US soybean farmers urge Trump to make purchase deal with China
China, the world's largest soybean buyer, is turning to Brazilian cargoes amid trade tensions with the U.S. and ongoing negotiations. The country has not pre-purchased soybeans from the upcoming U.S. harvest, an unusual delay that has worried traders and farmers.
"Soybean farmers are under extreme financial stress. Prices continue to drop and at the same time our farmers are paying significantly more for inputs and equipment. U.S. soybean farmers cannot survive a prolonged trade dispute with our largest customer," said the letter sent from the American Soybean Association to Trump on Tuesday.
China's turn to Brazilian soybeans could cost U.S. farmers billions. China bought 54% of U.S. soybean exports in the 2023-2024 marketing year, worth $13.2 billion, according to the ASA. The country's soybean imports hit a record July high this year.
Soybean prices jumped after an August 11 post from Trump on Truth Social urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases. However, farmers said they doubted such a large increase was possible.
"The further into the autumn we get without reaching an agreement with China on soybeans, the worse the impacts will be on U.S. soybean farmers," said the letter.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kilmar Abrego Garcia wants criminal case thrown out over Trump administration's ‘vindictive' prosecution
Kilmar Abrego Garcia is asking a federal judge to throw out a criminal case against him, claiming he was 'singled out' by President Donald Trump's administration for 'having the audacity to fight back, rather than accept a brutal injustice' after he was wrongfully deported to a brutal prison in his home country. Despite admitting in court that he was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March, government lawyers and top administration officials spent weeks insisting Abrego Garcia would never be allowed back into the country following a high-profile lawsuit challenging his arrest and removal. He was abruptly flown back to the United States in June to face a criminal indictment in Tennessee, where a grand jury indicted him on federal smuggling charges. Prosecutors cannot abuse the law to 'punish someone for exercising his constitutional rights,' lawyers for Abrego Garcia wrote on Tuesday. 'Yet that is exactly what has happened here.' 'Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been singled out by the United States government,' they added. 'It is obvious why. And it is not because of the seriousness of his alleged conduct.' Last month, the federal judge overseeing his criminal case ordered his release from jail before trial, finding that prosecutors failed to show 'any evidence' that his history or arguments against him warrant his ongoing detention. That order arrived moments after another federal judge overseeing his wrongful deportation case blocked the Trump administration from immediately arresting and deporting him after he is set to be released from jail. The court agreed to pause his release from pretrial detention so attorneys can 'evaluate options' as they brace for immigration officers to arrest and remove him a second time. That pause is set to expire this Friday August 22. Abrego Garcia's attorneys argue he was only charged because 'he refused to acquiesce in the government's violation of his due process rights.' 'Rather than fix its mistake and return [him] to the United States, the government fought back at every level of the federal court system,' attorneys wrote. 'And at every level, [he] won. This case results from the government's concerted effort to punish him for having the audacity to fight back, rather than accept a brutal injustice.' The Independent has requested comment from Homeland Security. In court filings, Abrego Garcia's attorneys detailed the 'severe mistreatment' and 'torture' he experienced during his month-long detention inside El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. His attorneys say the 29-year-old father was subject to 'severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture' at the facility. 'A group of the most senior officials in the United States sought vengeance: they began a public campaign to punish Mr. Abrego for daring to fight back, culminating in the criminal investigation that led to the charges in this case,' his attorneys wrote. His lawyers admitted that motions to dismiss on grounds of selective or vindictive prosecution are rarely granted but 'if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case,' they said. 'The government is attempting to use this case — and this Court — to punish Mr. Abrego for successfully fighting his unlawful removal. That is a constitutional violation of the most basic sort,' his attorneys wrote. Abrego Garcia — who entered the country illegally as a teenager after fleeing gang violence in El Salvador — was deported on March 15 despite an immigration judge's order that blocked his removal from the country for humanitarian reasons. Government lawyers admitted in court documents that he was removed from the country due to a procedural error and several federal judges and a unanimous Supreme Court ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' his return. Still, the government spent weeks battling court orders while officials publicly said he would never step foot in the United States, characterizing him as a serial abuser and criminal gang member. Emails and text messages provided to members of Congress appear to show that administration officials and government lawyers were sympathetic to his wrongful removal and made efforts to get him out of El Salvador before the case made headlines, which caused major headaches for the White House. A two-count indictment in Tennessee accuses Abrego Garcia of participating in a years-long conspiracy to illegally move undocumented immigrants from Texas to other parts of the country. He faces one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens. But in their request to keep him in jail before trial, federal prosecutors also claimed he is a member of transnational gang MS-13, and 'personally participated in violent crime, including murder.' Prosecutors also claim he 'abused' women and trafficked children, firearms and narcotics, and there is also an ongoing investigation into 'solicitation of child pornography.' Abrego Garcia is not facing any charges on those allegations and a federal judge determined that the government failed to link those allegations to evidence that implicates him.
Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tulsi Gabbard continues deep state purge by revoking security clearances for 37 officials tied to Russiagate
Tulsi Gabbard continued her purge of the deep state, revoking security clearances of 37 Obama-linked officials tied to the infamous Russiagate hoax which she has called a 'treasonous conspiracy'. It marked the Trump administration's latest act of retribution targeting public servants in the federal government's intelligence community. A memo posted online by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, accuses the targeted officials of having engaged in the 'politicization or weaponization of intelligence' to advance partisan goals, as well as failure to safeguard classified information and 'failure to adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards.' Many of the officials who were singled out left the government years ago and served in a broad range of roles, including in senior positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some have been openly critical of Trump and some worked on matters that have long provoked his ire, including the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on Trump´s behalf, or have openly criticized him. When The Daily Mail reached out for comment, the Office of the DNI directed us to a lengthy statement and tweet from Gabbard. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic,' she wrote. White House spokesperson Davis Ingle told The Daily Mail in a statement that Gabbard has Trump's full support. 'President Trump promised to end the weaponization of government against American citizens which is why Director Gabbard rightfully directed the revocation of 37 security clearances from current and former intelligence officials who abused their positions of public trust.' The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries. It reflects his continued distrust of intelligence officials from prior Democratic administrations and risks chilling dissenting voices from within the national security community. The revocation of clearances, a vital tool for intelligence professionals needing to preserve access to sensitive information, has been a go-to tactic for Trump. Its been used to target law firms that have fallen out of favor as well as dozens of former officials who signed onto a letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. In the last month Gabbard has declassified a series of years-old documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the assessment on Russian election interference. Many of those whose clearances were revoked only learned of the Gabbard action from news reports published Tuesday, according to two former government officials who were on the list. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity as they ponder whether to take legal action. It comes just weeks after Gabbard laid into Barack Obama on an appearance on Fox & Friends on Saturday, accusing him of 'treasonous conspiracy.' Gabbard cited allegations she made last week accusing Obama's White House of pushing a 'hoax' that Trump's 2016 campaign was propped up by the Kremlin. Trump also accused Obama of treason, while the 44th president issued a statement denying all the allegations lodged against him. 'The complicity, the deflection, and the silence of politicians, of the mainstream media, and of those directly implicated into this speaks volumes,' Gabbard said on Saturday. The former Democrat-turned-Republican also responded to a blistering comeback from Obama over her claims, in which Obama said Gabbard was making 'bizarre allegations' that are a 'weak attempt at distraction' from the Epstein files. Gabbard countered: 'President Obama's very carefully worded response that came from his office, again, deflects away from addressing any of the truth that was revealed. 'They would have to admit and actually address the details of their complicity in this or their absolute failure in conducting the most basic responsibilities of, again, asking, where is this intelligence coming from?' Gabbard made the remarks a day after she sent a criminal referral against Obama to Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleging he ' manufactured and politicized intelligence' to create a narrative implicating Trump with Russia. In an X post about her criminal referral, Gabbard said: 'Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people. 'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The integrity of our democratic republic depends on it. 'We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.' Gabbard's rebuke of Obama comes after the former president issued a rare statement to condemn Trump's wild allegations of 'treason.' 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' an Obama spokesperson said. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' The former president's spokesman then turned to Gabbard's report, saying: 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' That last lined needled Trump's secretary of state and national security advisor, who was seated next to the president during his extended discourse on Obama and his team. Trump and Obama have a fraught relationship, although they were spotted chatting in what appeared to be amiable fashion at Jimmy Carter's funeral in January. Trump rode 'birther' conspiracies about Obama to influence in his first successful run for president. The pushback from Obama's team came after Trump issued an extraordinary call Tuesday to investigate the ex-president – saying he had been caught 'cold' and accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' Trump issued his stunning series of attacks on the two-term Democratic president shortly after being asked yet another question about Jeffrey Epstein - the scandal that Obama appeared to be implying that Trump was trying to 'distract' from. Trump has since threatened to prosecute Obama, saying this week that Attorney General Pam Bondi should 'act' on the matter – while also indicating it was at her discretion.
Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
US, NATO planners start to craft Ukraine security guarantee options
Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, U.S. officials and sources told Reuters on Tuesday, following President Donald Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's war. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Trump's promise during a summit on Monday of security guarantees for Kyiv, but many questions remain unanswered. Officials told Reuters that the Pentagon is carrying out planning exercises on the support Washington could offer beyond providing weapons. But they cautioned that it would take time for U.S. and European planners to determine what would be both militarily feasible and acceptable to the Kremlin. One option was sending European forces to Ukraine but putting the U.S. in charge of their command and control, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The sources added that the troops would not be under a NATO banner but operate under their own nations' flags. The Pentagon and NATO did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the idea. In a press briefing, the White House said that the United States could help coordinate a security guarantee for Ukraine. Russia's Foreign Ministry has ruled out the deployment of troops from NATO countries to help secure a peace deal. Trump has publicly ruled out deploying U.S. troops in Ukraine but on Tuesday appeared to leave the door open to other U.S. military involvement. In an interview with Fox News "Fox & Friends" program, he suggested Washington could provide air support to Ukraine. "When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground, we're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, ... by air because nobody has stuff we have, really they don't have," Trump said. He did not provide further details. U.S. air support could come in a variety of ways including providing more air defense systems to Ukraine and enforcing a no-fly zone with U.S. fighter jets. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor in 2022, the United States has shipped billions of dollars worth of weapons and munitions to Kyiv. The Trump administration briefly halted those weapons shipments, including after a contentious White House meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in February and again in July. Shipments have resumed and Trump has pledged to send weapons, primarily defensive ones, to help the war-torn country. NATO military chiefs will focus on Ukraine and the way forward when they meet virtually on Wednesday, a conference first reported by Reuters. U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, who also oversees NATO operations in Europe, will brief the chiefs of defense on the Alaska meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin last week. A U.S. official speaking on condition of anonymity said U.S. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was expected to attend the meeting. The official added that Caine would meet with some of his European counterparts in Washington on Tuesday evening. Trump has pressed for a quick end to Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, and Kyiv and its allies have worried he could seek to force an agreement on Russia's terms after the president last week rolled out the red carpet for Putin. Russia says it is engaged in a 'special military operation' in Ukraine to protect its national security, claiming NATO's eastward expansion and Western military support for Ukraine pose existential threats. Kyiv and its Western allies say the invasion is an imperial-style land grab.
