logo
Japan to ease overseas student enrolment caps at universities in bid to attract talent

Japan to ease overseas student enrolment caps at universities in bid to attract talent

Straits Times27-07-2025
As part of the review, the ministry will consider whether international students can adequately cover their enrolment costs.
TOKYO – To attract highly talented international students, the education ministry has decided to ease the cap on university enrolment through implementing a special measure to start from the 2026 academic year.
In the case of large departments or faculties with an admission quota of 300 or more, international student enrolment will be allowed to exceed the fixed capacity up to an amount less than 110 per cent, according to the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry.
Under the current system, large departments are subject to a strict overall enrolment cap of less than 105 per cent capacity to ensure educational quality. If universities exceed this limit, they face penalties such as cuts to government subsidies.
The special measure will apply to universities that have met specific criteria over the past three years, including having no legal violations, an overall enrolment capacity rate of 90 per cent or higher, and sound financial conditions.
Universities are required to submit their plans on increasing the number of international students. The ministry will review the plans and examine how they manage enrolment, particularly focusing on the dropout rate of such students, to grant certification on a per-faculty basis.
As part of the review, the ministry will consider whether international students can adequately cover their enrolment costs.
To promote diversity, emphasis will be placed on plans to increase student enrolment from the Group of Seven nations, India and South-east Asia – regions that have been designated as government priority areas.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road South sinkhole removed; road remains closed for repairs
Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole
Life Vet Talk: Pet owners and vets need to work together to prevent infectious zoonotic diseases
Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE
Singapore For Singapore to do well, PAP govt has to continue to hold its own: SM Lee
Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021
Singapore Mum at 15: More teens in Singapore gave birth in 2024
Business Already owning 5 properties, woman wanted elderly dad's 4 homes
A survey by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development found that undergraduate international students made up 16 per cent of the student population in the Britain and 14 per cent in Canada, while in Japan it remained at only 3 per cent in 2021.
In April 2023, the government's Council for the Creation of Future Education recommended raising the cap on international students to 400,000 by 2033. The council also called for more flexible university enrolment management.
On July 25, the ministry began soliciting public comments regarding the introduction of this special measure. THE JAPAN NEWS/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Gaza exasperation pushed 3 Israel allies towards recognising Palestinian state, World News
How Gaza exasperation pushed 3 Israel allies towards recognising Palestinian state, World News

AsiaOne

timea day ago

  • AsiaOne

How Gaza exasperation pushed 3 Israel allies towards recognising Palestinian state, World News

OTTAWA/PARIS/LONDON - When Spain, Ireland and Norway announced in May 2024 that they would recognise a Palestinian state, Israel's closer allies dismissed the move as unhelpful to solving the crisis in Gaza. While France, Britain and Canada stressed their support for establishing two states with recognised borders as the long-term solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, they were wary of being seen to reward Hamas, of damaging relations with Israel and Washington, and of squandering diplomatic capital. "I will not do an 'emotional' recognition," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the time. But as Israeli restrictions on aid escalated Gaza's humanitarian crisis and a two-month truce ended in March, talks began in earnest that would lead three of the Group of Seven major Western economies to set out plans to recognise a Palestinian state in September. Fears for two-state solution boost recognition drive "The possibility of a two-state solution is being eroded before our eyes ... that has been one of the factors that has brought us to this point to try to reverse, with partners, this cycle," Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Thursday (July 31). France and Saudi Arabia formed a plan to have more Western countries move towards Palestinian recognition while Arab states would be pushed to take a stronger line against Hamas. The pair wanted their proposals to gain acceptance at a United Nations conference in June, but they struggled to gain traction and the meeting was then postponed due to Israeli airstrikes on Iran and amid intense US diplomatic pressure. The strikes led to a pause in public criticism of Israel from Western allies, and Arab states were hard to win round, but discussions continued behind the scenes. Macron, Carney and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer were communicating with each other regularly by phone and texts during June and July, according to a Canadian source with direct knowledge of the events. Canada was wary of acting alone and Britain wanted to ensure any move would have maximum impact, but Macron was more strident. Alarm was growing about images of starving children, and fears were mounting that Israel's Gaza offensive, combined with settler attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank, would further undermine any chance of creating a sovereign Palestinian state. On July 24, Macron made a surprise announcement that France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Neither Britain nor Canada followed immediately. But the relatively muted reaction by US President Donald Trump - saying the statement carried no weight but that Macron was still a "great guy" - brought some reassurance that the diplomatic fallout would be manageable if others went the same way. Macron, Starmer, Merz and Carney Macron spoke with Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz two days later to discuss a "sustainable route to a two-state solution", according to Starmer's spokesperson, just before the prime minister was due to meet Trump in Scotland. [[nid:720799]] With Trump, Starmer pressed the case to do more to help Gaza, although, according to Trump, he never explicitly said a recognition plan was on the cards, though Trump has since criticised such moves as "rewarding Hamas". With Trump still in Britain on Tuesday, opening a golf course, Starmer recalled his cabinet from their summer break to get approval for his recognition plan. Britain would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless there was a ceasefire and a lasting peace plan from Israel. Like Macron, Starmer gave Carney a few hours' warning. Once Britain and France had moved, Canada felt it had to follow suit, according to the Canadian source. "International co-operation is essential to securing lasting peace and stability in the Middle East and Canada will do its best to help lead that effort," Carney said on Wednesday, six days after Macron's announcement. In practical terms, the three countries' move will not change much. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio dismissed the recognition as "irrelevant" while its other major Group of Seven allies - Germany, Italy and Japan - have given no indication they will follow suit. More than three-quarters of the 193 members of the UN General Assembly already independently recognise a Palestinian state. But the opposition of the US, with its veto power on the UN Security Council, means the UN cannot admit Palestine as a full member - a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state at global level. However, Richard Gowan, UN director at the International Crisis Group, said the declarations mattered "precisely because we are seeing some big US allies catching up with the bulk of the Global South on the Palestinian question at the UN". "That makes it a little harder for Israel to write off the pro-recognition camp as irrelevant."

Ex-Malaysian minister Khairy Jamaluddin calls PAP 'juvenile' for response to WP chief Pritam Singh's podcast appearance
Ex-Malaysian minister Khairy Jamaluddin calls PAP 'juvenile' for response to WP chief Pritam Singh's podcast appearance

CNA

time3 days ago

  • CNA

Ex-Malaysian minister Khairy Jamaluddin calls PAP 'juvenile' for response to WP chief Pritam Singh's podcast appearance

SINGAPORE: Former Malaysian health minister Khairy Jamaluddin called Singapore's ruling People's Action Party (PAP) "immature" and "juvenile" for its response to Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh's appearance on his podcast earlier this year, and said that the party "needs to grow up". He also said in an episode of popular Malaysian political podcast Keluar Sekejap, released on YouTube on Jul 29, that he and co-host Shahril Hamdan, previously UMNO's information chief, have both been interviewed by Singaporean media on Malaysia's internal politics too. Workers' Party leader Singh had spoken to the duo in a video released on Jun 24. It was his most in-depth interview since the General Election, in which the PAP retained power with 65.57 per cent of the vote. During the interview, which lasted more than one-and-a-half hours, Mr Singh addressed a wide range of topics, including the WP's electoral strategy, and the intersection of race, religion and politics. It drew a response from the PAP, which questioned Mr Singh's intent on going on the Malaysian podcast, and that "politics should stop at the water's edge". In the latest episode, Mr Khairy and Mr Shahril were discussing whether to include Singapore among the stops for their overseas live shows. While it is a popular option based on their "engagement data", the "not-so-pleasant experience recently" surrounding Mr Singh's appearance on their show has turned them off. "When Pritam Singh appeared on KS (Keluar Sekejap), at first, there wasn't much of an issue. But I think, about a week after that, there was an article written, if I'm not mistaken, on PAP's own portal. This PAP portal belongs to Singapore's ruling party. It stated, and I suppose, accused Pritam Singh's appearance of being akin to interference in Singapore's internal politics," said Mr Khairy. "Its main target was Pritam Singh. Why did Pritam Singh go on a Malaysian podcast to talk about Singapore? And after that, it said this was like an interference in Singapore's internal politics and that politics should stop at 'the Water's Edge'. Meaning, don't you talk about our politics." Mr Khairy said he thought it was "such an immature take". APPEARANCE ON SINGAPORE MEDIA He noted that he and Mr Shahril have been interviewed by Singapore news outlets CNA and The Straits Times on Malaysia's internal politics, including when he was invited two weeks back to be a commentator virtually for a study conducted on UMNO by the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies think-tank, where he was a visiting fellow. "So I don't understand, when they want to talk about other people's politics, it's fine … But when it happens to you, when Pritam comes here to talk about the Singaporean election, suddenly it's, 'Oh, foreign interference'," said Mr Khairy. "I think I have a lot of friends there, but PAP needs to grow up." His co-host, Mr Shahril, said that he has also spoken about Malaysian politics in Singapore on academic platforms, and noted that having an extensive analysis of its neighbouring countries is one of Singapore's strengths. "Perhaps in a moment that was less self-aware, maybe a part of the establishment, a small part perhaps, felt they could use that argument to voice their dissatisfaction that an opposition party leader could perform and shine so well on our podcast," he said of Mr Singh's appearance. "I think that was just hopefully one small moment. When I asked friends in Singapore, including those who are strong supporters of the establishment, most of them didn't see it the way that article did. To be fair, I don't think that's the majority view. It's just a particular kind of view." Mr Khairy noted that "it's the view of the ruling party", and said that until the "PAP stops being juvenile on this issue", the duo would not come to Singapore as part of their overseas tour for their podcast live shows. Mr Shahril added that the duo typically banter and crack jokes on their podcast when discussing heavy topics, and that in Singapore, "if there are restrictions, or the perception of them, it won't be natural". CNA has reached out to the PAP for comment. POLITICS STOP AT THE WATER'S EDGE The PAP had said on Jul 3 that Mr Singh's decision to speak about Singapore's politics on a Malaysian podcast "raises serious questions" as to why he chose to address the topic "on foreign soil to a foreign audience". "Strikingly, he chose not a local media outlet, but a podcast hosted by Malaysians and recorded in Malaysia to share his views on our domestic political landscape," the party said in a statement. The PAP also challenged Mr Singh's claim that his party does not "score political points based on race or religion". The party added that while Singapore and Malaysia share close ties, they have long refrained from commenting on each other's politics and from using each other's media to influence public opinion, especially after the racial unrest of the 1960s. "As a sovereign nation, we must be clear: Politics should stop at the water's edge," it said. "Singapore's affairs are for Singaporeans to decide, based on what is best for our national interests." In response, the WP said that Mr Singh's podcast appearance "had no detrimental impact whatsoever on Singapore's national interests", adding that public reception in Singapore to the podcast has been positive. "It exemplified how a non-government Singaporean politician can speak fairly and frankly about Singapore and the Singapore government, without denouncing either. This particular point continues to be well-received by many Singaporeans," it said. PAP leaders routinely give interviews and share their views on domestic matters to foreign media outlets, it noted. In response to the WP's statement, the PAP said that while ministers do engage with foreign media, they discuss a wide range of topics, "be it on international and regional affairs or domestic matters", compared to Mr Singh's interview, which "focused almost entirely on Singapore's internal politics". Mr Singh has also declined invitations from Singaporean podcasters, it added. Noting that the WP has continued to brush aside serious concerns about its engagement with Noor Deros, a self-styled religious teacher in Malaysia known for "views that are at odds with Singapore's commitment to multiracialism and religious harmony", as well as public endorsements made by Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) politicians in support of its candidates, the PAP said that "many important questions raised remain unanswered".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store