
Trump's student loan forgiveness overhaul may block immigrants, transgender support groups & more — here's what's changing
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Who decides what's 'illegal'?
Millions already got help from this program
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump says some groups are harmful
Government didn't give clear answers
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
FAQs
Trump is changing student loan forgiveness rules. He wants to stop giving loan forgiveness to some groups and organizations. The rule targets immigrant and transgender support groups. These groups might lose access to student loan help if the government says they're involved in 'illegal activities', claims reports.The Education Department wrote a draft plan for the change. It would let the Secretary of Education decide which groups are doing something 'illegal.' The draft focuses on 3 big things: immigration, terrorism, and transgender issues, as per the report by Associated Press.These are the main areas the government is watching to decide what counts as 'illegal.' Advocates are worried this gives too much power to the government. Betsy Mayotte from the Institute of Student Loan Advisors said it might be used for 'political punishment', as per the reports.Over 1 million Americans have already had loans canceled under this program. These include teachers, nurses, firefighters, and more. The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program started in 2007, according to the report by Associated Press.It forgives the rest of your student debt if you work 10 years in public service and make 120 payments. Right now, nonprofits that work in education, law, or health also qualify. This includes groups that help transgender youth or immigrants, as per the reports.Trump said in March the program supports 'activist organizations' that harm national security. He ordered changes to remove groups he says break the law, especially those that support immigrants or transgender youth, according to the report by Associated PressHis plan could force many people to leave their jobs or lose loan forgiveness. If your job becomes 'ineligible,' your loan progress stops. Big groups like hospitals, schools, and nonprofits could all be affected, as per reports.Even if just one department in a hospital helps transgender kids, the whole hospital might become ineligible. The draft says 'illegal activities' include things like helping undocumented immigrants or giving hormone therapy to minors, as stated by Associated Press.Even if these are legal in some states, they could still be called illegal under this plan. This means even cities or states that don't work closely with immigration officials could be targeted.Alyssa Dobson from Slippery Rock University warned that 'entire cities' could lose access. The plan gives the Education Secretary final say, even without a court case. There doesn't need to be a legal conviction — just a decision from the department, as mentioned in the report by Associated Press.Experts said this could cause doctor and nurse shortages. Emeka Oguh from PeopleJoy said the rule might hurt hospitals and clinics if used too broadly. Some experts asked the department for clear examples, but got vague answers. For example, it's unclear how schools teaching diversity (DEI) lessons will be judged, as stated in the reports.There's also a new rule where employers must 'certify' they don't break laws. If they mess up the paperwork, employees could lose loan relief. The Department said they are open to making changes. But they still have the power to shape the final rule however they want, according to the report by Associated Press.The final rule will go through public comments and should be ready by July 2026. This means people can speak up before it becomes official. Last week, the Department said they are keeping Trump's promise. They said they're working to make sure the program doesn't help lawbreaking organizations, as per the reports.Groups that help immigrants or transgender youth could lose access if labeled as doing 'illegal activities' by the Education Department.The new rules are expected to take effect in July 2026, after public comments are reviewed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
US Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez Calls Trump 'Rapist', Accuses Him Of Hiding Epstein Files
Last Updated: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called Trump a "rapist" in a viral post, criticizing his impact on Epstein files. DOJ found no new criminal info, sparking MAGA supporters' outrage. Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez triggered a political storm by calling US President Donald Trump a 'rapist" while jabbing him for the MAGA crisis over his handling of the files on sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a social media post, the New York congresswoman suggested that Trump's presence in the White House had interfered with the Justice Department's handling of matters related to Epstein files. 'Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?" she said in a post on X referring to Department of Justice's recently released findings on the Epstein case, which dismissed two widely circulated conspiracy theories. Wow who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein Files?— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) July 11, 2025 Meanwhile, AOC's post quickly went viral, garnering over 12 million views and sparking backlash from Trump supporters and conservative commentators. Many accused AOC of defamation, pointing out that Trump has not been criminally convicted of rape. In 2023, Trump was found civilly liable for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll, but he was not found liable for rape and was never criminally charged in the case. DOJ's Findings On Epstein Files Prominent MAGA supporters, including Dan Bongino, Pam Bondi, and Elon Musk, expressed disappointment and outrage over the findings. The DOJ's release of the footage was intended to dispel theories that the footage contained revelations about Epstein's death, which was officially ruled a suicide. The July 6 memo stated that after a review of 300 GB of files, 10,000 video clips, and 4,000 images of victims, no criminal information beyond Epstein's already documented crimes was discovered. At the Cabinet meeting Wednesday, Trump shut down a reporter's question about the Epstein files. 'Are you still talking about Jeffery Epstein?" Trump asked. 'This guy's been talked about for years." view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump administration targets George Mason University in widening war on diversity hiring in higher education
The Trump administration has initiated a civil rights investigation into George Mason University, marking a sharp escalation in its national campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The move brings federal scrutiny to Virginia's largest public university and signals that public institutions, not just elite private colleges, are now firmly in the administration's crosshairs. Allegations of racial preferencing in hiring The U.S. Department of Education opened the investigation in response to a complaint filed by several faculty members at George Mason. The complaint alleges that the university has prioritized diversity considerations over traditional academic credentials in its hiring and promotion decisions. It points to internal practices such as including 'equity advisers' in academic departments and implementing 'diversity cluster hire' initiatives to increase representation of underrepresented groups. At the heart of the complaint is university president Gregory Washington, whose internal guidance allegedly encouraged departments to weigh diversity-related factors even when candidates may not have had superior qualifications compared to others. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m. ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo Federal response and legal grounds Preliminary statements from the Education Department suggest that George Mason's current hiring practices could constitute illegal racial preferencing under federal civil rights laws. The administration has argued that race-conscious hiring policies amount to reverse discrimination, especially against white and Asian American applicants, and has made dismantling such frameworks a key focus of its education policy. This probe reflects a broader ideological and legal strategy that frames DEI initiatives as violations of anti-discrimination laws, rather than efforts to promote inclusion and equity. University's position and recent changes George Mason University has denied the allegations and maintains that it remains fully compliant with all federal and state regulations. Earlier this year, the university renamed its DEI office, though it concluded that its broader policies already aligned with legal standards. The institution has emphasized that its recruitment processes are designed to attract qualified candidates while fostering a diverse academic environment. Despite its strong reputation in conservative law and economics circles, George Mason has drawn criticism from right-leaning groups for its commitment to DEI programming. The university has defended its practices, rejecting claims that they compromise academic excellence or fairness. A pattern across public universities This investigation comes just weeks after a similar probe at the University of Virginia, which led to the resignation of its president under political and legal pressure. Conservative advocacy groups have been actively filing complaints and monitoring DEI policies at public institutions, arguing that these programs are ideologically motivated and not legally defensible. A 2023 report by a conservative think tank singled out George Mason for its 'bloated' DEI staffing and programming, further fueling criticism. Though the university disputed the report's accuracy and methodology, it marked a turning point in public discourse around its campus policies. Higher education at a crossroads The George Mason case underscores a growing divide in American higher education. While many universities continue to defend DEI as essential to academic and social progress, the Trump administration has doubled down on its efforts to roll back such policies, particularly in institutions that receive federal funding. As the investigation proceeds, George Mason finds itself navigating a complex and politically charged environment—balancing institutional values, public accountability, and legal risk in a time of shifting federal priorities. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Ceasefire talks stalled as Israel proposes troop retention in Gaza
Indirect talks between Hamas and Israel for a ceasefire in Gaza are being held up by Israel's proposals to keep troops in the territory, two Palestinian sources with knowledge of the discussions told AFP on Saturday. Hamas has said it wants the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, which is home to more than two million people.(AFP) Delegations from both sides began discussions in Qatar last Sunday to try to agree on a temporary halt to the 21-month conflict sparked by Hamas's attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Both Hamas and Israel have said that 10 living hostages who were taken that day and who are still in captivity would be released if an agreement for a 60-day ceasefire were reached. But one well-informed Palestinian source said Israel's refusal to withdraw all of its troops from Gaza was holding back progress on securing a deal. "The negotiations in Doha are facing a setback and complex difficulties due to Israel's insistence, as of Friday, on presenting a map of withdrawal, which is actually a map of redeployment and repositioning of the Israeli army rather than a genuine withdrawal," the source said. Hamas has said it wants the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, which is home to more than two million people. The source said, however, that the Israeli delegation presented a map at the talks which proposed maintaining military forces in more than 40 percent of the Palestinian territory. "Hamas's delegation will not accept the Israeli maps... as they essentially legitimise the reoccupation of approximately half of the Gaza Strip and turn Gaza into isolated zones with no crossings or freedom of movement," the source added. Mediators have asked both sides to postpone the talks until the arrival of US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, in Doha, they added. A second Palestinian source said "some progress" had been made on plans for releasing Palestinian prisoners and getting more aid to Gaza. But they accused the Israeli delegation of having no authority, and "stalling and obstructing the agreement in order to continue the war of extermination".