Trump says he's considering ‘taking away' Rosie O'Donnell's US citizenship
It's just the latest threat by Trump to revoke the citizenship of people with whom he has publicly disagreed, most recently his former adviser and one-time ally, Elon Musk.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
But O'Donnell's situation is notably different from Musk, who was born in South Africa. O'Donnell was born in the United States and has a constitutional right to U.S. citizenship. The U.S. State Department notes on its website that U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization may relinquish U.S. nationality by taking certain steps – but only if the act is performed voluntary and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship.
Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, noted the Supreme Court ruled in a 1967 case that the Fourteen Amendment of the Constitution prevents the government from taking away citizenship.
Advertisement
'The president has no authority to take away the citizenship of a native-born U.S. citizen,' Frost said in an email Saturday. 'In short, we are nation founded on the principle that the people choose the government; the government cannot choose the people.'
O'Donnell moved to Ireland after Trump defeated Vice President Kamala Harris to win his second term. She has said she's in the process of obtaining Irish citizenship based on family lineage.
Responding to Trump Saturday, O'Donnell wrote on social media that she had upset the president and 'add me to the list of people who oppose him at every turn.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
SNAP, Medicaid and tax deductions on the line in Senate bill
A Trump-backed spending plan could end health insurance coverage for millions of Americans and drastically cut funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. Why it matters: President Trump has called the legislation a " big, beautiful bill" but Feeding Texas, which represents 20 food banks in the state, says the bill would enact the "most sweeping rollback" of SNAP in U.S. history. The big picture: The latest version of the bill, which narrowly passed the Senate this week, would slash food and health benefits for the poorest Americans, while giving tax cuts to higher earners. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said Tuesday. The upshot: The bill would temporarily increase the cap on state and local tax deductions for federal tax returns to roughly $40,000 annually. Around 12% of Texas properties are taxed over $10,000, the current deduction limit. Yes, but: The bill would also reduce nutrition funding, which includes SNAP, by $186 billion between 2025 and 2034. Nearly 12 million people are projected to lose health insurance under the bill's proposed Medicaid changes. The bill would also cut funding for energy and natural resources while allocating $175 billion for border security and $150 billion for defense. Zoom in: Texas may have to pay an additional $806 million annually on administrative costs and food benefits if the cuts are enacted, per Feeding Texas. "The consequences would be profound and devastating," Feeding Texas CEO Celia Cole said in a statement. Friction point: The bill has received intense opposition across party lines. What's next: The House and the Senate will need to agree on a unified bill to send to the president.
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump officials deflect from "Alligator Alcatraz" scrutiny by pointing fingers at Biden
Border czar Tom Homan and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Sunday brushed off humanitarian concerns about a new immigration detention center in Florida, opting instead to criticize conditions under the Biden administration. The big picture: There have been reports of negligence, inhumane treatment and limited access to legal counsel in the U.S. immigration detention system for years, but the Trump administration has embraced once-fringe tactics, setting off alarms for immigration rights advocates. Emblematic of that spectacle is a new facility in the Florida Everglades dubbed " Alligator Alcatraz," where detainees have reported inhumane and unclean conditions. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), one of a group of Democratic lawmakers who were given a reportedly limited tour of the site Saturday, condemned the lack of privacy in the facility and said detainees were "living in cages." State officials have denied allegations of inhumane conditions. Driving the news: Homan, who noted he has not visited the facility yet, said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday that he doubts reports from lawmakers were "factual," pointing to what he described as high ICE detention standards. He argued some lawmakers who are now criticizing Trump's approach didn't do the same with the Biden administration over conditions migrants faced during the former president's term. "Silence, silence," he said. "Because they're complicit. Because they didn't take the administration on and ask them to secure the border." Zoom out: Noem on NBC's "Meet the Press" Sunday disputed that detainees are held in "jail cells," saying they are in "secure facilities but are held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities." Noem argued "this politics has to end," but similarly accused Democrats of being mum on the state of migrant detention under Biden. "Because if you compare them to what happened under the Biden administration and under the Obama administration, these centers are at the highest levels," she said, adding the administration is looking into "how we can get more detention centers." Context: Republicans have continued to slam what they describe as Biden's "open border" policies during the prior surge at the U.S.-Mexico border.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Beshear blasts Trump tariffs: ‘It is chaos. It is increasing costs'
Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D) sharply criticized the administration's sweeping tariffs, saying the policy approach amounts to 'chaos' and is bad for the U.S. economy. 'No, not at all,' Beshear said in an interview on NBC News's 'Meet the Press,' when asked whether the people of Kentucky voted for this tariff agenda. 'This is, what was it, first across the board, then reciprocal, then industry-specific. I think there was a company-specific tariff proposed. Now, we have tariffs on countries if he doesn't like who that country is prosecuting,' Beshear continued, referring to the president's varying policies on tariffs. 'It is chaos. It is increasing costs. You know, the people of Kentucky, many of them, voted for Donald Trump because they thought he'd make paying the bills a little bit easier at the end of the week. And he's just making it harder. Beshear said he's seeing small businesses in his state lay people off because of the tariffs on raw materials, which Americans often import and then assemble on U.S. soil. 'And when a small business is laying somebody off, it's somebody they go to church with. It's somebody who their kids play soccer with. This is going to impact the economy in such negative ways,' he said. Trump on April 2 announced 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of other countries, using trade deficits to help calculate the tariff rate. But a week later, he lowered those rates to 10 percent for 90 days as markets reacted negatively, giving time for negotiations. That 90-day deadline had been set to expire this past week, but Trump has issued letters to numerous U.S. trade partners informing them of their new 'reciprocal' rates slated to take effect Aug. 1. Trump has sent mixed signals about whether there is still wiggle room to negotiates those rates.
