Is the leader of the GNU lost at sea? : Ramaphosa's leadership style questioned
President Cyril Ramaphosa is losing the country.
His hold on it is unravelling like a ball of frayed string rolling downhill.
The government of national unity, which had vowed to rescue South Africa, is dysfunctional, largely because of the president's appalling lack of leadership.
Unprecedented depths of economic and social distress have heightened public discontent and one senses that it needs just a spark to erupt.
The ever-faster cascade of events has punctuated the president's customary sang-froid. He has made foolish decisions and he has been caught in fabrications that he should have realised were bound to be exposed.
Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's explosive allegations about political meddling, cadre deployment and institutional capture in law enforcement and the justice system left Ramaphosa flat-footed.
It says much about how out of touch Ramaphosa has become that, despite the gravity of Mkhwanazi's allegations, he genuinely seemed to think he could shield his close ally, police minister Senzo Mchunu and deputy national commissioner Shadrack Sibiya.
Public outrage swiftly made his stance untenable. As Mchunu's stand-in, Ramaphosa chose Prof Firoz Cachalia.
A respected academic who, on paper, looked like a safe choice, Cachalia arrives with baggage of his own.
When Mkhwanazi earlier this year went public for the first time with claims of political meddling, Cacha lia accused him of 'public grandstanding' and urged him to stick to the internal police channels that he had accused of corruption.
But the comedy continues. Farcically, the portfolio in the meantime has been handed to Gwede Mantashe, the most compromised but longest-serving minister Ramaphosa has had.
It's during all this slapstick that Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni deemed it to be an opportune to release the 2024-2028 National Security Strategy assessment, which confusingly concludes that, despite political assassinations, incipient terrorism, violent extremism, economic sabotage and ram pant corruption, South Africa is a stable and secure nation.
She then went on to make some extraordinary remarks at the press conference about a potential coup d'état.
'There is,' Ntshavheni told the increasingly bewildered journalists, 'a potential risk of a coup d'état. We have identified it and put measures in place to mitigate against it.
So, that's why we say to South Africans that there will not be anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa.'
ALSO READ:'Cyril must fall': Organisations march against Ramaphosa to Union Buildings on Mandela Day
In the past few days or in the past few weeks, there has not been anyone attempting to do a coup in South Africa.
That does not mean people are not planning one. Or, as Lewis Carroll put it with greater elegance and far less chance of rocking national confidence: 'If it was so, it might be. And if it were so, it would be. But as it isn't, it ain't.'
Unfortunately for Ramaphosa, his other pet project, the National Dialogue, is not going to save the day for him.
To many, it's just the latest manifestation of Ramaphosa's preference for symbolism over action. Even ANC legacy foundations, long accustomed to wielding quiet influence behind the scenes, are now publicly voicing their frustration.
This week, the Walter and Albertina Sisulu Foundation issued a blistering statement, warning that Ramaphosa's habit of 'preaching dialogue while insulating political elites from accountability' amounts to little more than political theatre.
The foundation charged that his leadership – tarnished by the still unresolved Phala Phala scandal – 'contradicts the very principles his administration claims to uphold'. The foundation's conclusion was stark: it's time for Ramaphosa to resign.
NOW READ: What now for Senzo Mchunu? Police minister's political career on the ropes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Seven motorists arrested for speeding during EMPD operations in Edenvale
Seven motorists arrested for speeding during EMPD operations in Edenvale Seven men have been arrested for excessive speeding during high-impact enforcement operations conducted by the EMPD in Brakpan and Edenvale. According to the EMPD, the arrests took place on July 23 and 26. Officers from the EMPD High Speed Unit monitored traffic along the R554, R23, and Sam Green Road, where speed limits vary between 60km/h and 120km/h. ALSO READ: EMPD officers dedicate 67 minutes of service in honour of Mandela Day Several vehicles, including a white BMW sedan, a blue Volvo hatchback, two white Isuzu LDVs, a white BMW motorbike, a black Chery, and a white Mercedes-Benz, were clocked at dangerously high speeds. One driver was caught travelling at a staggering 210km/h. The motorists gave various excuses for their speed, including being late for work, but officers rejected these explanations as unacceptable under the National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996. All seven drivers were arrested on the spot and detained at Brakpan and Bedfordview police stations. ALSO READ: EMPD impounds vehicles in crackdown on illegal mechanics They face charges of reckless and negligent driving and are expected to appear in their respective magistrate's courts soon. The EMPD has reiterated its warning to motorists about the dangers of speeding. 'Speeding endangers not only the driver but everyone on the road,' the department said.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Time for liberation movements to rebuild trust, rethink strategy
Liberation movement leaders at the summit hosted by the African National Congress on July 25-27 in Ekurhuleni, Gauteng. Image: ANC/X Dr. Reneva Fourie Many South Africans failed to appreciate the relevance of the Liberation Movements Summit, held in Johannesburg from 25 to 28 July. In an era marked by widespread public disappointment and growing criticism, the very premise of such a gathering appeared, they argued, outdated if not entirely obsolete. Movements such as South Africa's ANC, Mozambique's FRELIMO, Namibia's SWAPO, Angola's MPLA and others are not conventional political parties. Their legitimacy was not conferred solely through elections. It was earned through generations of collective resistance, sacrifice and clarity of purpose in the face of colonialism and apartheid. They were forged in the trenches of anti-colonial struggle and shaped by the convictions of those who believed in dignity, equality and justice. However, in the years since the dawn of democracy, these once-powerful connections to the people have frayed. The post-liberation period has, for many citizens, become associated less with freedom and opportunity, and more with corruption, inequality and governance failures. In the wake of immense sacrifice and hard-won liberation, the urgent and deeply complex question confronting Southern Africa's former liberation movements is whether they have eroded their moral authority through complacency, self-enrichment and detachment from the aspirations of the people. The Liberation Movement Summit sought to confront these realities directly. It did not offer a platform for nostalgic celebration but one for critical reflection and collaborative renewal. Its central assertion was that historical legitimacy cannot excuse present failures. Rather, it is only through meaningful action, grounded in principle and delivered with urgency, that these movements can continue to play a relevant role in shaping their societies. The summit occurred within an increasingly unstable global environment. The declining coherence of the neoliberal project, further unravelling through the ongoing genocide in Gaza, the war in Ukraine and destabilisation across West Asia, has disrupted many of the ideological assumptions that underpinned global governance for the past three decades. Added to this is the rise of narrow nationalism, a retreat into bilateralism and the erosion of respect for international law, particularly by powerful Western states. This evolving landscape has profound implications for the continent. African states face increased vulnerability to external manipulation, regime-change agendas and exploitative economic arrangements. The summit, therefore, was necessary to provide a space for shared analysis, introspection and strategic coordination to enhance sovereignty and to assert a united voice in shaping a more just and inclusive global order. However, it was not only external pressures that required attention. Internally, liberation movements face complex democratic terrains that demand new forms of engagement. Factors such as declining electoral support, shifting generational political identities, and the enduring impact of structural inequality, poverty, unemployment and insecurity required thoughtful responses. The situation in Sudan was referenced as a painful example of how internal contradictions, if unresolved, can be exploited by external actors and descend into devastating conflict. It served as a reminder that liberation is not a singular event, but an ongoing process that requires vigilance, renewal and integrity. The summit's focus on democratic sustainability, effective governance, economic transformation and international solidarity was not incidental. It signalled a clear understanding that liberation must be understood as a living project. One of the central issues raised was the growing gap between political rhetoric and implementation. Widespread dissatisfaction does not stem from a lack of vision. It stems from the failure to translate that vision into material change. Inadequate socio-economic development, deteriorating public services, and perceptions of systemic corruption have undermined the legitimacy of former liberation parties. Where liberation once promised dignity, many now experience marginalisation. Discontent is particularly acute among young people and women. These are not marginal constituencies. They were at the centre of liberation struggles and remain central to any democratic renewal. Yet they are often excluded from decision-making spaces. The summit emphasised that genuine empowerment must move beyond rhetoric. It requires shifts in institutional culture, the opening up of leadership opportunities and policy frameworks that respond to the realities and capabilities of young people and women. The summit also reaffirmed the enduring relevance of international solidarity. While formal colonialism has ended, other forms of domination persist through financial dependence, extractive corporate practices and systemic inequality in global institutions. Collective resistance remains necessary. Regional cooperation is essential not only for economic development but for protecting sovereignty and pursuing peace on the continent's terms. By revisiting the principle of Pan-Africanism and anchoring itself within a broader vision of progressive internationalism, the summit resisted the idea that liberation movements are simply relics of a past era. It positioned them as political institutions still capable of shaping the future, provided they act with courage, humility and commitment to the people they claim to serve. In this sense, the summit was not a retreat into history. It was an attempt to reframe the liberation narrative to meet current realities. It outlined a multidimensional approach, encompassing accountability in governance, inclusivity in political participation, innovation in economic policy, and coherence in international engagement. The chosen theme, 'Defending the liberation gains, advancing integrated socio-economic development, strengthening solidarity for a better Africa', was both affirmation and provocation. It affirmed the commitments that guided the anti-colonial struggle, while insisting that the defence of those gains cannot rely on slogans. It must be evidenced in action. The political renewal required is not superficial. It cannot be achieved through new slogans or minor adjustments. It requires deep institutional reform, alignment with democratic values and a reconnection to the needs and aspirations of the people. If this does not occur, these movements risk losing not only electoral support but also their historical legitimacy. Even so, the summit offered a timely opportunity to regroup and recommit. It provided a forum to rethink strategy, rebuild trust and begin crafting a credible future. If these movements can confront their shortcomings with honesty, implement their commitments with discipline and listen to their people with sincerity, they may yet remain relevant in the evolving story of African freedom. * Dr Reneva Fourie is a policy analyst specialising in governance, development and security. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
‘It's our death sentence': SA couple pleads to stay in Australia amid safety fears
Charné-Lee Gunning, 31, and Ivan Strauss, 37, are facing an anxious wait in Western Sydney, Australia, as their application for protection visas hangs in the balance. Image: / Screengrab Charné-Lee Gunning, 31, and Ivan Strauss, 37, are facing an anxious wait in Western Sydney, Australia, as their application for protection visas hangs in the balance. The South African couple claim they face a "death sentence" if they are forced to return to South Africa. Gunning and Strauss arrived in Australia on visitor visas in December 2018 after fleeing South Africa due to fears of racial violence. Now, seven years later, they are pleading with the federal government not to deport them, alleging that their lives would be at risk if they were to return to their home country. According to them, they would be targeted for being white. Gunning stated that returning would be "our death sentence, especially with what's going on in South Africa at the moment. It has gotten a lot worse since we left". The couple revealed they had been victims of crimes from an early age into their adulthood. They note that this contrasts with Australia, where they can drive with windows open. Gunning added: "The nightmares are still there, but I have a sense of safety here that I've never had before". Despite their protection visa application being initially denied, they have appealed and are currently awaiting a decision from the Administrative Review Tribunal. If their appeal is rejected, they would have only five weeks to leave Australia. The couple say they are willing to relocate anywhere in Australia, even to the most remote places, to remain in the country. The couple's case followed months after former US President Donald Trump fast-tracked visas for white South African farmers, claiming they were victims of "genocide". This claim was rejected by President Cyril Ramaphosa, who stated that "People who do get killed, unfortunately through criminal activity, are not only white people, majority of them are black people". This case brings Australia into the spotlight of whether the country should adopt a similar stance to the US and consider white South Africans as refugees from violence. Shadow Immigration Minister Paul Scarr has emphasised that asylum and humanitarian visa applications should be assessed equally, regardless of the applicant's origin. A spokesperson for the Department of Home Affairs declined to comment on individual cases due to privacy reasons. TikTok user Edlin (edlin1344) shared the couple's plight on the social media platform, igniting a heated debate online, drawing comments of mockery while others acknowledged the crime rate. Many comments expressed strong scepticism and denial of the couple's claims. Some also accused the couple of dishonesty, suggesting they should be upfront about simply wanting to stay in Australia for "great career opportunities" rather than "acting like you are hunted". Others speculated they might be "running away from their debts". The claim of a "death sentence" was often met with disbelief or mockery. While many disputed the extreme nature of the couple's fears, some acknowledged high crime rates in South Africa, but reminded the internet community that it as a universal issue or one disproportionately affecting poorer communities. IOL NEWS
