
Republicans weigh ending Wall Street's favorite tax break
Republicans are considering doing away with one of Wall Street's favorite tax breaks at the encouragement of President Trump, one that has long enjoyed Republican support and that could put up yet another obstacle on the road to a tax bill.
The tax break on carried interest — often called the carried interest loophole — allows the managers of investment funds such as private equity firms and hedge funds to count their income as capital gains and thereby have it be subject to a lower tax rate.
The tax rule, which has been debated by lawmakers for more than a decade and has come within a hair's breadth of getting canceled in previous legislative fights, would affect compensation levels at some of Wall Street's most powerful firms.
Republicans say that canceling the tax break would improve the public perception of their tax law, which includes many tax breaks for business owners and other taxpayers at the top end of the income spectrum.
'[Trump] thinks it's a little unfair that one sector of industry gains a lot by using [carried interest] as part of their income and paying lower capital gains. President Trump doesn't want to see anything perceived as unfair. Certainly for the wealthy, he wants to make sure that all of America gets the benefit of this tax bill. And I agree with him,' Rep. Dan Meuser (R-Pa.) told The Hill.
Rep. Rick Allen (R-Ga.) said that nixing carried interest would help to break the image of Republicans as advancing the interests of America's richest taxpayers.
'We get accused of just looking after the wealthy — and this would include the wealthy,' he said. 'With the momentum in the country, I don't think folks will mind paying a little more to make sure we get this done.'
Carried interest is controversial because it allows the income of a hedge fund or a private equity firm, which usually pass their tax bills on directly to their owners, to be treated as a capital gain. Capital gains at the upper end of the income spectrum have lower tax rates than ordinary wage and salary income.
While fees charged by these firms are taxed as regular income up to a top marginal rate of 37 percent, the tax rate on the interest they get paid comes at a top rate of 20 percent plus a net investment income tax of 3.8 percent — substantially lower.
Private equity companies are dead set against canceling the tax break.
'We encourage the Trump administration and Congress to keep this sound tax policy in place and unleash more long-term investment,' the American Investment Council, a trade group for the private equity industry, said in a statement.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated last year that taxing carried interest payments as ordinary income would decrease the deficit by just $13 billion over the subsequent decade — a drop in the bucket of the $36 trillion national debt and little more than a feather on the scale of the $4.7 trillion burden of extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts.
However, ending the tax break could make extending the Trump tax cuts seem more egalitarian, Republicans said. According to one distributional analysis of the extensions by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), the richest 1 percent would receive an average tax cut of around $36,300 while nearly all other income segments would actually see a tax increase.
'The hike on the middle 20 percent [would be] about $1,500 and the increase on the lowest-income 20 percent of Americans [would be] about $800,' ITEP policy director Steve Wamhoff and his co-authors found.
Amid such a skew, Republicans are seeing the appeal of targeting a Wall Street-focused tax break, though they say the discussion is still in early stages.
'We really haven't socialized it that much,' Meuser said. 'I just know what the president said, and after assessing the situation, I see his point, and I agree with him.'
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said he was thinking it over.
'I haven't made a decision about carried interest,' he told reporters Monday. 'I know the way it works. Frankly, there are good arguments on both sides. If we end up [needing] the money, could I vote to get rid of carried interest? Yeah, I could.'
Asked about the tax break, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) told The Hill that the entire U.S. tax code was being reconsidered.
'As the tax teams have been working over the last year in 120 different meetings, we're looking at the entire tax code. Every provision is on the table,' Smith told The Hill Tuesday.
Former President Biden floated taxing carried interest as regular income in various legislative proposals, including the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and his fiscal year 2024 budget.
Democrats had to remove the carried interest change from the IRA to shore up their party-line vote and get the support of then-Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.), a wild card for Democrats during the previous Congress.
'I believe strongly in [closing] the carried interest loophole. I have voted for it. I pushed for it, I pushed for it to be in this bill. Sen. Sinema said she would not vote for the bill, not even move to proceed, unless we took it out. So we have no choice,' Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), then the Senate majority leader, said in 2022.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Is Trump's troop deployment in LA a prelude to martial law?
Neither did Hegseth announced that National Guard members and the Marines will stay in Los Angeles for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up At a Advertisement This is a Trump made-for-TV spectacle of authoritarianism disguised as law and order. It's likely a prelude to martial law. Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, is Advertisement Protests were sparked last week after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials conducted several workplace raids in Los Angeles, including a But what began as boisterous but peaceful protests against Trump's anti-immigrant scheme which now demands 'If I didn't ''SEND IN THE TROOPS,'" Trump said Tuesday on social media, Los Angeles 'would be burning to the ground right now,' before he disparaged Bass and Newsom. Yes, there has been looting, and some cars have been burned and vandalized. But Trump is lying about the extent of lawlessness. Trump is following his bad policies with even worse provocations that could portend a modern-day Kent State tragedy with soldiers firing live bullets at protesters. But for Trump, the more chaos, the better. As a White House official said, 'We're happy to have this fight.' To some extent this fight to suppress dissent has been boiling in Trump for five years. During nationwide demonstrations after the police murder of George Floyd in 2020, Trump, then in his first term, asked members of his Cabinet whether protesters could be shot. 'He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak, and 'us' meant him,' Mark Esper, Trump's former defense secretary, Advertisement Esper recalled Trump saying to now-retired General Mark Milley, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ''Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?' … It was a suggestion and a formal question. And we were just all taken aback at that moment as this issue just hung very heavily in the air.' Ultimately, Trump was talked out of it. That won't happen this time, with an administration packed with people whose only loyalty is to him, not to the Constitution or rule of law. After Tom Homan, Trump's bloviating border czar, If not for the ICE arrest of But not now. Everything in Trump's second administration is designed to codify his authoritarianism. If Trump can convince enough people, especially among his white base, that he alone represents the thin orange line between civilization — as Advertisement Right now, the administration claims the military is in Los Angeles to protect federal buildings and assets — theoretically. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but neither has he ruled out unleashing US troops on protesters. With his draconian policies, Trump has lit the fuse for what could be a long and difficult summer of protests. With an occupying military force in this nation's second largest city, he has declared war against America itself. Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at


New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump promised not to send in military to tamp down on NYC protests — if NYPD keeps demonstrators in line
President Trump promised NYPD brass over the weekend that he will not send in the military or National Guard to tamp down on anti-ICE protests in New York City — as long as cops keep the demonstrators in line, The Post has learned. Trump's pledge was made to Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and NYPD Chief of Department John Chell as the pair palled around with the president at his New Jersey golf club. Sources with knowledge of the meeting said Trump had voiced concerns over the destructive mass protests engulfing Los Angeles and them being replicated in the Big Apple. Advertisement But Chell reassured the president that any demonstrations in the city would not get out of hand, the sources said. Kaz Daughtry and John Chell though didn't tee it up with the commander in chief. Linkedin/john-chell The two Big Apple police officials met with Trump on Sunday. Linkedin/john-chell Advertisement Trump then told the two he didn't believe the National Guard would be necessary in New York City. It came after he ordered an initial 2,000 National Guard troops to LA Saturday amid the raging protests over federal immigration enforcement raids. Since then, the Trump administration has in total dispatched roughly 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to the city– sparking an emergency request by California Gov. Gavin Newsom Tuesday for a federal court to block the deployment. On Monday, Mayor Eric Adams and his police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, decried the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and issued a stern warning to New Yorkers to not follow suit. 'The escalation of protests in Los Angeles over the last couple of days is unacceptable and would not be tolerated if attempted in our city,' Adams said. Advertisement Tisch added that 'any attacks against law enforcement will be met with a swift and decisive response from the NYPD.' Earlier Monday, dozens of protestors calling for an end to the ICE raids were arrested at Trump Tower after refusing to leave the Manhattan high-rise. The meeting between Trump and Adams' allies raised eyebrows in New York City political circles — after Daughtry and Chell posted photos on social media from the Bedminster club. 'Great day on the links today with POTUS, #45-#47 – Donald J. Trump. Good conversation with a few laughs and a great lunch. Deputy Mayor of Public Safety Kaz Daughtry and I were grateful for the invite,' Chell wrote. Advertisement Sources said the two Big Apple officials didn't actually tee it up with the prez, despite the photos showing them chatting with him on the links. Still, Adams defended the outing on Tuesday, telling reporters, 'A lot of great deals have been made on the golf course.' 'I thank the two of them for doing it,' he said. 'Many of you who play golf know that great decisions are made on the golf course.' Both Chell and Daughtry also joined the mayor at Trump's inauguration earlier this year.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IQVIA Holdings (NYSE:IQV) Sees 11% Share Price Rise Over Last Week
IQVIA Holdings experienced a 10% rise in share price over the last week, correlating with its recent developments, notably the dosing of the first patient in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and its strategic alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute to optimize oncology trials. These initiatives likely provided a positive sentiment boost, aligning well with the broader market momentum, as indices such as the S&P 500 also reached new highs. The market's anticipation over US-China trade talks and overall strong corporate earnings have supported the upward trend, further enhancing IQV's market performance. We've identified 1 warning sign for IQVIA Holdings that you should be aware of. Uncover 18 companies that survived and thrived after COVID and have the right ingredients to survive Trump's tariffs. The recent 10% rise in IQVIA Holdings' share price has been influenced by important developments like the dosing in the RENEW Phase 2 trial and a key alliance with Sarah Cannon Research Institute. These initiatives are expected to potentially drive revenue growth, particularly as the strategic alliance optimizes oncology trials. The company's past performance, with total returns of 10.45% over five years, suggests modest growth in investor value. However, compared to the US Life Sciences industry's one-year return of 27% decline, IQVIA's recent rise highlights positive market sentiment. These initiatives, combined with FDA reforms and NVIDIA collaboration, may lower operational costs and have a favorable impact on earnings forecasts. Analysts predict revenue to grow by 5.2% annually over the next three years, which is somewhat cautious compared to the general expectations for the life sciences sector. The recent share price movement to US$146.2 remains below the consensus price target of US$216.31, indicating potential for future appreciation if the projected growth in revenue and earnings materializes. Click here to discover the nuances of IQVIA Holdings with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:IQV. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data