
Moms Are Trying To Delay Daughters' First Period—Experts Say They're Right
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Puberty in American girls is starting earlier than ever—and some moms aren't waiting around to see what that means for their daughters.
Rebecca Kinderman is just one who's doing everything in her power to try and delay her daughters'—aged 10 and 12—first periods. Her Instagram reel (@bec_kinderman) on the subject had received 1.6 million views and and over 57,000 likes across the platform at the time of writing.
For the Gold Coast mom, this has meant overhauling everything from her family's diet to screen time.
"I believe that if we can delay this part of 'growing up,' especially when their brains are not developed enough to be able to handle everything that they could be exposed to online, we are allowing our girls to stay young for longer," the 36-year-old told Newsweek.
Indeed, data shows the average age for a girl's first period is now just 11.9 years, with 16 percent starting before age 11 in the United States.
What is even more alarming about starting your period early is the increased risk of hormone-related cancers later in life. For instance, girls who start their period before age 12 have a 23 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer compared to those who start at 15. Additionally, early menarche has been linked to increased risks of endometrial and ovarian cancers.
But it wasn't always like this. Elena Bridgers (@elena.bridgers), a science writer who specializes in maternal wellness and mental health, explained in a recent reel on Instagram that girls in hunter-gatherer societies often started their periods as late as 17 and began proper ovulation around 19.
"For millions of years, women's brains and bodies went through the emotional turmoil of adolescence before we actually hit reproductive puberty, but modern teens have to deal with painful periods, the risk of getting pregnant, and sometimes actually getting pregnant well before their brains and bodies are actually mature enough," Bridgers said in her now viral clip.
This trend suggests an "evolutionary mismatch" adds Bridgers, with modern teens facing reproductive challenges before they are emotionally and physically mature.
"Early onset of menarche is associated with higher risk of miscarriage, more menstrual cramping, more painful and irregular periods, higher risk of preterm delivery, reproductive cancers, anxiety and depression," Bridgers told Newsweek.
"We are not sure whether early onset of menarche causes these things, or whether there is a third explanatory variable, like obesity, that causes both early onset of menarche and puts girls at higher risk for depression. But, on the whole, I think we can safely say that starting your period too early is not a good thing."
Evidence suggests that some of the leading contributing factors to early menarche—the age at which a girl starts her period—are in fact environmental, including stress, psychological factors and diet-related.
With this in mind, Kinderman is raising her daughters as holistically as possible.
"We are very focused on raising our kids with as much of a holistic approach as we can," she said. "This includes no personal devices for any of them, and certainly no access to social media and the internet."
The family eats mostly organic and removes pesticide residue from fruit and vegetables. Kinderman explained that there are no toxic chemicals in the house either.
"We make our own perfumes using essential oils," she told Newsweek. "This age is really big for girls wanting to smell pretty and unfortunately perfumes are a cocktail of hormone-disrupting chemicals."
Meanwhile mom of two daughters—7 and 4—Nicky Skinner has taken similar steps to delay her own daughters' first periods.
On her Instagram page (@nourished_and_vibrant), Skinner, from New Zealand, raises awareness that girls are starting their periods earlier than ever. Her recent reel on the topic, which had clocked up 8 million views at the time of writing, provides a list of reasons why other moms may want to join her on her mission.
But while delaying first menses is her goal, it's not about artificially manipulating natural development, she told Newsweek.
"It's about creating an environment that doesn't bring the period on prematurely," she said. "It's about an awareness that girls are starting to ovulate earlier, knowing that comes with risk, so doing what I can to ensure the environmental factors I can control as a mother—knowing there's a lot I can't control—are not impacting my girls' health in a negative way."
Indeed, the two moms are part of a growing group of parents rethinking early puberty and how modern life may influence when a girl has her first period. And the subject is gaining traction with with experts too.
Lara Briden, a doctor of naturopathic medicine with almost 30 years of experience in women's health, notes that very early menarche—before age 8—is considered abnormal and warrants medical attention.
"But even early menarche—before age 11—is not ideal," Briden told Newsweek. "From a health [and] biology perspective, early female puberty and menarche are also associated with a greater risk for insulin resistance, PCOS [polycystic ovary syndrome], and breast cancer later in life.
"Importantly, the early menarche may not directly cause those long-term health risks. Rather, it may simply be another manifestation or complication of the metabolic dysfunction (high insulin) that drives all the downstream health risks."
Briden, who is also the author of Period Repair Manual, said that the timing of female puberty is significantly influenced by food supply and environmental factors, leading to variations throughout human history.
She said that during periods of scarcity, puberty tends to be delayed. Meanwhile in times of abundance, it generally occurs earlier—adding that male puberty is not as sensitive to food supply.
"The modern trend toward earlier menarche is, in part, a biological response to more reliable nutrition, which is a good thing," Briden said. "But it has also coincided with an alarming rise in metabolic dysfunction (insulin resistance), which now affects people across all ages. It's not just that metabolic problems are increasing. They're also amplifying in severity, and that's happening across generations because of epigenetics."
Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background.
Young girls playing on rope swing in park with blue sky in background.
@bec_kinderman
So, is it any wonder that moms doing everything they can to delay their daughters' first period to prevent the associated risks?
Of course, Kinderman and Skinner acknowledge that, while moms can try their best to do everything they can to delay their daughters' first periods, there is no guarantee.
"It's important to remember that genetics play a big part in this, too," Skinner said. "If mother got her period early, even if you do everything 'right,' the daughter may still menstruate earlier, too. There need be no shame or guilt around this."
Bridgers said that genetic factors at play and even environmental factors can be very hard to control, and warns that setting a goal to delay a girl's menarche can cause shame and failure for both parents and girls, and may lead to unhealthy parenting practices.
"I do think, however, that parents should do their best to make sure their children are eating a healthy diet and getting plenty of outdoor exercise," Bridgers said. "We know this will be good for them anyway."
Bridgers advised limiting sugars and processed foods, ensuring they have plenty of time outside and away from screens and avoiding heavy use of personal care products with known endocrine disrupters.
Briden said that, while something can be done, the goal shouldn't be to delay menarche.
"It's not about restriction or micromanaging childhood, and certainly not about calorie restriction for kids," she said, adding that she doesn't believe Skinner or Kinderman are suggesting this. "Instead, it's about trying to create or restore a food environment that allows normal human female physiology to unfold."
Both Kinderman and Skinner are also advocates of open conversation around periods with their daughters.
Kinderman told Newsweek that she is always been open with her girls about their cycles and puberty.
"My hopes are that, when it does happen, it will be a really positive experience for them," she said. "There won't be any fear or uncertainty. I've heard too many women share that they weren't prepared for it, mothers never talked about it or talked very little about it, and they got it young and felt scared. My hopes are that my girls feel excited for the day and will be celebrated when it happens."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) Is Reinvesting At Lower Rates Of Return
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)? For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Elevance Health, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.11 = US$8.7b ÷ (US$122b - US$44b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). So, Elevance Health has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%. See our latest analysis for Elevance Health In the above chart we have measured Elevance Health's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Elevance Health for free. What Does the ROCE Trend For Elevance Health Tell Us? In terms of Elevance Health's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 14%, but since then they've fallen to 11%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run. The Bottom Line While returns have fallen for Elevance Health in recent times, we're encouraged to see that sales are growing and that the business is reinvesting in its operations. These trends are starting to be recognized by investors since the stock has delivered a 16% gain to shareholders who've held over the last five years. Therefore we'd recommend looking further into this stock to confirm if it has the makings of a good investment. Elevance Health could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our on our platform quite valuable. For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Newborn Was 'Normal Baby'—Then 5 Months Later Everything Changes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Two U.K. parents who welcomed their newborn into the world had no idea their lives would change just a few months later. Conor Cross, 33, told Newsweek that he and Meredith Bradley, 31, thought the hardest part of their journey was behind them when they had their baby boy Reggie on September 28, 2024. The pregnancy had been complicated—marked by abnormal scan results; talk of possible termination; and a diagnosis of hypospadias, a congenital condition affecting the genitals. From left: Conor Cross holds newborn son, Reggie Cross in hospital; and father and son are pictured together months later. From left: Conor Cross holds newborn son, Reggie Cross in hospital; and father and son are pictured together months later. @conorruns But, after months of monitoring, Reggie was born "a normal baby," sleeping soundly, smiling and charming everyone he met. Then, just before Reggie turned 5 months, everything changed. Even before birth, Conor and Meredith knew he would need medical care. A raised nuchal translucency at the 12-week scan triggered a battery of tests, including a CVS, to rule out genetic syndromes. Reggie was cleared but monitored monthly. By birth, he had not only hypospadias but also undescended testes—raising the possibility he could have both male and female reproductive organs. Testing confirmed that he was genetically male. Soon after, another hurdle appeared: a recurring inguinal hernia that led to frequent hospital visits, including spending Christmas Day in the emergency room. Surgery in February 2025 to repair the hernia and bring down one testicle went smoothly, and Conor hoped his son's crying, discomfort and swelling would end. But the problems didn't stop. "Reggie became unsettled, [he] stopped taking his milk and the swelling didn't improve," Conor said. Reggie's eyes were swollen almost daily. The couple were desperate for answers, but doctors dismissed their concerns. "The response was that they didn't know what they'd be referring him for," Conor said. "It felt like we were going in circles, trying to convince people that something wasn't right." On March 1, after weeks of worsening symptoms, Conor pushed for further testing at Accident & Emergency (A & E). Blood work finally revealed the truth: Reggie was in complete kidney failure. By the next morning, they were rushed to Great Ormond Street Hospital in London via ambulance. At GOSH, doctors diagnosed Reggie with Stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD5). His kidneys were so damaged that they posed a cancer risk if not removed before his first birthday. He was immediately placed on peritoneal dialysis, running from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. daily. Further genetic investigation led to a diagnosis of Denys-Drash syndrome, a rare condition linking his kidney failure with other medical issues. "Although emotions were high and we wanted answers, we had to let the life of our baby go into their hands," Conor said. "Anyone who knows GOSH knows that he is in the best place [but] even five months on, we don't know everything." The hospital's support extended beyond Reggie's treatment. The family has received financial help, free accommodation, food vouchers and funding for a shed to store Reggie's medications. Charities such as Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity and Kidney Care UK stepped in to make daily life more manageable. Grateful for the care they received, Conor decided to give back—by taking on a half marathon, despite never having run before. "I wanted to do something that would be challenging," he said. "I also wanted to show people that, if there is something in life that you want to do, then do it. Life is too short, and time will not slow down just because Reggie is going through a difficult time." Conor's first race will be the Chelmsford Half Marathon in October 2025, with a London Marathon spot secured for 2026. Reggie, now nearly 1 year old but still in 3-to-6-month clothes, remains "the happiest boy ever," according to his dad. Reggie faces the removal of both kidneys in September, followed by years of dialysis until he is big enough for a transplant at age 3 or 4. Through his updates on TikTok (@conorruns), Conor hopes to reassure parents—especially those facing medical uncertainty. "Don't feel pressured into living up to other people's expectations," he said. Conor, who is now a single father, also wants other families in similar situations to know they are not alone. "Mothers out there are just pure superheroes. For the dads, especially single dads like me, I want to inspire them by sharing my fitness journey." "I thought running would have been something I did just to raise money for these amazing charities, but, in fairness, it has saved me from going down a dark path," Conor added. "Starting something new is the hardest part, but you will fully understand how helpful that one thing can be just by doing it."


Los Angeles Times
16 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Opinion: A generation plugged in, tuned out
At just nine years old, a child today can hold the world in their hands – yet lose touch with the one around them. For much of Generation Z, this is a reality. Like many kids, I got my first phone not because I needed one, but because peer pressure made it feel like I'd be left behind without it. After countless months of begging my parents, they bought me my first phone. With a brand new iPhone 7 in hand, I felt like I had unlocked the rite of passage. However, once I downloaded popular social media apps – Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok – my life turned around. Social media exposed me to conversations that I wasn't ready for. There comes a point in a child's life when they start to become subject to peer pressure. According to Children's Health , peer pressure begins as early as age ten with the formation of friend groups in elementary school. Peer pressure can come in many different shapes and sizes: what you wear, how you act, and now, whether you own a phone. When it comes to peer pressure caused by phones, it more specifically goes under the category of ' social conformity . ' Social conformity is the tendency for one to adjust their thoughts, beliefs, or lifestyle to align with those in a group or a social norm. The tendency for children or teenagers to succumb to social conformity is becoming more and more prevalent in this day and age. Social media is dangerous. While it isn't physically dangerous, social media has created a culture of comparison and hate speech. According to the Anti-Defamation League's annual survey , up to 22% of Americans reported experiencing hate speech online. For children and teens, especially, this can be harmful. The harm is rooted in a child's maturity level. Now more than ever, before children develop proper emotional and psychological tools, they are shown explicit and harmful content. Instead of connecting and building confidence, kids often find themselves isolated and insecure. In fact, a survey conducted by the Royal Society for Public Health questioned 14-24-year-olds on how UK social media has impacted their health. The results revealed that Snapchat, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram all led to increased feelings of depression, anxiety, poor body image, and loneliness. As social media platforms continue to shape young minds, it's important to make a change. While it's nearly impossible to disconnect children from social media completely, we can reform these platforms from within. Now, more than ever, it's crucial to enforce extra precautions through stricter content moderation, promoting digital literacy, and holding platforms accountable for the harmful environments they create. Together, we must aim to create a space that fosters well-being and connection rather than harm and isolation. Related