Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Head Boasts Success as Palestinians Starve
'We've been filling a massive gap in a way that's direct to the people, that prioritizes the security of the situation in this very complex environment,' said Johnnie Moore, the chair of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, on Tuesday during an event hosted by the American Jewish Congress and joined by the World Zionist Organization. 'And despite what you may read in the press and the criticism that you hear from the United Nations and other institutions, what we're doing has actually been unbelievably effective.'
As Palestinians continue to starve to death in Gaza, Moore, an evangelical minister and former religious adviser to the Trump administration, has spent the past several weeks defending his organization's work. He's appeared on mainstream TV news outlets and in interviews with pro-Israel podcasts. He and his foundation have messaged in lockstep with the Israeli government, as both cast blame on Hamas officials and the international community for a famine of Israel's creation.
Israel has blockaded humanitarian aid from entering Gaza since March, when the Israeli government acknowledged it was weaponizing hunger to pressure Hamas into total disarmament — a plan that even U.S. officials have said is untenable. When the GHF took over aid distribution in the Strip in late May, Israeli troops began routinely opening fire on starving Palestinians waiting for food. As of this week, Israeli troops have shot and killed more than 1,000 people trying to get food: 766 near GHF aid sites, and 288 near aid convoys run by the United Nations and other organizations, according to the U.N.
Moore repeatedly blamed the U.N. for choosing 'politics … over the needs of these people,' during Tuesday's event. He claimed the U..N had failed to deliver 'thousands upon thousands of pallets' of aid already inside Gaza. The Israeli government has made the same argument in recent weeks, releasing video and photos of supposedly dormant stockpiles to advance a narrative that the U.N.-led system is broken.
The Israeli government and GHF have long alleged the U.N. system allowed for Hamas to steal and enrich itself with aid intended for Palestinian civilians. On Tuesday, Moore claimed Hamas would use aid to 'recruit fighters' and would sell the aid in 'the black market to make money.'
'It's shocking to imagine that's being said with a straight face,' said Mara Kronenfeld, executive director of UNRWA USA, referring to Moore's statements. 'This is a narrative that does not at all match the reality and is a very cynical and dark narrative, given how bad the reality is.'
Outside of reports that rely solely on anonymous Israeli intelligence sources, such as a recent Washington Post article that alleged Hamas seized 15 percent of goods for its own use, there has been no evidence of widespread theft of aid by Hamas. An aid audit recognized Hamas had been using some aid for revenue, but showed that only 1 percent of aid had been lost to theft. While the Israeli government publicly cried foul about such theft as far back as early 2024, Israeli officials failed to provide evidence of such allegations during confidential briefings with U.S. officials.
Despite news reports like the Haaretz investigation in June that Israeli soldiers have been ordered to shoot at unarmed Palestinians waiting for aid, or the July Associated Press story revealing that American contractors guarding the GHF aid sites had fired live ammunition, stun grenades, and tear gas at aid-seeking Palestinians, GHF markets itself as a safer alternative to U.N.-run aid sites.
'We exist so people live,' Moore said during the Tuesday event, while dismissing such reports. 'We don't want a single person to be hurt and certainly not killed trying to seek food. And we do everything in our power to make sure that that doesn't happen. But the way the world is responding to this challenge, this terrible challenge, in the middle of a war is making the situation worse rather than helping solve the issue.'
He called reports to the contrary a 'flood of misinformation.' Addressing the chaotic images of desperate Palestinians frantically rushing to sift through boxes of food at its aid sites, Moore said the GHF model is 'far more orderly than' that of the U.N.-led World Food Programme, and said it only appears disorderly to 'the untrained eye.'
'What they are missing is these are human beings.'
'The idea that this is the way you do aid, and only a 'trained eye' could see that, would be true if we were talking about corralling animals into such settings,' Kronenfeld said, adding that the U.N. operated 400 aid sites throughout the Strip to broaden the reach of aid and to prevent such chaotic scenes. 'What they are missing is these are human beings, and the kinds of scenes we are seeing are not fit for human beings, let alone people who've been suffering for 21 months.'
GHF has claimed it has delivered nearly 89 million meals in Gaza since it began operations. Moore said a new community distribution model has been 'incredibly successful in getting food more deeply into the Gaza Strip.'
But in the months since GHF took over aid distribution in Gaza, hospitals in the Strip have reported sharp increases in malnutrition cases. Doctors Without Borders said among its patients with severe or moderate malnutrition include 700 pregnant and breastfeeding women and nearly 500 children. Aid workers and journalists have also begun to report experiencing severe hunger, including one photographer with Agence France-Presse who quit after he said he was too weak to work.
In a letter released Wednesday, more than 100 humanitarian aid organizations urged Israel to end the siege on Gaza and come to a ceasefire, noting that acute malnutrition is especially prevalent among children and older people.
'Illnesses like acute watery diarrhoea are spreading, markets are empty, waste is piling up, and adults are collapsing on the streets from hunger and dehydration,' the letter said. It notes that about 28 trucks of aid per day are allowed into Gaza — a drop from the 600 daily that flowed into the Strip earlier this year amid the temporary ceasefire, which Israel later broke by continuing its bombing campaign.
There are 'tons of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items and fuel' sitting inside Gaza or at border crossings, the letter argues, but the Israeli government's restrictions have prevented them from accessing and delivering the aid.
As of Monday, Israel had deemed 87 percent of the Strip a military zone or put it under evacuation orders, severely straining movement for both aid-seeking Palestinians and aid workers. That territorial creep fits into the far-right Israeli government's broader plans for Gaza: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans in May to evacuate Palestinians to the south into a military-controlled 'sterile zone.' Last week, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said he had instructed the military to forcibly displace Gaza's entire population of about 2 million people into a 'humanitarian city,' which would be built atop the ruins of Rafah in southern Gaza, according to The Times of Israel. And Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has long called for the establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, continued to push the idea while attending a Knesset conference with other Israeli lawmakers called 'The Gaza Riviera – from vision to reality,' a riff off of U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed plan to take control of the Strip to construct 'the Riviera of the Middle East.'
As the writers of the letter argue, 'The UN-led humanitarian system has not failed, it has been prevented from functioning.'
However, Israel's blockade has prevented the delivery of other aid, such as medicine, medical supplies, hygiene products, water, fuel, and other essentials. Moore said his organization is prepared to deliver such supplies when called upon, but he continued to blame the U.N. and nongovernmental organizations for their unwillingness to collaborate.
The GHF did not immediately respond to The Intercept's request for comment.
Anastasia Moran, advocacy director at MedGlobal, a Chicago-based medical aid organization that has teams in Gaza and signed onto the letter, said that it has stockpiles of nutrition treatments, medicine, and other medical supplies sitting at the Gaza border that has been blocked by the Israeli government.
Like the remaining hospitals across Gaza, MedGlobal's clinic in Gaza City has seen an increase in severe malnutrition cases, Moran said. Lacking essential supplies, their medical teams have struggled to treat patients, and many have died.
'Every single one of those deaths is preventable.'
Moran said at least five infants and toddlers had recently died of malnutrition at MedGlobal's clinic: 3-month-old Mohammed, 4-month-old Nahed, 1.5-year-old Zein, 2-year-old Jouri, and 4.5-year-old Sewar.
'They died for the sole reason that we did not have the essential medications and IV fluids and nutrition treatments that we needed to save their lives,' Moran said. 'Every single one of those deaths is preventable, every single one of those deaths is not the norm of what we've been seeing in Gaza.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer's Complex Palestine Recognition Vow Risks Political Pain Next Month
Keir Starmer aimed to calm domestic criticism that he was failing to take a lead against the crisis in Gaza when he promised to recognize Palestine this week. Now, senior members of his UK government fret that he's set the scene for more political pain next month. The British premier's conditional pledge to recognize Palestinian statehood in September unless Israel agrees to end the conflict in Gaza sparked a backlash from both the left and right of the political spectrum, as well as accusations by the Israeli government, the White House and a British hostage who had been held captive by Hamas, that he risked rewarding terrorism.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.' ___
2 hours ago
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON -- For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'
