911 call centers in Colorado's high country receive false text alerts from iPhones using satellites
Someone was trapped by fire in the area around Meadow Creek Reservoir near Tabernash. In Grand County, which has been hit hard by wildfire at times, an alert like that generates a serious response.
"It triggered a pretty healthy response," said Grand County Sheriff Brett Shroetlin. "Sheriff's office, emergency medical services, fire department, search and rescue, along with the Forest Service."
On their screens, 911 operators get useful information. The phone number, the GPS coordinates, the approximate range of where that phone is in comparison to that, and even battery strength.
Call takers tried to reach back out to the phone. But they received no response.
"That causes a lot of commotion, causes a lot of our responders to be pulled from the more populous areas of the county and to the remote areas of the county. But we got to respond. We've got to respond until we know it's otherwise," said Shroetlin.
Ultimately, first responders found nothing out of the ordinary in the area where the call came from. No fire. No apparent danger.
It was a false alarm.
Emergency responders in the High Country have received a half dozen or so similar false alarm text alerts. In Boulder County, emergency responders were recently called to the Kelly Dahl Campground near Nederland for a similar issue.
Often, the messages say there's fire. Sometimes a lost person.
Had that been the call, Sheriff Shroetlin says he could not so easily have concluded there was no danger. A lost person might mean the initiation of a long search.
The phone's owner was unaware.
"She was still on the trail system somewhere. We didn't locate her that day, but I was able to finally connect with her on the phone. This happened on Friday, and I talked to her on Monday," said Shroetlin. The woman said she had not purposely sent any emergency message. The sheriff said she told him her hiking companion's phone was acting weird and the battery died prematurely. Then, he related, "She said she tried to take a picture with hers, and then her phone died as well. even though she had significant battery strength."
The feature allowing access to satellites to send emergency messages was added to iPhones from model 14 forward using IOS 18 or newer, going online last year.
Shroetlin talked with an Apple representative this week, who asked a lot of questions about what the phone's user may have been doing with the phone at the time. A message sent by CBS Colorado to an email address at Apple for comment Wednesday was not returned.
Word is now spreading among High Country search and rescue groups and law enforcement about the potential of false messaging.
It isn't the first time iPhone emergency notifications have caused difficulties with false alarms. In 2022, cell network-based automatic notifications of crash alerts were being triggered at ski areas in Colorado when skiers went down or made sudden stops.
Shroetlin likes the idea of phones connecting to satellites to send emergency messages.
"The idea is fantastic up here, where we don't have any good cellular service, especially in the far back country." But right now there's a sense of wariness developing about the messages.
"When I pull all these resources up to a remote area of the county that that leaves the other areas a lot of times uncovered or certainly under-covered," he said. "We have that connectivity issue up here already. This just adds complexity to it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 hours ago
- New York Post
NY parole officer who moonlights as therapist indicted on child porn charges
A New York State parole officer who moonlights as a therapist has been indicted after he was found with child pornography on his cellphone during a stop at JFK airport earlier this year. Colin Kowlessar, 53, was arrested when Customs and Border Protection agents found videos and photos of child porn on his iPhone during a stop at the airport after returning from a trip to Guyana on Feb. 27, according to a complaint from the time. Kowlessar, who worked as a parole officer with the new York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, is expected to be arraigned next week in Brooklyn federal court after a grand jury indicted him Wednesday in the same case on one count of possession of child pornography. Advertisement Colin Kowlessar — a parole officer and therapist — has been indicted for allegedly having child porn on his phone. Psychology Today Kowlessar, a husband and father living in Freeport, Long Island, has been free on $250,000 bond since his February court appearance. The conditions of his release included orders that he surrendered his service gun, agreed not to treat patients under the age of 18 as part of his side gig as a therapist, and stayed away from minors, with the exception of his 16-year-old son from another marriage. Advertisement The materials — including three short videos — found on his phone involved girls performing sex acts and were downloaded from the Telegram app, the complaint alleged. One of the victims was under the age of 12, according to the indictment. In the app, officers found archived chats in groups called 'Underworld VIP' and ' — which both contained a known code for child porn — an emoji of the number 18 crossed out in red, the court documents claim. Kowlessar was arrested earlier this year at JFK airport on a trip back to New York when border patrol officers stopped him and found the illicit materials on his phone. LinkedIn/Colin Kowlessar Advertisement Kowlessar admitted to cops during an interview that 'on at least two separate occasions he has purchased 'CP' [child porn] knowing that the persons depicted therein were minors,' the complaint alleges. 'The defendant also stated that he has since deleted the materials.' Kowlessar's criminal defense attorney Rich Langone told The Post by phone Thursday afternoon that 'this was an accidental downloading.' 'Be careful when you're floating around the internet,' Langone said. 'You never know what can pop on…and you go on something and something pops up and if it pops up, you could be liable for it.' 'He's a good man, a family man,' the lawyer said. 'He has no criminal history.' Advertisement Langone also said his client has never had a negative complaint from his work as a therapist. The defense attorney confirmed that his client has been on inactive duty as a parole officer since his arrest. Kowlessar's online therapist profile says he has 10-years of experience and helps clients with myriad issues, including depression, anxiety, relationship issues, parenting problems, career challenges and substance abuse issues, according to Psychology Today.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man threw petrol bomb at police outside Aldi
A man who threw a petrol bomb at police before pointing an imitation firearm towards them has been found guilty of attempting to cause an explosion with intent to endanger life. David Wiatrowski, 36, used a hammer to smash the windows of an Aldi store in Boston, Lincolnshire, on New Year's Day, before confronting officers who arrived to arrest him. Wiatrowski, of Bradford Road, Boston, previously admitted possession of an imitation firearm with intent to cause fear of violence, affray and criminal damage at a hearing in February. He was convicted by a jury at Lincoln Crown Court on Wednesday following a three-day trial and is due to be sentenced on 2 October. Lincolnshire Police said that at the time of the incident, Wiatrowski had what appeared to be a firearm in a holster on his right hip. He shouted to officers to get back in their vehicle as he lit a rag in a bottle and threw it towards them, before making a motion with the gun as if he were cocking it. Wiatrowski fled, but was arrested on 10 January after a member of the public responded to an appeal. According to police, Wiatrowski had no apparent motive for his actions, but told officers he was bored with life and wanted to make a Molotov cocktail – a type of petrol bomb. Officers found CCTV footage of him attempting to fill a drinking bottle with petrol as part of his plan. When questioned about why he had thrown the petrol bomb and pointed the gun, he said he wanted to scare the officers, "to think they were going to die". He also told police he had no intention of entering the store, on Queen Street, after smashing the windows. Det Insp Melissa Rooke said: "This was a calculated and entirely senseless act, carried out with blatant disregard for the impact it would have. "It's no surprise that those who responded to this incident were profoundly affected by what they encountered. Our officers faced an individual whose clear objective was to instil fear and potentially inflict serious harm." Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices More on this story Man who wielded knife in police station is jailed Man wanted by police for six years finally sentenced Police to target anti-social behaviour hotspots Related internet links HM Courts Service
Atlantic
2 days ago
- Atlantic
First Came Tea. Then Came the Male Rage.
Until last Thursday, the team behind the app Tea Dating Advice was having an extraordinary week. They claimed to have amassed more than 2 million new users, making Tea the most popular free app in Apple's App Store, after it stirred discussion on TikTok and Reddit. Women were using Tea, whose tagline is 'Helping women date safe,' in exactly the way they were supposed to: reviewing men they'd dated, giving them a 'green flag' or 'red flag' evaluation, seeking information on new prospects, running background checks to look for a criminal record or a sex-offender registration. But by Thursday evening, angry men had begun to amass online. They gathered on the anonymous messaging board 4chan, clamoring for a 'hack and leak' to publicly expose the app's users. On Friday morning, someone on 4chan posted a link leading to more than 70,000 images of Tea's users, including verification photos and pictures of government IDs, according to 404 Media, which first reported these events. Shortly afterward, someone created a map that claimed to link Tea users to locations and told anyone viewing it to 'enjoy'; another created a site for comparing and ranking the users' physical appearances. Posters across social-media platforms had a field day sharing Tea users' images, calling them 'whales' and 'ugly bitches,' saying that they deserved all of this. On Monday, 404 Media reported that a second data breach had revealed direct messages between users, including sensitive personal conversations, real names, social-media handles, and phone numbers. (A Tea representative told me that the company is investigating the issue and, having found that some messages were accessed in the breach, has taken their direct-messaging system offline. Tea has found no evidence of further exposures, she said, and is working to identify affected users and offer them free identity-protection services.) The whole episode, from start to finish, was horribly bleak—and also bleakly illuminating. Tea is hardly a perfect app. As its name suggests, it allows not only serious warnings about men but also gossip about their supposed defects and romantic tendencies. When Tea users do make serious allegations of predatory behavior, those accusations go unconfirmed, a glaring failure of due process. But for all of the app's flaws, the breaches have proved its users' concerns valid: Women had good reasons for wanting something like Tea in the first place. ____ Tea's emergence felt almost inevitable. Similar platforms have existed before: Consider Facebook groups such as 'Are We Dating the Same Guy?' (which have led to multiple lawsuits from men who were the subject of discussion) or an app called Lulu (which took down its man-reviewing feature in 2016 after facing criticism). Those digital whisper networks didn't exactly revolutionize dating safety. But by 2023, when Tea launched, American dating frustration had been mounting—perhaps especially for women. In 2019, Pew Research Center found that women were far more likely than men to say that dating had 'gotten harder for most people in the last 10 years.' The app had a ready audience, particularly among the many women who yearn for the era before apps, when a person was more likely to meet a romantic prospect through family or friends. That nostalgia isn't entirely misplaced: One real benefit of that courtship culture, researchers have told me, is that people are more likely to behave respectfully if they have mutual social connections who might hear how things go. Dating strangers, by contrast, involves a lack of accountability that may be more likely to lead to transgressions big and small, from ghosting and poor communication to sexual assault. On top of all that, women are looking for romance at a time when the U.S. government has been stripping away their reproductive rights, making pregnancy more perilous, and dismantling protections against gender discrimination. They're looking at a time of backlash to #MeToo and to the fact that women are relying less on men for financial security. They're looking as young men are moving further to the right politically, and when only 43 percent of Gen Z men say they'd consider themselves feminists —compared with 61 percent of Gen Z women. And they're looking as fear of sexual assault has grown. One doesn't need to have experienced assault, or to believe that every man poses a threat, to know that something in the culture has curdled, that caution is warranted. Tea arrived with good intentions. The actual product, unfortunately, isn't so great: It denies men the chance to defend themselves and—in some cases, surely—infringes on their privacy, publicizing their worst moments even when they might not make the same mistakes in the future. I would argue that the app isn't great for women, either. It's a sad approximation of what I think many really want: not strangers trashing other strangers online, but a return to a time when romantic prospects existed within a familiar context, when dating didn't feel quite so lonely. What Tea has accomplished, though, is showing what women are up against. The men so hell-bent on revenge against Tea's users are illustrating that hatred of women is alive and well. And the leaks demonstrated how insufficiently women are protected by the tech companies that shape their romantic lives. Tea's privacy policy promised that selfies used for verification would be 'deleted immediately' after authentication; the company then stored the photos in a way that left them so easy to access, 4chan users apparently didn't even need to break into anything. Tea was founded by a software engineer who said his mother had experienced 'terrifying' encounters with men who turned out to be using false identities on their dating profiles. What a terrible irony that after so many women, feeling unsafe, flocked to his app, it has now left thousands of them in potential danger. The first breach was awful: humiliating for the women who had to see their images passed around, and grim given the number of men making fun of those images with such open, gleeful cruelty. But news of the second breach, which reportedly exposed a larger amount of data with more identifying information, left a pit in my stomach. In more than 1.1 million private messages, women had told one another about rapes, opened up about abortions, identified cheaters. ('I am his wife,' one user wrote after saying she saw her husband being discussed on the app.) Some shared their phone numbers because, I imagine, they had made connections—because they needed support. When women realized they couldn't rely on the men in their life, they tried instead to rely on other women. In the end, misogyny got in the way of that too.
