logo
The Changing Face of UN Peacekeeping: Women on the Frontlines

The Changing Face of UN Peacekeeping: Women on the Frontlines

Each year on May 29, the world marks the International Day of UN Peacekeepers, honoring the courage of those who serve under the blue flag in the world's most challenging environments. Since 1948, peacekeepers have stood as guardians of stability in conflict zones across the globe. Today, more than 72,000 personnel work in peacekeeping operations, but a striking imbalance in their ranks reflects deeper questions about representation in global security. For the past 25 years, the Women, Peace and Security agenda has played an instrumental role in advancing women's participation in peacekeeping operations around the world.
The story of UN peacekeeping is not merely about numbers but about whose voices shape peace. In March 2023, women constituted 8.4 percent of the more than 76,700 uniformed peacekeepers at the time, 6.4 percent of military contingents and 21 percent of military staff officers and military observers, a significant rise from just 1 percent in 1993, yet still far from parity. These statistics tell a tale of progress and challenge, of institutional barriers and bold changes happening within one of the world's most significant security frameworks.
The Slow March Toward Equal Representation
Women remain starkly underrepresented in military contingents despite high-level commitments and strategic frameworks. By 2028, the UN aims to have women comprise at least 15 percent of military personnel, 25 percent of military observers and staff officers, and 20 percent of police units, ambitious goals that demand systemic change.
A variety of barriers hold back women's participation in peacekeeping, ranging from limited career advancement opportunities to family constraints and deployment criteria. The challenge runs deeper than simple recruitment: it reflects how societies structure their security forces and who they deem suitable for frontline roles.
Countries with stronger domestic records of equality between men and women deploy significantly more women peacekeepers. Ghana, which began enlisting women in 1958 and trained female officer pilots by 1965, contributed 14.1 percent female peacekeepers as of October 2022 according to UN peacekeeping. This pattern repeats across nations, demonstrating that peacekeeping gender balance begins with domestic military policies.
Beyond Numbers: The Quest for Meaningful Participation
However, the presence of women in peacekeeping missions does not automatically translate to meaningful participation. Too often, female peacekeepers find themselves limited to stereotypical roles: nursing, community engagement, administration, and domestic services, regardless of their skills and experience. Missions with higher percentages of combat-related forces typically have the lowest percentages of women, reflecting persistent beliefs that women cannot protect themselves in dangerous conflict areas.
This underutilization creates a challenging dynamic where women rarely conduct patrols or interact with local communities, precisely the areas where their representation could have the greatest impact. The focus on simply increasing recruitment numbers without addressing how women are deployed and what roles they fill risks what experts call the "instrumentalization" of female peacekeepers. As researcher Nina Wilen notes, there's an urgent need to contextualize women's contributions and emphasize the benefits that gender-balanced teams bring to peacekeeping, rather than segregating personnel based on gender alone.
Pathfinders: Countries Leading the Charge
Several nations have significantly outpaced global averages in deploying women to peacekeeping missions. According to Women in International Security, South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Tanzania all surpassed the UN's 2022 target of having at least 9 percent women among countries contributing more than 1,000 troops. Nigeria stands out with 21.5 percent of its peacekeepers being women, while Indonesia has deployed over 570 female peacekeepers to various UN missions since 1999.
The contrast with other major contributors is stark. India, the world's second-largest troop-contributing country with 5,548 deployed personnel, included only 51 women a mere 0.9 percent of their contribution. This disparity highlights how political will and institutional culture, not just available personnel, determine a country's balance between men and women in peacekeeping operations. When examining specific missions, MINUSCA in the Central African Republic, UNMISS in South Sudan, and MONUSCO in the Democratic Republic of Congo have the highest raw numbers of female troops, though women still represent only 5.9-6.4 percent of these forces. The United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) stands as an outlier with 40 percent female representation, demonstrating what's possible when intentional deployment practices are implemented.
True progress will require more than symbolic commitments. Experts suggest the UN should consider paying premiums to countries based on the percentage of high-ranking women assigned to contingents, creating financial incentives for meaningful inclusion. Such incentives could be tied to specialized training and rigorous vetting procedures, addressing multiple reform priorities simultaneously.
The story of women in UN peacekeeping operations reflects a broader narrative about security, representation, and whose perspectives shape peace processes worldwide. The Women, Peace and Security agenda emphasizes the critical role that women and their perspectives play in the success of peacebuilding and peacekeeping missions around the world.
As the blue helmets mark another International Day of UN Peacekeepers, the question remains: Will the next decade bring tokenistic increases in women's participation, or genuine transformation in how peacekeeping missions operate? The answer lies not just in recruitment statistics but in systemic changes to deployment practices, mission structure, and the fundamental understanding of what effective peacekeeping requires in complex modern conflicts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-backed group extends closure of Gaza aid sites
US-backed group extends closure of Gaza aid sites

CNA

time2 days ago

  • CNA

US-backed group extends closure of Gaza aid sites

GAZA CITY: A US- and Israeli-backed group operating aid sites in Gaza pushed back the reopening of its facilities set for Thursday (Jun 5), as the Israeli army warned that roads leading to distribution centres were "considered combat zones". The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) closed its aid distribution centres after a string of deadly incidents near sites it operates that drew sharp condemnation from the United Nations. Israeli bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 48 people across the Gaza Strip, including 14 in a single strike on a tent sheltering displaced people, the civil defence agency said. A day earlier, the civil defence and the International Committee of the Red Cross said 27 people were killed when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF site in southern Gaza. The military said the incident was under investigation. Britain called for an "immediate and independent investigation", echoing a demand from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. UK Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer said the deaths of Palestinians as they sought food were "deeply disturbing", calling Israel's new measures for aid delivery "inhumane". Israel recently eased its blockade of Gaza, but the UN says the territory's entire population remains at risk of famine. UN VOTE The GHF originally said it was closing aid distribution sites in Gaza on Wednesday for "renovation" and that they would reopen on Thursday. But the group said late on Wednesday that its facilities would not open at the regular time on Thursday, without clarifying when they would resume service. "Our distribution sites will not open early tomorrow morning as in previous days due to ongoing maintenance and repair work," it wrote on social media. "We will share information about opening times as soon as work is complete." The Israeli army warned against travelling "on roads leading to the distribution centres, which are considered combat zones". The GHF said it was working to made aid distribution "as safe as possible" and urged those travelling to its sites to "follow the routes designated" by the Israeli army. The GHF, officially a private effort with opaque funding, began operations a week ago. The UN and major aid groups have declined to work with it, citing concerns it serves Israeli military goals. Israeli authorities and the GHF, which uses contracted US security, have denied allegations the army shot at civilians rushing to pick up aid packages. Food shortages in Gaza have propelled fresh international calls for an end to the war, but a truce between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. The United States, Israel's key ally, used its veto power at the UN Security Council on Wednesday to block a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked US President Donald Trump, posting on social media: "That is the only way to destroy the Hamas terrorists" holding hostages in Gaza. Hamas condemned the veto as "disgraceful" and accused Washington of "legitimising genocide" in Gaza. "WAR CRIME" The Israeli military maintains that its forces do not prevent Gazans from collecting aid. Army spokesperson Effie Defrin said the Israeli soldiers had fired towards suspects who "were approaching in a way that endangered" the troops. UN human rights chief Volker Turk called attacks against civilians "unconscionable", and said they "constitute a grave breach of international law and a war crime". The International Committee of the Red Cross meanwhile said Gazans face an "unprecedented scale and frequency of recent mass casualty incidents". ACTIVISTS' BOAT Scenes of hunger in Gaza have also sparked fresh solidarity with Palestinians, and a boat organised by an international activist coalition was sailing toward Gaza, aiming to deliver aid. The boat from the Freedom Flotilla Coalition departed Sicily on Sunday carrying a dozen people, including environmental activist Greta Thunberg, along with fruit juices, milk, tinned food and protein bars. Israel's military said it stood ready to "protect" the country's maritime space, with army spokesman Defrin saying "we are prepared" to handle the flotilla, without elaborating. In response, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition said it "strongly condemns Israel's declared intent to attack" the boat, calling it a "threat". Israel has stepped up its offensive in Gaza in what it says is a renewed push to defeat the Palestinian group Hamas, whose October 2023 attack sparked the war. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said at least 4,335 people have been killed since Israel resumed its offensive on Mar 18, taking the war's overall toll to 54,607, mostly civilians. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, also mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.

Pledge to protect oceans falling billions short: Report
Pledge to protect oceans falling billions short: Report

Straits Times

time2 days ago

  • Straits Times

Pledge to protect oceans falling billions short: Report

Less than three per cent of all marine conservation areas globally are considered truly protected. PHOTO: AFP PARIS - Nations are spending less than 10 per cent of what is needed to meet a global target on marine conservation and must commit more at next week's UN oceans summit, NGOs said on June 5. In 2022, nearly 200 countries agreed to designate 30 pe rcent of the world's oceans as protected areas by 2030, but so far just 8.4 per cent are covered. Some US$15.8 billion (S$20.32 billion) is needed every year to achieve the '30x30' target but only US$1.2 billion is currently being spent, said a new report by a consortium of environmental groups. This gap was 'alarming' and must be redressed at the UN Ocean Conference (UNOC) starting on June 9 in Nice, France, said Mr Jonathan Kelsey from the Bloomberg Ocean Fund, which co-authored the report. 'UNOC is a critical opportunity for governments to narrow this gap with concrete actions, including... increasing financing that truly delivers on their ocean promises,' he said in a statement. Of all the UN's sustainable development goals, protecting the oceans is the least funded. Some 90 per cent of ocean conservation is financed by public money and 'in the short term, governments will need to increase funding flows to meet the capital injections needed, particularly high income countries', the report said. Environment groups have warned against the spread of 'paper parks' – protected areas in name only that lack the resources to enforce any real conservation measures. Less than three per cent of all marine conservation areas globally are considered truly protected. Some forbid all forms of fishing while others place no rules, or almost none, on what activities are forbidden, allowing bottom trawling and other intensive industrial operations. The report – co-authored by WWF, Campaign for Nature and the Marine Conservation Institute, amongst others – said that redirecting subsidies from harmful activities could also help fill the funding gap. For example, the US$15.8 billion needed every year is just two-thirds of what the world spends on harmful fishing subsidies, it added. 'We cannot afford promises that remain on paper while our coral reefs bleach, our fisheries decline, and our coastlines wash away,' Ms Brianna Fruean from campaign group Together for the Ocean, said in a statement. 'We need real protection, now – and we need investment that empowers communities on the frontlines of change.' France expects around 50 heads of state and government to attend the oceans conference in Nice, which runs until June 13 and is preceded by a major scientific summit. Nations present will issue a joint declaration in support of ocean conservation but the conference is not a formal UN negotiation, and any commitments made are voluntary. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

UN Security Council to Vote on Gaza Ceasefire Resolution, US Expected to Veto
UN Security Council to Vote on Gaza Ceasefire Resolution, US Expected to Veto

CNA

time2 days ago

  • CNA

UN Security Council to Vote on Gaza Ceasefire Resolution, US Expected to Veto

The United Nations Security Council will vote Wednesday (Jun 5) on a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, a measure expected to fail due to a United States veto. It marks the 15-member body's first vote on the subject since November, when the US, a key Israeli ally, also blocked a resolution calling for an end to fighting. The vote is scheduled for 4pm Wednesday. Several diplomats told AFP they expect the United States to exercise its veto power. Representatives from the Council's 10 elected members, who are introducing the draft, reportedly tried in vain to negotiate with the American side. If applied, the veto would be the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Ceasefire, Hostages, and Humanitarian Aid The resolution text, seen by AFP, 'demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties.' It also calls for the 'immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.' Citing a 'catastrophic humanitarian situation' in Gaza, the resolution demands the lifting of all restrictions on aid entry into the enclave, where the UN has warned that existing deliveries fall far short of needs. The proposal comes amid heavy scrutiny of both the Israeli military campaign and the efficacy of relief efforts. Israel blocked most humanitarian shipments for more than two months before partially easing restrictions in mid-May. Aid workers have said the volume remains insufficient and distribution dangerous. Critics have also raised concerns about the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF), accusing it of compromising humanitarian neutrality by coordinating with Israeli authorities. Rising Civilian Toll and Diplomatic Tensions Israeli strikes on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in Gaza, including 12 in a single attack on a tent sheltering displaced residents, according to the territory's civil defense agency. On Tuesday, another 27 people were killed in southern Gaza near a GHF aid site, where Israeli troops opened fire. The Israeli military has said the incident is under investigation. Pressure on the Security Council has grown in recent weeks, with both sides trading accusations over the war's toll on civilians. Palestinian UN envoy Riyad Mansour urged Council members to act. 'All of us will be judged by history as to how much we have done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people,' he said Tuesday. Israel's UN ambassador, Danny Danon, blasted the resolution as unhelpful and politically motivated. 'This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas,' Danon said in remarks prepared for the Council. 'It ignores the one party still endangering civilians in Gaza: Hamas.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store