Thabo Mbeki Foundation mulls return to National Dialogue after EPG's invitation
Image: Boxer Ngwenya / Independent Newspapers
The Thabo Mbeki Foundation (TMF) is reportedly mulling over a return to the National Dialogue process, following an olive branch extended by the Eminent Persons Group (EPG).
This comes after several legacy foundations, including the TMF, withdrew from the First National Convention due to concerns over preparation and process two weeks ago.
The foundation's withdrawal raised questions about the legitimacy of the National Dialogue process.
Controversy surrounded the National Dialogue held at Unisa last Friday and Saturday, particularly concerning its alleged R700 million budget. This led to the refusal of several political parties, including the uMkhonto weSizwe Party, the EFF, and the DA, to participate.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
On Wednesday, TMF spokesperson Bongani Kupe confirmed that all of the legacy foundations had received the letter and were considering it.
'We have always said that we are open to further discussions. In the letter that we wrote to the EPG, we mentioned that we just had a few concerns, including rushing the process,' Kupe said.
Other foundations refused to comment on the matter for now.
In a bid to restore trust, the EPG, a group of 32 independent volunteers appointed by President Cyril Ramaphosa to support and guide the National Dialogue, formally requested a meeting with the legacy foundations in a letter addressed to the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group.
The letter acknowledges the concerns raised by the foundations and expresses a desire to work together to ensure a successful and inclusive National Dialogue.
'We acknowledge the depth and seriousness of the concerns raised by the foundations,' it read.
These concerns included the preservation of citizen leadership, the need for a genuinely meaningful engagement platform, transparent financial and governance arrangements, and the importance of adequate preparation over rigid timelines.
The EPG stressed that these were not 'peripheral matters' but 'central to the credibility and success of the National Dialogue'.
The Presidency, in statements early this month, had already recognised the historic role of these foundations in initiating and shaping the National Dialogue, noting their continued commitment to its vision and principles.
The EPG echoed this sentiment, stating that the process would benefit from their 'leadership, commitment and knowledge'.
The EPG reaffirmed its commitment to a 'radically inclusive, transparent, and accountable' National Dialogue and expressed a desire for the foundations' continued engagement.
A delegation from the EPG has proposed a meeting at the earliest convenience to reaffirm shared principles for the Dialogue, consider joint strategies to safeguard its citizen-led nature, identify practical avenues for re-engagement, and explore governance and operational mechanisms to build confidence and transparency.
The TMF's Chairperson, Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi, reiterated on Monday that the foundation's initial withdrawal was due to a perceived lack of preparation for the National Convention.
She said the foundation believes that the precursor event needed a more solid basis for civil society interaction and engagement, with discussion documents drafted beforehand to provide a foundation for debate.
Fraser-Moleketi also noted that 11 reports on various topics were still being prepared when the convention date was set by a group outside the preparatory task team.
'The amount of work you put into the process, the pre-dialogue, results in the quality of the outcome, and especially dealing with the complexities we currently confront in South Africa,' she stated.
Fraser-Moleketi further emphasised that their withdrawal from the convention did not signify a complete boycott of the Dialogue process.
'It's never too late. Being the progenitors, we had not withdrawn from the National Dialogue. What we withdrew from was the National Convention, which we said should be given a bit more time.'
Meanwhile, former president Kgalema Motlanthe has unequivocally refuted allegations that his foundation pulled out of the convention, labelling such reports as misleading and incorrect.
The Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation (KMF) clarified in a statement that it was not part of the preparatory committee for the convention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward
The idea of a National Dialogue to get the nation talking about things that matter for the present and the future has been on our lips for a while now. It was first suggested as a Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) 2 over 15 years ago. It was also suggested as an economic CODESA in the past, but there was no urge to convene it. Now that President Cyril Ramaphosa has kick-started the process, there is contestation about the process and approach to this. The controversies preceding the 15-16 August National Convention put these differences in the open for all to see. First, the legacy foundations representing the legacies of major political figures in South African history announced a dispute within the preparatory team and pulled out of the convention. In a joint letter, these entities, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation and the FW De Klerk Foundation, protested against a government takeover of what was announced to be a citizen-led national dialogue. As a result of this alleged government takeover, the foundations said, there was a rush to convene the convention before all was ready for this and decisions to undertake emergency procurement in possible violation of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The government, through the Presidency, disputed this, and the president convened the preparatory task team to confirm that there was no merit to the foundations' concerns. Indeed, the National Convention happened with much fanfare and produced some notable decisions. The convention went off quite smoothly and signalled a thoughtful process. It seemed the foundations' decisions had not harmed the process and signalled that they do not have as much influence as some thought. But their decision had put a damper on the idea and caused many questions to be raised, including in talk shows, on social media and other public exchanges. Of course, a discussion of this nature could not avoid displaying the agony of many about the failure of the post-apartheid transition to deliver a better life for all. This is the failure to overcome poverty and reduce unemployment. The transition has not been successful in reducing inequalities according to race, class, gender and other dimensions. The beautiful post-apartheid democracy has been marked by a long period of lower economic growth, growing crime and corruption, fragmentation and disillusionment in the population. The sixth administration elected with great hope has delivered failures and disappointments while promising positive change. Couple this with a growing population, including illegal immigration swelling the numbers of the poor and climate change effects, the crisis keeps deepening, and despair is growing. This was evident in the discussions and submissions at the national convention. Some of the areas of consensus achieved are significantly important for moving forward. The decision to give a strong focus to discussions of problems and solutions in the economy towards an inclusive economy and livelihoods is a noble one. This subject is closely tied to the matter of land reform, agrarian transformation and food security. This was elevated into a priority on its own. We hope the discussion will reflect on why we have failed to achieve what was set out in the National Development Plan about this. Crime and corruption were ranked the second most important priority by virtue of public concern and the scale of it as a national crisis. On that score, the scourge of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) stood out as a matter for focused attention as the dialogue begins. The subject of education and health is framed as about winning the future. The discussions elevated the State as a subject of discussion because of its association with problems and its key role in managing many solutions to national crises. Indeed, the National Development Plan (NDP), too, made building a capable developmental State a key task of the nation back in 2012. If discussions clarify what has been achieved and what has not been achieved, and why it would have helped the country move forward. The subject of values and culture as a matter critical for rebuilding the social fabric on which the nation and the State are built was made prominent by civil society voices worried that failures were not incidental but systemic. The NDP had enjoined us to work hard to achieve social cohesion, a sort of renewal for the nation's soul. The convention re-emphasised the vagaries of inter-generational trauma and called for healing. This dialogue could help us find out how progress can be achieved. In the final analysis, what is said and recommended in response to growing poverty and inequality will be a measure by which the success of the dialogue will be judged. All these issues were interlinked. The attainment of one relies on the achievements in other areas. It seems that the National Dialogue is now back on track. But there are pointers to consider, which, when applied, would improve the process. The first is that it is to be expected that the National Dialogue will not be a smooth, quiet and united discussion but could have tough edges as stakeholders jostle for the nation's soul. It could even be messy and chaotic, without being a disaster. It can be dogged by controversy without collapsing. Professor Siphamandla Zondi Director: Institute for Pan-Africa Thought & Conversation; and co-director: Institute for Global African Affairs Professor: Department of Politics and International Relations
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
BOSA leader Mmusi Maimane urges legacy foundations to rejoin National Dialogue
Simon Majadibodu | Published 5 hours ago Build One South Africa (BOSA) leader Dr Mmusi Maimane has called on legacy organisations, including the Thabo Mbeki and Steve Biko foundations, to reconsider their withdrawal from the National Dialogue and make a return to the dialogue. Maimane appealed during a media briefing held in Rosebank, Johannesburg, on Thursday, where he addressed rising tensions within the Government of National Unity (GNU) and the controversy surrounding the National Dialogue. 'We hold the view that we must forge a new consensus about what South Africa's future should look like,' Maimane said. 'The question on the table is: who is on trial? Many have arrived at the dialogue and pointed fingers at the government. And rightly so – there have been massive governance failures, not only in the economy and safety of citizens, but in many other areas.' However, he said that South Africa's moral fabric is also under scrutiny. 'It cannot be that accountability only lies with the government when we see parents murdering their own children. It cannot be that young people are falling pregnant at alarming rates. It cannot be that we applaud corrupt individuals, send them to Parliament, and then act surprised when they fail us. As citizens, we vote for leadership – and too often, that leadership lacks ethics.' Maimane described the National Dialogue as a 'once-in-a-generation opportunity' that must not be squandered. 'We must get this right. We may not have another opportunity like this. That is why we must ensure the process is not politicised or corrupted – and that the right people are in the room.' He reiterated his appeal to civil society organisations and legacy foundations to rejoin the dialogue. 'Despite the challenges with the process, I urge them to return. They must come back. We must do everything possible to make this dialogue work – and it will only work if it is inclusive and non-political.' Maimane's comments come in the wake of the widely criticised National Convention of the National Dialogue, held last Friday and Saturday at the University of South Africa (UNISA) in Pretoria. The event has been marred by controversy, with several prominent individuals and organisations – including former president Thabo Mbeki, legacy foundations, civil society groups, and GNU members – withdrawing from the process. Legacy foundations such as the Thabo Mbeki Foundation and the Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation raised concerns about the rushed implementation, lack of transparency around a reported R700 million budget, and a perceived shift towards government control. However, IOL News previously reported that President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended the convention and criticised those who chose to boycott it. 'True dialogue means bringing people together, getting people to speak together – not just to speak to each other,' Ramaphosa said during the event. 'We need to be inside the tent, not outside it. And we need one tent – not multiple tents having parallel conversations.' He added that the National Dialogue is 'a call to action, not a platform for spectators.' The Democratic Alliance (DA) and Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) also withdrew, accusing the African National Congress (ANC) of using the platform to boost its image ahead of the 2026 local government elections. Tensions within the GNU have been ongoing since its formation, with the DA and FF Plus frequently clashing with the ANC over key policy matters. Opposition parties including the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party have dismissed the process as an 'expensive sideshow' aimed at bypassing Parliament and centralising power in the Presidency. Controversial lobby groups AfriForum and Solidarity have also pulled out of the dialogue. Ramaphosa has denied claims that the process would cost taxpayers R740 million, insisting it would be run at minimal cost using community halls, schools and churches as venues. 'That R740 million figure is not accurate,' he said. 'We can do this much more cheaply. Lower costs must be the order of the day.' [email protected] IOL Politics
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Maimane endorses national dialogue as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity
Build One SA leader Mmusi Maimane has called on South Africans to take up the opportunity presented by the national dialogue and participate in reshaping the country's morale. He believes this is a crucial moment for the country to discuss its future as a maturing democracy. 'Now, 31 years into our democracy, it is important for South Africans to forge a consensus about what the country looks like. The question on the table is, who is on trial? Some say the government is on trial, and yes, because the government has demonstrated huge governance failures, on the economy, safety of citizens and in many other areas.' However historically troubled the government has been, Maimane says, the citizens need to introspect and reflect on their own contribution to wrongdoing in the country. 'At the same time, the moral fabric of our society is also on trial. It cannot be that the fault resides in government when you see parents murdering their own children and young people falling pregnant, when we knowingly vote for leaders who are not ethical.' Maimane says the dialogue comes at an important moment and everyone should work to ensure its success. 'This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity. We mess this national dialogue up, be assured that we will not be able to hold another one. Therefore it is within that context that we have to do everything possible to ensure that the process is not politicised, that it is not corrupted and that ultimately the right people are in the room to have the conversation. 'I hold the view that the CEO who works in Sandton must be able to interact with the entrepreneur from Alexandra. So that we forge a new pathway as a country for the next 31 years. It is within that, where we have to say that our nation is on trial when we think about the national dialogue.' Maimane called on the 'disgruntled legacy foundations' such as the Thabo Mbeki Foundation to attend the dialogue, despite their concerns. 'I am appealing to the foundations, that while they may have challenges with the process, I am inviting them back into the fold. They must come back. I want to equally say to South Africans that we all have to ensure that this process works.' Maimane said he had written to President Cyril Ramaphosa and finance minister Enoch Godongwana in a bid to make the intervention non-partisan and as inexpensive as possible. 'I asked the ministry of finance for a thorough funding plan and accountability structure. South Africans are not represented in a lekgotla or anywhere else. They are represented in parliament. Godongwana responded extensively about what the national dialogue would effectively cost. 'In essence, he commits that coming out of the contingency reserve fund, the country will spend R485m. This is not a small amount, it is half a billion rand technically.' The parliament portfolio chairperson on appropriations said he would put it into context using the Presidency's budget vote for comparison. 'The Presidency's budget is below a billion rand. When you say you are going to spend half a billion rand, you must understand it is significant. 'What could this money have done? It could have at least employed 2,972 teachers at a full-year salary, feeding around 497,000 learners for a 200-day school year, you could be building just over 2,400 RDP houses, you could be providing 48,500 youth with learnerships, or even 24,250 start-ups with R20,000 grants.' Maimane says he is comforted by Godongwana's promise to safeguard the financial aspect of the process. 'The commitment from the minister is that we are going to use some of the money that was allocated to Nedlac. The municipalities will make their contributions in kind and they will pursue other in-kind donations from in the private sector. 'We will be there to make sure that each and every rand is spent correctly.'
