
This cookware maker is bracing for steel tariffs behind a wall of pots and pans
Steel and aluminum tariffs are going to cost Heritage Steel hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. But Danny Henn, who runs the family-owned stainless steel cookware company, says it may have a competitive edge.
Aug. 3, 2025, 2:06 PM EDT
By Emily Lorsch
Heritage Steel, a small, family-owned cookware manufacturer in Clarksville, Tennessee, is expecting to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in tariffs this year.
The company recently received a tariff bill of $75,000 on an order of handles, and the company's vice president of operations, Danny Henn, is anticipating another bill of closer to $200,000 for goods that will likely reach the U.S. this month.
'We're a pretty small business,' Henn said. 'Having that as an additional sort of surprise expense is not insignificant.'
But even with that new cost factored in, Heritage Steel believes steel and aluminum tariffs could be good for the business.
'Just from the base economics of it, yes, we have to pay more, but others have to pay a whole lot more,' Henn added.
Heritage Steel employs about 40 workers and has more than doubled its revenue since 2018. The company is up 60% in cookware sales since last year.
While company leaders now have to rethink pricing and make adjustments in response to President Donald Trump's trade war, Henn said they're feeling optimistic.
Business highlights
Danny Henn's grandfather Donald Henn was a door-to-door cookware salesman after graduating from college. In 1983, he purchased a factory in Clarksville, Tennessee, and from there was born New Era, which later became Heritage Steel.
'My grandma and grandpa and my parents were always big people about cooking at home. The cookware was always there,' said Henn.
From frying pans and skillets to stock pots, saucepans and knives, Heritage Steel sells about 50 different cookware products on its website and Amazon. The company also sells wholesale to independent gourmet retailers.
'We are happy and proud to be an American producer of goods.'
Heritage Steel needs three main types of inputs to make its cookware, and about 75% of the company's materials are imported. The most important part and the largest cost is the five-ply cladded body, which includes a combination of stainless steel and aluminum.
'It's very specialized processing that it has to go through to get into this form,' Henn said. 'And so, because it is very specialized, there's not a whole lot of people that do it.'
Tariff impacts
Heritage Steel imports its cladded steel from South Korea, which will be facing a 15% tariff that Trump announced on Wednesday after the country made 'an offer to buy down' the 25% duty level he had previously set.
The company imports its handles, made from pure stainless steel using a process called lost-wax casting, from China. Meanwhile, the company purchases the material for its stainless steel lids in the U.S. Those parts don't have to be cladded and are a more simple single layer of stainless steel that's more widely available.
Heritage Steel had previously sourced cladded steel from U.S. vendors, but those providers have since exited the business, according to Henn.
'There's just not enough of a U.S. market for cookware manufacturing of this type … right now. There isn't a viable vendor for us to find.'
Since the company only makes a handful of raw-material purchases each year, it typically has a large order coming in all at once, which set up the company nicely when the first 25% tariffs on steel went into effect earlier this year.
'We had a good amount of it,' Henn said, referring to the raw materials, 'so that gave us more time of being able to know we're going to be able to manufacture and sell a bunch of stuff without the tariff cost on it.'
Henn said that wasn't a tariff strategy, but instead a benefit of his company's workflow.
However, they knew that leeway wasn't going to last forever. Eventually it became time for Heritage Steel to order more materials. That first tariff bill was about $75,000, and Henn is expecting the next to be more than twice as much.
Who pays?
For Heritage Steel, there was never a doubt it would have to raise prices because of the tariff expenses. The question was how high would they have to go?
'We're happy and proud to be a provider of really high-quality cookware, but one that's more affordably priced than some of the others on the market,' Henn said. 'We want to continue to offer the best price we can, given our constraints.'
As of Friday, the company had raised prices by about 15% on all of its products. Heritage Steel explained the increase in an announcement on its website, calling the adjustment 'fairly modest' considering the price of the company's input materials spiked at least 50%.
'Obviously, we can't bear the full impact of these cost increases,' Henn said, 'but we also don't want our customers to bear the full cost.'
He expects these changes to negatively impact the company's profit margins, but as of now the extent is unclear. Henn believes the company has more flexibility than a lot of its competitors because Heritage Steel is only importing raw materials, not the full product, and manufactures in the U.S. That's why he expects the overall market disruption could be good for the company.
'They might have to do something closer to a 50% price increase,' he said of his competitors, 'because their entire cost of goods is going up by 50%.'
For Heritage Steel, on the other hand, only the price of parts is up 50%, not the full product. Henn said it's all about finding the sweet spot: a fair amount to charge customers to compensate for the new costs while still being a price leader in the market.
'We're just doing our best to do good by our customer, not raise prices too much, do well by our employees, keep paying them well and try to stay competitive within the market.'
Even though Henn is optimistic about this potential competitive edge, that doesn't mean he believes the Trump administration's tariffs are the right approach. What makes more sense to him, he said, is a change over a longer period of time.
'If there is something that would have a similar effect of giving incentives to bring more more industry back to the U.S., I think that would likely be a positive,' he said, adding that he believes the intent of the tariffs policy is good.
'The implementation is a little bit rocky,' he said.
Henn declined to comment on his political views and whom he voted for in the presidential election.
As for other options that could bring down Heritage Steel's tariff bill, that's something being discussed as well. While stainless clad cookware is the company's bread and butter, Henn and his co-owners are exploring a range of possibilities.
'If we had our full wish,' Henn said, 'we would be able to have a fully U.S.-based supply chain for our entire manufacturing process.'
Emily Lorsch
Emily Lorsch is a producer at NBC News covering business and the economy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
VA terminates key union contracts
The Department of Veterans Affairs is terminating collective bargaining agreements with several key government unions representing its employees. In an announcement Wednesday, the VA said the move is in response to an executive order President Donald Trump signed in March that nixed collective bargaining rights for many federal workers in the name of national security. The agency's decision comes after a federal appellate court lifted a lower court ban on the ending of union contracts on Friday, although the Trump administration previously issued guidance that agencies should not terminate any collective bargaining agreements until litigation challenging the order is over. 'Too often, unions that represent VA employees fight against the best interests of Veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,' VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a statement. 'We're making sure VA resources and employees are singularly focused on the job we were sent here to do: providing top-notch care and service to those who wore the uniform.' The VA said it notified five major unions that their contracts for 'bargaining-unit employees' were being terminated: the American Federation of Government Employees; the National Association of Government Employees; the National Federation of Federal Employees; the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United; and the Service Employees International Union. Contracts covering the roughly 4,000 VA police officers, firefighters or security guards represented by those unions will remain in place, the agency said. The VA said the move will allow staff to 'spend more time with Veterans,' noting that in 2024, nearly 2,000 union employees 'spent more than 750,000 hours of work on taxpayer-funded union time.' Without those obligations, 'those hours can now be used to serve Veterans instead of union bosses,' the agency said. The move will also open up more physical space for veterans' needs, the VA said. 'More than 187,000 square feet of its office and clinical space is currently being used by union representatives free of charge,' the agency said, adding that it has 'cost VA millions of dollars in lost rent and expenses.' The agency also says labor contracts have restricted managers' ability to hire, promote and reward high performing employees and to hold poor performers accountable. The move was met with outrage by at least two of the top unions representing VA employees. AFGE, which represents 320,000 employees at the agency, said it is assessing its options to challenge Collins' move. 'Secretary Collins' decision to rip up the negotiated union contract for majority of its workforce is another clear example of retaliation against AFGE members for speaking out against the illegal, anti-worker, and anti-veteran policies of this administration,' AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement. He noted that Collins' action is 'inconsistent' with Office of Personnel Management guidance instructing agencies to hold off on ending union agreements while the legal challenges played out. Those losing their representation by AFGE and several other unions include nurses, doctors, housekeepers, maintenance, food service workers, lawyers, mental health specialists, cemetery workers and others, according to AFGE. NNU, the largest union of registered nurses in the country, said the VA's announcement to terminate its contract and those of the other unions 'is an attack on those who dedicate their lives in the service of others.' 'We know this administration is hellbent on silencing nurses and other VA workers to steamroll the destruction of the VA,' the nurses' union said in a statement to CNN. 'It is because of VA nurses' ability to speak up about patient safety through our union that our nation's veterans receive the highest level of care.' NNU says it will 'continue to pursue legal action with our fellow unions.' The department's move comes just days after a federal appeals court in California lifted a lower court's preliminary injunction that had blocked several federal agencies from canceling certain union contracts. Trump's expansive executive order applies to more than 1 million federal workers across many agencies, including the departments of State, Defense, Justice and Health and Human Services. The order is aimed at stopping federal unions that have 'declared war on President Trump's agenda,' according to a White House fact sheet. It noted that the largest union – AFGE – has filed many grievances to 'block Trump policies.' 'President Trump refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests,' the fact sheet said. The two largest federal employee unions – AFGE and the National Treasury Employees Union – sued in separate courts, saying Trump was retaliating for their advocacy for their members and for federal services. The unions were initially successful in blocking the order in separate federal district courts, but they each lost on the appellate level. NNU, as well as other unions, joined AFGE in its lawsuit against the executive order.


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
VA terminates key union contracts
The Department of Veterans Affairs is terminating collective bargaining agreements with several key government unions representing its employees. In an announcement Wednesday, the VA said the move is in response to an executive order President Donald Trump signed in March that nixed collective bargaining rights for many federal workers in the name of national security. The agency's decision comes after a federal appellate court lifted a lower court ban on the ending of union contracts on Friday, although the Trump administration previously issued guidance that agencies should not terminate any collective bargaining agreements until litigation challenging the order is over. 'Too often, unions that represent VA employees fight against the best interests of Veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,' VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a statement. 'We're making sure VA resources and employees are singularly focused on the job we were sent here to do: providing top-notch care and service to those who wore the uniform.' The VA said it notified five major unions that their contracts for 'bargaining-unit employees' were being terminated: the American Federation of Government Employees; the National Association of Government Employees; the National Federation of Federal Employees; the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United; and the Service Employees International Union. Contracts covering the roughly 4,000 VA police officers, firefighters or security guards represented by those unions will remain in place, the agency said. The VA said the move will allow staff to 'spend more time with Veterans,' noting that in 2024, nearly 2,000 union employees 'spent more than 750,000 hours of work on taxpayer-funded union time.' Without those obligations, 'those hours can now be used to serve Veterans instead of union bosses,' the agency said. The move will also open up more physical space for veterans' needs, the VA said. 'More than 187,000 square feet of its office and clinical space is currently being used by union representatives free of charge,' the agency said, adding that it has 'cost VA millions of dollars in lost rent and expenses.' The agency also says labor contracts have restricted managers' ability to hire, promote and reward high performing employees and to hold poor performers accountable. The move was met with outrage by at least two of the top unions representing VA employees. AFGE, which represents 320,000 employees at the agency, said it is assessing its options to challenge Collins' move. 'Secretary Collins' decision to rip up the negotiated union contract for majority of its workforce is another clear example of retaliation against AFGE members for speaking out against the illegal, anti-worker, and anti-veteran policies of this administration,' AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement. He noted that Collins' action is 'inconsistent' with Office of Personnel Management guidance instructing agencies to hold off on ending union agreements while the legal challenges played out. Those losing their representation by AFGE and several other unions include nurses, doctors, housekeepers, maintenance, food service workers, lawyers, mental health specialists, cemetery workers and others, according to AFGE. NNU, the largest union of registered nurses in the country, said the VA's announcement to terminate its contract and those of the other unions 'is an attack on those who dedicate their lives in the service of others.' 'We know this administration is hellbent on silencing nurses and other VA workers to steamroll the destruction of the VA,' the nurses' union said in a statement to CNN. 'It is because of VA nurses' ability to speak up about patient safety through our union that our nation's veterans receive the highest level of care.' NNU says it will 'continue to pursue legal action with our fellow unions.' The department's move comes just days after a federal appeals court in California lifted a lower court's preliminary injunction that had blocked several federal agencies from canceling certain union contracts. Trump's expansive executive order applies to more than 1 million federal workers across many agencies, including the departments of State, Defense, Justice and Health and Human Services. The order is aimed at stopping federal unions that have 'declared war on President Trump's agenda,' according to a White House fact sheet. It noted that the largest union – AFGE – has filed many grievances to 'block Trump policies.' 'President Trump refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests,' the fact sheet said. The two largest federal employee unions – AFGE and the National Treasury Employees Union – sued in separate courts, saying Trump was retaliating for their advocacy for their members and for federal services. The unions were initially successful in blocking the order in separate federal district courts, but they each lost on the appellate level. NNU, as well as other unions, joined AFGE in its lawsuit against the executive order.


CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
VA terminates key union contracts
The Department of Veterans Affairs is terminating collective bargaining agreements with several key government unions representing its employees. In an announcement Wednesday, the VA said the move is in response to an executive order President Donald Trump signed in March that nixed collective bargaining rights for many federal workers in the name of national security. The agency's decision comes after a federal appellate court lifted a lower court ban on the ending of union contracts on Friday, although the Trump administration previously issued guidance that agencies should not terminate any collective bargaining agreements until litigation challenging the order is over. 'Too often, unions that represent VA employees fight against the best interests of Veterans while protecting and rewarding bad workers,' VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a statement. 'We're making sure VA resources and employees are singularly focused on the job we were sent here to do: providing top-notch care and service to those who wore the uniform.' The VA said it notified five major unions that their contracts for 'bargaining-unit employees' were being terminated: the American Federation of Government Employees; the National Association of Government Employees; the National Federation of Federal Employees; the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United; and the Service Employees International Union. Contracts covering the roughly 4,000 VA police officers, firefighters or security guards represented by those unions will remain in place, the agency said. The VA said the move will allow staff to 'spend more time with Veterans,' noting that in 2024, nearly 2,000 union employees 'spent more than 750,000 hours of work on taxpayer-funded union time.' Without those obligations, 'those hours can now be used to serve Veterans instead of union bosses,' the agency said. The move will also open up more physical space for veterans' needs, the VA said. 'More than 187,000 square feet of its office and clinical space is currently being used by union representatives free of charge,' the agency said, adding that it has 'cost VA millions of dollars in lost rent and expenses.' The agency also says labor contracts have restricted managers' ability to hire, promote and reward high performing employees and to hold poor performers accountable. The move was met with outrage by at least two of the top unions representing VA employees. AFGE, which represents 320,000 employees at the agency, said it is assessing its options to challenge Collins' move. 'Secretary Collins' decision to rip up the negotiated union contract for majority of its workforce is another clear example of retaliation against AFGE members for speaking out against the illegal, anti-worker, and anti-veteran policies of this administration,' AFGE National President Everett Kelley said in a statement. He noted that Collins' action is 'inconsistent' with Office of Personnel Management guidance instructing agencies to hold off on ending union agreements while the legal challenges played out. Those losing their representation by AFGE and several other unions include nurses, doctors, housekeepers, maintenance, food service workers, lawyers, mental health specialists, cemetery workers and others, according to AFGE. NNU, the largest union of registered nurses in the country, said the VA's announcement to terminate its contract and those of the other unions 'is an attack on those who dedicate their lives in the service of others.' 'We know this administration is hellbent on silencing nurses and other VA workers to steamroll the destruction of the VA,' the nurses' union said in a statement to CNN. 'It is because of VA nurses' ability to speak up about patient safety through our union that our nation's veterans receive the highest level of care.' NNU says it will 'continue to pursue legal action with our fellow unions.' The department's move comes just days after a federal appeals court in California lifted a lower court's preliminary injunction that had blocked several federal agencies from canceling certain union contracts. Trump's expansive executive order applies to more than 1 million federal workers across many agencies, including the departments of State, Defense, Justice and Health and Human Services. The order is aimed at stopping federal unions that have 'declared war on President Trump's agenda,' according to a White House fact sheet. It noted that the largest union – AFGE – has filed many grievances to 'block Trump policies.' 'President Trump refuses to let union obstruction interfere with his efforts to protect Americans and our national interests,' the fact sheet said. The two largest federal employee unions – AFGE and the National Treasury Employees Union – sued in separate courts, saying Trump was retaliating for their advocacy for their members and for federal services. The unions were initially successful in blocking the order in separate federal district courts, but they each lost on the appellate level. NNU, as well as other unions, joined AFGE in its lawsuit against the executive order.