logo
Brazos Co. case leads to new law about peace officer attacks

Brazos Co. case leads to new law about peace officer attacks

Yahoo02-06-2025
Austin, Tx (FOX 44) – A 2022 Brazos County case involving two peace officers being shot has led to a new law with strong penalties for trying to kill police.
State Senator Charles Schwertner said the need for the legislation which increases the penalties for attempted capital murder of a police officer was brought to his attention by Brazos County District Attorney Jarvis Parsons. State Representative Paul Dyson of Bryan was also told about the problem, leading to the writing of what became House Bill 1871.
The bill passed by the legislature not only increases the punishment for the offense but also modifies parole.
In December 2022, a man shot a Bryan officer, stole their patrol vehicle, and later shot a Brazos County sheriff's deputy during a standoff. Fortunately, both officers survived. In 2024, that man was found guilty of aggravated assault of a public servant.
Senator Schwertner said the ultimately exposed a serious gap in our legal system. Current Texas law treats both attempted capital murder of a peace officer and aggravated assault of a public servant as first degree felonies. However, proving attempted capital murder is a more difficult task, requiring the prosecution to prove the offender's intent to kill. As a result, prosecutors could have been discouraged from pursuing attempted capital murder, and instead pursue aggravated assault, even after an attempt to take an officer's life.
House Bill 1871 addresses this issue by enhancing the punishment for attempted capital murder of a peace officer, ensuring that the law better reflects the seriousness of this crime and provides a more appropriate deterrent. The bill also includes provisions that adjust parole eligibility and restrict mandatory supervision for individuals convicted under this offense, emphasizing the state's commitment to protecting peace officers who risk their lives in the line of duty.
'HB 1871 increases the punishment for criminals who do everything in their power to murder police officers in the line of duty and attempt to take law enforcement away from their family and friends,' said Brazos District Attorney Jarvis Parsons 'It increases the punishment for Attempted Capital Murder of a Peace Officer from a minimum of probation to a minimum of 25 years in prison up to life in prison with no parole. This increased punishment sends a vital message that as Texans we will protect the people who protect us.'
'Every day, Texas peace officers put their lives on the line to protect our communities,' said Senator Charles Schwertner. 'House Bill 1871 sends a clear message: if you attempt to kill a law enforcement officer, you will face the full weight of the law.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas's New Map Is Racial Division by Another Name
Texas's New Map Is Racial Division by Another Name

Time​ Magazine

timean hour ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Texas's New Map Is Racial Division by Another Name

I represent the people of El Paso, Texas in the state legislature, a west Texas district that is a 14-hour drive away from the Louisiana border. Yet, data from the Texas Legislative Council indicates that the congressional lines Republicans are rushing through Austin manages to somehow knit 90% of the state's white voting power across that entire expanse—while slicing Latino and Black communities into pieces so small they have little power to choose their own representatives. Fueled by rapid Latino population growth, Texas has amassed new congressional seats. But these gains have not strengthened the political voice of the communities driving that growth. Instead, Texas Republicans have, in my view, used racial engineering to make sure Texans of color cannot meaningfully influence elections for Congress or the state legislature. Latinos now make up a larger share of Texas's 31 million population than in California, the state often considered the Latino capital of America. Texas also has more Black residents than Georgia, despite Georgia's reputation as a center of Black political power. Nearly 60% of Texans are people of color, and 95% of the state's population growth in the past decade has come from those communities. Despite this reality, Texas's new congressional lines position white voters to decide at least 26 of the state's 38 congressional seats—putting power in the hands of white voters by design, not accident. In another three districts, a 'Latino majority' exists only on paper: map-drawers split cohesive barrios, added high-turnout Anglo precincts, and minimized the share of voting-age Latino citizens, handing the keys to white voters in these districts as well. Together, the racially-engineered 26 white-majority seats—plus the three manufactured 'Latino' seats—is how the federal and state government openly conspired to gain additional Republican congressional seats. But the Trump Administration's ambitions come at the expense of Latino and Black Texans. Here's the blunt math on the Texas Republican proposal: under this map, my team and I estimate it would take roughly 445,000 white residents to secure one member of Congress, but about 1.4 million Latino residents and 2 million Black residents to secure the same. In effect, the political 'worth' of a Latino Texan is cut to one‑third of a white Texan's, and for Black Texans, to one‑fifth. On paper the districts are equal in population; in practice the map assigns unequal electoral weight across racial lines. This means that the value of one Latino resident's vote is worth just one-third the value of one white resident, and a black resident is one-fifth; it would take three Latino Texans, or five Black Texans, to equal the voting power of a single white Texan. Republicans insist this is just politics. But Texas has a long, well‑documented history of crossing the line from hardball politics to what I would define as unlawful racial engineering. In 2006, the Supreme Court threw out a South Texas district for unlawfully diluting Latino voting strength after a mid‑decade redraw. Federal courts found problems with parts of the state's 2011 maps, too. Texas operated under federal 'preclearance' for decades because of past discrimination. When Shelby County v. Holder in 2013 removed that guardrail, it invited states like Texas to test the limits—passing racially engineered maps that can stand for years while litigation drags on, yielding short-term gains of up to five additional U.S. House seats. Courts have recently required more Black opportunity districts in Alabama and allowed a second Black district to stand for now in Louisiana, underscoring that the Voting Rights Act still means something when states overreach. Texas, meanwhile, is moving in the opposite direction. Some Republicans argue that growing GOP support among a subset of Latino voters in Texas justifies these lines. But even if you accept their premise, the Voting Rights Act is about opportunity, not partisan outcomes—ensuring communities of color can form districts where they have a realistic chance to elect their preferred candidates, regardless of party. Here, the state is doing the opposite: cracking and packing Latino and Black neighborhoods to reduce the number of such districts. This potential racial engineering sidelines communities of color and ensures they cannot meaningfully influence elections for Congress or the state legislature. If this plan passes, Texas Latinos could become the most underrepresented racial or ethnic group in all 50 states. The level of under-representation in Texas's proposal far exceeds the disparities that courts already forced Alabama and Louisiana to correct. Maps like this do not merely entrench a party; they entrench a racial hierarchy. By cracking Latino barrios and Black neighborhoods, dismantling multi-racial districts, and fine-tuning the citizen-voting-age share to keep those communities just below the thresholds where they can elect their candidates of choice, the lines ensure white voting blocs remain decisive—even inside districts labeled 'Latino.' That is racial vote dilution: it denies Latino and Black Texans an equal opportunity to translate population into seats, and it teaches a generation that their ballots carry less electoral weight because of race, not ideas. A government that is not accountable to Latino and Black Texans teaches children early that their voices don't count. Their families, who pay taxes, work hard, and build this state, are told their votes will be discounted by design and that representation can be rationed by color. When districts are drawn to dilute their votes, the message is that citizenship is conditional and equal protection negotiable. That is the very struggle the civil rights movement sought to end: government may not target voters based on race and then claim neutrality at the ballot box. We have seen this before, from literacy tests to poll taxes—different tools, same result, keeping power just out of reach. A true democracy demands maps that make our government accountable to all of its people, not just the ones it prefers.

Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest
Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Several Texas Democrats join Rep. Nicole Collier in chamber protest

Several Texas Democrats joined state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) on Tuesday to protest new guidelines preventing party members from leaving the House chambers without a police escort and signed agreement. Democratic State Reps. Mihaela Plesa, Morales Shaw, Rhetta Bowers, Cassandra Garcia Hernandez and Salman Bhojani joined Collier and House Minority Leader Gene Wu on the floor after their Monday overnight in rebuke of GOP lawmakers' redistricting efforts. Several members tore up their 'permission slips' outside the chamber. Texas lawmakers will vote on whether to add five new congressional seats on Wednesday after a group of Democrats fled the state for 15 days seeking to prevent a quorum, the number of present legislators required to proceed with votes. 'Yesterday, I left in custody and I came back in custody, because I stand with Nicole Collier and Gene Wu,' Shaw said. 'This is illegitimate, this is a wrongful use of power, and I will not condone it, and I don't want to be a part of setting a very bad and low precedent for future legislators,' she added. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) said Monday lawmakers who leave the floor would have to agree to be shadowed by a Department of Public Safety officer until Wednesday morning. 'This is a blatant violation of our freedoms as Texans, as Americans and as duly elected officials,' Bowers said, as reported by CNN. Collier gained national attention over her decision to remain inside the House chamber overnight instead of leaving with an officer. 'I refuse to comply with this unreasonable, un-American and unnecessary request,' Collier, who spent two nights on the House floor, told CBS News. The Democrat said she received a call from former Vice President Harris encouraging her to continue her efforts in the Lone Star State. 'She said, 'Keep going.' She said, 'Don't give up. Stand strong. Stand tall, and don't back down,''she told CNN's Dana Bash on 'The Arena.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store