
How Leo became the unexpected pope
'Nobody does drama like the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church,' said Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York,shortly after emerging from the conclave that elected Pope Leo XIV on Thursday.
The quick decision, made some 33 hours after the Sistine Chapel's doors closed and the cardinals went into sequestration, was a sign that they likely entered the conclave with enough unity around the decision to continue Francis' legacy that they did not have to spend days tussling over a new direction for the Vatican.
In the weeks ahead of the conclave, Cardinal Joseph Tobin, Archbishop of Newark, said in a joint press conference with five other American cardinals on Friday. 'We listened to each other. What does the church need? What does the world need? What are we hoping for? What are we dreaming about?'
Leo, previously Cardinal Robert Prevost, a U.S. native with Peruvian citizenship and deep ties to Latin America, is described by the Vatican as the 'second pope from the Americas,' to Francis' first. He is known to have been close to the late pontiff, both in their daily dealings at the Vatican, and ideologically.
Like Francis, Leo is known for his concern for the poor and marginalized, and in his first Sunday blessing as pope, quoted Francis and called for ceasefires in Ukraine and Gaza, the subjects of Francis' final message to the world.
The conclave is shrouded in secrecy, and many of the dealings that lead up to it remain in the shadows, but since the end of the conclave some cardinals have offered glimpses to what happened in the hours that led up to Leo's election.
Once the Sistine Chapel's doors close, the cardinals swear an oath of "absolute and perpetual secrecy," as do all Vatican staff assisting them, including cooks, cleaners and drivers. Mobile phones are confiscated, an ancient reason for a digital detox that at least one cardinal, Vincent Nichols, the Archbishop of Westminster, appreciated for giving him 'more time on my hands just to be prayerful, just to reflect, just to be still, rather than being constantly agitated," he told the BBC.
On the first evening, the cardinals cast their first round votes, but black smoke billowed from the chimney, meaning no pope was chosen.
The cardinals adjourned for the night to Casa Santa Marta, the guesthouse were most of them were staying — and eating. Cardinal Wilton Gregory said that "a lot of dialog occurred at mealtime, coffee breaks, those moments when you can engage in smaller groups."
'The only method is the human method, to get to talk to another, the dialogue, to listen to one another," Cardinal Robert McElroy, Archbishop of Washington, said, about the conversations that eventually lead to the two-thirds majority required to elect a pope.
The next morning the cardinals returned to the Sistine Chapel and two more ballots were cast, but black smoke emerged once again.
'Voting is like watching a glacier move, but sometimes glaciers under stress move a lot faster,' Tobin said.
We don't know who the other frontrunners were in the three votes that preceded Prevost's election, or why they fell behind, but Dolan told CNN that Prevost's name had begun to emerge from relative obscurity even before the conclave began. And he continued to confer with his brother cardinals into the conclave.
'It wasn't that he stood up and made this overwhelmingly convincing speech that just wowed,' said Gregory. 'I don't remember any particular intervention, but I do believe he engaged quite effectively in the smaller group conversations.'
And while conclaves in centuries past could stretch for weeks, Prevost's election began to take shape on the second day.
Or as Gregory framed it: 'There was a great movement on the second day, a great movement within the body that was there and there could be nothing other than the grace of God moving us toward this consensus."
'What I experience is that everything begins in politics and finishes mystic,' added McElroy.
Tobin recalled the moment after casting his vote. 'I walked back and I took a look at Bob, and because his name had been floating around, and he had his head in his hands,' he said. 'I was praying for him, because I couldn't imagine what happens to a human being when you're facing something like that.'
During a press conference on Saturday, Filipino Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, himself considered one of the leading candidates for pope, said he was seated next to Prevost.
In the minutes after his election, when the new pope was gasping for air as the weight of his new role descended on him, Tagle said he asked him if he wanted a piece of candy. Prevost accepted and Tagle pulled one from a pocket beneath his cardinal's robe, 'that's my first act of charity," he said he told Prevost, jokingly, "for our new Holy Father.'
Soon after, Prevost emerged on the balcony of St. Peter's Basilica as Pope Leo XIV, proof of an efficient and sucessful conclave.
'This wasn't our first rodeo,' Dolan said. 'We've been through this 268 times.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
BBC will not appeal against Adams' defamation case victory
Mr Adams, a former president of Sinn Fein, said there needed to be 'substantial reform' of the broadcaster. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Fein leader's legal costs. After the decision, the broadcaster's legal team was granted a stay in the payment of the full award as it took time to consider an appeal. However, on Friday, the BBC confirmed it would not pursue an appeal. A spokesperson said: 'We have given careful consideration to the jury's decision. 'We will not be appealing its verdict, bringing this matter to a conclusion. 'We remain committed to public interest journalism and to serving all BBC audiences.' In a statement issued through the Sinn Fein press office on Friday, Mr Adams said: 'The decision not to appeal by the British Broadcasting Corporation has to be followed by a substantial reform of its internal journalistic processes and a recognition that it cannot continue to be a voice for the British state in Ireland. 'It must also become more accountable to the public. 'The Dublin Court found the BBC guilty of libel and rejected its claim that its journalism was fair and reasonable and in the public interest. 'The British Broadcasting Corporation is a public service provider. There is an onus on the BBC to ensure that in the future its ethics and journalism reflect the principles and values of a public broadcast service. 'As I have already said the damages will be donated to good causes.'