
Complex Universal Credit savings rules mean 2million families miss out on cash
A COMPLEX Universal Credit savings rule is seeing 2million miss out on benefit cash.
A new report has found an increasing number of families are having their payments reduced or stopped due to frozen thresholds.
1
Universal Credit is a means-tested benefit which means your income and "capital" is taken into account when deciding whether you qualify and how much you can get.
Money stowed away in bank accounts and ISAs as well as any cash you have is classed as capital.
But if you breach certain capital thresholds your Universal Credit payments are either reduced or stopped.
Have less than £6,000 in capital and you won't be deducted anything.
However, if you've got between £6,000 and £16,000 stashed away you will have some Universal Credit taken away while anyone with more than £16,000 is no longer eligible for the benefit.
Now, a new report from The Resolution Foundation has found around 2million families eligible for Universal Credit are having their payments reduced because they're breaching these thresholds.
The number of people breaching them is rising too, as they have been frozen since 2006 and haven't kept up with inflation.
In 2006-08, only 35% of UK families on Universal Credit had capital greater than £6,000, but by 2020-22 that had risen to 45%, it found.
Sarah Coles, senior personal finance analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "If these (capital) limits are too low, there's a risk people will avoid putting away enough to protect themselves – for fear of losing their benefits.
"The fact that the thresholds have been frozen for so long means that someone who simply worked to ensure their savings kept up with inflation could easily have been dragged over a threshold."
How does work affect Universal Credit?
The Resolution Foundation says the current rules around capital thresholds undermine government savings schemes like Help to Save and Lifetime ISAs.
Meanwhile, it says the manner of the thresholds mean those on Universal Credit face a "cliff-edge" of losing some or all of their benefit even if they breach these limits by just a few pounds.
Molly Broome, senior economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: "The long-term neglect of the capital rules in Universal Credit means they are now undermining wider Government efforts to encourage low-income families to save.
'Important schemes such as Help to Save and Lifetime ISAs should be exempted from these capital rules so that families doing the right thing by saving into them aren't penalised for doing so.
'And with the Government currently reviewing Universal Credit, it should take the opportunity to index the capital thresholds to inflation, to prevent the system from penalising more families every year."
A Government spokesperson said: "We support millions of people through Universal Credit every year, and are committed to reviewing the benefit to make sure it is still doing the job we want it to.
"It is important we continue to strike the balance between protecting low-income households and our duty to the taxpayer, and the current thresholds allow people on Universal Credit to continue saving, whilst encouraging them to manage their own day-to-day support."
How do the capital limits work?
Your Universal Credit payments can be affected by any money, savings and investments you have, known as capital.
Any properties you own but do not live in also have a bearing on your payments.
If you have capital worth between £6,000 and £16,000, the DWP takes money off your monthly payment.
Anyone with capital over £16,000 does not receive any Universal Credit.
Your Universal Credit goes down by £4.35 for every £250 you have in capital between these two amounts.
Another £4.35 is taken off for any remaining amount that is not a complete £250.
So, if you have capital of £6,300, and classed as having £300 in capital over the £6,000 threshold, your Universal Credit is reduced by £8.70 (2 x £4.35 a month).
If you have capital of £14,500, you are classed as having £8,500 of capital over the £6,000 limit.
Your Universal Credit payments are reduced by £147.90 (34 x £4.35 a month).
If you have £17,000 in capital, you do not qualify for Universal Credit.
The Government has a list on its website of what it classes as capital.
Some of these include cash, money in a bank account, any savings accounts including ISAs, savings for children in your name and more.
Any income you've earned, say from salary from a job, is counted as capital if you have not spent it by the end of the assessment period after the one it was received in.
You can find out more via www.gov.uk/guidance/universal-credit-money-savings-and-investments.
You can also use a free calculator to find out how much any capital you've got will affect a Universal Credit claim.
Charity Turn2Us' can be found via benefits-calculator.turn2us.org.uk.
Are you missing out on benefits?
YOU can use a benefits calculator to help check that you are not missing out on money you are entitled to
Charity Turn2Us' benefits calculator works out what you could get.
Entitledto's free calculator determines whether you qualify for various benefits, tax credit and Universal Credit.
MoneySavingExpert.com and charity StepChange both have benefits tools powered by Entitledto's data.
You can use Policy in Practice's calculator to determine which benefits you could receive and how much cash you'll have left over each month after paying for housing costs.
Your exact entitlement will only be clear when you make a claim, but calculators can indicate what you might be eligible for.
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Readers Letters: Believe carbon capture project support when we see it
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project is coming… but when, asks reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... More smoke and mirrors from the Labour Party and the UK Government. From my recollection this is the third time the UK Government has proclaimed financial backing for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project (proposed 20 years ago) but there is still no money on the table. While tens of billions of pounds continue to flow into projects south of the Border, Scotland is supposed to be grateful for the UK Government now declaring financial support for the Edinburgh exascale supercomputer a year after it cancelled funding. Increased public spending commitments have been cynically hailed by Labour Party politicians without reference to projected inflation increases or different spending choices made north and south of the Border. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To cap it all, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray now hypocritically says that the Scottish Government did not spend last year's Budget increase 'wisely' when much of it was spent on increased public sector wages, while the Scottish Government also continued to mitigate the effects of Westminster-imposed austerity. Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves leaves from 11 Downing Street on Wednesday before heading to Parliament to present her Spending Review (Picture: Henry Nicholls/AFP) Or has the 'Governor' now abandoned the last vestiges of socialist principles he presumably once held and if that is the case why are Scottish trade unions still supporting a Labour Party that in government continues to betray the poor and disadvantaged in Scotland while being complicit in the continuing slaughter and devastation in Gaza? Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Power play It's good that Edinburgh is to be blessed with the UK's most powerful supercomputer, but what about the considerable electricity required to support it? Is there now to be a new power station built? For surely our creaking National Grid system will either need to be upgraded or a dedicated and separately managed power station will have to be built to service it. Elizabeth Marshall, Edinburgh Privacy paramount Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Jane Lax (Letters, 12 June) says the police are recording people's sex wrongly. She writes, 'The law is the law', but her description of the law on this is incorrect. The Supreme Court was clear that its recent judgment on the meaning of trans people's sex applies only to the Equality Act. For other law, it remains the case that a gender recognition certificate changes a trans person's legal sex 'for all purposes' (to directly quote the legislation). The Court also said that discrimination against trans people continues to be unlawful under the Equality Act. For the police to ask victims, witnesses or suspects whether they are trans, as a matter of course, would very likely be unlawful indirect discrimination, undermining trans people's right to privacy. The law allows an exception on a case-by-case basis: when asking is necessary and for a legitimate reason. There will be good reason to record that a suspect or victim of crime is trans in some cases where it is relevant to the nature of the crime, or where an accused person is remanded in custody. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But for the large majority of offences with non-custodial outcomes – theft, vandalism, speeding, and many more – whether anyone involved as victim, witness or suspect is trans will be completely irrelevant to the offence, and should not be asked or recorded. Tim Hopkins, Edinburgh Driving forces Harald Tobermann (Letters, 12 June) wants even 'more buses to ensure balance and harmony on our roads'. Actually we need fewer buses driving around with few passengers in them. Far too much taxpayers' money is spent on public transport and far too little on maintaining and improving public roads. The chaotic Edinburgh tram project cost £1 billion for eight miles and because it was years late and grossly over budget there was a public inquiry into its failings, which cost £13m. Meanwhile, Edinburgh has been turned into an anti-car city with bottlenecks caused by bus lanes, lack of parking, congestion, potholes, and more patches than Windows Vista. While Newcastle has a three-lane city bypass Edinburgh has a two-lane one which is often at a standstill. Sheriffhall roundabout was supposed to be replaced by a flyover with construction beginning this year. What happened to that? The fact is that road users – commercial and private – are being robbed by central government and mostly ignored by local government in favour of subsidised buses and mass travel. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Take, for example, road fund licence, or vehicle tax as the DVLA now styles it. This is £195 for 12 months for a car with a list price under £40,000, but £620 for the first five years if it is over £40,000. A £40,000 car will trouser the government £8,000 in vat. All this largesse doesn't go back into the road system, it goes straight into Rachel Reeves's piggy bank. A new road construction programme would boost economic development, as would reducing taxes on owning and driving cars, vans and lorries. William Loneskie, Oxton, Lauder, Berwickshire Sick society? Who will win a Scotsman Health Hero award ? Despite the nice picture of him on the front of The Scotsman of 11 June, is SNP health minister Neil Gray really in the running? Our NHS is floundering in a sea of crises, the latest being the recent sharp rise in drug deaths. This is even more awful given the SNP's 'clean' drug usage programme at the Thistle in Glasgow which was meant to really help. It is rumoured that John Swinney is considering a cabinet reshuffle. If Mr Gray goes, who can possibly replace him? This is not because Mr Gray is irreplaceable, more to do with the question as to whether anyone in the SNP is able to do the job following a long line of failures, including Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf. Mr Gray ought to have been a certainty for a hero award. The likelihood he is highly unlikely to get one speaks volumes. Gerald Edwards, Glasgow Fly high Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lt Cdr Lester May raises an interesting opinion (Letters, 10 June), but I regret to inform him that he is almost a whole century out of date (and more so in the UK context). Military aviation has become acknowledged worldwide as the primary armed force, without which a modern-day army and navy simply could not function. Postulating that a ship-borne or army-ancilliary alternative to an Air Force could ever work is, frankly, farcical. I could refer him to the many studies from the early 1930s onwards, but I think that the current UK perception as encompassed by the Chiefs of Staff Commitee is sufficient to vindicate a tri-service policy. Iain Masterton, Kirknewton, West Lothian Lines of sadness Former Makar Kathleen Jamie this week, commenting on the unveiling of her words on the Canongate wall at Holyrood, said: 'Poetry is democratic. It's available to anybody – through libraries, through memory.' How right she is. I was reminded of a beautiful poem of hers, 'Lochan', which ends with this line: 'underneath a rowan, a white boat waits'. This poem captures my sadness at the growing evidence of a crisis in democracy in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Yes, a white boat waits for us all: possibly beside a flamingo or near a needless wind turbine. Let's hope there are some rowans left when our time comes. Mary Howley, Dunoon, Argyll Ferry tale It is somewhat ironic that EU rules put the final voyage of the Hebridean Isles ferry on hold, given the EU funded its construction (your report, 11 June). A grant from the European Regional Development Fund enabled financing of the project and a senior Director-General from the European Commission attended its launch by the Duchess of Kent at Selby on 4 July 1985. Stephen Fox, Edinburgh Lights out In all my years of attending art galleries and museums, I have never encountered such crass irresponsibility as that of Glasgow's Gallery of Modern Art, which clearly think nothing of putting visitors' safety at the height of the tourist season in jeopardy. The ground floor main gallery 'film installation' exhibition for John Akomfrah's Mimesis: African Soldier is in pitch blackness – apart from the small video screens – and near to its only entrance, hidden in perfect darkness, are two large concrete pillars, impossible to see until one literally walks painfully into them, and particularly hazardous to those coming in from the street whose eyes have had no chance to adjust so as to have the remotest chance of spotting the pillars in time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When I pointed this out to a staff member, their response was to shrug their shoulders and laugh. There's a twisted irony that this touchy feely, sensitivity training obsessed art gallery eschews basic common sense, never mind basic health and safety training that would never have allowed this dangerous state of affairs to have arisen, unless Glasgow Life (the city council's deniable asset Culture and Sport wing) are determined to bankrupt themselves in a litany of injury claims. Mark Boyle, Johnstone, Renfrewshire Mystery moon On Tuesday night I looked out to the south from my bedroom window and saw the moon, very full and riding high over the Pentlands, but to my amazement, it was bright red! Can anybody tell me, is this a natural phenomenon or is it a celestial forecast of impending doom? Enlightenment please. Sandy Macpherson, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman


Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Do I need a Crit'Air sticker to drive in France this summer? France votes to abolish low emission zones
French ministers last month sensationally voted to abolish the nation's low emission zones, with the zones à faibles émissions (ZFEs) criticised for hitting hardest those who cannot afford less-polluting vehicles. The measure was introduced during President Emmanuel Macron's first term to reduce pollution in French cities. However, on 29 May, a handful of his MPs joined opposition parties from the right and far right in voting 98-51 to scrap the zones, which have gradually been extended across French cities since 2019. But until they are officially rescinded, UK drivers entering some of France's largest metropolises still need to display a 'Crit'Air' badge - clean air stickers to non-French speaking motorists - to avoid fines when entering their boundaries. The Government estimates over seven million Britons will drive their own motors in the country this year, and so, as summer holiday season is starting up, we've put together a guide to avoid you getting stung by France's ULEZ equivalent. From which cities require Crit'Air badges and how to buy one, to how serious the fines are, here's everything you need to know before taking to French roads. What are Crit'Air badges? Crit'Air vignettes (stickers) are used in France to help authorities identify a vehicle's level of air pollution emissions. Do I need a Crit'Air badge? While most new cars fall within the lowest polluting bands, and be allowed in low emission zones, they still require a badge to prove this. The badge you need is based on Euro emission levels - the levels we've detailed below. How do Crit'Air badges work? The sticker covers the vehicle for its entire lifetime, and less polluting vehicles are allowed to more access to France's low emission zones, ZFEs, than more polluting vehicles. There are six levels within the Crit'Air system, based on the Euro emissions levels, with green representing the cleanest vehicles and dark grey representing the dirtiest, most polluting vehicles. The levels are as follows: Crit'Air 0/E (Green) – Zero emission vehicles (electric and hydrogen vehicles) Crit'Air 1 (Violet) – Plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), Euro 5/6 petrol vehicles Crit'Air 2 (Yellow) – Euro 4 petrol vehicles, Euro 5/6 diesel vehicles Crit'Air 3 (Orange) – Euro 2/3 petrol vehicles, Euro 4 diesel vehicles Crit'Air 4 (Red) – Euro 3 diesel vehicles Crit'Air 5 (Grey) – Euro 2 diesel vehicles Crit'Air 3 (orange), Crit'Air 5 (red) and Crit'Air 6 (grey) stickered vehicles are banned from driving in Paris, with orange and red vignette vehicles not allowed in Marseille, Rouen, and Strasbourg. Marseille and Rouen recently relaxed its requirements, allowing Crit'Air 3 badge vehicles into the ZFE zones because there has been a significant reduction in air pollutant concentrations and improvement in urban air quality. There are currently two different types of low emission zones in France: Permanent low emission zones (known as ZCR – Zone à Circulation Restreinte) and Temporary emergency low emissions zones (known as ZPA – Zone de la Protection de l'Air) How do I get a Crit'Air badge? How much does it cost? You can apply for your Crit'Air vignette on the official French government website. You'll need to know your car's European Emissions Standard for. Upload an image or scan in your vehicles' V5C registration form – image specifications can be found on the website. You can't buy it in France so make sure you order it before you leave the UK and display it. Critically make sure you order it well in advance because the process can take up to six weeks (this is France after all). It costs €4.51 for a UK-registered car which includes the cost of the sticker itself (€3.11) and international postage (€1.65). Don't forget it lasts for your vehicle's lifetime, so once you've got it you don't have to apply again. Just don't remove it! Where do I display my Crit'Air badge? The sticker needs to be displayed on the lower right-hand side of the windscreen and be clearly visible. What happens if I don't get a Crit'Air? Will I be fined? Failure to have or properly display a sticker can result in fines of between €68 and €180. While many drivers have reported to have not been issued a fine, it is at your own risk if you want to chance not buying a Crit'Air badge before entering one of the French zones. Cars too old to get a sticker can't drive in certain cities during restricted times, for instance in Paris between 8am and 8pm, Monday to Friday. Make sure you check beforehand where you're driving and whether your car is compliant and apply accordingly. When did France introduce its Low Emission Mobility Zones (ZFE) and Crit'Air stickers? France first introduced low emission zones in 2015. Central Paris was the first zone with its 'City of Paris ZCR' which came in in September of that year and currently covers the entire area within the Boulevard Périphérique ring-road. Crit'Air badges were introduced in 2016 to categorise vehicles based on their type, age, and emission class. In 2019 the Greater Paris ZCR (ZPE – Zone à Faibles Emissions) - a permanent low emissions zone within the city's A86 'outer' ring road – was established, and Paris' clean air zones have become progressively stricter since with only Crit'Air 1 vehicles permitted in the ZCR since 2024 and a zero-emissions zone planned for 2030. By the end of 2024 12 ZFEs were operational, covering cities such as Paris, Lyon, Rouen, Reims, Strasbourg, Grenoble, Nice, Marseille, Montpellier, Toulouse, Saint-Étienne, and Clermont-Ferrand. As of 1 January 2025 rules have been tightened with 42 cities now prohibiting vehicles with Crit'Air 3 stickers – diesel vehicles over 14 years old and petrol vehicles over 19 years old – from entering their ZFEs. There are currently two different types of low emission zones in France: Permanent low emission zones (known as ZCR – Zone à Circulation Restreinte) and Temporary emergency low emissions zones (known as ZPA – Zone de la Protection de l'Air). There are also emergency low emission zones (ZPA) that can come into play during certain high pollution conditions. Why were Crit'Air stickers introduced? The French government introduced ZFE to reduce harmful vehicle emissions in areas of France where air quality is poorest. It aims to remove atmospheric particles and reduce serious illnesses linked to exposure to vehicle pollution. France is actually lagging behind its European neighbours, with aims to introduce 100 fewer LEZs than Spain despite having a population of almost 20 million more. France has a higher-than-average number of diesel vehicles than many countries. What changes have been voted for? At the end of May, France's National Assembly voted to abolish the low emission zones because they've been criticised for hitting drivers who can't afford low polluting vehicle the hardest. MPs from President Macron's Renaissance party voted with opposition from the right and far right to scrap the zones, in a 98-51 majority. The motion was put forward by Pierre Meurin of the far-right National Rally, and backed by some motoring organisations. Writer Alexandre Jardin set up a called Les #Gueux (Beggars), arguing that 'ecology has turned into a sport for the rich'. Despite the vote to abolish France's clean air zones, drivers still need to display at Crit'Air badge as there are many steps the bill will need to pass through before it becomes law However, the abolition has to pass through the French Senate (the upper house), and it still needs to be approved in a broader bill in the lower house in June. It will also have to be approved by France's Constitutional Council, before it comes into law, which is not guaranteed. RAC senior policy officer Rod Dennis cautioned UK drivers thinking they'll be spared from needing a Crit'Air in the immediate future, saying: 'Despite the vote by France's National Assembly to abolish the country's low emission zones, it doesn't yet mean the end of the need for Crit'Air stickers as there are still a number of political hurdles on the road ahead. 'UK drivers planning to visit any city that has a ZFE should therefore still apply for a sticker in the usual way using the official website.'


The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Councils in England warn of mass bankruptcies as Send deficits soar
Council leaders in England have warned that a multi-billion pound deficit from years of overspending on special educational needs has become a 'burning platform' that will push scores of councils into bankruptcy within months. They say time is running out to resolve rapidly growing shortfalls and are concerned the government gave no indication in Wednesday's spending review how it will deal with Send debts, which are expected to exceed £5bn by next March. Official figures show a sharp rise in the number of children receiving special needs support in England, along with an increase in tribunal cases brought by parents challenging council refusals of Send provision for their children. Ministers confirmed on Wednesday they will publish a schools white paper in the autumn containing measures aimed at drastically reducing eligibility for Send support, potentially by raising the threshold for access to education, health and care plans (EHCPs). EHCPs give children and young people up to the age of 25 the legal right to support from local authorities for conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, social, emotional and mental health needs, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and speech, language and communication needs. Councils fear the white paper will not immediately slow the rapid increase in Send spending in recent years. A Guardian investigation in March revealed accrued Send deficits would rise by 54% over the coming year to more than £5.2bn. At least 15 councils will have accumulated Send deficits exceeding £100m by next March, with one in four predicting debts of more than £50m. Two-thirds overspent their allocated Send budgets last year, with 18 councils exceeding them by more than £30m. An accounting measure, known as a statutory override, has allowed councils to keep the accrued deficits off their balance sheets. The override is due to end on 31 March, leaving large numbers of councils in effect insolvent. Councils declaring effective bankruptcy would affect all areas of provision, shed hundreds of jobs, and force them to sell off assets such as buildings and land. Tim Oliver, chair of the County Councils Network, said: 'The mounting Send service deficits are the burning platform for many local authorities yet there was no resolution in the spending review. 'We are now nine months away from a financial cliff edge when these multi-billion deficits are placed on to councils' budget books, potentially rendering half of England's county and unitary councils insolvent overnight.' The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (Cipfa) said uncertainty over the deficit 'seriously undermined' councils' financial planning, leaving them potentially unable to meet their legal obligations to set a balanced budget. A Cipfa spokesperson said: 'The government continues to leave local authorities in the dark about the future of the Send system and their financial sustainability. By the time ministers provide clarity on the statutory override councils will already be well into their budget-setting processes.' Nearly one in five pupils in England have special educational needs, according to figures published by the Department for Education, including 482,600 children with EHCPs, an increase of 11% in just 12 months. A further 1.28 million pupils require special needs support without having an EHCP, meaning there are a total of 1.7 million pupils with special needs. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Separate figures show parents are engaging in legal battles with councils over the plans in record numbers. The Ministry of Justice said 23,800 appeals over EHCPs were received by the courts in the year to March, a 36% annual increase. Hampshire county council, which has England's largest cumulative Send deficit, projected to be £312m by the end of March, said it will be forced to declare effective bankruptcy if no solution to the deficit is forthcoming. Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) council, which has projected a Send deficit of £165m by next March, said it had taken out a £57m loan to ensure it could cover rising demand for Send services this year. 'Unless the government tells us very soon [how it will deal with historic send deficits] we are going to have to issue a section 114 notice (a formal declaration of effective bankruptcy),' said Mike Cox, BCP cabinet member for finance. Penny Carpenter, cabinet member for children's services at Norfolk county council, which has a projected deficit of £183m, said: 'The lack of clarity and assurance from on future funding is deeply frustrating. The current financial pressures are unsustainable and severely hinder our ability to plan effectively.' The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government was approached for comment.