Elderlies who witnessed flood events at high risk of skin, neurological issues: Study
Findings published in The Lancet Planetary Health journal show that on average, hospitalisation rates remained high by three per cent for skin conditions and 2.5 per cent for nervous system problems during and following floods.
Risks of being hospitalised for conditions affecting joints and muscles, and physical injuries and poisonings remained elevated by over one per cent, said researchers, including those from Harvard University's school of public health.
An exposure to poor sanitation and contaminated water sources could be causes for
skin diseases
, while delays in seeking care and injuries suffered from cleaning up after a flood could be reasons behind developing or worsening of musculoskeletal conditions, they said.
The team looked at US' national health insurance claims made by adults aged 65 and above during 2000-2016. These were compared with flood maps from the 'Global Flood Database' developed using historical data.
More than 4.5 million hospitalisations for 13 disease categories over the four weeks following a flood event -- 72 major ones -- were analysed.
"Among adults older than 65 years, exposure to severe
flood events
was associated with increased hospitalisation rates for skin diseases, nervous system diseases, musculoskeletal system diseases, and injuries," the authors wrote.
Older adults especially are at an increased risk of health impacts following exposure to a major flood event owing to weakened immune systems and a possibly limited ability to move.
The section of society may also have age-related brain disorders, such as dementia, which can further limit their capacity to cope with climate hazards, the authors said.
The team called for flood preparedness measures and adaptation strategies for the society's vulnerable communities, which include older adults and the minorities. PTI
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
4 hours ago
- India.com
Planning to pursue a degree in Mathematics? Here are Top 10 US Universities you should consider, names are...
Mathematics is frequently described as the language of the universe. Well, it is a beautiful, logical system that allows us to comprehend the world around us. From counting and measuring to dealing with complex calculations, mathematics is vital to every aspect of our daily lives. Math sharpens our brains, teaches clear reasoning, and is the pathway to infinite discoveries in the realms of science, technology, and an unseen world! Whether it's basic addition or multivariate calculus, math challenges us to think critically and creatively, so we see it as a tool for learning and innovation! Well, the US has produced several greatest mathematicians over the years. Some of them are Benjamin Peirce(commonly known as the father of American mathematics), and Eliakim Hastings Moore. Many students love studying mathematics. However, they often face the difficulty of choosing a college. For those of you looking for a quality education in mathematics, the QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025 is a good place to start your research. The 2025 edition of the QS World University Rankings by Subject features 55 individual subjects across five broad subject areas. This year's rankings are our biggest yet, with 171 institutions included this year who were not present in the 2024 edition. Several subjects, including medicine, computer science and information systems, and materials science, now feature more ranked institutions than ever before. The QS ranks universities based on their overall success in teaching and research, providing insight into where to conduct your formerly theoretical study of advanced mathematics or applied research in mathematics. The following list of universities will help students determine where to study. Rank 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge US Rank 2. Harvard University, Cambridge US Rank 5 (as per QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) Stanford University, Stanford, US Rank 6( QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) University of California, Berkeley (UCB) Rank 7( QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) Princeton University Rank 12( QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) Carnegie Mellon University Rank = 13( QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Rank 15 (as per QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) New York University (NYU) Rank = 16 (as per QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) California Institute of Technology (Caltech) Rank 21(as per QS World University Rankings by Subject 2025) Columbia University It is to be noted that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has been ranked as the best institute in the world for the 13th consecutive year.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 hours ago
- Business Standard
Harvard scientists warn of years-long setback from funding freeze
Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of US soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it, said Ascherio. We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.' Researchers laid off and science shelved The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions - meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Research jeopardised, even if court case prevails Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus," the university said in its legal complaint. But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism. The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find non-government funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of difficult decisions and sacrifices ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. Knowledge lost in funding freeze It's really devastating, agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost," Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. "It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day." John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were cancelled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. I'm in a position where I have to really think about, Can I revive this research?' he said. Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on? The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called politically motivated social science studies. White House pressure a good thing? Madras said pressure from the White House has catalysed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole. But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard," she said. But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country. Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized, Quackenbush said. We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.
Indian Express
3 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Our processing system will turn that into drinking water': Learn how astronauts wash their hair in space
Washing hair in space is a unique challenge due to the lack of gravity. On Earth, we rely on running water to rinse out shampoo, but in the microgravity environment of the International Space Station (ISS), water behaves differently. In a video, NASA astronaut Karen Nyberg provided a step-by-step demonstration of how astronauts wash their hair while floating in zero gravity. To wash her hair in space, Nyberg uses a bag of warm water, no-rinse shampoo, a towel, and a comb. She explains, 'These are the things I need: a bag of warm water, a little no-rinse shampoo, a towel, and my comb.' Since water does not flow like on Earth, Nyberg has to squirt warm water directly onto her scalp. She describes, 'What I like to do is start by just putting some hot water, squirting it onto my scalp. I have a mirror there so I can kind of watch what I'm doing. Sometimes the water gets away from you, and you try and catch as much as you can. Then, I just work the water up through to the ends of my hair.' Astronauts use a special no-rinse shampoo, which does not require full rinsing. Nyberg explains, 'Next, I take my no-rinse shampoo and squirt it onto my scalp—just a little bit—and rub it in, again working it out to the ends. Sometimes, I'll actually take my comb to help work it all the way to the end.' Without running water, astronauts rely on towels to help remove dirt and excess shampoo. She says, 'I like to take my towel while I have the shampoo in there and just kind of work it because, without standing under running water, you need to use the towel a little bit to help get some of the dirt out.' Even though the shampoo is no-rinse, Nyberg finds that adding a little extra water helps with the cleaning process. 'I like to follow that by a little more water. It's called no-rinse shampoo, but I think it's best if you use a little water with it.' Once the hair is clean, it dries naturally in the weightless environment. The evaporating water is captured by the ISS's air conditioning system and eventually recycled into drinking water. 'Now, as my hair dries, the water evaporates and becomes humidity in the air. Then, our air conditioning system will collect that into condensate, and before long, our water processing system will turn that into drinking water.' After washing, Nyberg carefully combs through her hair to remove tangles and lets it dry freely. She notes, 'At the end, I just do one final comb-through to make sure there are no snarls and snags. While it dries, I like to let it stay free—I don't put it back in a ponytail while it's drying.' Washing hair in space requires patience and adaptation, but astronauts have developed efficient techniques to maintain hygiene while orbiting Earth. Nyberg's demonstration offers fascinating insight into daily life aboard the ISS, where even simple tasks like hair-washing require creative solutions.
