health, notes that very early menarche—before age 8—is considered abnormal and warrants medical attention. "But even early menarche—before age 11—is not ideal," Briden told Newsweek. "From a health [and] biology perspective, early female puberty and menarche are also associated with a greater risk for insulin resistance, PCOS [polycystic ovary syndrome], and breast cancer later in life. "Importantly, the early menarche may not directly cause those long-term health risks. Rather, it may simply be another manifestation or complication of the metabolic dysfunction (high insulin) that drives all the downstream health risks." Briden, who is also the author of Period Repair Manual, said that the timing of female puberty is significantly influenced by food supply and environmental factors, leading to variations throughout human history. She said that during periods of scarcity, puberty tends to be delayed. Meanwhile in times of abundance, it generally occurs earlier—adding that male puberty is not as sensitive to food supply. "The modern trend toward earlier menarche is, in part, a biological response to more reliable nutrition, which is a good thing," Briden said. "But it has also coincided with an alarming rise in metabolic dysfunction (insulin resistance), which now affects people across all ages. It's not just that metabolic problems are increasing. They're also amplifying in severity, and that's happening across generations because of epigenetics." Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background. Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background. @bec_kinderman So, is it any wonder that moms doing everything they can to delay their daughters' first period to prevent the associated risks? Of course, Kinderman and Skinner acknowledge that, while moms can try their best to do everything they can to delay their daughters' first periods, there is no guarantee. "It's important to remember that genetics play a big part in this, too," Skinner said. "If mother got her period early, even if you do everything 'right,' the daughter may still menstruate earlier, too. There need be no shame or guilt around this." Bridgers said that genetic factors at play and even environmental factors can be very hard to control, and warns that setting a goal to delay a girl's menarche can cause shame and failure for both parents and girls, and may lead to unhealthy parenting practices. "I do think, however, that parents should do their best to make sure their children are eating a healthy diet and getting plenty of outdoor exercise," Bridgers said. "We know this will be good for them anyway." Bridgers advised limiting sugars and processed foods, ensuring they have plenty of time outside and away from screens and avoiding heavy use of personal care products with known endocrine disrupters. Briden said that, while something can be done, the goal shouldn't be to delay menarche. "It's not about restriction or micromanaging childhood, and certainly not about calorie restriction for kids," she said, adding that she doesn't believe Skinner or Kinderman are suggesting this. "Instead, it's about trying to create or restore a food environment that allows normal human female physiology to unfold." Both Kinderman and Skinner are also advocates of open conversation around periods with their daughters. Kinderman told Newsweek that she is always been open with her girls about their cycles and puberty. "My hopes are that, when it does happen, it will be a really positive experience for them," she said. "There won't be any fear or uncertainty. I've heard too many women share that they weren't prepared for it, mothers never talked about it or talked very little about it, and they got it young and felt scared. My hopes are that my girls feel excited for the day and will be celebrated when it happens."